Family Research Council: Difference between revisions
→Statements on homosexuality: noting the relevance of American College of Pediatricians |
|||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
===Statements on homosexuality=== |
===Statements on homosexuality=== |
||
The Family Research Council holds the belief that "homosexual conduct is harmful to the persons who engage in it and to society at large, and can never be affirmed", and asserts that it is "by definition unnatural, and as such is associated with negative physical and psychological health effects."<ref name=FRCwebsite /><ref name = FRChomosexuality>{{cite web|title = Homosexuality|url = http://www.frc.org/homosexuality|accessdate = January 14, 2018|deadurl = no|archive-date = December 17, 2017|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20171228192103/http://www.frc.org/homosexuality}}</ref> The Council also asserts that "there is no convincing evidence that a homosexual identity is ever something genetic or inborn".<ref name=FRCwebsite>{{cite web|url = http://www.frc.org/human-sexuality|year = 2012|publisher = Family Research Council|title = Human Sexuality|accessdate = December 27, 2012|deadurl = yes|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20121125012454/http://www.frc.org/human-sexuality|archive-date = November 25, 2012}}</ref> These positions are in opposition to [[Homosexuality and psychology|the |
The Family Research Council holds the belief that "homosexual conduct is harmful to the persons who engage in it and to society at large, and can never be affirmed", and asserts that it is "by definition unnatural, and as such is associated with negative physical and psychological health effects."<ref name=FRCwebsite /><ref name = FRChomosexuality>{{cite web|title = Homosexuality|url = http://www.frc.org/homosexuality|accessdate = January 14, 2018|deadurl = no|archive-date = December 17, 2017|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20171228192103/http://www.frc.org/homosexuality}}</ref> The Council also asserts that "there is no convincing evidence that a homosexual identity is ever something genetic or inborn".<ref name=FRCwebsite>{{cite web|url = http://www.frc.org/human-sexuality|year = 2012|publisher = Family Research Council|title = Human Sexuality|accessdate = December 27, 2012|deadurl = yes|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20121125012454/http://www.frc.org/human-sexuality|archive-date = November 25, 2012}}</ref> These positions are in opposition to [[Homosexuality and psychology|the view of mainstream psychological and medical experts]] that homosexuality is a normal, healthy variation of human behavior.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdf/Submission%20to%20the%20Church%20of%20England.pdf|date = October 31, 2007|accessdate = July 8, 2010|title = Submission to the Church of England's Listening Exercise on Human Sexuality|archive-date = 27 August 2010|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100827104609/http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdf/Submission%20to%20the%20Church%20of%20England.pdf|deadurl = yes|publisher = [[Royal College of Psychiatrists]]}}</ref><ref name = AppropriateResponse>{{cite web|title = Report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on Appropriate Therapeutic Responses to Sexual Orientation|date = September 28, 2009|accessdate = January 14, 2018|first1 = Judith M.|last1 = Glassgold|first2 = Lee|last2 = Beckstead|first3 = Jack|last3 = Drescher|authorlink3 = Jack Drescher|first4 = Beverly|last4 = Greene|first5 = Robin Lin|last5 = Miller|first6 = Roger L.|last6 = Worthington|first7 = Clinton W.|last7 = Anderson|url = http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbt/resources/therapeutic-response.pdf|publisher = [[American Psychological Association]]|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100615023708/http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbt/resources/therapeutic-response.pdf|deadurl = no|archive-date = June 15, 2010}}</ref><ref name=APAamicus>{{cite web|title = ''Perry v. Schwarzenegger'' – Brief of the American Psychological Association, the California Psychological Association, the American Psychiatric Association, and the American Association for Marriage and Family as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiff-Appellees|date = October 27, 2010|url = http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2010/10/27/amicus29.pdf|publisher = [[United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit]]|accessdate = May 18, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title = "Therapies" to change sexual orientation lack medical justification and threaten health|url = http://new.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=6803&Itemid=1926|publisher = [[Pan American Health Organization]]|date = May 17, 2012|accessdate = May 26, 2012|deadurl = no|archive-date = May 26, 2012|archive-url = https://www.webcitation.org/67xKQyixE?url=http://new.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=6803&Itemid=1926}}</ref> FRC's statements and positions have been further criticized by ''[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]]'' as being based upon [[pseudoscience]] or junk science; according to ''[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]]'', the group has misrepresented data and mis-designed sociological studies in order to negatively depict LGBT people.