User talk:Edgar181/Archive9

Please read before editing:

1. Please add new comments to the bottom of the page. You can use the "new section" button above to start a new topic.
2. In general, I will respond here to comments, rather than on your talk page, so that the conversation isn't scattered.
3. If you want to know why I blocked your IP address, you have to let me know what IP address you are referring to.
4. If you want to know why I deleted an article, you have to let me know what article you are referring to.

---

Archives

Oct 2005 - May 2006 Jun 2006 - Sep 2006 Oct 2006 - Feb 2007 Mar 2007 - May 2007 Jun 2007 - Sep 2007 Oct 2007 - Dec 2007 Jan 2008 - Mar 2008 Apr 2008 - Jun 2008

Forbidden Truth

The forbidden truth article was deleted before some proof or importance can be shown. U can find the proof here, http://www.metal-archives.com/band.php?id=47868 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ftbd (talk • contribs) 10:30, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

The article did not contain any assertion of notability and met criteria for deletion. If you think the band does meet Wikipedia's guidelines for music outlined at WP:MUSIC, then you can recreate the article or I can undelete it so that you can add the necessary info. -- Ed (Edgar181) 10:38, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

It will be very nice of u to undelete it so that I can add the necessary info... thankx —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.4.127.26 (talk) 03:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

WP:HAU

Hello yet again. I regretfully inform you that the bot we were using to update the user status at Wikipedia:Highly Active Users, SoxBot V, was blocked for its constant updating. With this bot out of operation, a patch is in the works. Until that patch is reviewed and accepted by the developers, some options have been presented to use as workarounds: 1) Qui monobook (not available in Internet Explorer); 2) User:Hersfold/StatusTemplate; 3) Manually updating User:StatusBot/Status/USERNAME; or 4) Not worry about it and wait for the patch to go through, which hopefully won't take long. If you have another method, you can use that, too. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Useight (talk) 17:53, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Re:Forbidden Truth

It will be very nice of u to undelete it so that I can add the necessary info... thankx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ftbd (talk • contribs) 03:58, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

OK, I've restored the article to give you a chance to work on it. (But just so you know, it can still be nominated for deletion again by other editors.) -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:14, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

User:Azango334

Oh sorry bout that one admeen, the left side of my brain tells my right hand to vandalise wikipedia. It's all under control now and i'm ready to be a W star! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Azango334 (talk • contribs) 13:32, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Hongosan

Hi. :) I happened to notice that when you restored this article, you didn't restore the talk page. (The restoration was fresh up on the deletion log when I checked it today; I noticed then, but kept the article open while doing other things so as not to anticipate you.) I'm pretty sure that it's restoration is uncontroversial, so I've taken the liberty of bringing it back. Not much on it but a project tag, but it has been assessed so it might save some duplicate effort. If I've misread the situation and you would rather I not have restored the talk page, then please accept my hearty apologies and feel free to redelete. :) Second-guessing people sometimes backfires and there may be other factors you had in mind there of which (obviously) I'm unaware. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:08, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

You're right - my mistake. Thanks for catching it, fixing it, and letting me know. -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:32, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Wallaceij - deleted page

Hello, I tried to start the page, Applying to Graduate School in Psychology: Advice From Successful Students and Prominent Psychologists. I understand that parts of the original page appeared to be blatent advertising. I revised the page to remove blatent advertising and increased a focus on the book as a first of its kind. I also placed an entry on the talk page defending place as a legitimate entry, which I've reproduced here:

This page represents a legitimate encyclopedia entry because it is the first book published by the American Psychological Association - the largest and most popular publisher of psychological resources - to be edited by current graduate students in psychology. This is a significant accomplishment in view of the 100's if not 1000's of books on pursuing higher education that are exclusively published by professionals. Furthermore, it is also unique to other such resources because it is predominantly authored by graduate students.

To reduce the impression that this page is an advertisement, I have removed the long block quote describing the marketable qualities of the book.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Applying_to_Graduate_School_in_Psychology:_Advice_From_Successful_Students_and_Prominent_Psychologists"

My intention creating this page was to document the novelty of a book about getting into graduate school in psychology that is edited by actual graduate students. It is a first of its kind, which seems like a legitimate reason for being included in an encyclopedia such as Wikipedia. If not, please explain.

