User talk:Bonadea

“Qadiani” term on the tombstone of Mirza

Dear Bonadea, is it possible we discuss here that why are you removing the reference to MGAs tombstone, which refers to himself as “Qadiani”? And if he refers to himself using that term, how is it necessarily a slur? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Secretive lobbyist (talk • contribs) 15:06, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Request on 21:40:33, 31 October 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by SourceRight

• SourceRight (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Jonita Doda (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

hi thanks for the advice i have made all the necessary changes as advised by you.. kindly review the article and approve it. its about a notable Indian actor SourceRight (talk) 21:40, 31 October 2021 (UTC) SourceRight (talk) 21:40, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

@SourceRight: thanks for your message. I'm afraid the draft is still written like an advertisement, which was the reason why I declined it. Another editor has removed a lot of inappropriate content, but there is still quite a bit of promotional text there. In addition there doesn't seem to be any coverage of her in reliable independent sources. A Google search is not a source. --bonadea contributions talk 15:07, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

References

Move to Draft Ryan Avery (speaker)

bonadea Can you move this to draft so I can find another source? I was not able update this but was supposed to. Could you help me more on how I can get this approved to Wikipedia page. I would appreciate it if you could give me more feedback regarding this article. I'm confident I got reliable sources indicated and that the person is considered notable. Thank you! Azumi121 (talk) 14:34, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

@Azumi121: thanks for your message. I'm afraid I am not able to help you with this; since Ryan Avery (speaker) was deleted, I have no access to the text that was in the article. Contact the deleting administrator, whose name you'll see in the deletion log (the reddish-pink box on Ryan Avery (speaker)), on their user talk page.

When you say "I was not able update this but was supposed to", what do you mean? The article was deleted following a community discussion, so it was in fact supposed to be deleted at the time. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 15:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

jonita doda draft edited

Sir thanks for your message again , il make more changes and make it absolute encyclopaedic .meanwhile for your reference im attaching few more sources for notability confirmation. I only cited google just for your reference. there are thousands of external articles on Actor Jonita Doda.. or il request if you can refer me to any editor who could help me draft it more formal to exactly suit wikipedia format. She hasbeen covered extensively by the leading newspapers and electronic media such as times of India, hindustan times, the tribune, deccan chronicle, Indian express to name a few. References:

— Preceding unsigned comment added by SourceRight (talk • contribs) 04:56, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Re: Edits Removed from Keyword Tool (software)

Hello Bonadea,

I just want to provide a list of free tools in one place to the users and that is why I think it's the perfect page to display. If you have any other page where I can edit and let users know about this list, do let me know. I would be very happy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henry Veno (talk • contribs) 10:22, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

@Henry Veno: thank you for your message. I'm afraid there is no article or other page on Wikipedia that you can use for that purpose. Please see What Wikipedia is not, and this information about external links to avoid. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 13:04, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Sassa Gurl

Hi Bonadea, Thank's for helping us to figure out what's the matter of the article i created also i would like to ask your help to please help me to edit the article i created to make it look encyclopedic, also the references ive been givin is legit and i think it meets the subjects notability. Thank You Very Much — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sassamiss (talk • contribs) 19:11, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

@Sassamiss: thank you for your message. I'm afraid you must make a disclosure of the fact that you are being paid for editing Wikipedia before you make any other edits; you have been given instructions on your user talk page. --bonadea contributions talk 21:23, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 47

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 47, September – October 2021

• On-wiki Wikipedia Library notification rolling out
• Search tool deployed
• New My Library design improvements

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Soopy Narikkatteri

Dear friend i added reference of Mr.Narikkatteri's personal and family details from his official blog.watch it on my new reference — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikihysom (talk • contribs) 15:52, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Jake Allyn

Hi Bonadea! Just want to check with you to see what I can do to get Jake Allyn's wikipedia page approved? I added some more sources to prove his notability (He has starred in multiple tv shows and even the feature film "No Mans Land"). He has also been praised for his work on multiple outside sources like the "New York Times" and "The Hollywood Reporter" Also, his brother, Conor Allyn, who he writes/produces alongside, just got his wikipedia article approved! Let me know if this qualifies him! Thanks!-Emma Hernandez Emmachernandez (talk) 18:25, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

@Emmachernandez: The draft was resubmitted without changes, so obviously it was declined again. That there is a Wikipedia article about his brother (it is not "his article") is irrelevant, and as long as the draft is entirely promotional in tone, it can't be accepted even if he should turn out to be notable. --bonadea contributions talk 21:27, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Sources

Can you give me the list of unreliable sources in Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itcouldbepossible (talk • contribs) 04:33, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Teahouse

Hello. Why did you remove my reply in Teahouse? Thank you. Richard M William (talk) 10:26, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

It was not on purpose – your response was not there when I started writing mine. I don't know why I did not get an edit conflict. As a general principle, though, avoid making "I don't know" responses – nobody can answer every Teahouse question, and it is better to leave questions we can't answer, in the hope that somebody will be able to answer it. --bonadea contributions talk 10:41, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your advice. I'm new on Wikipedia and Teahouse. Richard M William (talk) 11:07, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

Bonadea hey this the Ip address of User:Funk Hipster so don't accuse me like that 49.149.188.69 (talk) 13:22, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

I had asked you a question in Teahouse.