<ref name=Wired>{{cite news|title = Trump's Transition Team is All Tied Up With Anti-Gay Pseudoscience|url = https://www.wired.com/2016/11/trumps-transition-team-tied-anti-gay-pseudoscience/|last = Ellis|first = Emma Gray|newspaper = ''[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]]''|date = November 30, 2016|accessdate = January 14, 2018|archive-date = December 1, 2017|deadurl = no|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20161201135847/https://www.wired.com/2016/11/trumps-transition-team-tied-anti-gay-pseudoscience/}}</ref> FRC also states that "[s]ympathy must be extended to those who struggle with unwanted same-sex attractions, and every effort should be made to assist such persons to overcome those attractions, as many already have"<ref name = FRChomosexuality /> – though evidence on the effectiveness of [[sexual orientation change efforts]] is limited.<ref name = AppropriateResponse /><ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.apa.org/about/policy/sexual-orientation.pdf|title = Appropriate Affirmative Responses to Sexual Orientation Distress and Change Efforts|publisher = [[American Psychological Association]]|date = August 5, 2009|accessdate = January 14, 2018|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120511024946/http://www.apa.org/about/policy/sexual-orientation.pdf|archive-date = May 11, 2012|deadurl = no}}</ref> |
||
In 2012, Rob Schwartzwalder, then a Senior Vice President at FRC, wrote: "To love people who identify as gays or lesbians means to extend grace to them: to welcome them as friends, to care for them when ill, and to respect them as persons whose creation was ordained by the God of the universe and for whom the Son of God died. Such love will oppose attempts to legalize homosexual marriage, as to do so would vindicate a corruption of that which God intended... To love homosexuals means that believing churches cannot accept those practicing or advocating homosexuality as members, ministers, or leaders any more than persons living in any other kind of sexual sin."<ref>http://www.frc.org/op-eds/on-love-homosexuality-and-sin-an-evangelical-proposal</ref> |
In 2012, Rob Schwartzwalder, then a Senior Vice President at FRC, wrote: "To love people who identify as gays or lesbians means to extend grace to them: to welcome them as friends, to care for them when ill, and to respect them as persons whose creation was ordained by the God of the universe and for whom the Son of God died. Such love will oppose attempts to legalize homosexual marriage, as to do so would vindicate a corruption of that which God intended... To love homosexuals means that believing churches cannot accept those practicing or advocating homosexuality as members, ministers, or leaders any more than persons living in any other kind of sexual sin."<ref>http://www.frc.org/op-eds/on-love-homosexuality-and-sin-an-evangelical-proposal</ref> |
Revision as of 17:14, 14 January 2018
![]() Logo of Family Research Council | |
Founded | 1983 |
---|---|
Founder | James Dobson |
Type | 501(c)(3) Charity |
Registration no. | 52-1792772 (EIN) |
Location |
|
Area served | United States |
Key people | Tony Perkins, President Thomas R. Anderson, Chairman |
Revenue | $13,064,417 (2011 FY)[1] |
Employees | 85 |
Website | www |
2011 FY Tax Return |
Family Research Council (FRC) is a non-profit charitable 501(c)(3) organization that is an American conservative Christian group and lobbying organization. Its stated mission is "to advance faith, family and freedom in public policy and the culture from a Christian worldview".[2] The FRC was formed in the United States in 1981 by James Dobson. It was incorporated in 1983.[3] In the late 1980s, FRC officially became a division of Dobson's main organization, Focus on the Family; however, after an administrative separation, FRC became an independent entity in 1992. Tony Perkins is its current president.
FRC promotes what it considers traditional family values, by advocating and lobbying for socially conservative policies. It opposes and lobbies against equal rights for LGBT people (such as same-sex marriage, same-sex civil unions, and LGBT adoption), abortion, divorce, embryonic stem-cell research and pornography. FRC is affiliated with a 501(c)(4) lobbying PAC known as FRC Action.[4] In 2010, the Southern Poverty Law Center classified FRC as an anti-gay hate group,[5][6] which generated some controversy.
History
![]() | This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (January 2018) |
The Council was incorporated as a nonprofit organization in 1983. James Dobson, Armand Nicholi, Jr., and George Rekers were some of its founding board members.[3] In 1988, following financial difficulties, FRC was incorporated into Focus on the Family, and Gary Bauer joined the organization as president.[7] FRC remained under the Focus on the Family umbrella until 1992,[7] when it separated out of concern for Focus' tax-exempt status.[8] Tony Perkins joined FRC as its president in 2003.[9] On June 18, 2013, Josh Duggar was named executive director of FRC Action, the non-profit and tax-exempt legislative action arm of Family Research Council.[10] Duggar stepped down in 2015.
