Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 45: Line 45:
:{{u|331dot}} But [[The Japan Times]] is a national newspaper; Sound & Recording Magazine Guitar Magazine and Bass Magazine are both nationally available magazines; and Shoegazer Disc Guide is a nationally available secondary source (musical reference book), all of which are neither self-published nor self-penned by or affiliated with the band. You are asking for "published" "reliable" "secondary" sources that are "independent" from the subject and I am providing them. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Sutatatabunwa|Sutatatabunwa]] ([[User talk:Sutatatabunwa#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sutatatabunwa|contribs]]) 11:16, 1 October 2021 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:{{u|331dot}} But [[The Japan Times]] is a national newspaper; Sound & Recording Magazine Guitar Magazine and Bass Magazine are both nationally available magazines; and Shoegazer Disc Guide is a nationally available secondary source (musical reference book), all of which are neither self-published nor self-penned by or affiliated with the band. You are asking for "published" "reliable" "secondary" sources that are "independent" from the subject and I am providing them. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Sutatatabunwa|Sutatatabunwa]] ([[User talk:Sutatatabunwa#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sutatatabunwa|contribs]]) 11:16, 1 October 2021 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::I was the editor who most recently declined this draft. I'd be happy to reconsider if you would provide me (here) with links to the two best secondary sources that have significantly covered this subject. [[User:Salimfadhley|Salimfadhley]] ([[User talk:Salimfadhley|talk]]) 00:12, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
::I was the editor who most recently declined this draft. I'd be happy to reconsider if you would provide me (here) with links to the two best secondary sources that have significantly covered this subject. [[User:Salimfadhley|Salimfadhley]] ([[User talk:Salimfadhley|talk]]) 00:12, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

:{{u|Salimfadhley}} A primary example of such sources is a disc review on Shoegazer Disc Guide Revised Edition which, being a book published in Japan, is not available online. Here is the publisher's site to prove that the book exists. The pages cited are specified in the reference section of the draft.
https://www.shinko-music.co.jp/item/pid0648528

Similarly, both Guitar Magazine and Sound & Recording Magazine are unavailable online, but here are the publisher's pages for each edition of the magazines. Scroll down and you can see that they have published content on For Tracy Hyde.
https://www.rittor-music.co.jp/magazine/detail/3119111006
https://www.rittor-music.co.jp/magazine/detail/3119121005

And here is a review of For Tracy Hyde's live performance on TBS Radio posted on TBS Radio's official site. TBS Radio is a Japanese national radio station owned by TBS Television.
https://www.tbsradio.jp/archives/?id=p-417746

This interview by The Japan Times is available online but was also printed on the actual newspaper. The Japan Times is Japan's most recognized English-language newspaper and is available nationwide.
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/culture/2021/02/25/music/for-tracy-hyde-ethernity/


== 08:41:42, 1 October 2021 review of submission by Endrabcwizart ==
== 08:41:42, 1 October 2021 review of submission by Endrabcwizart ==

Revision as of 05:10, 6 October 2021

Main pageTalk pageSubmissions
Category — List Sorting — Feed		ShowcaseParticipants
Apply — By subject		Reviewing instructions
Help deskBacklog
drives
Shortcuts
Welcome to the Articles for Creation help desk

  • This page is only for questions about article submissions—are you in the right place?
  • Do not provide your email address or other contact details. Answers will be provided on this page.
  • Watch out for scammers! If someone contacts you saying that they can get your draft published for payment, they are trying to scam you. Report such attempts here.
Ask a new question
Please check back often for answers.
Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions


September 30

03:46:22, 30 September 2021 review of submission by 216.174.91.149


I'm at my wit's end not knowing what more to write about St. Xenia?

216.174.91.149 (talk) 03:46, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. No amount of editing can confer notability on a topic. 331dot (talk) 09:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 08:56:19, 30 September 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Oyindebrah


I stumbled on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abimbola_Fashola. So I decided to create Wikipedia pages for first ladies in Nigeria.

Apparently I am starting with Kebbi state. I am having issues with the page, the person is a first lady of a state, she sits on an international board. had done quite a lot of things on cancer which I have also reported but the message reviewers keep leaving is about her notability.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Zainab_Bagudu

Here is the draft above, please help

Oyindebrah (talk) 08:56, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPOL does not grant a presumption of notability to people on NGO boards or to first ladies/husbands. Please refer to the top table here:
Only one of your sources is usable, and even then it's not a particularly good one. The notability threshold has not been met, let alone the biographical sourcing requirements. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 22:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Oyindebrah: - re-signing for ping. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 22:02, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:35:14, 30 September 2021 review of submission by Nomadicghumakkad


Any thoughts on notability of this and similar subjects? I don't think I know enough to give a good feedback to creator. This is being discussed at my talk page [1]

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 15:35, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 17:58:45, 30 September 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by LEO FUKS


dear Colleagues I wanted to improve the article "Throat Singing" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Throat_singing, but it is a DISAMBIGUATION PAGE, not a regular article Then, I edited with an explanation about the subject, that was regarded as not suitable by a reviewer I also started creating a page on "Throat Singing Techniques", that has a different meaning than "Throat Singing", but the reviewer did not accept it and suggested that the contribution could be transferred to the existing one. BUT HOW CAN A DISAMBIGUATION PAGE BE CONVERTED INTO A REGULAR WIKIPEDIA PAGE? Thanks a lot Leo Fuks

