Jump to content

WSPR (amateur radio software): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 65: Line 65:
In May 2021, Richard Godfrey suggested an examination of historical WSPR data to further define the flight path of [[Malaysian Airlines flight MH370]] on 8 March 2014.<ref name="2021-05-05_ABC">[https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-05/malaysia-airlines-mh370-series-of-turns-before-disappearing/100116446 Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 left 'false trails' before disappearing, new research suggests], Anne Barker, [[ABC News Online]], 2021-05-05</ref> In November 2021, Godfrey reported that this analysis indicated that the aircraft flew in circles for around 22 minutes in an area 150 nautical miles from the coast of [[Sumatra]] before vanishing, later proposing a search area centered around {{coord|33.177|S|95.3|E}}.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Browning|first=Simon|date=3 December 2021|title=MH370: Could missing Malaysian Airlines plane finally be found?|work=[[BBC]]|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/business-59517821|access-date=27 January 2022}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Thomas |first=Geoffrey |date=2021-09-07 |title=Breakthrough technology giving real hope for a new search for MH370 |url=https://www.airlineratings.com/news/breakthrough-technology-giving-real-hope-for-a-new-search-for-mh370/ |access-date=2023-05-16 |website=Airline Ratings |language=en-AU}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Thomas |first=Geoffrey |date=2022-06-25 |title=MH370 TRACKING EXPERT DEMONSTRATES HIS TECHNOLOGY ONCE AGAIN |url=https://www.airlineratings.com/news/industry-news/mh370-tracking-expert-demonstrates-technology/ |access-date=2023-05-16 |website=Airline Ratings |language=en-AU}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Thomas |first=Geoffrey |date=2022-10-28 |title=MH370: New Research Paper Confirms WSPRnet Tracking Technology |url=https://www.airlineratings.com/news/mh370-new-research-paper-confirms-wsprnet-tracking-technology/ |access-date=2023-05-16 |website=Airline Ratings |language=en-AU}}</ref>
In May 2021, Richard Godfrey suggested an examination of historical WSPR data to further define the flight path of [[Malaysian Airlines flight MH370]] on 8 March 2014.<ref name="2021-05-05_ABC">[https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-05-05/malaysia-airlines-mh370-series-of-turns-before-disappearing/100116446 Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 left 'false trails' before disappearing, new research suggests], Anne Barker, [[ABC News Online]], 2021-05-05</ref> In November 2021, Godfrey reported that this analysis indicated that the aircraft flew in circles for around 22 minutes in an area 150 nautical miles from the coast of [[Sumatra]] before vanishing, later proposing a search area centered around {{coord|33.177|S|95.3|E}}.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Browning|first=Simon|date=3 December 2021|title=MH370: Could missing Malaysian Airlines plane finally be found?|work=[[BBC]]|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/business-59517821|access-date=27 January 2022}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Thomas |first=Geoffrey |date=2021-09-07 |title=Breakthrough technology giving real hope for a new search for MH370 |url=https://www.airlineratings.com/news/breakthrough-technology-giving-real-hope-for-a-new-search-for-mh370/ |access-date=2023-05-16 |website=Airline Ratings |language=en-AU}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Thomas |first=Geoffrey |date=2022-06-25 |title=MH370 TRACKING EXPERT DEMONSTRATES HIS TECHNOLOGY ONCE AGAIN |url=https://www.airlineratings.com/news/industry-news/mh370-tracking-expert-demonstrates-technology/ |access-date=2023-05-16 |website=Airline Ratings |language=en-AU}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Thomas |first=Geoffrey |date=2022-10-28 |title=MH370: New Research Paper Confirms WSPRnet Tracking Technology |url=https://www.airlineratings.com/news/mh370-new-research-paper-confirms-wsprnet-tracking-technology/ |access-date=2023-05-16 |website=Airline Ratings |language=en-AU}}</ref>