2012 domestic terrorist attack
On August 15, 2012 Floyd Lee Corkins II, wielding a 9mm pistol along with two magazines and 50 rounds of ammunition, entered the lobby of Family Research Council's Washington, D.C. headquarters.[11] Corkins shot an employee, 46-year-old Leonardo Johnson, in the left arm.[12][13][14][15] While injured, Johnson assisted others who wrestled the gunman to the ground until police arrived and placed the gunman under arrest.[16][17] Johnson was taken to a hospital to treat his wound.[18]
The gunman was interviewed by the FBI.[18] Law enforcement officials said that the suspect, 28-year-old Floyd Corkins II, a resident of nearby Herndon, Virginia, had served as a volunteer at a LGBT community center.[16][19] The FBI and the Metropolitan Police Department investigated jointly "to determine motive/intent and whether a hate crime/terrorism nexus exists." During his FBI interview Corkins was asked how he chose his target. His response was "Southern Poverty Law lists anti-gay groups. I found them online".[20][21] Corkins appeared in court the following day and was charged with assault with intent to kill while armed and interstate transportation of a firearm and ammunition.[22] An affidavit filed in the case stated that Corkins had told the guard "words to the effect of 'I don't like your politics.'"[23][24]
On August 22, 2012, Corkins was indicted on three charges: two charges in the District of Columbia, possession of a handgun during a violent crime and assault with intent to kill, and interstate transportation of a firearm and ammunition, a federal charge.[25] In January 2013, Corkins pleaded guilty to all charges.[26] Corkins was sentenced to 25 years in prison on September 19, 2013.[27]
On the day of the shooting, a joint statement was issued by 25 LGBT groups condemning Corkins' actions.[18][19] The National Organization for Marriage, an active campaigner against same-sex marriage,[24] issued a statement saying "Today's attack is the clearest sign we've seen that labeling pro-marriage groups as 'hateful' must end".[28]
FRC president Tony Perkins issued a public statement calling the shooting "an act of domestic terrorism" and criticizing the Southern Poverty Law Center for being "reckless in labeling organizations as hate groups because they disagree with them on public policy."[29] SPLC spokesman Mark Potok called Perkins' accusation "outrageous", and in a statement said: "The FRC and its allies on the religious right are saying, in effect, that offering legitimate and fact-based criticism in a democratic society is tantamount to suggesting that the objects of criticism should be the targets of criminal violence."[30][31] The SPLC responded by saying the group was listed as a hate group because "it has knowingly spread false and denigrating propaganda" about lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgender people.[31]
Politics, policies and positions
Family Research Council opposes efforts to make the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine mandatory for school attendance. HPV is a virus that can be transmitted by sexual contact, that can cause cervical cancer. FRC defends its position on the basis of the rights of parents and because of its support for abstinence prior to marriage.[32]
It supports a federal conscience clause, allowing medical workers to refuse to provide certain treatments to their patients, such as abortion, blood transfusion or birth control. It also advocates for abstinence-only sex education, intelligent design and prayer in public schools, and the regulation of pornography and other "obscene, indecent, or profane programming" on broadcast and cable television. It opposed, but failed to prevent, the introduction of a .xxx domain name, and it lobbied for an increase in indecency fines from the Federal Communications Commission.[citation needed]
FRC also holds that hotel pornography may be prosecutable under federal and state obscenity laws.[33][34] It opposes the expansion of civil rights laws to include sexual orientation and gender identity as illegal bases for discrimination.[35]
Family Research Council is also fiscally conservative[36] and wants to increase the child tax credit.[37] FRC supports the requirement of a one-year waiting period before a married couple with children can legally get a divorce so that they can receive marital counseling, unless the marriage involves domestic violence. FRC also supports permanently eliminating the marriage penalty and estate taxes.[38]
The Council opposes legalized abortion, stem-cell research which involves the destruction of human embryos and funding thereof (instead advocating research using adult stem cells), legal recognition of same-sex domestic partnerships in the form of marriage or civil unions, and all forms of gambling.[39] The Council has questioned whether humans are mainly or completely responsible for climate change, and has opposed other evangelicals who have affirmed their belief in global warming.[40][41][42][43]
Statements on homosexuality
The Family Research Council holds the belief that "homosexual conduct is harmful to the persons who engage in it and to society at large, and can never be affirmed", and asserts that it is "by definition unnatural, and as such is associated with negative physical and psychological health effects."[44][45] The Council also asserts that "there is no convincing evidence that a homosexual identity is ever something genetic or inborn".[44] These positions are in opposition to the view of mainstream psychological and medical experts that homosexuality is a normal, healthy variation of human behavior.[46][47][48][49] FRC's statements and positions have been further criticized by Wired as being based upon pseudoscience or junk science; according to Wired, the group has misrepresented data and mis-designed sociological studies in order to negatively depict LGBT people.[50] FRC also states that "[s]ympathy must be extended to those who struggle with unwanted same-sex attractions, and every effort should be made to assist such persons to overcome those attractions, as many already have"[45] – though evidence on the effectiveness of sexual orientation change efforts is limited.[47][51]
