Jump to content

Talk:Animal euthanasia: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Joelmills (talk | contribs)
m {{WikiProject Veterinary medicine}}
POV in no-kill shelter section
Line 12: Line 12:


The phrase regarding equating no-kill shelters to human life imprisonment, while possibly accurate, is not expressed in the neutral point of view. Please think about removing that statement. [[User:Natasha Johnson|Nat]] 00:01, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
The phrase regarding equating no-kill shelters to human life imprisonment, while possibly accurate, is not expressed in the neutral point of view. Please think about removing that statement. [[User:Natasha Johnson|Nat]] 00:01, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

== POV in no-kill shelter section ==

This section appears to have bias against no-kill shelters. I believe there is also a similar dispute on the main no-kill shelter article. [[User:Bobo The Ninja|Ninja!]] 22:24, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:24, 8 June 2007

WikiProject iconVeterinary medicine Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Veterinary medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Veterinary medicine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCats Stub‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cats. This project provides a central approach to Cat-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconDogs Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Canidae and commonly referred to as "dogs" and of which the domestic dog is but one of its many members, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Dogs To-do:

Here are some tasks you can do to help with WikiProject Dogs:

Should this article link to slaughter? That seems kind of unrelated and suggestive to me. Was the author trying to imply something? 24.22.185.207 04:47, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

rate

The article is clearly a stub. It doesn't even have any references or citations. --((F3rn4nd0 ))(BLA BLA BLA) 21:11, 29 January 2007 (UTC) I agree, references are definitely needed. For example: "Euthanasia is typically performed in a veterinary clinic or hospital, or in an animal shelter, and is usually carried out by a veterinarian, or a veterinary technician working under the vet's supervision." I'd like to see a citing reference for this. In plenty of animal shelter that I've worked at all you need is a couple of hours of training and you're qualified to perform euthanasia. GingerGin 00:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the US, laws concerning the possession/use of controlled substances such as euthanasia solutions dictate who is authorized to euthanize animals. In practice, often these laws are only loosely enforced. I agree that references are needed. --Bk0 (Talk) 02:24, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The phrase regarding equating no-kill shelters to human life imprisonment, while possibly accurate, is not expressed in the neutral point of view. Please think about removing that statement. Nat 00:01, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POV in no-kill shelter section

This section appears to have bias against no-kill shelters. I believe there is also a similar dispute on the main no-kill shelter article. Ninja! 22:24, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]