LEO FUKS (talk) 17:58, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AngusWOOF: Your decline. Victor Schmidt (talk) 18:20, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The article you linked to Throat singing is not a disambiguation page. It's an article which lists the varieties of throat-singing techniques. Rather than make a page which substantially duplicates our current page you could improve the current page. It may be better to begin by making small changes so that you can get the feel for editing on Wikipedia. --Salimfadhley (talk) 00:09, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:11:12, 30 September 2021 review of draft by DamesnetV


Why is this being declined when it contains more references than some articles that have been published? DamesnetV (talk) 19:11, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DamesnetV: We are not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. Every claim about a living or recently-departed person that could potentially be challenged for any reason what-so-ever MUST be cited to a strong, in-depth, third-party source that corroborates it or (if no such sources can be found) removed. This is a HARD REQUIREMENT when writing about such topics on Wikipedia and is NOT NEGOTIABLE. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 21:18, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 1

01:25:29, 1 October 2021 review of submission by 2601:2C1:8880:5550:69BA:3E5F:9F10:2660


2601:2C1:8880:5550:69BA:3E5F:9F10:2660 (talk) 01:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC):[reply]

If you can't provide the draft link, we can't help you. The likelihood of an IP having the desired draft in its contribution history is extremely low. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 16:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

04:39:55, 1 October 2021 review of draft by Sutatatabunwa


My draft has been repeatedly declined on the basis that it does not meet the criteria for notability of music-related topics, but I have already provided sources proving that

1. the band in question has been the subject of or mentioned in multiple nation-wide published works that are reliable independent and not self-published, including books, newspaper and magazine articles

2. the band has had multiple albums in a national music chart (in this case, Japan's major music chart Oricon)

3. the band has released multiple albums from an important indie label (P-VINE, which has Wikipedia articles in both Japanese and English)

4. the band is internationally recognized as a prominent example of the Japanese shoegaze scene

5. the band has performed music for a notable work of media (in this case a theatrical performance featuring Rina Ikoma, who has Wikipedia articles in both Japanese and English)

6. the band has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio network (in this case TBS)

If meeting six out of the twelve criteria isn't enough, then what should I do?

Sutatatabunwa (talk) 04:39, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sutatatabunwa As noted by reviewers, the sources that you provided are of poor quality or are not independent reliable sources. Even if the band technically meets the notability criteria, it still must receive significant coverage in independent reliable sources. 331dot (talk) 08:46, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
331dot But The Japan Times is a national newspaper; Sound & Recording Magazine Guitar Magazine and Bass Magazine are both nationally available magazines; and Shoegazer Disc Guide is a nationally available secondary source (musical reference book), all of which are neither self-published nor self-penned by or affiliated with the band. You are asking for "published" "reliable" "secondary" sources that are "independent" from the subject and I am providing them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sutatatabunwa (talk • contribs) 11:16, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I was the editor who most recently declined this draft. I'd be happy to reconsider if you would provide me (here) with links to the two best secondary sources that have significantly covered this subject. Salimfadhley (talk) 00:12, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Salimfadhley A primary example of such sources is a disc review on Shoegazer Disc Guide Revised Edition which, being a book published in Japan, is not available online. Here is the publisher's site to prove that the book exists. The pages cited are specified in the reference section of the draft.

https://www.shinko-music.co.jp/item/pid0648528

Similarly, both Guitar Magazine and Sound & Recording Magazine are unavailable online, but here are the publisher's pages for each edition of the magazines. Scroll down and you can see that they have published content on For Tracy Hyde. https://www.rittor-music.co.jp/magazine/detail/3119111006 https://www.rittor-music.co.jp/magazine/detail/3119121005

And here is a review of For Tracy Hyde's live performance on TBS Radio posted on TBS Radio's official site. TBS Radio is a Japanese national radio station owned by TBS Television. https://www.tbsradio.jp/archives/?id=p-417746

This interview by The Japan Times is available online but was also printed on the actual newspaper. The Japan Times is Japan's most recognized English-language newspaper and is available nationwide. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/culture/2021/02/25/music/for-tracy-hyde-ethernity/

08:41:42, 1 October 2021 review of submission by Endrabcwizart

Hello
The article I contributed, Sushma Adhikari, has been rejected for publication. I am asking for help from this help desk to publish this article. Please write down the areas that need improvement.

Endrabcwizart (talk) 08:41, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Endrabcwizart The reviewer left a message as to what needs improvement. 331dot (talk) 08:43, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

09:33:36, 1 October 2021 review of draft by Emfletch91


I have recently had my first article declined due to lack of referencing - I have since made improvements on this however I have two sources that I am unsure on how to reference. The articles in question are old newspaper articles and cannot be located online, yet contain information that I have referenced. Please can you advise how I would go about referencing these? Would I scan them on and use them as an image on the article? Thank you

Emfletch91 (talk) 09:33, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Emfletch91: You are allowed to cite offline sources - see Wikipedia:Offline sources. Make sure to include at least newspaper name, release date (for periodically released newspapers), (page number,) article title and ideally article author. See {{cite news}} for a template that can assist with creating a newspaper citation. Please do not scan and upload them to Wikipedia, as this can, depending on the aage of the newspaper, be a copyright violation. Just include all information required to find the article you cite in a library. Victor Schmidt (talk) 09:59, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Emfletch91: I am concerned about some of the images, particularely File:Leigh Spinners Dance.jpg. You state that you are not the copyright holder (and probbably correctly so). Where can I find the evidence for the asserted CC-BY-SA 4.0 License? Victor Schmidt (talk) 10:13, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10:20:48, 1 October 2021 review of submission by D2325292