In 2012, Rob Schwartzwalder, then a Senior Vice President at FRC, wrote: "To love people who identify as gays or lesbians means to extend grace to them: to welcome them as friends, to care for them when ill, and to respect them as persons whose creation was ordained by the God of the universe and for whom the Son of God died. Such love will oppose attempts to legalize homosexual marriage, as to do so would vindicate a corruption of that which God intended... To love homosexuals means that believing churches cannot accept those practicing or advocating homosexuality as members, ministers, or leaders any more than persons living in any other kind of sexual sin."[52]
Jointly with Focus on the Family, the Council submitted an amicus brief in Lawrence v. Texas,[53] the U.S. Supreme Court case in which anti-sodomy laws were ruled unconstitutional on privacy grounds.[54] The summary of the amicus curiae brief declares that "[states] may discourage the 'evils' ... of sexual acts outside of marriage by means up to and including criminal prohibition" and that it is constitutionally permissible for Texas to "choose to protect marital intimacy by prohibiting same-sex 'deviate'a acts".[53] Similar positions have been advocated by representatives of the organization since Lawrence was decided in 2003. An amicus brief submitted in relation to United States v. Windsor (which struck down part of the Defense of Marriage Act) argued that DOMA did not discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation,[55] and their amicus brief in Obergefell v. Hodges argued against same-sex marriage.[56] An article written by Travis Weber, the Director of the Council's Center for Religious Liberty, was highly critical of both Supreme Court decisions.[57] In 2017, at the Council-sponsored Values Voter Summit, a tote bag was distributed to all attendees that included a copy of a flyer entitled "The Health Hazards of Homosexuality" written by MassResistance; the Southern Poverty Law Center has designated MassResistance as a hate group.[58]
In February 2010, Family Research Council's Senior Researcher for Policy Studies, Peter Sprigg, stated on NBC's Hardball that same-sex behavior should be outlawed and that "criminal sanctions against homosexual behavior" should be enforced.[59] In May that same year, Sprigg publicly suggested that repealing the Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy would encourage molestation of heterosexual service members.[60] In November 2010, Perkins was asked about Sprigg's comments regarding the criminalization of same-sex behavior: he responded that criminalizing homosexuality is not a goal of Family Research Council.[61][62] Perkins repeated FRC's association of homosexuals with pedophilia, stating: "If you look at the American College of Pediatricians, they say the research is overwhelming that homosexuality poses a danger to children."[61][62] Perkins' statements have been contradicted by mainstream social science research,[63] and the likelihood of child molestation by homosexuals and bisexuals has been found to be no higher than child molestation by heterosexuals;[50][63][64][65][66] as Newsweek put it, "[f]or decades, the [FRC] has smeared homosexuals in its publications, insinuating that gay people are more likely to sexually abuse children" and an analysis by John Aravosis concluded that the FRC "cherry-picks and distorts evidence as part of a deliberate campaign to smear the LGBT community."[67] Some scientists whose work is cited by the American College of Pediatricians—a conservative group of approximately 200 members to which the FRC points for evidence supporting its positions and which was created following the American Academy of Pediatrics' endorsement of adoption by same-sex couples—have said the organization has distorted or misrepresented their work[68] and the organization has been widely criticized for publishing "myths" and "junk science" about LGBT youth.[65] As a response to the FRC's promotion of such widely-rejected[50] claims about LGBT people, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) designated FRC as a hate group in the Winter 2010 issue of its Intelligence Report.[69] Mother Jones reported that "The Southern Poverty Law Center’s classification of the FRC as a hate group stems from FRC’s more than decade-long insistence that gay people are more likely to molest children... Research from non-ideological outfits is actually firm in concluding the opposite."[66]
Same-sex marriage cases
Family Research Council on January 28, 2013 issued an amicus brief in support of Proposition 8 case and the Defense of Marriage Act cases before the Supreme Court,[55] arguing for the court to uphold DOMA banning federal recognition of same-sex unions and Proposition 8 banning gay marriage in California.[70] On June 26, 2013, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Windsor that the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutionally discriminated against gay and lesbian couples, and in Hollingsworth v. Perry that Proposition 8's proponents had no standing to defend the law, leaving in place a lower-court ruling overturning the ban.
Publishing and lobbying activities
Family Research Council is a member of ProtectMarriage.com, a coalition formed to sponsor California Proposition 8 to restrict marriage to opposite-sex couples only, which passed in 2008 (but was struck down as unconstitutional by a federal court in California).[71]
Justice Sunday
Justice Sunday was the name for three religious conferences organized by the FRC and Focus on the Family in 2005 and 2006. According to FRC, the purpose of the events was to "request an end to filibusters of judicial nominees that were based, at least in part, on the nominees' religious views or imputed inability to decide cases on the basis of the law regardless of their beliefs."[72]
Values Voter Summit
Every fall, FRC Action (the political action group affiliated with FRC) holds an annual summit composed for conservative Christian activists and evangelical voters in Washington, D.C. The summit has been a place for social conservatives across the nation to hear Republican presidential hopefuls' platforms. Since 2007 a straw poll has been taken as a means of providing an early prediction of which candidate will win the endorsement of Christian conservatives.[73]
Ugandan Resolution
In 2010, FRC paid $25,000 to congressional lobbyists for what they described as "Res.1064 Ugandan Resolution Pro-homosexual promotion" in a lobbying disclosure report.[74] The US House of Representatives resolution condemned the Uganda Anti-Homosexuality Bill,[75] a bill which, among other things, would have imposed either the death penalty or life imprisonment for sexual relations between persons of the same sex.[76][77][78][79]
Following exposure of the lobbying contribution in June 2010, FRC issued a statement denying that they were trying to kill the bill, but rather that they wanted to change the language of the bill "to remove sweeping and inaccurate assertions that homosexual conduct is internationally recognized as a fundamental human right." They further stated, "FRC does not support the Uganda bill, and does not support the death penalty for homosexuality—nor any other penalty which would have the effect of inhibiting compassionate pastoral, psychological, and medical care and treatment for those who experience same-sex attractions or who engage in homosexual conduct".[80] The Ugandan Resolution was revived by Uganda's President Museveni in 2012.[81]
FRC used one of Museveni's speeches in an e-mail to its supporters praising Uganda’s commitment to Christian faith and "national repentance" around the time that he reintroduced the Anti-Homosexuality Bill. The speech did not refer to homosexuality specifically, but did mention "sexual immorality" among the sins for which Ugandans must repent.[82][83]
Controversies and criticism
2010 listing as a hate group by SPLC
The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) designated FRC as a hate group in the Winter 2010 issue of its magazine, Intelligence Report. Aside from statements made earlier in the year by Sprigg and Perkins (see Statements on homosexuality), the SPLC described FRC as a "font of anti-gay propaganda throughout its history".[84][85] As evidence, the SPLC cited a 1999 publication by FRC, Homosexual Activists Work to Normalize Sex With Boys, which stated: "one of the primary goals of the homosexual rights movement is to abolish all age of consent laws and to eventually recognize pedophiles as the 'prophets' of a new sexual order."[85][86] The report said FRC senior research fellows Tim Dailey and Peter Sprigg (2001) had "pushed false accusations linking gay men to pedophilia".[85][69]
FRC President Tony Perkins called the "hate" designation a political attack on FRC by a "liberal organization".[87] On December 15, 2010, FRC ran an open letter advertisement in two Washington, D.C., newspapers disputing the SPLC's action; in a press release, FRC called the allegation "intolerance pure and simple" and said it was dedicated to upholding "Judeo-Christian moral views, including marriage as the union of a man and a woman".[88] A section of the letter supporting FRC and certain other organizations designated as hate groups by the SPLC had signers which included twenty members of the House of Representatives (including then soon-to-be Speaker John Boehner), three U.S. Senators, four state Governors, and one state Attorney General.[89][90] In response, Mark Potok (SPLC spokesman) emphasized the factual evidence upon which the SPLC had taken the step of making the designation.[91]
A shooting incident in the lobby of FRC headquarters in 2012 (see below) prompted further comments on the SPLC's 'hate group' listing. Dana Milbank, columnist for the Washington Post, referred to the incident as "a madman's act" for which the SPLC should not be blamed, but called its classification of FRC as a hate group "reckless" and said that "it's absurd to put the group, as the law center does, in the same category as Aryan Nations, Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, Stormfront and the Westboro Baptist Church."[92][93] Tufts University political science professor Jeffrey Berry described himself as "not comfortable" with the designation: "There's probably some things that have been said by one or two individuals that qualify as hate speech. But overall, it's not seen as a hate group."[94] Journalist Adam Serwer of Mother Jones argued that the description, while subjective, was justified by the "FRC's record of purveying stereotypes, prejudice, and junk science as a justification for public policy that would deny gays and lesbians equal rights and criminalize their conduct."[66]
Josh Duggar
On June 18, 2013, it was announced that Josh Duggar of the television show 19 Kids and Counting would serve as the executive director of FRC Action, the non-profit and tax-exempt legislative action arm of Family Research Council.[10]
Duggar resigned on May 21, 2015, when it became public and he confirmed that he had molested five underage girls, including some of his sisters, twelve years earlier, when he was between 14 and 15 years old. In reference to Duggar's resignation, FRC president Tony Perkins said: "Josh believes that the situation will make it difficult for him to be effective in his current work."[95][96][97]
See also
- Christian Coalition
- Christian Voice
- LGBT rights opposition
- List of organizations designated by the Southern Poverty Law Center as anti-gay hate groups
- Moral Majority Coalition
- Values Voter Summit
Notes
- ^a The terms "deviate" and "deviant" sex were used historically in laws such as the one struck down by Lawrence v. Texas.[54]
References
- ^ "Nonprofit Report for Family Research Council". GuideStar. Retrieved October 2, 2012.
- ^ "Family Research Council". Retrieved March 6, 2017.
- ^ a b "About FRC: History/Mission". Family Research Council. May 8, 2010. Archived from the original on February 4, 2007.
- ^ Paul S. Herrnson; Ronald G. Shaiko; Clyde Wilcox (2005). The interest group connection: electioneering, lobbying, and policymaking in Washington. CQ Press. p. 410. ISBN 978-1-56802-922-1. Retrieved November 28, 2010.
- ^ Eichler, Alex. "13 New Organizations Added to Anti-Gay 'Hate Groups' List". The Wire via The Atlantic. Retrieved March 13, 2017.
- ^ Lin, Joy. "Family Research Council Demands Apology Over 'Hate Group' Label". FoxNews. Retrieved March 6, 2017.
- ^ a b Paul A. Djupe; Laura R. Olson (2003). Encyclopedia of American religion and politics. Infobase Publishing. p. 163. ISBN 978-0-8160-4582-2. Retrieved November 28, 2010.
- ^ Glenn H. Utter; James L. True (2004). Conservative Christians and political participation: a reference handbook. ABC-CLIO. p. 355. ISBN 978-1-85109-513-1. Retrieved November 28, 2010.
- ^ "Tony Perkins biodata". Family Research Council. Retrieved November 28, 2010.
- ^ a b "Josh Duggar snags Family Research Council job in Washington, D.C." United Press International. Retrieved June 19, 2013.
- ^ Ann E. Marimow (February 6, 2013). "Family Research Council shooter pleads guilty to three felonies". Washington Post. Retrieved December 7, 2016.
