Jump to content

Comfort women: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
OpieNn (talk | contribs)
rv More sockpuppets
Line 1: Line 1:
{{chinesename koreanname | tradchi=慰安婦 | simpchi=慰安妇 | py=Wèiān Fù | wg=Wei-An Fu | hangul=위안부 | hanja=慰安婦 | rr=wianbu | mr=wianbu}}
{{chinesename koreanname | tradchi=慰安婦 | simpchi=慰安妇 | py=Wèiān Fù | wg=Wei-An Fu | hangul=위안부 | hanja=慰安婦 | rr=wianbu | mr=wianbu}}


{{nihongo|'''Comfort women'''|[[Japanese language|Japanese]]: 慰安婦|ianfu}} is a [[euphemism]] for the women from Japan, Korea, and other Asian countries who served as state-regulated prostitutes in the [[Empire of Japan|Japanese]] army's brothels during [[World War II]]. A less
{{nihongo|'''Comfort women'''|[[Japanese language|Japanese]]: 慰安婦|ianfu}} or {{nihongo|'''military comfort women'''|[[Japanese language|Japanese]]: 従軍慰安婦|jūgun-ianfu}} is a [[euphemism]] for some 200,000 women who served in the [[Empire of Japan|Japanese]] army's brothels during [[World War II]]. The majority of them were from [[Korea]], as well as [[China]] and other occupied territories, recruited by force or deception to serve as sex slaves. <ref>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/06/world/asia/06japan.html</ref><ref>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6411471.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6431011.stm</ref>
known use of this word is to mean prostitutes who worked for
Recreation and Amusement Association (RAA) in Japan during American
occupation <ref>Yoshimi, Yoshiaki ''Comfort Women: Sexual Slavery in the Japanese Military During World War II'', Columbia University Press,
2001.ISBN 0-231-12032-X.</ref>. RAA was established initially in Tokyo
on August 28, 1945 by
local prostitution industry with support from Japanese government
and police with the aim to prevent sexual crimes by American soldiers,
which virtually failed in its mission allowing many rape and sexual
abuse incidents to happen during the occupation. This page mainly
describes the first more common use of the word.


There is still a controversy about the number and nature of the Ianfu among historians. Some insists that the Japanese Army was directly or indirectly involved in coercing, deceiving, luring young women throughout Japan’s Asian colonies and occupied territories, although he acknowledges that there is no evidence that the Army kidnapped them.<ref>Yoshimi, ibid.</ref> Other says that the Ianfu were recruited by the agents contracted with the Army, that they were paid much higher than soldiers, and that there was no abduction by the Army.<ref>Hata, Ikuhiko, <i>Ianfu to senjo no sei</i> (Comfort women and the sex in the battlefield) Shinchosha, ISBN 4106005654 (in Japanese)</ref>
Japanese historians, using the diaries and testimony of military officials as well as official documents from the United States and other countries, have been able to show that the military was directly or indirectly involved in coercing, deceiving, luring and sometimes kidnapping young women throughout Japan’s Asian colonies and occupied territories.[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/world/asia/08japan.html] Accounts of abuse by the military including the kidnapping of women and girls for use in the brothels have been backed up by witnesses and victims, as well as by former Japanese soldiers. <ref>http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/japanese-pm-dashes-sex-slaves-hope-of-apology/2007/03/05/1172943356992.html</ref>
Many victims say they were kidnapped and forced into sexual slavery by Japanese troops, and historians have said evidence unearthed in Japanese documents in 1992 showed that military authorities had a direct role in working with contractors to forcibly procure women for the brothels.<ref>http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/asiapcf/03/03/sex.slaves.ap/index.html?eref=rss_world</ref>


[[Image:Chinese girl from one of the Japanese Army's 'comfort battalions'.jpg|thumb|280px|[[Rangoon]], [[Myanmar|Burma]]. August 8, 1945. An [[Chinese diaspora|ethnic Chinese]] woman who was in one of the [[Imperial Japanese Army]]'s "comfort battalions" is interviewed by an [[Allies of World War II|Allied]] officer.]]
[[Image:Chinese girl from one of the Japanese Army's 'comfort battalions'.jpg|thumb|280px|[[Rangoon]], [[Myanmar|Burma]]. August 8, 1945. An [[Chinese diaspora|ethnic Chinese]] woman who was in one of the [[Imperial Japanese Army]]'s "comfort battalions" is interviewed by an [[Allies of World War II|Allied]] officer.]]
Line 19: Line 10:
==Number of comfort women==
==Number of comfort women==


Estimates vary from 50,000 to 300,000, but most sources indicate about 200,000 young women were recruited to serve in Japanese military brothels. <ref> http://archives.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/east/03/29/japan.comfort.women/index.html http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/10/15/congress_backs_off_of_wartime_japan_rebuke/</ref>
Estimates of the number of women varies greatly, but it is generally recognized that most of them were from Japan and Korea. [[Yoshiaki Yoshimi]] estimates that there were about 2,000 centers where as many as 200,000 Japanese, Chinese, Korean, Filipino, Taiwanese, Burmese, Indonesian, Dutch and Australian women were interned.<ref>Yoshimi, ibid.</ref> [[Ikuhiko Hata]] estimates the number of women working in the licensed pleasure quarter was fewer than 20,000. They were 40% Japanese, 20% Koreans, 10% Chinese, with others making up the remaining 30%. 200,000 might be an overestimation because the total number of government-regulated prostitutes was 170,000 in Japan during the WW2.<ref>Hata, ibid.</ref> Others came from the [[Philippines]], [[Taiwan]], [[Dutch East Indies]], and other Japanese-occupied countries and regions. <ref>http://www.jpri.org/publications/workingpapers/wp77.html</ref>