I had asked you a question in Teahouse (see this [1]). So what is your decision??? And another question, why did you do this???(see this [2] I mean if cast can be added without sources, then what is your reason for doing the following action. I understand that it had fluffy text, but why did you remove casts. See, I am not ordering you.. I just want to know the actual thing. Which is right, and which is wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itcouldbepossible (talk • contribs) 13:34, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

@Itcouldbepossible: I'm a little confused by your message. You say I had asked you a question in Teahouse and link to my response – are you asking what I meant, or something else? I see that you posted the exact same text to two discussion boards; please don't do that, it just wastes the time of other people. Then you say So what is your decision??? – decision about what, exactly? As for why did you do this???, you link to an edit where I explain exactly what the problem was: the case list was insanely bloated, and the entries contained a lot of text that went against what the manual of style says. Also note that Mon Phagun has been very heavily edited by spammers, which is why it is protected. --bonadea contributions talk 22:12, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

@GoingBatty: @Bonadea: Going batty wrote this. '@GoingBatty: @Itcouldbepossible: I don't interpret the manual of style pages to say that the credits are sufficient, only that the order of appearance in the credits can be used to determine how the cast is listed in the Wikipedia article. But it's true that a local consensus can always decide to go by what the credits say, even if there are no secondary sources naming cast members. Itcouldbepossible, I suggest that you take this question to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film, or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force if you are focusing on Indian films. The corresponding discussion page for TV series is Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television.' So I created the same thing in the two discussion pages.

@Bonadea: I am asking you if many articles can have many people on the cast list, then why not Mon Phagun. Consider Dhulokona, or Gangaram (TV series) or even any English drama, say Fringe (TV series), they have a lot of cast and crew. So what was wrong with Mon Phagun?? I understand they related characters to many other else, so you could have just removed the relationships. Itcouldbepossible (talk) 04:02, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

No, I wrote that, not Goingbatty–you are quoting the post by me that you also linked to. You wrote the exact same thing that you had already asked in the Teahouse, on two different boards. And in that same post that you link to and quote I also addressed your question here.WP:OTHERCONTENT. Wikipedia has six million articles – why focus on this one? Also note that Mon Phagun has been very heavily edited by spammers. --bonadea contributions talk 06:24, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Bonadea You only asked me to post that in the two boards, and so I did that. I am not focusing on Mon Phagun. I was editing random articles, when I landed on Mon Phagun. I saw that it had a very small amount of cast items. So when I looked into the page history, I saw that you had removed many cast items because they were overcrowded. I understand WP:OTHERCONTENT, but I want the clear-cut answer...... - should cast list always have references, or they can go without references?? Just like Wikipedia has over a 6 million articles, many TV and film stubs in it have cast list without sources. I thought that there was nothing wrong with it, until I came to your edit. And at that point I became confused. I read Manual of Style and everything, but I cannot still interpret it clearly. As per Manual of Style for TV or for films, every cast must have suitable references or they would be removed, then most of the wiki articles there would not have been more than 2 or 4 casts.

I want to make things clear from this stage, because soon I am going to create an article, and I am not in a mood to get it deleted. I found out that you are a very experienced user, that is why I want to make things clear from you. Please don't get irritated of me. I am completely new, and I have just started learning Wikipedia, and its thousands of norms and regulations. So things are getting really crazy for me. Please bear with me. Yours Faithfully Itcouldbepossible. Regards. Have a great day ahead, and continue editing like a hero. Thank you. Itcouldbepossible (talk) 08:22, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Please stop disallowing the correct Information to be written

Each time incorrect and false information is edited on this site and subsequently corrected in order to represent the person in the manner in which they have designed their career, individuals refer to incorrect citations and use the site simply an extension of the media publishing false information. This is apparent when rectified information is removed and false information added. I have fixed much wrong information and now been asked to stop in a threatening way, this is unacceptable. ReidyMedia (talk) 03:05, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

You have removed sourced information and replaced it with unsourced claims that seem to imply that it was someone else who did the thing that Reid was concicted for. What does to represent the person in the manner in which they have designed their career mean? And a templated warning about your violations of Wikipedia policies is not a threat.

I just noticed that your user name is the same as Reid's own company. --bonadea contributions talk 06:40, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Hm, I don't think I've looked at that article since 2018. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:50, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Dravidian architecture

Hi Bonadea
An Earwig search of Dravidian architecture gives 97.9% similarity to venkataramaniblog.wordpress.com/2016/07/17/a-dravidian-reality-in-vedic-india.
I have had trouble in the past with Wordpress articles being mirrors of Wikipedia ones, rather than the other way round - If you have any time, could you please look at this one? Many thanks - Arjayay (talk) 14:02, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

@Arjayay: sure, I'll try to look into it later today. --bonadea contributions talk 14:04, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Ashok Swain

Do you know him? You must declare that on Wikipedia, or today or tomorrow if it is found out, then you will face problem. --Count Of The Baskervilles (talk) 17:59, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

No, I don't. Why? --bonadea contributions talk 18:24, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Reverts

Can you please explain me the reason for the reverts you made in Rochard??? Were they vandalism????Itcouldbepossible (talk) 13:18, 17 November 2021 (UTC) I also don't understand the reason for this (see this [3]. I had only changed all the pronouns and changed until to 'to'. Please explain me my mistakes. Regards. Itcouldbepossible (talk) 13:18, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

@Itcouldbepossible: No, your edits were not vandalism. Vandalism, on Wikipedia, are edits by someone who is deliberately trying to vandalise. More information on this page. Your edits to Rochard were clearly made in good faith, but that does not mean they were improvements. This edit for instance removed the italics from the game title which should be italicised, it removed some definitions of the type of game ("two-dimensional game" is not very descriptive), and it changed some instances of "John" (the name of the character in the game) to "the player". It is not the player who has a gravity beam – though that would be rather cool! As for your edit to Thom de Graaf, here, you said in the edit summary "Cleaned up some grammatical errors" which was actually not correct. You removed proper nouns and replaced them with pronouns, and you changed the preposition "until" to "to" or "till". While the use of de Graaf's name was maybe a little repetitive, it was not grammatically incorrect, and none of the uses of "until" was incorrect, either. "till" and "until" are exactly equal – neither is more or less correct – and when talking about time, "from ... until" is slightly more frequent than "from ... to". It is possible to use "from ... to" about time as well. Hope this makes sense. --bonadea contributions talk 15:36, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Fraser reverts

User:Bonadea noticed you reverted a number of my edits on Robert Fraser. As far as I know, they were adequately sourced? Greg Dahlen (talk) 11:55, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

@Greg Dahlen: thank you for your message. Yes, I removed most of the text you added to Robert Fraser (art dealer). (Your edits are here, and this is my revert).