The validity of these methods and results is highly controversial.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Thomas |first=Geoffrey |date=2022-11-02 |title=MH370 New Location Critics Sunk |url=https://www.airlineratings.com/news/critics-of-wsprnet-tracking-mh370-been-answered/ |access-date=2023-05-16 |website=Airline Ratings |language=en-AU}}</ref> In February 2022, the [[Australian Transport Safety Bureau]] and [[Geoscience Australia]] confirmed they were reviewing old data related to MH370, following the release of Godfrey's report.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Ransley|first=Ellen|date=16 February 2022|title=New technology could hold key to MH370 disappearance|work=[[News.com.au]]|url=https://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-updates/incidents/new-technology-could-hold-key-to-mh370-disappearance/news-story/cd49b64358cd87b2828fb0b494ec772d|access-date=17 February 2022}}</ref> In April, 2022 the data review concluded "that it is highly unlikely there is an aircraft debris field within the reviewed search area."<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-11-20 |title=MH370 data review joint statement from the Australian Transport Safety Bureau & Geoscience Australia {{!}} ATSB |url=https://www.atsb.gov.au/media/news-items/2022/mh370-data-review |access-date=2023-05-16 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221120160250/https://www.atsb.gov.au/media/news-items/2022/mh370-data-review |archive-date=2022-11-20 }}</ref>
The validity of these methods and results is highly controversial.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Thomas |first=Geoffrey |date=2022-11-02 |title=MH370 New Location Critics Sunk |url=https://www.airlineratings.com/news/critics-of-wsprnet-tracking-mh370-been-answered/ |access-date=2023-05-16 |website=Airline Ratings |language=en-AU}}</ref> In February 2022, the [[Australian Transport Safety Bureau]] and [[Geoscience Australia]] confirmed they were reviewing old data related to MH370, following the release of Godfrey's report.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Ransley|first=Ellen|date=16 February 2022|title=New technology could hold key to MH370 disappearance|work=[[News.com.au]]|url=https://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-updates/incidents/new-technology-could-hold-key-to-mh370-disappearance/news-story/cd49b64358cd87b2828fb0b494ec772d|access-date=17 February 2022}}</ref> In April 2022 the data review concluded "that it is highly unlikely there is an aircraft debris field within the reviewed search area."<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-11-20 |title=MH370 data review joint statement from the Australian Transport Safety Bureau & Geoscience Australia {{!}} ATSB |url=https://www.atsb.gov.au/media/news-items/2022/mh370-data-review |access-date=2023-05-16 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221120160250/https://www.atsb.gov.au/media/news-items/2022/mh370-data-review |archive-date=2022-11-20 }}</ref>


==History==
==History==

Revision as of 07:43, 18 February 2024

WSPR
Developer(s)Joe Taylor, K1JT
Initial release2008
Written inPython (GUI), Fortran, C [1]
Operating systemCross-platform
Available inEnglish, Italian, Spanish, French, German, Japanese, Polish, Portuguese, Russian
TypeAmateur radio and DSP
LicenseGPL
Websitephysics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wspr.html[dead link]

WSPR (pronounced "whisper") is an acronym for Weak Signal Propagation Reporter. It is a protocol, implemented in a computer program, used for weak-signal radio communication between amateur radio operators. The protocol was designed, and a program written initially, by Joe Taylor, K1JT. The software code is now open source and is developed by a small team. The program is designed for sending and receiving low-power transmissions to test propagation paths on the MF and HF bands.

WSPR implements a protocol designed for probing potential propagation paths with low-power transmissions. Transmissions carry a station's callsign, Maidenhead grid locator, and transmitter power in dBm. The program can decode signals with a signal-to-noise ratio as low as −28 dB in a 2500 Hz bandwidth.[2] Stations with internet access can automatically upload their reception reports to a central database called WSPRnet, which includes a mapping facility.

The WSPR Protocol

The type of radio emission is “F1D”, frequency-shift keying. A message contains a station's callsign, Maidenhead grid locator, and transmitter power in dBm.[3] The WSPR protocol compresses the information in the message into 50 bits (binary digits). These are encoded using a convolutional code with constraint length K = 32 and a rate of r = 1⁄2.[3][4] The long constraint length makes undetected decoding errors less probable, at the cost that the highly efficient Viterbi algorithm must be replaced by a simple sequential algorithm for the decoding process.[3]

Protocol specification

The standard message is <callsign> + <4 character locator> + <dBm transmit power>; for example “K1ABC FN20 37” is a signal from station K1ABC in Maidenhead grid cell “FN20”, sending 37 dBm, or about 5.0 W (legal limit for 630 m). Messages with a compound callsign and/or 6 digit locator use a two-transmission sequence. The first transmission carries compound callsign and power level, or standard callsign, 4 digit locator, and power level; the second transmission carries a hashed callsign, 6 digit locator, and power level. Add-on prefixes can be up to three alphanumeric characters; add-on suffixes can be a single letter or one or two digits.