It is generally recognized that most of them were from Korea. <ref>* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/world/asia-pacific/1061599.stm BBC article] "An estimated 200,000 to 300,000 women across Asia, predominantly Korean and Chinese, are believed to have been forced to work as sex slaves in Japanese military brothels"
* [http://mdn.mainichi-msn.co.jp/national/news/20070306p2a00m0na001000c.html Mainichi Daily News article] "Historians say thousands of women -- as many as 200,000 by some accounts -- mostly from Korea, China and Japan worked in the Japanese military brothels"
* [http://research.unc.edu/endeavors/win97/comfort.html University of Carolina publication:]"A majority of the 80,000 to 200,000 comfort women were from Korea, though others were recruited or recruited from China, the Phillipines, Burma, and Indonesia. Some Japanese women who worked as prostitutes before the war also became comfort women."
* [http://www.apublicbetrayed.com/case_studies/case_study5.htm A Public Betrayed]"Approximately 80 percent of the sex slaves were Korean;"
* [http://www.jpri.org/publications/workingpapers/wp77.html Japan Policy Research Institute publication] "Estimates of the number of comfort women range between 50,000 and 200,000. It is believed that most were Korean."</ref> <ref>However, according to [[Kanto Gakuin University]] professor [[Hirofumi Hayashi]], the majority of the women were from [[Japan]], [[Korea]], and [[China]]. [http://www.jpri.org/publications/workingpapers/wp77.html] [http://hnn.us/articles/13533.html History News Network] [http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=10155 ZNet] Chuo University professor [[Yoshiaki Yoshimi]] states there were about 2,000 centers where as many as 200,000 Japanese, Chinese, Korean, Filipino, Taiwanese, Burmese, Indonesian, Dutch and Australian women were interned. See Yoshimi, Comfort Women : Sexual Slavery in the Japanese Military during World War II, Columbia University press, 2002. Nihon University professor [[Ikuhiko Hata]] estimated the number of women working in the licensed pleasure quarter was fewer than 20,000. They were 40% Japanese, 20% Koreans, 10% Chinese, with others making up the remaining 30%. 200,000 might be an overestimation because the total number of government-regulated prostitutes was 170,000 in Japan during the WW2. See Hata, Ikuhiko, <i>Ianfu to senjo no sei</i> (Comfort women and the sex in the battlefield) Shinchosha, ISBN 4106005654 (in Japanese)</ref>

Others came from the [[Philippines]], [[Taiwan]], [[Dutch East Indies]], and other Japanese-occupied countries and regions. <ref>http://www.jpri.org/publications/workingpapers/wp77.html</ref>


==Establishment of comfort women system==
==Establishment of comfort women system==
===Japanese military prostitution===
===Japanese military prostitution===
Given the well-organized and open nature of prostitution in Japan, it was seen as logical that there should be organized prostitution to serve the Japanese Armed Forces.<ref>George Hicks, "The Comfort Women". Allen & Unwin ISBN: 1863737278</ref> Japanese authorities hoped that by providing easily accessible prostitutes, the morale and ultimately the military effectiveness of Japanese soldiers would be improved. Also, by institutionalizing brothels and placing them under official scrutiny, the government hoped to control the spread of [[Sexually transmitted infection|STD]]s.
Given the well-organized and open nature of prostitution in Japan, it was seen as logical that there should be organized prostitution to serve the Japanese Armed Forces.<ref>George Hicks, "The Comfort Women". Allen & Unwin ISBN: 1863737278</ref> Japanese authorities hoped that by providing easily accessible prostitutes. the morale and ultimately the military effectiveness of Japanese soldiers would be improved. Also, by institutionalizing brothels and placing them under official scrutiny, the government hoped to control the spread of [[Sexually transmitted infection|STD]]s.


===Recruitment===
===Recruitment===
Line 33: Line 32:
As a victim of the incident, Jan Ruff-O'Hearn testimonied to the U.S. House of Congress, "Many stories have been told about the horrors, brutalities, suffering and starvation of Dutch women in Japanese prison camps. But one story was never told, the most shameful story of the worst human rights abuse committed by the Japanese during World War II: The story of the “Comfort Women”, the jugun ianfu, and how these women were forcibly seized against their will, to provide sexual services for the Japanese Imperial Army. In the so-called “Comfort Station” I was systematically beaten and raped day and night. Even the Japanese doctor raped me each time he visited the brothel to examine us for veneral disease." [http://foreignaffairs.house.gov/110/ohe021507.htm][http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/world/asia/08japan.html]
As a victim of the incident, Jan Ruff-O'Hearn testimonied to the U.S. House of Congress, "Many stories have been told about the horrors, brutalities, suffering and starvation of Dutch women in Japanese prison camps. But one story was never told, the most shameful story of the worst human rights abuse committed by the Japanese during World War II: The story of the “Comfort Women”, the jugun ianfu, and how these women were forcibly seized against their will, to provide sexual services for the Japanese Imperial Army. In the so-called “Comfort Station” I was systematically beaten and raped day and night. Even the Japanese doctor raped me each time he visited the brothel to examine us for veneral disease." [http://foreignaffairs.house.gov/110/ohe021507.htm][http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/world/asia/08japan.html]