• The phrase "(Fraser was gay)" that you inserted after "It soon transpired that Fraser was also suffering from AIDS" was misplaced; a few words about his being gay would be OK, but connecting it directly to his contracting AIDS is not.
• As for the "Personal life" section, it is difficult for me to understand how that addition could be seen as appropriate in an encyclopedia. The language was not remotely neutral, there were trivial and frankly puerile details about his sex life, and it was not adequately sourced. A blog site is almost never a reliable source, so the blogspot.com source is right out. The review of Vyner's book at artforum.com, and the artlyst.com source, are OK as sources go (as far as I can tell), and they are still in the article; using a throwaway, hyperbolic line in the book review to make a statement in Wikipedia's voice about what kind of sex Fraser liked is not OK, though. The corkstgalleries.com also seems to be pretty reliable, and the claim about his being painted by artists whose work was displayed in his gallery could perhaps be incorporated in the Career section. But it looks like original research to interpret the source's "Many of his artists found it baffling to be in his presence but they were fascinated, too. Never has an art dealer been the subject of so many of his artist’s paintings." as "He was painted more often by artists he represented and associated with than other gallery owners." A more neutral phrasing might be "he was painted by several artists he represented", but without some sourced information about which artists did paint him, it is not particularly informative. --bonadea contributions talk 12:28, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

User:Bonadea Well, I wasn't trying to connect his contracting AIDS to his being gay in an absolute sense, because clearly non-gay people contract AIDS. But doesn't it look like he contracted AIDS from his gay activity? I saw no mention in any source of any heterosexual relationship. Are you saying that even though no source mentions a heterosexual relationship he may have had one?

Yes, I've read that Wikipedia is doubtful about blogs. I hadn't noticed that the source was a blog when I went to post the edit. The Wikipedia filter told me that a blog source is okay as long as the article was written by the owner of the blog, which appears to be the case in this instance. Knowing that, do you accept the blog information?

I'm not sure how the language is non-neutral? Fraser was a promiscuous homosexual. The facts I presented flesh out that portrait, and I'd say give a sense of his life, activities, and personality.

Not sure how the line about a kind of sex Fraser liked, and apparently liked best, was "throwaway." The reviewer read the book and apparently this info was in the book.

If the source says, "Never has an art dealer been the subject of so many of his artist’s paintings," how is it original research to say, "He was painted more often by artists he represented and associated with than other gallery owners"? I do think it's useful because it shows Fraser was an interesting person if prominent artists wanted to paint his portrait. It gives a sense of his life, activities, and how he spent his time i.e. he spent some time sitting for artists. It shows a different kind of connection to artists than only dealing their art. Greg Dahlen (talk) 09:10, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

I think you may have misinterpreted Wikipedia's policy about using blogs. WP:ABOUTSELF says that a blog source might be OK to use about uncontroversial statements of fact about the blogger. If there had been a Wikipedia article about Redwel Trabant, their own blog might be used as a source for claims about Redwel Trabant, but not about anyone else.

"...apparently liked nothing better than..." is classic hyperbole, and it was certainly a throwaway line in the book review. --bonadea contributions talk 11:30, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Do not return articles

hi,Do not return articles. I did not enter these in the article space. These were entered by the AFC، Please do some research. You are destroying my articles, I will not bring these articles into the main space. These articles have entered the main space automatically. If you continue to work, I have to report your harassment, I just entered the (illegal) movie into the main space, and that was because I fixed the problem with that article.--Iranianbio (talk) 14:04, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

@Iranianbio: thank you for your message. I have moved three articles that you created to draftspace.

• Bee Ghanoon (film), which you created as a draft at Draft:Bee Ghanoon (iranian film), was declined by an AfC reviewer. You moved it to mainspace yourself, I moved it back to draftspace, you moved it back again and then another editor restored it to draftspace. It is currently at Draft:Bee Ghanoon (film).
• Anahita (film), which you created as a draft and submitted for review; instead of allowing it to be reviewed you moved it to mainspace. Another editor moved it back to draftspace. You immediately returned it to mainspace, and removed some maintenance templates. I returned it to draftspace, and then took the time to review it; it was declined. It is at Draft:Anahita (film).
• Mahmoud Maghami, which you created in mainspace yourself without going through AfC. I moved it to draftspace at Draft:Mahmoud Maghami as it is far from being ready for mainspace.

In other words, none of the articles I have draftified has been through AfC, and I don't undersatnd what These articles have entered the main space automatically means. The reasons they were returned to draftspace (by me and other editors) include a large number of poor / unreliable sources instead of a reasonable number of reliable sources; promotional writing; and text that is impossible to understand such as "This film is very few because it maneuvers on an actor." If a draft has some grammar errors that can be fixed, but when it isn't possible to understand what the text is supposed to mean, and the entire draft would need to be completely rewritten, it is a problem. --bonadea contributions talk 14:48, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

bonadea In your opinion, the links are invalid because you can not understand the validity of the link because it is in Persian. You should not expect the links to my article from the New York Times. There is valid news that I use most of them. All newspapers are also valid links according to Wikipedia rules. I explained to you about the actors and the importance of the film so that you understand that the film is important. As I said, Iranian articles can be better understood by Iranian Wikipedians. (Illegal) was entered into the main space by me, and that was because I modified the links to that article. Anyway, I joined Wikipedia fourteen years ago and this is my new username and I'm glad to see your positive feedback on my activities. It's better to help improve articles instead of deleting them, thank you.--Iranianbio (talk) 15:33, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

In your opinion, the links are invalid because you can not understand the validity of the link because it is in Persian. No, that has nothing to do with it.