D2325292 (talk) 10:20, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@D2325292: You don't ask a question, but your draft has been rejected, which means it will not be considered again. Wikipedia is not a site like LinkedIn or other websites where you can post a personal profile. Here is some information about what makes a person notable, as Wikipedia defines notability. --bonadea contributions talk 12:47, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10:50:26, 1 October 2021 review of submission by Sette-quattro

Hello, I've seen that the submission has not been accepted. The motivation states: Does not demonstrate WP:SIGCOV in indepedent reliable sources.

Is it a matter of number of sources? Or variety? Or not related to sources?

Please let me know how can I improve the article. Thank you!

All the best! --Sette-quattro (talk) 10:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Sette-quattro (talk) 10:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We don't cite the subject or GitHub. The remaining citations are passing mentions that cannot help for notability a whit. The issue is thus that none of your sources are acceptable. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 16:42, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sette-quattro: re-signing for ping —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 16:47, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10:52:43, 1 October 2021 review of draft by Gyan.Know


Hello. I submitted page on article for Global Esports. It was moved to Draft:Global Esports. According to me, the page has sufficient content and sources to be pass notability for WP. I am not able to understand what is wrong on the page. Please help. Thanking You.

Gyan.Know (talk) 10:52, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The "sources" seem to consist of recycled press releases, articles not about the company, and routine coverage from an obscure trade publication. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:06, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18:07:17, 1 October 2021 review of submission by Pathum M Ranasinghe


Pathum M Ranasinghe (talk) 18:07, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing in the draft to suggest that you are notable, sorry, most of us not notable enough for articles. Theroadislong (talk) 18:10, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pathum M Ranasinghe (ec) You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning it will not be considered further. It is inadvisable to attempt to write about yourself, please read the autobiography policy. We are interested in what independent reliable sources say about you, not what you want to say about yourself. Please use social media to tell the world about yourself. 331dot (talk) 18:11, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am sri lankan Musical artist — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pathum M Ranasinghe (talk • contribs)
Pathum M Ranasinghe I hope that you have a successful career, but you cannot use Wikipedia as a way to aid your career or enhance search results for you. Once you are shown with significant coverage in independent reliable sources, showing how you meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable musician, someone will eventually take note of your career and choose to write about you. Don't try to force the issue and go out and work on your career. Be advised that a Wikipedia article is not necessarily desirable. There are good reasons to not want one. 331dot (talk) 18:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23:37:06, 1 October 2021 review of draft by Rio197


I added a couple of new (independent) references to this page today. Do they help boost enough notability for this topic to be approved for publishing?

Rio197 (talk) 23:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2

02:41:39, 2 October 2021 review of draft by NruasPaoYPP


Hello,

Would you like to help me please? My question is about my draft "Ban Phou pheung noi". It has been denied twice. The problem is because there were some YouTube video references cited there and they needed to fix the time and date of the videos. There was another thing too, and it was about the topic of my article. Is it the mountain "Phou pheung" or the village of "ban Phou pheung noi"?

Actually, the two issues are fixed. All YouTube videos have been removed from my article. An the topic of article is about the village "Ban Phou pheung noi", it's not the mountain which is "Phou pheung".

Would you like to help me and check the paragraphs of my article if they make sense to readers? Do you see any video references cited there need to remove from my article? What should I need to change or remove?

Thank you.


NruasPaoYPP (talk) 02:41, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs a rewrite for grammar and clarity. The first few paragraphs are confusing: The article is supposed to be about a village but the introduction to the draft seems to be describing a nearby mountain and some geography that is not specific to the village. Salimfadhley (talk) 00:16, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

04:05:39, 2 October 2021 review of draft by Annammedias


I'm new to Wikipedia. I created a page yesterday.

Submission has been declined. I have given adequate links for verification. And our film is on 9th place out of 30 movies (Times of india)

Can you please let me know why submission is declined?

Annam Medias (talk) 04:05, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Annammedias The reviewer left a reason at the top of the draft; the draft is not adequately supported by independent reliable sources. 331dot (talk) 07:03, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

05:43:05, 2 October 2021 review of draft by Akkanadan j g jayakrishna menon gurukkal


the wikipedia i created is showing that it is declined by theroadislong i need help to rectify it and to pulish my page as it is genuine and there is no false submission how can i create this page without any mistake and publish it please provide necessary guidence Akkanadan j g jayakrishna menon gurukkal (talk) 05:43, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Akkanadan j g jayakrishna menon gurukkal Wikipedia is not for telling the world about yourself, please see the autobiography policy. Your draft was also completely unsourced, which is unacceptable for any biography, see the biographies of living persons policy. Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a person, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. We are interested in what others say about you, not what you want to say about yourself. If you just want to tell the world about yourself, you should use social media or a personal website. 331dot (talk) 07:01, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10:09:35, 2 October 2021 review of draft by Marvelcanon1


I need help on finding out what mistakes i have done and what i should do to make this article accapted or reliable.