According to a veteran showa soldier Yasuji Kaneko "The women cried out, but it didn't matter to us whether the women lived or died. We were the emperor'soldiers. Whether in military brothels or in the villages, we raped without reluctances."[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/01/AR2007030100578.html] But this trial was a mock court that convicted the dead man [[Hirohito]] without defense attorney, and Kaneko is notorious for his dubious testimony about spreading poison gas at the [[Unit 731]], murder and rape at [[Nanking massacre]], and other criminal activities as a soldier of the Army.
According to veteran showa soldier Yasuji Kaneko "The women cried out, but it didn't matter to us whether the women lived or died. We were the emperor'soldiers. Whether in military brothels or in the villages, we raped without reluctances." <ref>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/01/AR2007030100578.html </ref> Beatings and physical torture were said to be not uncommon. <ref>http://foreignaffairs.house.gov/110/ohe021507.htm statement of Jan Ruff O'Herne, 15 February 2007, Subcommitte on Asia, Pacific and the Global Environnement, Committe on Foreign Affairs, U.S. House of representatives. Access date : 7 March 2007</ref>


Ten Dutch women were taken by force from prison camps in Java by officers of the Japanese Imperial Army to become forced sex slaves in February 1944. They were systematically beaten and raped day and night in so called "Comfort Station". Even the Japanese doctor visiting the brothel "Comfort Station" to examine for veneral disease participated in the rape. [http://foreignaffairs.house.gov/110/ohe021507.htm][http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/world/asia/08japan.html]
Ten Dutch women were taken by force from prison camps in Java by officers of the Japanese Imperial Army to become forced sex slaves in February 1944. They were systematically beaten and raped day and night in so called "Comfort Station". Even the Japanese doctor visiting the brothel "Comfort Station" to examine for veneral disease participated in the rape. [http://foreignaffairs.house.gov/110/ohe021507.htm][http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/world/asia/08japan.html]
Although they were returned to the prison camps within three months upon protest of the Dutch prisoners against the Imperial Army, the officers were not punished by Japanese authorities until the end of the war.[http://www.awf.or.jp/program/pdf/p107_141.pdf] After the end of the war 11 Japanese officers were declared guilty with one sentenced to death by the Batavia War Criminal Court.[http://www.awf.or.jp/program/pdf/p107_141.pdf] It decided that the case was not crime organized by the Army and that the ones who raped violated the Army’s order to hire only voluntary women.[http://www.awf.or.jp/program/pdf/p107_141.pdf]
Although they were returned to the prison camps within three months upon protest of the Dutch prisoners against the Imperial Army, the officers were not punished by Japanese authorities until the end of the war.[http://www.awf.or.jp/program/pdf/p107_141.pdf] After the end of the war 11 Japanese officers were declared guilty with one sentenced to death by the Batavia War Criminal Court.[http://www.awf.or.jp/program/pdf/p107_141.pdf] It decided that the case was not crime organized by the Army and that the ones who raped violated the Army’s order to hire only voluntary women.[http://www.awf.or.jp/program/pdf/p107_141.pdf]

===Documents proving the business practices===
Prof. Hayashi's article presents a typical document about the Ianfu. According to him, "Although Japanese military comfort stations were used predominantly by military personnel, they were by no means the only people to frequent these facilities."[http://www.japanfocus.org/products/details/2332] The document says <blockquote>While comfort stations are in principle for the use of Japanese military personnel and civilian army employees, Japanese residents of Mandalay are, for the time being, permitted to visit these stations after 24:30 as long as it causes no hindrance to use by military personnel and civilian employees, and provided that certain rules are strictly observed. Entry is strictly forbidden before 24:30.<ul><li type=a>There must be no interference with the recreation of military personnel and civilian army employees.<li>The rules must be obeyed and public morals upheld.<li>Prior booking before the time of arrival is strictly forbidden.<li>Fees are according to officers’ rates.<li>Anyone violating one of the above rules will be permanently barred.</blockquote>As displayed in the pictures below, the women were recruited with the ad saying "Wanted! Ianfu. The wage is more than 300 yen per month". This wage is twenty times more than average soldiers.