- ^ Jennifer Donelan (August 15, 2012). "Family Research Council shooting leaves security guard wounded". WJLA. Retrieved August 27, 2012.
- ^ "Hero Who Stopped Domestic Terrorist at FRC: God Prevented Me from Killing Him". September 19, 2013. Retrieved May 18, 2017.
- ^ "Family Research Council Hero Leo Johnson: 'God Put Me In a Position to Be There'". www.christianpost.com. Retrieved May 18, 2017.
- ^ CNN, From Carol Cratty. "Suspect charged in Washington Family Research Council shooting - CNN.com". CNN. Retrieved May 18, 2017.
{{cite web}}
:|last=
has generic name (help) - ^ a b Johnson, Jessica. "Official: Suspect Floyd Corkins II criticized group before Wash. shooting". Today's THV. Retrieved August 15, 2012.
- ^ Emery, Theo (August 15, 2012). "Policy Group in Washington Is Shooting Site". The New York Times. Retrieved August 15, 2012.
- ^ a b c DiMargo, Carissa. "Security Guard Shot at Family Research Council in Downtown DC". NBC News Washington. Retrieved August 15, 2012.
- ^ a b "Cops: LGBT volunteer shoots conservative group's guard". CBS News. August 15, 2012. Retrieved August 15, 2012.
- ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on April 30, 2013. Retrieved 2013-04-29.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ Confessed Terrorist Floyd Corkins Admits to Using SPLC Target List. YouTube. April 24, 2013.
- ^ Hermann, Peter; Alexander, Keith L. (August 16, 2012). "Floyd Lee Corkins charged in Family Research Council shooting". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 16, 2012.
- ^ Schmidt, Michael S. (August 16, 2012). "Family Research Council Shooting Possibly Driven by Politics". The New York Times. Retrieved August 17, 2012.
- ^ a b Virginia man charged in shooting at Family Research Council, CNN.
- ^ "Herndon man indicted in Family Research Council shooting". The Washington Post. August 22, 2012.
- ^ "Floyd Corkins pleads guilty to Family Research Council shooting". WJLA. February 6, 2013.
Corkins pleaded guilty to one federal count of crossing state lines with guns and ammunition. He also pleaded guilty to one count of intent to kill while armed and one count of committing an act of terrorism with the intent to kill.
- ^ "Virginia Man Sentenced to 25 Years in Prison in Shooting of Security Guard at Family Research Council". Federal Bureau of Investigation. September 19, 2013. Retrieved October 11, 2013.
- ^ Lopez, Kathryn Jean (August 15, 2012). "Oh My Goodness". The Corner. Retrieved May 6, 2015.
- ^ Lisee, Chris (August 16, 2012). "Family Research Council accuses Southern Poverty Law Center of sparking shooter's hatred". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 16, 2012.
- ^ Watkins, Tom (August 16, 2012). "After D.C. shooting, fingers point over blame". CNN. Retrieved August 18, 2012.
- ^ a b "SPLC: Family Research Council License-to-Kill Claim 'Outrageous'" Archived August 19, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, August 16, 2012. Retrieved May 6, 2015.
- ^ "Clarification of 2005 Family Research Council Media Remarks on HPV Vaccine". Family Research Council. Archived from the original on July 1, 2007. Retrieved November 28, 2010.
- ^ Brynaert, Ron (August 22, 2006). "Coalition of conservative groups believe hotel porn may be prosecutable". Raw Story. Archived from the original on October 15, 2007. Retrieved November 28, 2010.
- ^ Crary, David (August 23, 2006). "Ad crusade targets hotel porn movies — Conservatives want feds to pull the plug". The Journal Gazette. Associated Press.
{{cite news}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - ^ "Homosexuality Is Not a Civil Right" (PDF). Family Research Council.
- ^ "FAQs". Family Research Council. Retrieved October 29, 2010.
- ^ Roger W. Stump (2000). Boundaries of faith: geographical perspectives on religious fundamentalism. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 108. ISBN 978-0-8476-9320-7. Retrieved November 28, 2010.
- ^ "Family Research Council". frc.org.
- ^ Leonard, Andrew (November 15, 2007). "Life, liberty and the right to play online poker". Salon. Retrieved November 29, 2010.
- ^ "One-Size Politics Doesn't Fit All". Christianity Today. April 27, 2007. Retrieved May 10, 2007.
- ^ "Climate Change: An Evangelical Call to Action". 2012.
- ^ "Global warming gap among evangelicals widens". CNN. March 14, 2007. Retrieved August 15, 2012.
- ^ Szobody, Ben (July 18, 2012). "Young conservatives seek fixes for climate change". Greenville Online. Retrieved August 16, 2012.
- ^ a b "Human Sexuality". Family Research Council. 2012. Archived from the original on November 25, 2012. Retrieved December 27, 2012.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b "Homosexuality". Archived from the original on December 17, 2017. Retrieved January 14, 2018.
