Talk:Apple Inc.: Difference between revisions
Undid revision 1229575828 by Skipple (talk) selfrevert |
|||
Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
:::Perhaps we should create a "Criticism" section, with subsections for supply chain practices and environmental impact, which would be short sections pointing to [[Apple supply chain]], [[Environmental impact of Apple]], [[Apple and unions]], [[App Store (Apple)]], and any pages that I've missed, or sections thereof, and redirect [[Criticism of Apple]] there. Either that, or just create that as a "Criticism of Apple" page, again pointing to the pages about said topics. For better or worse, criticism of Apple is scattered across pages about topics on which Apple has received criticism, rather than being combined into a single criticism page. [[User:Guy Harris|Guy Harris]] ([[User talk:Guy Harris|talk]]) 23:34, 15 June 2024 (UTC) |
:::Perhaps we should create a "Criticism" section, with subsections for supply chain practices and environmental impact, which would be short sections pointing to [[Apple supply chain]], [[Environmental impact of Apple]], [[Apple and unions]], [[App Store (Apple)]], and any pages that I've missed, or sections thereof, and redirect [[Criticism of Apple]] there. Either that, or just create that as a "Criticism of Apple" page, again pointing to the pages about said topics. For better or worse, criticism of Apple is scattered across pages about topics on which Apple has received criticism, rather than being combined into a single criticism page. [[User:Guy Harris|Guy Harris]] ([[User talk:Guy Harris|talk]]) 23:34, 15 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
::::I suggest we start by undeleting [[Criticism of Apple Inc.]] As far as I can tell, there was never a deletion discussion. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 14:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC) |
::::I suggest we start by undeleting [[Criticism of Apple Inc.]] As far as I can tell, there was never a deletion discussion. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 14:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::::Unless I'm missing the point you are making, there was [[Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_May_17#Criticism_of_Apple_Inc.|a RfD with the result being delete]]. <span style="font-family:Didot;font-size:90%;">[[User:Skipple|<span style="color: #063891">''' - Skipple'''</span>]] [[User talk:Skipple|<span style="color: #063891">☎</span>]]</span> 15:26, 17 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Semi-protected edit request on 30 April 2024 == |
== Semi-protected edit request on 30 April 2024 == |
Revision as of 15:26, 17 June 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Apple Inc. article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Apple Inc." – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Apple Inc. was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
To-do list for Apple Inc.:
Priority 1 (top)
|
Criticism of Apple missing/lacking?
Is there an equivalent criticism article for Apple, similar to Criticism of Microsoft, Criticism of Netflix, Criticism of Amazon, etc.? The existing Criticism of Apple is simply a redirect to Apple Inc.? GobsPint (talk) 19:02, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Through a series of page moves, the criticism section ended up at Apple supply chain. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- I’ve retargeted the various criticism redirects back there. It seems one person changed all of them. The criticism page was moved to “Practices of Apple Inc.” then to “Apple supply chain”. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- The only comprehensive discussion of criticism I see remaining are in Apple supply chain and that's not, for the most part, direct criticism of Apple. I remember Criticism of Apple Inc./Practices of Apple Inc. had some of this meat but this has been deleted so we can't see exactly what was pared out and by whom. I know there is more about Apple that has received criticism in reliable sources than issues related to supply chain. There is still a lead paragraph that mentions this but not much remaining in the body supporting it especially anti-competitive practices. Can we get some balance back into our coverage please? ~Kvng (talk) 19:13, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- As per Talk:Apple Inc./Archive 10#Redirect to this page goes nowhere, criticism of Apple is now scattered between Environmental impact of Apple and Apple supply chain, neither of which are solely criticism pages. Guy Harris (talk) 22:45, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- Perhaps we should create a "Criticism" section, with subsections for supply chain practices and environmental impact, which would be short sections pointing to Apple supply chain, Environmental impact of Apple, Apple and unions, App Store (Apple), and any pages that I've missed, or sections thereof, and redirect Criticism of Apple there. Either that, or just create that as a "Criticism of Apple" page, again pointing to the pages about said topics. For better or worse, criticism of Apple is scattered across pages about topics on which Apple has received criticism, rather than being combined into a single criticism page. Guy Harris (talk) 23:34, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- I suggest we start by undeleting Criticism of Apple Inc. As far as I can tell, there was never a deletion discussion. ~Kvng (talk) 14:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Perhaps we should create a "Criticism" section, with subsections for supply chain practices and environmental impact, which would be short sections pointing to Apple supply chain, Environmental impact of Apple, Apple and unions, App Store (Apple), and any pages that I've missed, or sections thereof, and redirect Criticism of Apple there. Either that, or just create that as a "Criticism of Apple" page, again pointing to the pages about said topics. For better or worse, criticism of Apple is scattered across pages about topics on which Apple has received criticism, rather than being combined into a single criticism page. Guy Harris (talk) 23:34, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- As per Talk:Apple Inc./Archive 10#Redirect to this page goes nowhere, criticism of Apple is now scattered between Environmental impact of Apple and Apple supply chain, neither of which are solely criticism pages. Guy Harris (talk) 22:45, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 30 April 2024
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
2600:8804:A80:60C0:C5AF:71FB:99CC:24CC (talk) 22:23, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Declined You have not specified what to be changed. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 23:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
"Criticism of Apple Inc." listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Criticism of Apple Inc. has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 17 § Criticism of Apple Inc. until a consensus is reached. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
international business
a) For the chosen Fortune 500 company, identify the primary industry and the international operational network in which it operates. 106.214.125.61 (talk) 08:01, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, we cannot do your homework for you. Have a read at Apple Inc. and also Apple and unions for the economics of Apple. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 13:36, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
History section
This section is way too long, especially considering that a sub-article History of Apple Inc. exists 68.133.31.122 (talk) 16:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Delisted good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- B-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class Apple Inc. articles
- Top-importance Apple Inc. articles
- WikiProject Apple Inc. articles
- WikiProject Artificial Intelligence articles
- B-Class Computing articles
- Top-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- B-Class electronic articles
- Mid-importance electronic articles
- WikiProject Electronics articles
- B-Class Internet articles
- Mid-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- B-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles
- B-Class Robotics articles
- High-importance Robotics articles
- WikiProject Robotics articles
- B-Class company articles
- Top-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- B-Class Effective Altruism articles
- Mid-importance Effective Altruism articles
- B-Class California articles
- High-importance California articles
- B-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
- High-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
- San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- B-Class United States articles
- High-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of High-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class Brands articles
- Top-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles
- B-Class video game articles
- Low-importance video game articles
- WikiProject Video games articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists