User talk:Sodapoppers

Welcome!

Hello, Sodapoppers! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Scorpions13256 (talk) 05:29, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

AfC notification: Draft:Mz Boom Bap has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mz Boom Bap. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:34, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mz Boom Bap has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mz Boom Bap. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:53, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mz Boom Bap (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

If resubmitted again without addressing the issues the draft may be outright rejected, meaning it will no be considered.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mz Boom Bap and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mz Boom Bap, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 01:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sodapoppers! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 01:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Sodapoppers, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! S0091 (talk) 01:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sally bugs.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sally bugs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 14:56, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Salvatore Briguglio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Washington Memorial Park. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jimmy Mozzarella

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Jimmy Mozzarella, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 06:03, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please do not make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in a block from editing. Thank you. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 06:03, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hoax articles

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with being blocked from editing, or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:24, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mz Boom Bap

Hello, Sodapoppers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mz Boom Bap, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:09, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mz Boom Bap

Hello, Sodapoppers. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mz Boom Bap".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 01:49, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:Sodapoppers/sandbox

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as User:Sodapoppers/sandbox, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. GeneralNotability (talk) 02:42, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Fisher-Price—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 09:43, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Herman Fisher. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ContributeToTheWiki (talk • contribs) 10:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 12:50, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sodapoppers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What I did in June was ridiculous and unfunny now that I look back on it. I do not really know why I did that, it was 3 AM and everything was hilarious to me. I do understand what I did and why it was wrong and I will never do it again. I apologize for what I did and would like to make good contributions to Wikipedia. Sodapoppers (talk) 03:46, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You used multiple accounts to vandalize a page. I think the standard offer is probably your best way back. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:10, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can you give an example of the type of constructive edit you would like to make if you were unblocked? Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I would like to improve my article Salvatore Briguglio and just help improve articles in general. I really like baseball and want to make a few edits on Hilton Smith. Sodapoppers (talk) 22:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Sodapoppers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have followed the standard offer. Basically, my vandalism back in June was stupid and childish. So I would like to apologize for that. I regret it because I had fun making Salvatore Briguglio, and I hate to think that I'd never be able to do that again. If you would allow me, I would love to be able to contribute Wikipedia in a meaningful way. I may not be entirely active, but I will try to make constructive edits, even if they're small. Sodapoppers (talk) 19:00, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I have accepted your unblock request. Please take care to avoid any edits that could be construed as vandalism. Good luck. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 01:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sodapoppers (talk) 19:00, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser data shows no evidence of recent block evasion. --Yamla (talk) 10:35, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: Care to weigh in? Jake Wartenberg (talk) 21:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you guys for giving me another chance. Stay cool. Sodapoppers (talk) 04:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]