{{cite web}}
:|archive-date=
/|archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; December 28, 2017 suggested (help); Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ "Submission to the Church of England's Listening Exercise on Human Sexuality" (PDF). Royal College of Psychiatrists. October 31, 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 27, 2010. Retrieved July 8, 2010.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b Glassgold, Judith M.; Beckstead, Lee; Drescher, Jack; Greene, Beverly; Miller, Robin Lin; Worthington, Roger L.; Anderson, Clinton W. (September 28, 2009). "Report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on Appropriate Therapeutic Responses to Sexual Orientation" (PDF). American Psychological Association. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 15, 2010. Retrieved January 14, 2018.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ "Perry v. Schwarzenegger – Brief of the American Psychological Association, the California Psychological Association, the American Psychiatric Association, and the American Association for Marriage and Family as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiff-Appellees" (PDF). United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. October 27, 2010. Retrieved May 18, 2017.
- ^ ""Therapies" to change sexual orientation lack medical justification and threaten health". Pan American Health Organization. May 17, 2012. Archived from the original on May 26, 2012. Retrieved May 26, 2012.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b c Ellis, Emma Gray (November 30, 2016). "Trump's Transition Team is All Tied Up With Anti-Gay Pseudoscience". Wired. Archived from the original on December 1, 2017. Retrieved January 14, 2018.
{{cite news}}
:|archive-date=
/|archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; December 1, 2016 suggested (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|newspaper=
(help); Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ "Appropriate Affirmative Responses to Sexual Orientation Distress and Change Efforts" (PDF). American Psychological Association. August 5, 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 11, 2012. Retrieved January 14, 2018.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ http://www.frc.org/op-eds/on-love-homosexuality-and-sin-an-evangelical-proposal
- ^ a b "Legal Brief: Lawrence & Garner v. Texas". Family Research Council. February 18, 2003. Archived from the original on October 24, 2008. Retrieved December 27, 2012.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help)CS1 maint: year (link)
Full text available from:
"Lawrence and Garner v. Texas, No. 02-102, Brief Amicus Curiae of the Family Research Council and Focus on the Family in Support of Respondent, February 18, 2003". The Fred Parks Law Library, South Texas College of Law, Houston. February 18, 2003. Archived from the original on September 11, 2017. Retrieved January 14, 2018.{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b "Supreme Court Strikes Down Texas Law Banning Sodomy". The New York Times. Associated Press. June 26, 2003. Archived from the original on June 20, 2017. Retrieved December 27, 2012.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b "Brief Amicus Curiae of the Family Research Council in Support of Respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group Addressing the Merits and Supporting Reversal" (PDF). Family Research Council. January 24, 2013. Retrieved January 14, 2018 – via SCOTUSblog.
- ^ "Brief Amicus Curiae of the Family Research Council in Support of Respondents and Affirmance" (PDF). Family Research Council. March 31, 2015. Retrieved January 14, 2018 – via SCOTUSblog.
- ^ Weber, Travis S. (2015). "Critical Analysis of Obergefell v. Hodges". Family Research Council. Retrieved January 14, 2018.
- ^ Brammer, John Paul (October 14, 2017). "'Hazards of Homosexuality' Flier Distributed at Values Voter Summit". NBC News. Retrieved January 14, 2018.
- ^ "CHRIS MATTHEWS: Do you think we should outlaw gay behavior?
- PETER SPRIGG: Well, I think certainly-
- MATTHEWS: I’m just asking you, should we outlaw gay behavior?
- SPRIGG: I think that the Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. Texas, which overturned the sodomy laws in this country, was wrongly decided. I think there would be a place for criminal sanctions against homosexual behavior.
- MATTHEWS: So we should outlaw gay behavior.
- SPRIGG: Yes."
- ^ "Family Research Council Labeled 'Hate Group' by SPLC Over Anti-Gay Rhetoric". Talking Points Memo. Retrieved November 26, 2010.
- ^ a b "Perkins, Potok spar over hate group". Hardball with Chris Matthews. MSNBC. Retrieved December 8, 2010.
- ^ a b "Tony Perkins Defends Family Research Council, Sort Of". Southern Poverty Law Center. Retrieved November 30, 2010.
- ^ a b Evelyn Schlatter and Robert Steinback, 10 Anti-Gay Myths Debunked, Southern Poverty Law Center. Retrieved December 3, 2010.
- ^ "Sexual orientation, homosexuality, and bisexuality". American Psychological Association. Retrieved November 30, 2010.
- ^ a b The American College of Pediatricians Is an Anti-LGBT Group. Turban, Jack. Psychology Today, 8 May 2017
- ^ a b c What the Right Gets Wrong About the FRC Shooting. Serwer, Adam. Mother Jones, 17 August 2012
- ^ Porter, Tom (July 26, 2017). "Transgender Military Ban: The Rise of Anti-LGBT Hate Groups in Trump's White House". Newsweek. Archived from the original on July 27, 2017. Retrieved January 14, 2017.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ Pinto, Nick (May 26, 2010). "University of Minnesota professor's research hijacked". Minneapolis City Pages. Archived from the original on November 17, 2010. Retrieved January 13, 2017.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b Lengell, Sean (November 24, 2010). "Family Research Council labeled a 'hate group'". The Washington Times. Retrieved August 19, 2012.