  • Standard message components after lossless compression:
28 bits for callsign,
15 bits for locator,
7 bits for power level,
total: 50 bits.
  • Forward error correction (FEC):
non-recursive convolutional code with constraint length K = 32, rate r = 1⁄2.
  • Number of binary channel symbols:
nsym = (50 + K − 1) × 2 = 162.[3]
  • Keying rate is 12000⁄8192 = 1.4648 baud.
  • Modulation is continuous phase 4 FSK, with 1.4648 Hz tone separation.
An Agilent Modulation Domain Analyzer 53310A showing the narrow band 4-FSK signal produced by a Raspberry Pi.
  • Occupied bandwidth is about 6 Hz
  • Synchronization is via a 162 bit pseudo-random sync vector.
  • Each channel symbol conveys one sync bit (LSB) and one data bit (MSB).
  • Duration of transmission is 162 × 8192⁄12000 = 110.6 s.
  • Transmissions nominally start one second into an even UTC minute: e.g., at hh:00:01, hh:02:01, etc.
  • Minimum S/N for reception is around –34 dB on the WSJT scale (2500 Hz reference bandwidth).

Applications

Raspberry Pi as WSPR transmitter

The protocol was designed to test propagation paths on the LF, MF and HF bands. Also used experimentally at VHF and higher frequencies.

Other applications include antenna testing, frequency stability and frequency accuracy checking.

Usually a WSPR station contains a computer and a transceiver, but it is also possible to build very simple beacon transmitters with little effort.

For example a simple WSPR beacon can be built using the Si 570,[5] or Si 5351.[6] The Raspberry Pi can also be used as WSPR beacon.

Density distribution of WSPR spots, January 2014 vs July 2014, using only most distant reception per spot.

An accurate clock is essential both for transmission and decoding of received signals.

MH370 theory

In May 2021, Richard Godfrey suggested an examination of historical WSPR data to further define the flight path of Malaysian Airlines flight MH370 on 8 March 2014.[7] In November 2021, Godfrey reported that this analysis indicated that the aircraft flew in circles for around 22 minutes in an area 150 nautical miles from the coast of Sumatra before vanishing, later proposing a search area centered around 33°10′37″S 95°18′00″E / 33.177°S 95.3°E / -33.177; 95.3.[8][9][10][11]

The validity of these methods and results is highly controversial.[12] In February 2022, the Australian Transport Safety Bureau and Geoscience Australia confirmed they were reviewing old data related to MH370, following the release of Godfrey's report.[13] In April 2022 the data review concluded "that it is highly unlikely there is an aircraft debris field within the reviewed search area."[14]

History

WSPR was originally released in 2008.

References

  1. ^ "WSJT Program Development Page". physics.princeton.edu.
  2. ^ "WSJT Home Page". physics.princeton.edu.
  3. ^ a b c d Joe Taylor, K1JT: WSPRing Around the World. QST November (2010), p. 30-32.
  4. ^ G4JNT: The WSPR Coding Process: Non-normative specification of WSPR protocol
  5. ^ WSPR Beacon with Si 570 and Atmel AVR http://wsprnet.org/drupal/sites/wsprnet.org/files/si570wspr.pdf
  6. ^ QRSS/WSPR Transmitter Kit https://qrp-labs.com/
  7. ^ Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 left 'false trails' before disappearing, new research suggests, Anne Barker, ABC News Online, 2021-05-05
  8. ^ Browning, Simon (3 December 2021). "MH370: Could missing Malaysian Airlines plane finally be found?". BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2022.
  9. ^ Thomas, Geoffrey (2021-09-07). "Breakthrough technology giving real hope for a new search for MH370". Airline Ratings. Retrieved 2023-05-16.
  10. ^ Thomas, Geoffrey (2022-06-25). "MH370 TRACKING EXPERT DEMONSTRATES HIS TECHNOLOGY ONCE AGAIN". Airline Ratings. Retrieved 2023-05-16.
  11. ^ Thomas, Geoffrey (2022-10-28). "MH370: New Research Paper Confirms WSPRnet Tracking Technology". Airline Ratings. Retrieved 2023-05-16.
  12. ^ Thomas, Geoffrey (2022-11-02). "MH370 New Location Critics Sunk". Airline Ratings. Retrieved 2023-05-16.
  13. ^ Ransley, Ellen (16 February 2022). "New technology could hold key to MH370 disappearance". News.com.au. Retrieved 17 February 2022.
  14. ^ "MH370 data review joint statement from the Australian Transport Safety Bureau & Geoscience Australia | ATSB". 2022-11-20. Archived from the original on 2022-11-20. Retrieved 2023-05-16.

External links

Further reading

GDTAAA WSPRnet MH370 Analysis Flight Path Report (Self-published, Dropbox)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WSPR_(amateur_radio_software)&oldid=1208622927"