==History of the controversy==
==History of the controversy==
===Yoshida's confession and its refutation===
===Yoshida and Hata===
In 1983, [[Seiji Yoshida]] published ''Watashino sensō hanzai - Chōsenjin Kyōsei Renkō'' (''My War Crimes: The Impressment of Koreans''), in which the author confesses to forcibly procuring women from [[Jeju Island]] in Korea under the direct order from the Japanese military. In 1991, ''[[Asahi Shimbun]]'', one of the major newspapers of Japan, ran a series on comfort women for a year. This is often regarded as the trigger of the on-going controversy over comfort women in Japan. In this series the ''Asahi Shimbun'' repeatedly published excerpts of his book. Consequently, it was regarded as evidence of "forced comfort women" and cited in the U.N. report by Dr. [[Radhika Coomaraswamy]] as well.
In 1983, [[Seiji Yoshida]] published ''Watashino sensō hanzai - Chōsenjin Kyōsei Renkō'' (''My War Crimes: The Impressment of Koreans''), in which the author confesses to forcibly procuring women from [[Jeju Island]] in Korea under the direct order from the Japanese military. In 1991, ''[[Asahi Shimbun]]'', one of the major newspapers of Japan, ran a series on comfort women for a year. This is often regarded as the trigger of the on-going controversy over comfort women in Japan. In this series the ''Asahi Shimbun'' repeatedly published excerpts of his book. Consequently, it was regarded as evidence of "forced comfort women" and cited in the U.N. report by Dr. [[Radhika Coomaraswamy]] as well.


But some people, including a reporter of Korean newspaper "The Jeju Times", doubted Yoshida's "confession" because nobody other than him told of such crimes. When Prof. Ikuhiko Hata revisited the villages in South Korea where Yoshida claimed he had abducted many women, nobody confirmed Yoshida's confession and the situation was contradictory to his confession. When Hata questioned these problems to Yoshida, he admitted that his confession was not a true story.<ref>Hata, ibid.</ref> Since then nobody quotes Yoshida's book as evidence.
But some people doubted Yoshida's "confession" because nobody other than him told of such crimes. When Prof. Ikuhiko Hata revisited the villages in South Korea where Yoshida claimed he had abducted many women, nobody confirmed Yoshida's confession and the situation was contradictory to his confession. When Hata questioned these problems to Yoshida, he admitted that his confession was not a true story.<ref>Hata, ibid.</ref> Since then nobody quotes Yoshida's book as evidence.

When Yoshida admitted his confession was a "novel" in 1996, there were no other evidences that prove the abduction of women by the Army. Former Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary, Nobuo Ishihara, who collected the documents for the apology, admitted that there was no official document of Army that coerced the women into brothels but that [[Kiichi Miyazawa]], then Prime Minister, decided to apologize as a political compromise with Korean government.[http://abirur.iza.ne.jp/blog/entry/30961/]


===Kono statement===
Initially the Japanese government denied any official connection to the wartime brothels; in June 1990, the Japanese government declared that all brothels were run by private contractors. In 1990, the Korean Council for Women Drafted for Military Sexual Slavery filed suit, demanding compensation. Several surviving comfort women also independently filed suit in the [[Tokyo]] [[District Court]]. The court rejected these claims on grounds such as statute of limitations, the immunity of the State at the time of the act concerned, and non-subjectivity of the individual of international law.[http://www1.jca.apc.org/vaww-net-japan/english/sexualslavery/courtcase.html].
Initially the Japanese government denied any official connection to the wartime brothels; in June 1990, the Japanese government declared that all brothels were run by private contractors. In 1990, the Korean Council for Women Drafted for Military Sexual Slavery filed suit, demanding compensation. Several surviving comfort women also independently filed suit in the [[Tokyo]] [[District Court]]. The court rejected these claims on grounds such as statute of limitations, the immunity of the State at the time of the act concerned, and non-subjectivity of the individual of international law.[http://www1.jca.apc.org/vaww-net-japan/english/sexualslavery/courtcase.html].


===Kato statement===
However, in 1992, the historian [[Yoshiaki Yoshimi]] discovered incriminating documents in the archives of Japan's [[Japan Defense Agency|Defense Agency]] indicating that the military was directly involved in running the brothels (by, for example, selecting the agents who recruited). <ref>Yoshimi, ibid.</ref> When Yoshimi's findings were published in the Japanese media on January 12, 1993, they caused a sensation and forced the government, represented by Chief Cabinet Secretary, [[Koichi Kato]], to acknowledge some of the facts the same day. On January 17, Prime minister [[Kiichi Miyazawa]] presented formal apologies for the suffering of the victims during a trip to South Korea.
However, in 1992, the historian [[Yoshiaki Yoshimi]] discovered incriminating documents in the archives of Japan's [[Japan Defense Agency|Defense Agency]] indicating that the military was directly involved in running the brothels (by, for example, selecting the agents who recruited). <ref>Yoshimi, ibid.</ref> When Yoshimi's findings were published in the Japanese media on January 12, 1993, they caused a sensation and forced the government, represented by Chief Cabinet Secretary, [[Koichi Kato]], to acknowledge some of the facts the same day. On January 17, Prime minister [[Kiichi Miyazawa]] presented formal apologies for the suffering of the victims during a trip to South Korea.