Marvelcanon1 (talk) 10:09, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the sources on this draft are inappropriate. We cannot cite self-published sources such as StackExchange. All our sources need to be reliable secondary sources. Salimfadhley (talk) 00:19, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 11:49:00, 2 October 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by TobiOdeyemi


Kylie tastic rejected my post even though it has ORIGINAL Reasearch.

TobiOdeyemi (talk) 11:49, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You realise that Original research is not permitted here? Victor Schmidt (talk) 12:48, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:30:05, 2 October 2021 review of submission by 171.76.228.43


171.76.228.43 (talk) 14:30, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The only source this nearly content-less and poorly-spelt article has is to the subject's own website. Notability has not been met. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 15:53, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:32:26, 2 October 2021 review of submission by SebastianMendoza34


SebastianMendoza34 (talk) 14:32, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SebastianMendoza34 Your draft has no content? Theroadislong (talk) 15:54, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@SebastianMendoza34: This has never had any content on it other than submission and decline templates. There's no point submitting a blank page for review. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 15:55, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:42:59, 2 October 2021 review of submission by Imadnanhossain


Imadnanhossain (talk) 19:42, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have recreated this badly written, self-serving promotional autobiography so many times that it has been blocked from further recreation here. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:53, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


October 3

02:27:13, 3 October 2021 review of submission by Dondaestaskanye?


Dondaestaskanye? (talk) 02:27, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


The subject of the article is notable for their activism in gender equality. Nied's efforts were critical in allowing for the participation of boy's and female business leaders. Since the Neptune Festival is the largest festival in the Commonwealth of Virginia by number of attendees and money generated, and because of Nied's activism in climate change and success in organizing the planting of 7,000 trees around the world, Nied's activism warrants a biography on Wikipedia.

Dondaestaskanye? The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 07:06, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 07:00:13, 3 October 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by ArcherSkulldog


I made the article of Skye Folf to help him grow and be able to be recognized like how other people are in the Wikipedia site. If you guys can please accept this I'd appreciate this so much and it help me out so much as a creator to keep making articles.

ArcherSkulldog (talk) 07:00, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArcherSkulldog The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. It is almost completely unsourced. All articles, especially those about living people, must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about (in this case) a person, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person or notable musician. Wikipedia is not a means to recognize someone or "help them grow", they must have already become notable to merit an article. This is just one of many people who post music online, which is possible for any of us to do. 331dot (talk) 07:04, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

08:31:08, 3 October 2021 review of submission by 1.22.228.185

Hi This article was created for Vinod Mishra who is a notable figure from Mumbai, he is elected representative and corporator. We have also added relevant references of published in News. Please reconsider this article. 1.22.228.185 (talk) 08:31, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to the top table here. I will be skipping over the sources I am clearly going to be unable to assess due to the language barrier.
Based on the English-language sources, notability has not been met even if the non-English sources are acceptable. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 16:35, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

08:44:16, 3 October 2021 review of draft by Chlopim


I feel that the singer CHINCHILLA is notable enough for a Wikipedia article, but I do not have enough experience to create a good article. I would like some help understanding how to write a suitable article. Chlopim (talk) 08:44, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chlopim Writing an article is the hardest task to perform on Wikipedia; you increase your chances of success and reduce the chances of frustration and hurt feelings by first gaining experience by editing existing articles in areas that interest you, and also using the new user tutorial.
In terms of the draft, interviews are not acceptable as a source to establish notability. An article about a musician must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about them, showing how they meet Wikipedia's special definition of a notable musician. Please see Your first article. 331dot (talk) 10:50, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10:37:17, 3 October 2021 review of submission by DK-cchcrp

Hi! I really do not understand why the article (Draft:Transregionalism) has been rejected. Transregionalism as a term is very often used among researches of new regionalism and international relations. A lot of new international initiatives (like Belt and Road, Quad (Quadrilateral Security Dialogue), TPP or Indo-Pacific, are letated as TRANSREGIONAL. So it is not a neologism as pointed by the reviewer. but for University's students it would be great to have such a page with a brief and easy theoretical explanation of the phenomenon. Please consider it one more time. Thank you!

DK-cchcrp (talk) 10:37, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DK-cchcrp You may resubmit it, but any article about this term must show with significant coverage in independent reliable sources that it is in widespread use, as you were told by the reviewer. Note that the whole URL is not needed for a link. 331dot (talk) 10:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:54:59, 3 October 2021 review of submission by 88.10.153.144

What does a well-known person need to be sufficiently notable in Wikipedia? Because in this case, Iker Unzu has over 8 million followers on the internet, yet he is not considered notable. He has also got a Google Knowledge Graph, which basically proofs his notability, with many other articles/news. It would mean a lot if you could answer these questions and thanks for reviewing the article! 88.10.153.144 (talk) 14:54, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Followers can be bought, and having a Knowledge Graph doesn't prove anything about his notability as Wikipedia defines it. We don't cite YouTube or Google. Refer to the top table here:
Thus, notability has not been shown. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 16:18, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:15:22, 3 October 2021 review of draft by Bonchee


I need help with publishing the page for Asuquo Ekpenyong. This is the first time I am working on a wikipedia article

Bonchee (talk) 17:15, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18:28:09, 3 October 2021 review of draft by RankingPedia


Of the reference sources that the article contains, I would like to know which ones are reliable and which ones are not. By then continue to improve the article