What other usernames have you used? --bonadea contributions talk 16:19, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

I am currently working with the same username, but fourteen years ago I was working with another username on Wikipedia and I do not know that name and email if I knew I was logging in with the same username and did not need to create a new username. Iranianbio (talk) 16:34, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Fourteen years later, I re-entered Wikipedia to edit Iranian articles that have problems, and to create a new article if I needed to. Iranianbio (talk) 16:36, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Please unhide my discussion

@Bonadea Please unhide my discussion, I am not a sockpuppet. You can see that in my talk page. Blablubbs just blocked me because he thought that I had same behavioral evidence. Please guide me again, as you always did. Please take my deepest regards. Itcouldbepossible (talk) 04:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Please stop misinformation and hostility

Bonadea First of all, all your information is wrong as always, you were completely wrong about the links, but let me inform you, in the links, the "sarshenasan" art news agency has dealt with this issue in three different news, this is a government news agency and the creator of this It is not a film, it is a producer (Iran Movie) The second issue is the national newspaper (shoroo) which is a government newspaper and covers the subject, newspapers are credible sources for articles. Third, in Iran, no news agency gives a detailed explanation about a film. This is the news policy of Iranian sites،Do you know more than me, an Iranian journalist? Your behavior is intentional and you are looking for war, please end this hostility or increase your information about Iranian articles and its links, I have warned you several times. I have added two valid links to this article, I will add another link and enter it in the main space. You do not have the right to delete it or enter it in the space (Draft Box), you can only the candidate for delet article if you wish. You are not an administrator. Stop destruction and enmity.--Iranianbio (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Courtesy link: Draft:Bee Ghanoon (film). @Iranianbio: if you are going to resort to personal attacks, I have no reason to discuss with you. However, note that if you move this draft into mainspace yourself, it will be nominated for deletion since it does not show how it meets any of the notability criteria for films. In addition, given your conflict of interest, you should not create articles about this topic, instead you should create drafts and submit those through the Articles for Creation process. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 14:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Bonadea you are too strict, in any case, the importance of the film is clear with the same links, but i will add one or two more links, you are interfering in all my articles, you are at war, not me. Given your long history on Wikipedia, it would have been better if you had helped me rather than discourage me.--Iranianbio (talk) 15:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Bonadea, Note: This user is probably sock of Hoseinkandovan, and is currently under investigation. Sockmaster has interest of expanding and creating non-notable iranian biographies, iranian film and persistent edits at List of Iranian actresses, if you happen to stumble upon his socks next time. 180.0.123.50 (talk) 08:03, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Thank you, IP. I won't wait for the SPI to block the editor; their posts above are enough. Bishonen | tålk 08:13, 25 November 2021 (UTC).

Thanks, both. I think you are absolutely right about their identity. --bonadea contributions talk 10:06, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Article submission for re-review

Dear Editor,

My article under the title of Gulabuddin Sukhanwar was declined by you on Oct 25th for further development. I have added more than 100 percent new information with credible sourcing. Some other authors have also contributed to develop it further and now it is considered as one of the richest article of its type in Wikipedia.

Please kindly re-review it at your earliest convenience.

Thank you Sanchoof Sanchoof (talk) 07:19, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Povel

So, I've got Schöier and the Samlade Livstycken — staggered home with them from the convenience store. Talk about tegelstens. I've made a start on Följ mig bakåt vägen, what a fun read! Look at me starting to plan. Might you know the answer to the footnote question? Bishonen | tålk 13:46, 26 November 2021 (UTC).

help for review

Hello,good night sir,About my article {uncensored with ali tajdary},Given that this is a series and has international coverage, is there a problem with its links?--Confermation (talk) 20:52, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

I need help

Hi User talk:Bonadea i need help in editing the article i published i saw you reviewed it thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Infoupdate20202 (talk • contribs) 02:20, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Removing quoted content

Can you please explain what I had done wrong here. I mean why did you remove the content? ― Itcouldbepossible^Talk 13:22, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

@Bonadea: Did you see this? Please reply to me.

McGeown draft

In an attempt to end the creator's frustration, I created sections, moved content, cut sentences, cut laudatory adjectives, and left a note on the creator's Talk page about the need to address COI. Hoping the ends the impasse. David notMD (talk) 13:51, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Povel again

So.. how are your own plans for Povel? I'm enjoying the autobiography, but not finding Schöier and Wermelin as useful as I'd hoped. Helpful index and chronologies, though. I was hoping I could lean on your library skills to possibly find some book reviews. The autobiography is a primary source, so using it would need as much secondary commentary as possible. Trying LIBRIS showed me I've lost such skills as I ever had with library research. Bishonen | tålk 21:31, 15 December 2021 (UTC).

Query

Hi, I an learning and want to understand is it necessary to go through afc? Although I addressed your Draft:PharmEasy valid points.1друг (talk) Hi, I updated the draft as per your suggestion, have you seen that? Let me if the page can be moved. 1друг (talk) 11:32, 19 December 2021 (UTC) I am assuming you are not interested in the topic as I pinged you 2 times and page can be moved now but I still want to know your views. 1друг (talk) 15:38, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Songs of the season

		Holiday cheer
		Here is a snowman a gift a boar's head and something blue for your listening pleasure. Enjoy and have a wonderful 2022 B. MarnetteD|Talk 12:30, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Sanjaysinh sukhdevsinh Gohil's Wikipedia

HI @Bonadea, I have gone through Provided Source and tried to find our other sources to make sure Person is notable or not i found more than 20 news articles in Google Search Engine and Google News as well i have checked his social media accounts he has more than 50k followers in each account. Sharing links here please check

-- Social Media -- https://www.facebook.com/INC.Sanjaysinh https://www.instagram.com/INC_Sanjaysinh

Please Open this Google Search link https://g.co/kgs/w6bKGQ , It has news links and it shows Mr. Gohil is Notable person.

Joyous Season

I wish that you may have a very Happy Holiday! Whether you celebrate Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, Hogmanay, Festivus or your hemisphere's Solstice, this is a special time of year for almost everyone! May the New Year provide you joy and fulfillment! Thanks for everything you do here. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:16, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Coffee/Holidays}} to your fellow editors' talk pages.