Line 60: Line 54:


===U.S. Congressional debate===
===U.S. Congressional debate===
In 2007 the problem occurred because of the resolution by assembly member of the American House of Representatives.[http://www.thomas.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.RES.121:] In the resolution to Japan that they prepared says "Admit young women to have been changed to the sex slave compulsorily", "Educate over the generation in the future", and "Prohibit and suppress an opposite insistence". Japanese Minister of Foreign Affairs [[Taro Aso]] dismissed it "It is extremely regrettable and definitely not based on facts" [http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/japan-dismisses-criticism-over-use-of-sex-slaves/2007/02/19/1171733684559.html]
In 2007 the problem occurred because of the resolution by assembly member HONDA of the American House of Representatives . In the resolution to Japan that they prepared, it was , saying that "Admit young women to have been changed to the sex slave compulsorily", "Educate over the generation in the future", and "Prohibit and suppress an opposite insistence".


===Abe controversy===
===Abe controversy===
In 1997, [[Shinzo Abe]], then as a member of [[House of Representatives of Japan|House of Representatives]], demanded the government to revise the apology because its ground was overturned by the author, Yoshida.[http://kokkai.ndl.go.jp/SENTAKU/syugiin/140/0414/14005270414002c.html] On 2 March 2007, Abe commented "The fact is, there is no evidence to prove there was coercion of the Army to abduct women." Before he spoke, a group of Liberal Democratic Party lawmakers also sought to revise Yohei Kono's 1993 apology to former comfort women.[http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/editorial/20070307TDY04005.htm][http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Japan-Sex-Slaves.html] Abe's statement provoked a negative reaction from Asian and Western countries. The New York Times editorial said “These were not commercial brothels. Force, explicit and implicit, was used in recruiting these women.”[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/06/opinion/06tues3.html] Aso said there was misunderstanding among American media. Abe said on 11 March 2007 that he would succeed [[Yohei Kono]]'s 1993 apology to former comfort women.[http://www.jiji.com/jc/c?g=pol_30&k=2007031100047]
On 2 March 2007, the issue was raised again by Japanese prime minister [[Shinzo Abe]], in which he denied that the military had forced women into [[sexual slavery]] during World War II in an orchestrated way. He stated, "The fact is, there is no evidence to prove there was coercion." Before he spoke, a group of Liberal Democratic Party lawmakers also sought to revise Yohei Kono's 1993 apology to former comfort women.[http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/editorial/20070307TDY04005.htm][http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Japan-Sex-Slaves.html] Abe's statement provoked a negative reaction from Asian and Western countries. The New York Times editorial said “These were not commercial brothels. Force, explicit and implicit, was used in recruiting these women.”[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/06/opinion/06tues3.html]


[[Image:COMFORTAdd.GIF|thumb|250px|Fig.1. Recruitment advertising for Comfort women in newspapers in Korea.<br>(Right: Keijō nippō, July 26, 1944) "Comfort Women Wanted, Urgent!" Age: 17-30. Place of Employment: entertainment for non-frontline unit [obscured]. Monthly Salary: More than 300 yen. (You can receive an advance on salary up to 3000 yen.) From 8 a.m. to 10 p.m., ...[obscured]. [Contact at] [Address(unreadable)] Imai [Employment] Registry]]
[[Image:COMFORTAdd.GIF|thumb|250px|Fig.1. Recruitment advertising for Comfort women in newspapers in Korea.<br>(Right: Keijō nippō, July 26, 1944) "Comfort Women Wanted, Urgent!" Age: 17-30. Place of Employment: entertainment for non-frontline unit [obscured]. Monthly Salary: More than 300 yen. (You can receive an advance on salary up to 3000 yen.) From 8 a.m. to 10 p.m., ...[obscured]. [Contact at] [Address(unreadable)] Imai [Employment] Registry]]
Line 83: Line 77:
Some recent work on the comfort women issue include:
Some recent work on the comfort women issue include:
* Tanaka, Yuki ''Japan's Comfort Women: Sexual Slavery and Prostitution During World War II and the US Occupation'', London, Routledge: 2002. ISBN 0-415-19401-6.
* Tanaka, Yuki ''Japan's Comfort Women: Sexual Slavery and Prostitution During World War II and the US Occupation'', London, Routledge: 2002. ISBN 0-415-19401-6.
* Yoshimi, Yoshiaki ''Comfort Women: Sexual Slavery in the Japanese Military During World War II'', Columbia University Press, 2001. (also includes descriptions about RAA) ISBN 0-231-12032-X.
* Yoshimi, Yoshiaki ''Comfort Women: Sexual Slavery in the Japanese Military During World War II'', Columbia University Press, 2001. (mentioned RAA too) ISBN 0-231-12032-X.
* Molasky, Michael S. ''American Occupation of Japan and Okinawa'', Routledge, 1999. ISBN 0-415-19194-7, ISBN 0-415-26044-2.
* Molasky, Michael S. ''American Occupation of Japan and Okinawa'', Routledge, 1999. ISBN 0-415-19194-7, ISBN 0-415-26044-2.
*D. Kim-Gibson, ''Silence Broken: Korean Comfort Women'', 1999. ISBN 0-931209-88-9.
*D. Kim-Gibson, ''Silence Broken: Korean Comfort Women'', 1999. ISBN 0-931209-88-9.