RankingPedia (talk) 18:28, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RankingPedia, none of the references used are considered reliable or useful towards showing notability. We don't care what the organization say about themselves or what they post. We only care what others say about it in independent published reliable sources. Reliable sources need oversight and fact checking, if they do not have this then they are not usable. This eliminates any sort of social media and user generated content. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 19:21, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 19:11:11, 3 October 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by MONA DAR LISA


I wrote an article about Sudipta Karmakar but it getted declined will you help me with itMONA DAR LISA (talk) 19:11, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MONA DAR LISA (talk) 19:11, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:55:40, 3 October 2021 review of draft by Sodapoppers


I'm not sure how to prove reference on my wikipedia draft, it's about this hip-hop produce Mz Boom Bap and i'm talking to him directly through instagram, but i'm not sure how to prove it. Sodapoppers (talk) 19:55, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sodapoppers, things you learn through Instagram are not allowed on Wikipedia. Instagram is not a reliable soyrce. Please read No original research. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 20:01, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:46:50, 3 October 2021 review of submission by Dark Angel23490


Dark Angel23490 (talk) 22:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC) Hi, why did my value of Shay Wize was declined? I wanted to connect it with the one in Hebrew. I thought that Wiki rules says that if it's an artist that released an album we can write about. And this artist was in Shazam top 50... Did I put there something wrong? Dark Angel23490 (talk) 22:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Dark Angel123490: Unfortunately, he.wp and en.wp have different sourcing standards, and en.wp is much stricter than he.wp in this regard. (en.wp is actually one of the strictest projects with regards to standards.) Because of all the unsourced biographical claims in the draft, it can't be accepted. Source or remove them, then try again. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 18:57, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23:53:39, 3 October 2021 review of submission by Annamaria.dmrt


Annamaria.dmrt (talk) 23:53, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hello :)

Draft:The_Lottery_Office

I sadly have received a decline on a draft which I am trying to publish. The sources for referencing are independent and reliable, there is also a reference on every statement made in the article. There are many references. I really don't know what to do here, can you recommend anything? Are there any references I should remove? If you guys don't want this article published, that's totally fine. I proposed the article as it would be a good addition to Wikipedia, because this lottery has been very mainstream for a few years now in Australia and Wikipedia is outdated.

The comment the reviewer left was: Needs to summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about this organization itself, not just tell what they do.

@Annamaria.dmrt: Refer to the top table here:
Notability has thus far not been met. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 18:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 4

02:43:40, 4 October 2021 review of draft by Howdyfreshhhhh


Hello,

Would like to know if any edits are necessary for draft to be accepted. Thank you.

Howdyfreshhhhh (talk) 02:43, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

05:54:29, 4 October 2021 review of submission by 117.193.136.129

I do not know why every reviewer of this draft gave the comment that it is not notable as it is not really possible to give only show reviews as a reliable reference because not every Indian newspaper gives only reviews about the tv shows in their articles. It will always have to do with launch dates, actors and other short descriptions about the show. Why are the reviewers so adamant about the draft to be having only reviews to show notability that and they don't give the article any chance? Does that mean this show Draft:Zindagi Mere Ghar Aana does not even deserve an article in Wikipedia? This show has been on-air for the past two months and has satisfied both WP:TVSHOW and WP:GNG but the reviewers gave some or the other reasons and kept declining the submissions. There is also a additional claim that the people are paid and are promoting the show. I really don't know about the others but I'm neither paid nor do I want to promote the show but I am a fan of the show. Can please do something about Draft:Zindagi Mere Ghar Aana. I can understand the issues of disruptive editing but for that can't the article be protected once it is published? Or can you atleast reduce the page protection required for it's creation given to atleast the extended confirmed users than the administrators? Because no administrator is interested in contributing to the creation of this page. I humbly request please help with Draft:Zindagi Mere Ghar Aana. Thank you--117.193.136.129 (talk) 05:56, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was rejected, and as such will not be considered any more. Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a subject. This does not include routine announcements such as casting decisions or announcements of production. Please read other stuff exists. 331dot (talk) 08:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
331dot I totally get your point about other stuff exists but believe me this show has much more reliable sources than those given in it's draft Draft:Zindagi Mere Ghar Aana. To be frank, I really don't get why Wikipedia does not want this article to be included. This show does have everything required for any Wikipedia article of it's own. Please I request again, please give a chance. Atleast make the protection of creating the page to extended confirmed users because I'm sure the extended will surely create the article respecting all guidelines of Wikipedia, there are some really good extended confirmed users of WP:TVSHOW articles like Shinnosuke15 and Mann Rocks whose editing track records you can check. Otherwise, atleast suggest some admin who can help with creating the article. Anybody from India and once they create it then please give the article ultra-level protection such that nobody will cause any mess in that article but for that you have to give one chance please--117.193.136.129 (talk) 09:56, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What is your connexion to the show? (Also, "ultra-level protection" is not a thing and we do not use protection to enforce content, we do not and will not enforce locality restrictions, and Shinnosuke15 and Mann Rocks, as far as I am aware, do not review drafts). —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 23:55, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Jéské Couriano *What is your connexion to the show? The only answer to this question is that I am a really ardent fan of the show. You know that special feel which you get when something touches your heart. I get the same with this show and I feel really sad that this is only show in Star Plus which does have any article in Wikipedia while one of it's upcoming shows like Dance Plus (season 6) has a Wikipedia article with "just three sources where one is not even reliable" which makes it clear that it has not at all fulfilled WP:GNG. I don't know if I can ask this but then why is the Wikipedia admin so careless about such articles as Dance Plus (season 6) but are very strict not to have an article for Zindagi Mere Ghar Aana which has the potential to fulfill both WP:TVSHOW and WP:GNG? Not trying to offend anyone here just asking.
"ultra-level protection" is not a thing and we do not use protection to enforce content Isn't there any other way out such that an proper article is created on the show while protecting it so that no disruptive or paid editing is done? That is what I asked.
Shinnosuke15 and Mann Rocks, as far as I am aware, do not review drafts No I don't want them to review drafts. I want them to create a proper Wikipedia article for this show. As of now only an administrator can create an article which as far as I know none of the admin is interested to contribute. If the article creation access is given also to the "extended confirmed users" then the very best editors and article creators of Indian Shows which as far as I know are only Shinnosuke15 and Mann Rocks can create the article with what Wikipedia needs in the article. I'm 100% sure that Shinnosuke15 and Mann Rocks will value all that the Wikipedia needs for a good article on WP:TVSHOW. You can check their edit history, they always have created the best articles of Indian Shows or even better if they are eligible give them the admin access to create this article.--117.193.136.129 (talk) 07:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't there any other way out such that an proper article is created on the show while protecting it so that no disruptive or paid editing is done? No. Protection is reactive. We don't protect a page in anticipation issues will arise; we protect pages in response to issues already occurring - such as repeatedly re-crating an article while disregarding the deletion debate that resulted in its initial deletion. I don't want them to review drafts. I want them to create a proper Wikipedia article for this show. We will not compel users to write about articles that they do not wish to write about; historically any such compulsions for editors have been due to outside influences and not an editorial mandate. Given the history here, I would be very surprised if they wanted to try their hand at this without drafting the page first. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 22:27, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I understand thank you for taking your time and explaining everything:) Jéské Couriano--117.193.136.129 (talk) 03:18, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