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas, Bonadea! Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! As the year winds to a close, I would like to take a moment to recognize your hard work and offer heartfelt gratitude for all you do for Wikipedia. May this Holiday Season bring you nothing but joy, health and prosperity.Onel5969 TT me 18:26, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Hello Bonadea: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, ― Itcouldbepossible^Talk 06:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

― Itcouldbepossible^Talk 06:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

That wasnt the first time they made such a disruptive move....

You may want to see this [4]. Mako001 (talk) 11:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Season's greetings and Merry Christmas to you and your family. Have a wonderful holiday season. Cheers! RV (talk) 03:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Much love to you and yours!!!

Its been a rough few months and we disagreed on a lot. But I still love you guys. I wish you happy holidays!Godsentme1 (talk) 23:44, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!

Hello Bonadea, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. Happy editing, ~~~~ Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Randall Abrahams

I understand why the af wiki citation was removed but why were the other sources removed as well?

I'm trying to improve the article Motlatlaneo (talk) 12:57, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Bonadea,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! Itcouldbepossible^Talk 02:59, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

---

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

ItcouldbepossibleTalk 02:59, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

First ANI summons of 2022

Happy New Year, neighbor! Someone who doesn't know how to follow instructions wants your attention at WP:ANI#User:bonadea violating Qadiani. Favonian (talk) 14:46, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

However, even if Nyåret got a bit wild, you should stop violating Quadani, that is not cool. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:28, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Wait a minute

I will have to straighten this up to you on this edit, Bona. You shouldn't have to look at my contributions when I made that edit on MrBeast updating his sub ranking on the platform in a sentence. You shouldn't remove the sentence that the claim is that "His main channel is the fifth most-subscribed channel on YouTube, as well as the second most-subscribed channel owned by an individual, and the most-subscribed channel owned by an individual from the United States." That's a trivial claim for him right now. Why do you think it's not necessary to include that kind of information in a sentence on that creator article when you removed it? That edit is kind of weird when I just visited my latest edit on that page. --Allen ^{(talk / ctrb)} 09:30, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

declining my article of Anirudh Madesia

Bro this is nit the way. This man deserve wikipedia. The person with less profile are listed on Wikipedia. This is not fair. Don’t decline article just for ur fun. Avanish kumar8271 (talk) 09:21, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Have a Question

I saw a comment you wrote that all are press releases but when I checked I saw no disclaimer on the articles so I thought it's notable. ... २ तकरपेप्सी _talk 21:39, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Neighbour relations

Hi, Thanks for taking to time to review and comment my draft on neighbour relations. I don't know how to proceed, should I reply to your comment somewhere? I have made some changes that are in line with your comments. It seems that the phenomenon to which this page is dedicated is qualified differently from one author to another, as you rightly note. Perhaps a solution would be to redirect to this page from the synonyms? Kind regards --SoCarl (talk) 16:11, 21 January 2022 (UTC)SoCarl

Request

Please do not redirect Agnibaan with Agnikul cosmos.The previous Agnibaan page was removed so I created a new page.This article is better than Draft:Agnibaan.I have requested Robert McClenon to merge Draft: Agnibaan with Agnibaan.He did same with Vikram 1 Harshdeep2021 (talk) 16:02, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Can you look at this Article

Provide feedback regarding this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Muzamil_Mahmood — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4054:30B:5A25:0:0:DE2:68A1 (talk) 17:19, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Dear Bonadea Sir

I am not paid however knowing the personality. I am writing about as I had seen her struggle closely and her achievement makes me motivated. I had selected this article as my practice for an article for creation and your comments and suggestions make me to do better every time and I start editing as I get your or any reviewers comment. Hence request if you allow me to enhance my learning and edit this article

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manoj02feb (talk • contribs) 12:15, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Arup Basak

At the same time as you were moving it to draft, I was gutting the original version (copied word for word from https://en.everybodywiki.com/Arup_Basak a blacklisted non-RS source, and plagiarism tho' not strictly copyvio as "Content is available under License CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted.") and upgrading the two refs. So we now have Draft:Arup Basak and also a minimal stub at Arup Basak. I'm not sure how to proceed from here. PamD 21:07, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Clearing up my mess

Thank you for spotting and fixing the mess I made on the RSN. I have no idea how I managed to do that. BobFromBrockley (talk) 15:44, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Delete article

Brother, the article published by me, you did not check the references I had given last time and did speedy resolution without checking, whereas last time I had given all the references genuine, do you not even accept the original reference? — Preceding unsigned comment added by STA series (talk • contribs) 16:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

For your enjoyment

[5]. I was actually looking for a differnt theory by Anne Elk (miss), but the original doesn't seem to be on YT atm. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:16, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 48

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 48, November – December 2021

• 1Lib1Ref 2022
• Wikipedia Library notifications deployed

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Bypassing AfC by paid editors

Atul2901 who has declared themselves as being WP:PAID per [6] and are subject to WP:COI by actor Jeet (actor) moved Raavan (2022 film) from draftspace submitted for WP:AFC per [7]. It can be a possibility that २ तकर पेप्सी are Atul2901 are involved in some kind of sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry since both are involved in creation/submission/movement from draftspace to mainspace of Raavan (2022 film) and Draft:First HelpCare per [8]. This must stop as its a kind of violation. 2402:3A80:1C46:D09C:196C:D08C:3137:2E88 (talk) 13:35, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Creation Draft:Ray Strachan

hello i have been editing Ray Strachans page for a long time now and i need help getting it created i have followed every single guide line that wiki has put in place can you please approve it or help in improve it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.58.6.192 (talk) 22:25, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Teahouse

I am very sorry to see you have decided to remove your name from the Teahouse host list, but I hope this doesn't mean we will lose your valuable contributions at the Q&A forum itself? With 1,161 contributions there, as at Dec 2021, you have been the 13th most active contributor there since its inception and one of the stalwarts. As you can guess, Cullen328 far and away outdoes all the rest of us! If the wording I used at WT:TH in my attempts to inform and encourage everyone to ensure they're up-to-date with the latest developments that new users are going to see soon has been the cause of this, then I would like to sincerely apologise. That certainly wasn't my intention. Kind regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 18:25, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Gaya3em

A mess. Engvar changes, capitalizing a refname, changing "The ceremonies here held outside" to "The ceremonies here held outside" when there was no "here", that was a typo foe "were". A few good changes but not enough. Doug Weller talk 08:18, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Blocked but I'm going to ANI to ask for a review and help. Please chime in when I do. Doug Weller talk 08:30, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Regarding Talk:Ayan Nayak

I have filled a new report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AnonymousIndiaz based on the observations and evidence presented and on suggestion from SPI clerk. Thank you 2402:3A80:6BE:CA37:AE63:22F4:F2FD:E2DA (talk) 05:02, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

 Note: Above LTA IP is User:Amkgp see this SPI Archives there clearly mentioned about this LTA IP.