Revision as of 07:28, 14 March 2007

Template:Chinesename koreanname

Comfort women (Japanese: 慰安婦, ianfu) or military comfort women (Japanese: 従軍慰安婦, jūgun-ianfu) is a euphemism for some 200,000 women who served in the Japanese army's brothels during World War II. The majority of them were from Korea, as well as China and other occupied territories, recruited by force or deception to serve as sex slaves. [1][2]

Japanese historians, using the diaries and testimony of military officials as well as official documents from the United States and other countries, have been able to show that the military was directly or indirectly involved in coercing, deceiving, luring and sometimes kidnapping young women throughout Japan’s Asian colonies and occupied territories.[2] Accounts of abuse by the military — including the kidnapping of women and girls for use in the brothels — have been backed up by witnesses and victims, as well as by former Japanese soldiers. [3] Many victims say they were kidnapped and forced into sexual slavery by Japanese troops, and historians have said evidence unearthed in Japanese documents in 1992 showed that military authorities had a direct role in working with contractors to forcibly procure women for the brothels.[4]

Rangoon, Burma. August 8, 1945. An ethnic Chinese woman who was in one of the Imperial Japanese Army's "comfort battalions" is interviewed by an Allied officer.

Number of comfort women

Estimates vary from 50,000 to 300,000, but most sources indicate about 200,000 young women were recruited to serve in Japanese military brothels. [5]

It is generally recognized that most of them were from Korea. [6] [7]

Others came from the Philippines, Taiwan, Dutch East Indies, and other Japanese-occupied countries and regions. [8]

Establishment of comfort women system

Japanese military prostitution

Given the well-organized and open nature of prostitution in Japan, it was seen as logical that there should be organized prostitution to serve the Japanese Armed Forces.[9] Japanese authorities hoped that by providing easily accessible prostitutes. the morale and ultimately the military effectiveness of Japanese soldiers would be improved. Also, by institutionalizing brothels and placing them under official scrutiny, the government hoped to control the spread of STDs.

Recruitment

In the early stages of the war, Japanese authorities recruited prostitutes through conventional means. Middlemen advertised in newspapers circulating in Japan and the Japanese colonies of Korea, Taiwan, Manchukuo, and mainland China. Many who answered the advertisements were already prostitutes and offered their services voluntarily. Others were sold by their families to the military due to economic hardship. However, these sources soon dried up, especially from Japan. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs resisted further issuance of travel visas for Japanese prostitutes, feeling it tarnished the image of the Japanese Empire. The military turned to acquiring comfort women outside mainland Japan, especially from Korea and occupied China. Many women were tricked or defrauded into joining the military brothels. The US Army Force Office report of interview with 20 comfort women in Burma found that the girls were induced by the offer of plenty of money, an opportunity to pay off the family debts, and on the basis of these false representations many girls enlisted for overseas duty and were rewarded with advance of a few hundred yen. [3]

In urban areas, conventional advertising through middlemen was used alongside kidnapping. However, along the front lines, especially in the countryside where middlemen were rare, the military often directly demanded that local leaders procure women for the brothels. This situation became worse as the war progressed. Under the strain of the war effort, the military became unable to provide enough supplies to Japanese units; in response, the units made up the difference by demanding or looting supplies from the locals. Moreover, when the locals, especially Chinese, were considered hostile, Japanese soldiers carried out the "Three Alls Policy", which included indiscriminately kidnapping and raping local civilians.[10][11][12]

Treatment of comfort women

As a victim of the incident, Jan Ruff-O'Hearn testimonied to the U.S. House of Congress, "Many stories have been told about the horrors, brutalities, suffering and starvation of Dutch women in Japanese prison camps. But one story was never told, the most shameful story of the worst human rights abuse committed by the Japanese during World War II: The story of the “Comfort Women”, the jugun ianfu, and how these women were forcibly seized against their will, to provide sexual services for the Japanese Imperial Army. In the so-called “Comfort Station” I was systematically beaten and raped day and night. Even the Japanese doctor raped me each time he visited the brothel to examine us for veneral disease." [4][5]

According to veteran showa soldier Yasuji Kaneko "The women cried out, but it didn't matter to us whether the women lived or died. We were the emperor'soldiers. Whether in military brothels or in the villages, we raped without reluctances." [13] Beatings and physical torture were said to be not uncommon. [14]

Ten Dutch women were taken by force from prison camps in Java by officers of the Japanese Imperial Army to become forced sex slaves in February 1944. They were systematically beaten and raped day and night in so called "Comfort Station". Even the Japanese doctor visiting the brothel "Comfort Station" to examine for veneral disease participated in the rape. [6][7] Although they were returned to the prison camps within three months upon protest of the Dutch prisoners against the Imperial Army, the officers were not punished by Japanese authorities until the end of the war.[8] After the end of the war 11 Japanese officers were declared guilty with one sentenced to death by the Batavia War Criminal Court.[9] It decided that the case was not crime organized by the Army and that the ones who raped violated the Army’s order to hire only voluntary women.[10]

History of the controversy

Yoshida and Hata

In 1983, Seiji Yoshida published Watashino sensō hanzai - Chōsenjin Kyōsei Renkō (My War Crimes: The Impressment of Koreans), in which the author confesses to forcibly procuring women from Jeju Island in Korea under the direct order from the Japanese military. In 1991, Asahi Shimbun, one of the major newspapers of Japan, ran a series on comfort women for a year. This is often regarded as the trigger of the on-going controversy over comfort women in Japan. In this series the Asahi Shimbun repeatedly published excerpts of his book. Consequently, it was regarded as evidence of "forced comfort women" and cited in the U.N. report by Dr. Radhika Coomaraswamy as well.