- ^ McVeigh, Karen (February 28, 2013). "Obama to support gay couples' supreme court challenge to California's Prop 8". The Guardian. Retrieved May 25, 2015.
- ^ Hubbell, John M. (April 28, 2005). "Coalition seeks male-female marriage definition/New ballot push for constitutional amendment". San Francisco Chronicle. p. B3.
- ^ Justice Sunday II: A Special Note From Executive Vice President of FRC, Chuck Donovan, frc.org. Retrieved May 6, 2015.
- ^ Michelle Vu, "Presidential Hopefuls Highlight 'Values' to Christian Conservatives", The Christian Post, October 20, 2007
- ^ Tripodi, Paul. "Lobbying Report". Lobbying Disclosure. US House of Representatives. Retrieved August 16, 2012.
- ^ US House of Representatives (February 3, 2010). "H.Res.1064". OpenCongress. Retrieved August 16, 2012.
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the "Anti-Homosexuality Bill, 2009" under consideration by the Parliament of Uganda, that would impose long term imprisonment and the death penalty for certain acts, threatens the protection of fundamental human rights, and for other purposes.
- ^ http://nationalpress.typepad.com/files/bill-no-18-anti-homosexuality-bill-2009.pdf
- ^ Weigel, David (June 4, 2010). "Family Research Council explains: It lobbied for changes to Uganda resolution". Right Now. Retrieved August 16, 2012.
- ^ McEwan, Alvin (June 7, 2010). "Family Research Council evades regarding Ugandan anti-gay bill lobbying efforts". The Huffington Post. Retrieved August 16, 2012.
- ^ Melloy, Kilian (June 4, 2010). "FRC Opposes U.S. Resolution Against Ugandan 'Kill Gays' Law". Edge. Boston, MA. Retrieved August 16, 2012.
- ^ Montopoli, Brian (June 4, 2010). "Family Research Council Lobbied Congress on Resolution Denouncing Ugandan Anti-Gay Bill". Political Hotsheet. CBS News. Retrieved August 16, 2012.
- ^ Caplan-Bricker, Nora (December 5, 2012). "Uganda Revives Its Favorite Distraction: Anti-Gay Legislation". The New Republic. Retrieved May 25, 2015.
- ^ "For the sins of Uganda, I repent – Museveni". newvision.co.ug.
- ^ Burack, Cynthia (December 5, 2012). "Christian Right Leader Lauds Uganda Dictator as 'Kill the Gays' Bill Is Revived". AlterNet. Retrieved May 6, 2015.
- ^ Dutton, Nick (August 18, 2012). "Shooting sparks controversy over 'hate' designation for conservative group". wtvr.com. Retrieved August 18, 2012.
- ^ a b c Evelyn Schlatter. "18 Anti-Gay Groups and Their Propaganda". SPLC. Archived from the original on November 29, 2010. Retrieved November 28, 2010.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ Ariosto, David (August 17, 2012). "SPLC draws conservative ire". CNN. Retrieved August 19, 2012.
- ^ Thompson, Krissah (November 24, 2010). "'Hate group' designation angers same-sex marriage opponents". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 25, 2010.
- ^ "FRC, Members of Congress, Governors, and Conservative Leaders Release Open Letter Calling for Civil Debate, End to Character Assassination". PR Newswire. December 15, 2010. Retrieved August 17, 2012.
- ^ Boyle, Matthew (December 15, 2010). "Family ResearchCouncil, top GOP lawmakers fight back against SPLC 'hate group' label". The Daily Caller. Retrieved December 24, 2010.
- ^ "Start Debating, Stop Hating" (PDF). Family Research Council. December 15, 2010. Retrieved December 24, 2010.
- ^ "SPLC Responds to Attack by FRC, Conservative Republicans", December 5, 2010.
- ^ Washington Post columnists continue blaming hate group classification for FRC shooting, advocate.com. Retrieved May 6, 2015.[better source needed]
- ^ Milbank, Dana (August 16, 2012). "Dana Milbank: Hateful speech on hate groups". Washington Post. Retrieved December 21, 2017.
- ^ Pearson, Michael (August 17, 2012). "Shooting sparks controversy over 'hate' designation for conservative group". CNN. Retrieved August 29, 2012.
- ^ "Josh Duggar Admits Molestation Resigns from Family Research Council". TMZ. May 21, 2015. Retrieved May 22, 2015.
- ^ "Bombshell Duggar Police Report: Jim Bob Duggar Didn't Report Son Josh's Alleged Sex Offenses For More Than a Year". In Touch Weekly. May 21, 2015. Retrieved May 22, 2015.
- ^ "Josh Duggar apologizes amid molestation allegations, quits Family Research Council". The Washington Post. May 22, 2015. Retrieved May 21, 2015.
External links
- Official website
- Appearances on C-SPAN
- Profile at Ministry Watch
- 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations
- American Christian political organizations
- Anti–LGBT rights organizations in the United States
- Charities based in Washington, D.C.
- Conservatism in the United States
- Organizations established in 1983
- Organizations that oppose same-sex marriage
- Political organizations in the United States
- Pro-life organizations in the United States
- Same-sex marriage in the United States
- Lobbying in the United States