06:02:04, 4 October 2021 review of submission by Weatherforyou

I have added 8 refernces to the article already. 3 of the references(story published by newspapers) have their own wikipedia pages. All the 8 refernces directly target the person or refer to the person(actually all 8 have published a story of the subject in their newspapers, separately from 2 years, as you can check the date of the articles, among which 3 newspapers have their own wikipedia pages in which the subject's story was published. The last time I included around 15 news media portals/newspapers (in URL form) that have taken forecasts from the subject, one of the reviewers told me there is no need to mention it as the subject is enough notable and would obviously be in the newspaper. So, I removed the list. Should I add all of them again? or you would allow publishing of the wikipedia page. Please take a look into this. Thanking you in anticipation. Weatherforyou (talk) 06:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weatherforyou Wikipedia has articles, not mere "pages". This is a subtle but important distinction. The draft article was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. The sources you offer seem to mostly be interviews with him; this does not establish notability as interviews are a primary source. A Wikipedia article summarizes what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own, not based on any materials from the subject or brief mentions, to say about a topic. 331dot (talk) 08:32, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12:04:07, 4 October 2021 review of submission by Laveatein


Laveatein (talk) 12:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12:05:35, 4 October 2021 review of submission by Laveatein

Hello, Would like to know if any edits are necessary for draft to be accepted. Thank you. Laveatein (talk) 12:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12:14:52, 4 October 2021 review of submission by Gyan.Know

Hello. I am a reviewer at Afc. Accordingly, can I myself review my pages, and approve my drafts? GyanKnow contributions? 12:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12:37:06, 4 October 2021 review of draft by Akshaypatil510


I resubmitted my article after making it a simple read and not any sort of paid advertisement. But still the reviewer rejected it. Please do suggest me how else can I change the article to get that approved. Akshaypatil510 (talk) 12:37, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are editing using your own name and have yet to declare your clear position as a paid editor here. Theroadislong (talk) 12:42, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What name should I use then to edit ? Also please let me know how to prove that I'm not a paid editor. Because honestly I'm not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshaypatil510 (talk • contribs) 12:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are in the employment of A5E_Consulting, so you are deemed to be a paid editor and need to make the mandatory disclosure on your user page. Theroadislong (talk) 12:59, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Will that solve the problem and the article be approved? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshaypatil510 (talk • contribs) 13:17, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also as suggested can I knowhow to do mandatory disclosure, I'm bit messed up and can't find where to do that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshaypatil510 (talk • contribs) 13:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Akshaypatil510, making disclosure is not going to help in your page being accepted. But it is mandatory requirement to disclose the information in question. Kindly read: WP:COI GyanKnow contributions? 14:32, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:27:32, 4 October 2021 review of submission by Sajidnasar4

Hi, Greetings for the day.! I've removed all the unnecessary information from the draft. Request you to kindly review the same once more. Sajidnasar4 (talk) 14:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sajidnasar4, your draft was rejected and cannot be reviewed again. Please make enough substantial changes, take your time, and then try again. Happy to help. GyanKnow contributions? 14:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:06:44, 4 October 2021 review of draft by Howdyfreshhhhh


Please edit article and give feedback for submission. Thank you. Howdyfreshhhhh (talk) 16:06, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Howdyfreshhhhh: Per WP:NCRICKET playing for minor-league and U## squads doesn't grant any presumption of notability. Box scores and game recaps are routine coverage and don't help for notability either. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 18:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:20:08, 4 October 2021 review of submission by Michaelse2002