But some people doubted Yoshida's "confession" because nobody other than him told of such crimes. When Prof. Ikuhiko Hata revisited the villages in South Korea where Yoshida claimed he had abducted many women, nobody confirmed Yoshida's confession and the situation was contradictory to his confession. When Hata questioned these problems to Yoshida, he admitted that his confession was not a true story.[15] Since then nobody quotes Yoshida's book as evidence.

Initially the Japanese government denied any official connection to the wartime brothels; in June 1990, the Japanese government declared that all brothels were run by private contractors. In 1990, the Korean Council for Women Drafted for Military Sexual Slavery filed suit, demanding compensation. Several surviving comfort women also independently filed suit in the Tokyo District Court. The court rejected these claims on grounds such as statute of limitations, the immunity of the State at the time of the act concerned, and non-subjectivity of the individual of international law.[11].

Kato statement

However, in 1992, the historian Yoshiaki Yoshimi discovered incriminating documents in the archives of Japan's Defense Agency indicating that the military was directly involved in running the brothels (by, for example, selecting the agents who recruited). [16] When Yoshimi's findings were published in the Japanese media on January 12, 1993, they caused a sensation and forced the government, represented by Chief Cabinet Secretary, Koichi Kato, to acknowledge some of the facts the same day. On January 17, Prime minister Kiichi Miyazawa presented formal apologies for the suffering of the victims during a trip to South Korea.

On August 4 in 1993, Yohei Kono, the Chief Cabinet Secretary of the Japanese government, issued a statement by which it recognized that "Comfort stations were operated in response to the request of the military of the day", that "The Japanese military was directly or indirectly involved in the establishment and management of the comfort stations and the transfer of the women" and that the women "were recruited in many cases against their own will through coaxing and coercion". The Government of Japan "sincerely apologizes and (expresses its] remorse to all those, irrespective of place of origin, who suffered immeasurable pain and incurable psychological wounds". In that statement, the Government of Japan expressed its "firm determination never to repeat the same mistake and that they would engrave such issue. through the study and teaching of history".[12]

Asia Women's Fund

In 1995, Japan set up an "Asia Women's Fund" for atonement in the form of material compensation and to provide each surviving comfort woman with a signed apology from the prime minister, stating "As Prime Minister of Japan, I thus extend anew my most sincere apologies and remorse to all the women who underwent immeasurable and painful experiences and suffered incurable physical and psychological wounds as comfort women."[13] The fund is funded by private donations and not government money, and has been criticized as a way to avoid admitting government abuse.[14][15] But because of the unofficial nature of the fund, many comfort women have rejected these payments and continue to seek an official apology and compensation.[16]

U.S. Congressional debate

In 2007 the problem occurred because of the resolution by assembly member HONDA of the American House of Representatives . In the resolution to Japan that they prepared, it was , saying that "Admit young women to have been changed to the sex slave compulsorily", "Educate over the generation in the future", and "Prohibit and suppress an opposite insistence".

Abe controversy

On 2 March 2007, the issue was raised again by Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe, in which he denied that the military had forced women into sexual slavery during World War II in an orchestrated way. He stated, "The fact is, there is no evidence to prove there was coercion." Before he spoke, a group of Liberal Democratic Party lawmakers also sought to revise Yohei Kono's 1993 apology to former comfort women.[17][18] Abe's statement provoked a negative reaction from Asian and Western countries. The New York Times editorial said “These were not commercial brothels. Force, explicit and implicit, was used in recruiting these women.”[19]

Fig.1. Recruitment advertising for Comfort women in newspapers in Korea.
(Right: Keijō nippō, July 26, 1944) "Comfort Women Wanted, Urgent!" Age: 17-30. Place of Employment: entertainment for non-frontline unit [obscured]. Monthly Salary: More than 300 yen. (You can receive an advance on salary up to 3000 yen.) From 8 a.m. to 10 p.m., ...[obscured]. [Contact at] [Address(unreadable)] Imai [Employment] Registry

See also

References

Some recent work on the comfort women issue include:

  • Tanaka, Yuki Japan's Comfort Women: Sexual Slavery and Prostitution During World War II and the US Occupation, London, Routledge: 2002. ISBN 0-415-19401-6.
  • Yoshimi, Yoshiaki Comfort Women: Sexual Slavery in the Japanese Military During World War II, Columbia University Press, 2001. (mentioned RAA too) ISBN 0-231-12032-X.
  • Molasky, Michael S. American Occupation of Japan and Okinawa, Routledge, 1999. ISBN 0-415-19194-7, ISBN 0-415-26044-2.
  • D. Kim-Gibson, Silence Broken: Korean Comfort Women, 1999. ISBN 0-931209-88-9.
  • Hicks, George L. The Comfort Women: Japan's Brutal Regime of Enforced Prostitution in the Second World War, 1997. ISBN 0-393-31694-7.
  • Schellstede, Sangmie Choi. Comfort Women Speak: Testimony by Sex Slaves of the Japanese Military, 2000. ISBN 0-8419-1413-3.