Thanks

Anachroliz aka २ तकर पेप्सी along with Atul2901 is CU confirmed and blocked for sockpuppetry per 22 Feb. 2022 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AnonymousIndiaz. Thanks for helping out for which I was able to file the SPI case by providing evidences at Talk:Ayan Nayak. I am sure that Ayan Nayak is some kind of rising/junior artist who is trying to create articles through brand agencies for WP:PROMOTION. Their social media links makes it more of a strong case. Anyways, Ayan Nayak is fully protected and since evidences are present at the talk page I think we need to worry but need to be vigilant as they may come back soon. 2402:3A80:6BE:DC75:B4BC:35B3:B6FC:9A5A (talk) 17:36, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Draft:Philipp_Hochmair

Hello Bonadea, I am sorry if it seems that I have a conflict of interest. I don't know the actor personally, but I am enthusiastic about his films and projects. That's why I started to add missing information in the German article. Since I am interested in the work of Wikipedia, I wanted to try to create the English version and then found that there is already a draft, which I then revised. Since I was rejected again and again, I am now somewhat at a loss and therefore very much hope that I now meet all the criteria and finally understand the work of Wikipedia. Many thanks for the support and many greetings Emmy1707 (talk) 14:18, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Philipp_Hochmair

Thank you for your detailed feedback. I will revise the article accordingly. However, I have one last question: There was a TV broadcast for Brandauer's 78th birthday to which only Hochmair was invited and in which their friendship becomes clear. But it is no longer available and could at most appear on YouTube. YouTube, however, is unfortunately not a reliable source. There is only the reference to this broadcast in the net: https://tv.orf.at/program/orf2/ausdemarch106.html. Therefore I must look then probably further.Emmy1707 (talk) 11:48, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Dear Bonadea I have now revised the article according to your completely justified criticism and - hopefully - found reliable sources. I hope that everything is now correct. Thank you very much.Emmy1707 (talk) 08:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Draft: Shrimad rajchandra love and care draft page

Hello, I am an unpaid volunteer, working with other unpaid volunteers to edit the page of Shrimad rajchandra love and care. An organisation that is well-known to Indians primarily due to its nationwide/worldwide charitable activities. The organisation is the highest fundraising NGO for Asia's biggest marathon, the Mumbai Marathon for the past 11 years.

It is well-known to the public, celebrities, and leaders such as the Prime Minister of India and various state and federal politicians in countries around the world. The page currently reads factually, without embellishments.

Please re-read or point out specific sections that need to be edited for neutrality and I'll gladly rework it to make it like other NGO pages (which were referenced heavily prior to starting this draft). This page currently reads more neutral than several other existing ones.

Please help me make this page rich with detailed information because it is truly noteworthy.

Also wanted to know how the page's title case can be improved to Shrimad Rajchandra Love and Care. Dmehta81 (talk) 05:32, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

What

I am not promoting any website, that you are saying, sportskeeda I have many other website to add link. And you are saying you block me, I can also block you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ripomobo11 (talk • contribs) 08:09, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

@Ripomobo11: I did not say you were promoting a website. I said that you needed to stop adding promotional content, especially when you restored such content after it had been removed. I also didn't say that I would block you (I couldn't do that, since I am not an administrator – and if I were an admin I wouldn't block someone I had been in a content dispute with), but that if you keep making promotional edits you might eventually be blocked. --bonadea contributions talk 09:53, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

OK dude sorry Ripomobo11 (talk) 10:05, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Virat kohli

You are saying this is not look fan based but when I add such words like well regarded, one of the greatest etc in Ms dhoni page an editor is saying there is not needed to add, it is fan based, you can't decide who is worst or who is greatest by your words despite I have reference of website like ESPN, ICC, Hindustan times etc so I will consider your edit also as a fan based Ripomobo11 (talk) 08:49, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

@Ripomobo11: you misunderstand the problem here, and I think the main issue is really the fact that you don't quite understand the policies involved. You are absolutely right when you say that Wikipedia editors can't decide who is "worst" or "greatest", and it is important that Wikipedia articles don't make such claims in Wikipedia's voice. What Wikipedia can do is present a neutrally written summary of what reliable and independent sources say. This should not be ridiculously detailed and shouldn't repeat every opinion by every critic in every newspaper. If editors disagree about which information is relevant and which is undue detail, they should discuss that on the article talk page.