Michaelse2002 (talk) 16:20, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:21:06, 4 October 2021 review of draft by Mokbul7000


Hello, Would like to know if any edits are necessary for draft to be accepted. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mokbul7000 (talk • contribs) 17:24, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mokbul7000 (talk) 17:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft deleted, user blocked, request moot. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 18:24, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:21:57, 4 October 2021 review of submission by Gyan.Know

I am a reviewer at Afc. I created this page. I need some other editor to accept it on my behalf, because I'm finding it immoral accepting my own pages. GyanKnow contributions? 17:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:44:57, 4 October 2021 review of submission by Spncrinc


Hello. The draft (link above) was deleted speedily, even though I contested it, so the link will only take you to a blank "new document" page. I have been a Wikipedia editor for over 12 years, but have not created a brand new article, yet. I am well acquainted with Wikipedia markup, etc.

I have been hired as a freelance writer by a company, FlexTeam, who has a client who feels that their large company "Happy Returns" is a notable company and they would like an article on Wikipedia. I have declared paid conflict-of-interest in every possible section as I have worked on the draft.

I understand that the article was not admitted because of section G11 criteria and I would like your advice on how to create a simple article for Happy Returns company which just states facts, cites many accurate sources and does not appear to be an advertisement. Might I just create a draft with a company infobox? My understanding is that Happy Returns is a fairly large player in the consumer industry and would therefore be a notable article for Wikipedia. Please, let me know your advice. Thanks. Spncrinc (talk) 17:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spncrinc (talk) 17:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Courtesy link: User:Spncrinc/sandbox/HappyReturnsCompany_Draft6
@Spncrinc: I am going to answer based on what appears to be the most recent incarnation of the draft in your sandboxen. This draft reads more like an advert rather than a neutrally-worded encyclopaedia article that explains what a subject is, what they do, and why people should care. I will also refer you to the top table here.
Of all the sources you use, only two are acceptable. This dog ain't hunting anytime soon. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 18:18, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also, as a general heuristic, articles about notable companies and organisations generally include some criticism or negative coverage (which is correct, as Wikipedia is written in a neutral point of view and does not care if the coverage in sources is good or bad). The spin-off articles Criticism of Apple Inc and Criticism of Amazon should give you some idea of what to expect. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Jéské Couriano: Thank you and :@Ritchie333: Thank you

That was super helpful! Exactly what I needed to know. Thanks again for taking the time to go through it and explain it to me. Spncrinc (talk) 00:59, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 01:41, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Courtesy link: User:Spncrinc/sandbox/HappyReturnsCompany_Draft7
@Jéské Couriano: I removed the references that wouldn't work for Wikipedia and kept the 2 good ones. I searched on the Internet myself for a few more references. I found one by Yahoo and one by MSN. Are these two sources (Yahoo and MSN) considered reliable? I tried to rewrite the article relying upon the newest set of citations. Please, let me know your thoughts when you get a sec. Thanks. Spncrinc (talk) 21:48, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Spncrinc: Yahoo and MSN are both essentially news aggregators, so we would assess them based on where they originally came from. The Yahoo source is marked as coming from Cision/PRNewswire, which only ever publishes press releases. The MSN source is from Women's Wear Daily, and is borderline - it has a substantial lede, but other than that it's an interview. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 22:19, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:02:08, 4 October 2021 review of draft by Howdyfreshhhhh


Requesting help as both drafts have been declined. Thank you.

Howdyfreshhhhh (talk) 19:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Howdyfreshhhhh: I refer you to the response given above. Same issues, same answer. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 19:17, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20:13:30, 4 October 2021 review of draft by Market News 101


How are my sources not reliable? All of my sources referred to the actual websites.


Market News 101 (talk) 20:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Market News 101, People keep using "reliable source" incorrectly. In this case, they mean "no significant coverage in reliable and independent sources". User:Uncle G/On notability is worth a read. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:19, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Market News 101: The page is also promotional, and seems to be more focused on selling (Redacted) to readers than actually being a neutrally-written encyclopaedia article. If you have any connexion to him or his ventures, you are obligated to disclose this per the ToU. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 20:24, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20:28:14, 4 October 2021 review of draft by Howdyfreshhhhh


Need help with citing references. Thanks.

Howdyfreshhhhh (talk) 20:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Howdyfreshhhhh: You need help finding references, more like. Again, minor-league and U## squads do not grant notability, and box scores, stat lines, and bleacher reports are routine coverage that don't help for notability. Pleaseactually read what others have told you. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 20:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20:29:02, 4 October 2021 review of draft by Howdyfreshhhhh


How do I improve this article? Thanks.

Howdyfreshhhhh (talk) 20:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Howdyfreshhhhh: You need help finding references, more like. Again, minor-league and U## squads do not grant notability, and box scores, stat lines, and bleacher reports are routine coverage that don't help for notability. Pleaseactually read what others have told you. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 20:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Howdyfreshhhhh I'm the reviewer for you Draft. The state in which your draft currently is, there's no way it is going to be accepted. You need to work a lot to find credible independent secondary sources. Otherwise, the draft is going to get rejected. GyanKnow contributions? 01:55, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 21:47:42, 4 October 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Marukome1981


Hello there I need some assistance on editing my article since I am still un familiar with wikipedia's format

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.