A review of the Tanaka text can be found in the academic journal Intersections, Issue 9:

A review of some of these books and a history and historiography of the issue, from a critical viewpoint, can be found in issue 58:2 of Monumenta Nipponica:

  • Wakabayashi, Bob Tadashii "Comfort Women: Beyond Litigious Feminism"

A work of literature on the issue was created by Korean American writer Nora Okja Keller:

  • Nora Okja Keller "Comfort Woman", London, Penguin: 1998. ISBN 0-14-026335-7.

  • Asian Women's Fund web site
  • Comfort-Women.org
  • "The Victims" (from the South Korean Ministry of Gender and Family Equality)
  • Photo gallery at the Seoul Times.
  • A Public Betrayed - How the Japanese Media Betrays its Own People
  • Coop, Stephanie (December 23, 2006). "Sex slave exhibition exposes darkness in East Timor" (Newspaper article). The Japan Times. Retrieved 2006-12-23. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |accessyear=, |coauthors=, and |month= (help)CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  • "Matter concerning recruitment such as martial comfort place employed" (at japanese wikipedia).
  • "慰安婦(comfort woman)" (at japanese wikipedia).

Academic research

Japanese official statements

United States historical documents

Footnotes

  1. ^ http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/06/world/asia/06japan.html
  2. ^ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6411471.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6431011.stm
  3. ^ http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/japanese-pm-dashes-sex-slaves-hope-of-apology/2007/03/05/1172943356992.html
  4. ^ http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/asiapcf/03/03/sex.slaves.ap/index.html?eref=rss_world
  5. ^ http://archives.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/east/03/29/japan.comfort.women/index.html http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/10/15/congress_backs_off_of_wartime_japan_rebuke/
  6. ^ * BBC article "An estimated 200,000 to 300,000 women across Asia, predominantly Korean and Chinese, are believed to have been forced to work as sex slaves in Japanese military brothels"
    • Mainichi Daily News article "Historians say thousands of women -- as many as 200,000 by some accounts -- mostly from Korea, China and Japan worked in the Japanese military brothels"
    • University of Carolina publication:"A majority of the 80,000 to 200,000 comfort women were from Korea, though others were recruited or recruited from China, the Phillipines, Burma, and Indonesia. Some Japanese women who worked as prostitutes before the war also became comfort women."
    • A Public Betrayed"Approximately 80 percent of the sex slaves were Korean;"
    • Japan Policy Research Institute publication "Estimates of the number of comfort women range between 50,000 and 200,000. It is believed that most were Korean."
  7. ^ However, according to Kanto Gakuin University professor Hirofumi Hayashi, the majority of the women were from Japan, Korea, and China. [1] History News Network ZNet Chuo University professor Yoshiaki Yoshimi states there were about 2,000 centers where as many as 200,000 Japanese, Chinese, Korean, Filipino, Taiwanese, Burmese, Indonesian, Dutch and Australian women were interned. See Yoshimi, Comfort Women : Sexual Slavery in the Japanese Military during World War II, Columbia University press, 2002. Nihon University professor Ikuhiko Hata estimated the number of women working in the licensed pleasure quarter was fewer than 20,000. They were 40% Japanese, 20% Koreans, 10% Chinese, with others making up the remaining 30%. 200,000 might be an overestimation because the total number of government-regulated prostitutes was 170,000 in Japan during the WW2. See Hata, Ikuhiko, Ianfu to senjo no sei (Comfort women and the sex in the battlefield) Shinchosha, ISBN 4106005654 (in Japanese)
  8. ^ http://www.jpri.org/publications/workingpapers/wp77.html
  9. ^ George Hicks, "The Comfort Women". Allen & Unwin ISBN: 1863737278
  10. ^ Fujiwara, Akira (藤原彰) The Three Alls Policy and the Northern Chinese Regional Army (「三光作戦」と北支那方面軍), Kikan sensô sekinin kenkyû 20, 1998
  11. ^ Himeta, Mitsuyoshi (姫田光義) Concerning the Three Alls Strategy/Three Alls Policy By the Japanese Forces (日本軍による『三光政策・三光作戦をめぐって』), Iwanami Bukkuretto, 1996
  12. ^ Bix, Herbert P. Hirohito and the Making of Modern Japan, HarperCollins, 2000. ISBN 0-06-019314-X
  13. ^ http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/01/AR2007030100578.html
  14. ^ http://foreignaffairs.house.gov/110/ohe021507.htm statement of Jan Ruff O'Herne, 15 February 2007, Subcommitte on Asia, Pacific and the Global Environnement, Committe on Foreign Affairs, U.S. House of representatives. Access date : 7 March 2007
  15. ^ Hata, ibid.
  16. ^ Yoshimi, ibid.