In other words, a Wikipedia article can't say "She is the best fielder of all time", but it could be perfectly fine to say "She has been regarded as one of the best fielders of all time". In the case of Virat Kohli, I think you refer to my edit here. I restored the text "He is often considered one of the best batsmen of his era and some critics believe him to be one of the best limited-overs batsmen in history." Note how it says "often considered one of the best", and "some critics believe him to be one of the best"? That is very different from saying "He is the best"! And importantly, there are multiple sources – nine, in fact – quoting experts and other cricketers in several countries. If you believe the wording to be too strong, or if you think that one or more of the individual sources is inadequate, by all means bring that up at Talk:Virat Kohli. But you would have to explain what you mean by "fan based" (I used that phrase because that's what you used in your edit summary when you removed the text, but I honestly don't understand what it refers to!) The edit history of MS Dhoni is a mess and quite honestly that article should be thoroughly revised – I won't try to dig out relevant diffs there, but in Rahul Chaudhari, this could be an example. Your phrasing "who has played as a defender and later became one of the most successful raiders" is written in Wikipedia's voice, and had no reliable source and no context as to what "later" means. Again, if you think that kind of information would be valuable and relevant, Talk:Rahul Chaudhari is the place to discuss it. --bonadea contributions talk 11:43, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

@bonadea I also added one of the greatest not the greatest. Despite of this they said you can't write it. I have reference of website like ESPN, ICC etc but they revert my every true edit. If you able to add this that he is one of well regarded wicket keeper batsman in the cricket, I will be your thankfull because If I do so they eventually revert it.if you wanted I will provide all the resources of reliable and renowned website to proof or refer it Ripomobo11 (talk) 12:00, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

@Ripomobo11: Here is what you need to do: go to the talk page of whichever article it is you want to add that text to. (Maybe Talk:MS Dhoni?) Start a new section at the bottom of the talk page. Be really clear about what you suggest, like so: "I think this text should be added after the second sentence: the exact sentence you would like to add". Do not say anything about other Wikipedia articles, or about other editors being unfair, and remember that your command of English is not that strong which can make some of the things you say sound less polite than you intended. Focus only on the specific information you want to add to that specific article. Then, provide the references you want to use to support the text. Not just links, but formatted references, like multiple editors have demonstrated on your user talk page. And then you wait for other editors to weigh in. You should not start editing the article after a few hours because nobody has responded.

What you need to stop doing is indiscriminately removing text and sources from articles about cricket players, with odd edit summaries that have no basis in Wikipedia policy (and are sometimes pretty difficult to understand): [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14].... maybe some of these are appropriate, maybe not, but it really looks like you are removing individual words and phrases without making an effort to understand the context or whether they are supported by sources or not. Especially since you have edited at least 14 different cricket biographies today, with no more than two edits to any of them. ––bonadea contributions talk 16:28, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

ItsKesha

Hi I am coming to you for help since I have seen you have been arguing with this user a well - [15] well I started a little one with her on the article of Scott Hall. It started since User:FæɹHaad made this edit on the page - [16] in which he combined both sections, death and personal life, however as I have seen in all of other Wikipedia articles, this two sections are separated in every single one of them, so I undid the edition. Then User:ItsKesha came and undid it - [17] she provided me with the article of Kirk Douglas, in which the death and personal life sections are separated as well... so I undid the edition - [18], later the user undid it again by just saying "His death was part of his personal life, that's how it works" - [19] and I came back to undid the revision by asking it politely to provide me with an article where it was stated that it should go like that "No it does not, show me a guide style article where is claimed that it workd like that, all of the articles on Wikipedia have their Death and Personal life sections separated, even the one you send me to check was the same. Provide me a good source where it says it should go as you are claiming." - [20]. Finally she approached to my talk page and send me the edit warring thing - [21] I feel this is like a kind of abuse of power for the side of this user, plus also a little bit childish since all I asked for was for an article, guide style, where I could checked that what he or she was doing was the correct thing. I also wrote her back - [22] "Well the edit war shall stop if you just provde me with what I was asking for, you just told me that it was as it was, but who actually claims that? If there is an article saying that those sections should be merged just give it to me, this is a childish move by your side If you ask me." So I have also seen this user is problematic in this kind of terms, that is why I am approaching you to remedy this situation and not cause me problems. Greetings, and I await for your comments fella. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 21:00, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Update, I have read the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout, "Body sections" part, there I found that usually sections with very few portions of text are the ones that should not have their own subsection, and this is not the case, plus it says nothing on separating death and personal life, I see the user argue about how the health problems of Hall were part of his death and that was the reason of the combining, but actually not even his health problems had something to do with it since his main problem was the alcholism, and he died following complications of a hip surgery after breaking it on a fall. So it made no sense for her/he on doing this. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 00:16, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Update 2, response from ItsKesha after she reverted my approaching to him/her - [23] "you said all articles were like that, I found one instantly that proved you wrong, go away" the article she provided me with was this - Kirk Douglas, which actually has his own "Personal life", and "Death" sextion separated as seen Personal life, Health problems and death maybe she provided me with this because of the section saying "Health problems", which could of been translated to "Illness and death" used in articles such as José José - Illness and death, or Edith González, Illness and death. And yet again, the health problems of Scott Hall had nothing to do with his death. I could of just left this situation behind, but what he or she did was to send me an "edit warring" thing without even trying to investigate a little bit further, which may cause Wikipedia to lose faith on me or thinking I am doing bad-faith edits, which I am not doing. I do not feel this correct from the part of the user, and for what I could see on his/her talk page, she is an user doing this edit warrings most of the time. I woould not like to stay with cross arms watching how she/he discredits me as an editor. Greetings fella, I await for some feedback. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 00:35, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Twinkle Khanna

This page says in infobox & short description that she is a columnist, interior designer without reliable citations and in the lead . The below section don't have info about her this profession and Refrences section also don't have any reliable sources, who back this claim. I suggest to remove it immediately as per WP: BLP I red in talk page that someone wrote that she is a bestsellers author of India but it's a false thing, she have little recognition 'cause she is a retired actress. Success think (talk) 20:13, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 49

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 49, January – February 2022

• New library collections
• Blog post published detailing technical improvements

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

E-Daakhil

Hi Bonadea. Thanks a lot for reviewing this article. However it was reviewed and reinstated earlier after meeting Wikipedia policies as the article is needed as iinformative platform for raising consumer complaints. Request you to revert your earlier comments. Thanking in advance. Gardenkur (talk) 01:04, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

No, it was restored as a draft. The text was unambiguous spam, and that is why it was deleted in the first place. You moved it back to mainspace yourself with minimal changes, ignoring the information from the admin who restored it. I am not an administrator so it was not I who deleted it, nor would I be able to restore it even if I wanted to. --bonadea contributions talk 08:48, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Heartfulness – Experience Life’s Potential(HELP)