Marukome1981 (talk) 21:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Marukome1981: We are not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. Every claim about a living or recently-departed person that could potentially be challenged for any reason what-so-ever MUST be cited to a strong, in-depth, third-party source that corroborates it or (if no such sources can be found) removed. This is a HARD REQUIREMENT when writing about such topics on Wikipedia and is NOT NEGOTIABLE. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 22:24, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23:15:16, 4 October 2021 review of submission by SavetheTreeSBro


SavetheTreeSBro (talk) 23:15, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply] 

                             ``You Were rude Why cant There be Another It was Kind of you not to just Decline and not Leave a message it was ruude though mine was about the local area of ovedio so its kinda rude of you to just shatter my WHOLE ARTICLE under no circumstances So Can you please Allow me to ``  -Dear SL93 -
 Courtesy link: Draft:The Townstead of Ovedio
No sources, no article, no debate. In addition, this is already covered in an existing article in a considerably more legible and less promotional fashion. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 23:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@SavetheTreeSBro: re-signing due to botched ping —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 23:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 5

05:15:57, 5 October 2021 review of submission by EdwinKibs

Requesting help in editing this article because I have tried writing as an independent person but it seems there are elements of advertising which I have failed to tress out. Thank you

EdwinKibs (talk) 05:15, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

05:33:33, 5 October 2021 review of draft by Varshaji123


I've created this article but I have an NPOV issue, in that Noone in the company was asked to create this article as a personal. I am not getting paid but wanted to run it by some other editors before I move it to the main space


Varshaji123 (talk) 05:33, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Varshaji123 Please read the advice left by reviewers. If you are employed by this festival, the Terms of Use require that to be disclosed, see WP:PAID. If you have an unpaid association with this festival, please review conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 12:14, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10:15:45, 5 October 2021 review of submission by Eshamgd


Eshamgd (talk) 10:15, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12:07:24, 5 October 2021 review of submission by Laveatein

Hello, I wrote an article but it got declined several times for different reasons, which exclude each other. Can you help me with it, please? I would like to know what kind of edits are necessary for the draft to be accepted. If such is possible, of course. Thank you in advance! --Laveatein (talk) 12:07, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Laveatein The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place to merely tell about a company and what it does. A Wikipedia article must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. Sources like the company website, interviews with staff, announcments of routine business activities, press releases, and brief mentions do not establish notability.
If you have an association with this company, you must review conflict of interest and paid editing for information on required formal disclosures. 331dot (talk) 12:12, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12:40:58, 5 October 2021 review of submission by 122.168.167.34


122.168.167.34 (talk) 12:40, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don't ask a question, but the draft was clear advertising. Wikipedia is not a place for companies to tell the world about themselves. Please review conflict of interest and paid editing for information on required formal disclosures. 331dot (talk) 12:46, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you have an account, remember to log in before posting. 331dot (talk) 12:47, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12:58:43, 5 October 2021 review of submission by Veproctor

Could you please explain what you consider to be relevant references? As similar articles to mine, concerning very similar medical societies, have been published with fewer references. E.G. British_Thoracic_Society or British_Society_of_Gastroenterology. Can I reference the website itself? Veproctor (talk) 12:58, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both of those articles were never drafted by virtue of predating the drafting process' existence. Both also happen to have maintenance tags on them indicating they have issues. Our standards and enforcement thereof have only been toughening over the years. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 18:52, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:03:23, 5 October 2021 review of draft by Kashubro


Hi there, I'm checking in on the progress of a page I (and a few others, it seems) have edited. It's the Kevin Nicholson Businessman page. Could you let me know why the page isn't public/out of draft mode? Thank you!

Kashubro (talk) 15:03, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kashubro, you didn't submit the draft for a review after your last set of changes, probably that's why it is still in the draftspace. Regardless, as a politician, he has yet to meet the notability guidelines for politicians. As a businessman, his activities thus far are not standing out as notable as well. I noted that he receives a Bronze Star Medal. However, as a non-US person, I won't comment on the notability of him being awarded. – robertsky (talk) 16:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18:37:39, 5 October 2021 review of draft by Dixiebella


The page I have developed has been moved to DRAFT: MAINE COAST HERITAGE TRUST. Is this page, as a draft, still under review for possible addition to Wikipedia? Dixiebella (talk) 18:37, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's been reviewed and declined. Laws are not acceptable sources, and nor is anything the subject controls. Your offline sources are missing required bibliographical information (page numbers for the periodicals, page numbers and ISBNs/OCLC#s for the books). —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 18:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:32:50, 5 October 2021 review of draft by Howdyfreshhhhh


Which one of my references are not considered reliable sources?

Howdyfreshhhhh (talk) 19:32, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Have you been paying attention to literally anything said to you on this page? Any further requests will be reverted off unless and until you actually read the feedback you've gotten and take it on-board. We are not obligated to repeat ourselves ad nauseam to someone who refuses to listen. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 19:40, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:43:52, 5 October 2021 review of submission by NicoleMASD

Hello! I have added several citations to aid in the establishment of notability. Can you please take a look and let me know your thoughts?

NicoleMASD (talk) 22:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was rejected, meaning it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 22:58, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 6

04:10:33, 6 October 2021 review of submission by NruasPaoYPP Then, copy and paste this code in the big input box below that:

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&oldid=1048470678"