Hi Bonadea. Thanks for your time and efforts for reviewing this article. However as I checked all the secondary sources and observed that they meet Wikipedia policies for having them in this article . Request you to suggest suitable additions to make improve it for the main space. Thanks in advance. Gardenkur (talk) 01:16, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Which secondary sources, and which policy? It is against Wikipedia policy to make the kind of claims that were in the article before I edited it down. There are no secondary sources in the draft, and no independent sources – just two press releases and a journal article by an author affiliated with the organisation, who interviewed heartfulness practitioners and found that they all thought heartfulness was good. The sources I removed were multiple copies of one of the two PRs in the draft, and another PR which only mentioned the programme in passing. It could possibly be mentioned in the article about Shri Ram Chandra Mission if there was an independent and secondary source, but there is no sign of it being independently notable. I am getting pretty tired of the heartfulness institute trying to use Wikipedia as a marketing / proselytising tool. --bonadea contributions talk 09:51, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi Bonadea. Thanks for your reply. Really appreciate of your time and efforts to improve this article and will be thankful. However will share below points as my opinion on this article.

1. I write articles to promote Wikipedia platform in public and all of them are not related to any particular organisation.

2. The programme in special I observed was being conducted across India and some countries.

3. It has really helped students in removing stress and pressure.

4. I dont know the history of Heartfulness or Shri Ram Chandra Mission either as Organisations or they using Wikipedia as marketing / proselytising tool.

As I gave considerable time and efforts building this article I hope you will help me to share suggestions to get this to main space. Thanking you in advance. Gardenkur (talk) 02:25, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi Bonadea. Hope you are keeping well. I added two more references to the article to make it notable as per Wikipedia policies. Kindly review and share your opinion. Thanks in advance. Gardenkur (talk) 06:50, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello Gardenkur, thank you for your message. In this edit you added a misleading statement ("A study conducted showed that Heartfulness Experience of Life's potential programme has positive impact on students"). The authors of the study are practitioners of heartfulness meditation, and the article was published in a predatory journal.

The source you included, [24], is a press release from the Heartfulness institute. Press releases are not independent, not secondary, and do not indicate notability. Besides, that press release was already in the article, published by a different outlet, [25], and the version you added had already been removed from the draft, together with several other copies of the same press release. A press release is produced by an organisation and is usually sent to a number of publications, or to a central news agency which other publications can then reprint. And a press release published in multiple places is still only one source. The source you added today, [26], is also a copy of that same press release, and you added it after a claim that already had a source, and was not verified by the source you added. So I'm afraid nothing has changed – the programme is still not shown to be notable. I replaced the copy of the PR that was in the draft with the copy you added today, which was published a few days earlier. --bonadea contributions talk 10:14, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi Bonadea. Thanks for your reply. As lot of efforts goes in preparing any article, hence request you to keep me guiding on making an article complete with reliable and independent secondary sources. Will get back whenever I add more references. Gardenkur (talk) 04:09, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi Bonadea. Thanks for your reply. Hope you are well. Is there a way to find out that the authors of this study are practitioners of Heartfulness meditation and it was published in predatory journal. Can you guide me how can we make out from published articles, if they are press releases. Additionally how this published article came from same press release.

Would like to learn from your long time experience in Wikipedia. Thanks in advance. Gardenkur (talk) 01:29, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

It is trivially easy to see that [27], [28], and [29] are identical. Surely you must have seen that the text, images, and even the headline are the same in the PNI and biznewsconnect sources? The UNI source uses slightly different phrasing but the content is 100% identical – and UNI, like PNI, is a news agency, their entire business model is to publish press releases.

The International Journal of Current Research is listed in Beall's List and discussed in this paper and this list (which is more recent than either of the others). And none of the authors tries to hide their affiliation with the heartfulness foundation. The paper is not quite as horribly unscientific as the paper from Research Reinforcement. that's already cited in the draft – that one raises a lot of red flags. But the IJCR paper does not show that the programme has "a positive impact" on students. --bonadea contributions talk 18:21, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Let me be clear: there is not the slightest trace of independent, secondary sources talking about the programme in detail. I suggest that you stop trying to create an article about it. --bonadea contributions talk 18:21, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Article Discussion

Hello, I want to discuss Draft:Ramesh Dahal like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sushma Adhikari (2nd nomination)

How Can I do that. Endrabcwizart (talk) 06:42, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

@Endrabcwizart: Do you mean that you want the draft to be deleted? --bonadea contributions talk 06:48, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

It makes me clear that, article needs to publish or reject last time. It take long time contribution. Now I'm going to move article draft to main space. Endrabcwizart (talk) 11:22, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Sujata Parashar Publishing Issue

Sir, we want to publish the page for [Parashar|Sujata Parashar] as she is an award-winning Indian author. We have already edited the content regarding formal tone, and the sources available added are all authenticate, independent, reliable, published sources. Please help us to figure this out and specify the issue we need to focus or edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sneha-SIPL (talk • contribs) 10:58, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

@Sneha-SIPL: thank you for your message. When you say "we" and "us", what does that mean? Who are the "we" that want to publish the article? --bonadea contributions talk 11:20, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

This was a typo mistake. I have already edited the content before in respect to formal tone also the sources given are authenticate and reliable. I request you to specify the errors/issue to publish & improve the article in main space.

Page link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sujata_Parashar

Thanks in advance. Sneha-SIPL (talk) 12:51, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Article moved to mainspace after draft declined

Hello Bonadea. Recently you reviewed the draft of Ganesh Bala and found it currently unsuitable for publication, which I agree with. Unfortunately its SPA author has now moved it to mainspace anyway. Could you please suggest what can be done here? Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:18, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

@MrsSnoozyTurtle: Oh dear. Thanks for the heads-up. Have to leave the computer for a bit now so I can't double check sources etc, but I think an AfD might be called for. --bonadea contributions talk 14:45, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi

Hi! Please look at my draft. Thank you very much!31.40.143.16 (talk) 10:24, 8 April 2022 (UTC)