Additionally, please move my deleted page to my userpage. Thank you. --Ian (talk) 19:24, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Based on the content of the article, I don't think the book meets Wikipedia's standards for inclusion as outlined at Wikipedia:Notability (books). However, I have created a copy of the article at User:Wallaceij/Applying to Graduate School in Psychology so that if you think does meet notability criteria, you can work on improving the article there. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:00, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

After reviewing the notability criteria, I can see that the book, which is the subject of my proposed page, doesn't meet any criterion. Thanks for clarifying things. --Ian (talk) 23:45, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

IP Block

Thanks for blocking the IP I reported. StewieGriffin! • Talk 20:45, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:46, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Hub Bike Coop Talk page

OK, the Hub Bike Coop article has now been deleted TWICE. I added a talk page to start a discussion regarding the article's problems, a discussion which you swiftly DELETED. So what is wrong with you??? Are you against healthy debate??? Do you oppose constructive negotiation??? Are you seemingly hell-bent on destroying the American ideals of the right to free speach and opinion??? Well if you are, I highly reccommend that you leave Wikipedia IMMEDIATELY, because it is people like YOU who create these one-sided non peer-reviewed articles. Frankly, that is quite the opposite of Wikipedia's goal. Next time you want to raise hell with my efforts, tell me. Let's not resort to guerilla war-tactics here, Edgar. Your's sincerely, Ldud, crusader of Wikipedian rights. ل داد 10:08, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

An article titled Hub Bike Coop has never existed. Can you tell me the name of the article you are referring to? -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:26, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Hub Bicycle Co-op, I think. BobAmnertiopsis_{ChitChat Me!} 21:23, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

OK, I see now. Thanks, Bob.

Ldud, Hub Bicycle Co-op was deleted May 24th by Orangemike (talk · contribs). A couple of weeks later, you created the talk page for the article. It's unlikely that anyone would come across "orphaned" talk pages to discuss the deletion, so these kinds of pages are routinely deleted (this is a criteria for speedy deletion, and the reason I deleted the talk page). If you want to discuss the deletion of the article, it would be best contact Orangemike and talk to him, and if that doesn't work out you can look into Wikipedia:Deletion review. Hope this helps. -- Ed (Edgar181) 01:34, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

74.194.19.176 (talk · contribs)

I was looking into this (I removed the message from AIV) and just saw you blocked this IP - I have a feeling the block is actually the fault of CanadianLinuxUser (talk · contribs) who upset an anon user by reverting their good faith edit, which was actually a correct edit, and then slapped a warning template on the anon user. Neıl 龱 15:14, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes, looking closer, it does appear that CanadianLinuxUser erred, but I wouldn't say that the block is his fault. I would say that the anon user who made the personal attacks is responsible for his own actions. I normally block for that kind of thing, but since it's not as clear-cut as it originally appeared to me, I'll unblock and warn instead. Thanks for letting me know. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:22, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Edgar. Much appreciated. Neıl 龱 15:49, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Topotecan

Hi Ed. Can you please check the CAS number? The number 123948-87-8 is given in the article and confirmed on nlm.nih.gov, while the number in DrugBank is 119413-54-6. Is one the pure substance and the other the hydrochloride? --Leyo 12:46, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

I'll have a chance to take a look tomorrow. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:46, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

It looks like you are right. From Chemical Abstracts: 123948-87-8 is the CAS number for topotecan free base, and 119413-54-6 is topotecan hydrochloride. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:00, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I added the latter to the drugbox. --Leyo 16:42, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Mr. Hedge

Why did you delete Mr. Hedge? Why did you delete it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by AndrewCoelho (talk • contribs) 16:43, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

It was a biography that made no assertion of notability. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:55, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

The Queen's Own Cameron Highlanders of Canada Wikipedia page

I am the DCO (second-in-command)of the Camerons of Canada and have tried to edit the Wikipedia page on my Regiment to include better links (one of which is to the Regiment's own website). After editing the page I received a message that Wikipedia had reverted the page to how it was prior to my additions. If there is anyone who is more of a subject matter expert on the Regiment than I am, I already know them personally or would be very interested in corresponding with them. I want to make the article on the Camerons as complete and accurate as it can be. To do so I need to be able to edit it.

Ullamh (talk) 16:26, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

B.W. Takeuchi Maj DCO Camerons of Canada

XLinkBot (talk · contribs) automatically reverts the addition of links to geocities when added by new users. This is because of common misuse of these types of links. I have now switched back to your version of the article. You shouldn't have trouble editing the article now. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:40, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks very much. Brett —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ullamh (talk • contribs) 23:41, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Damn brother, thats some fine investigative skills

I dont mind that you deleted it, but it was great lols fooling my friend who thought he had such tits connections.. I thought it sounded like a pretty good drug thou, psychadelic opiate.. is that possible? do you know how to do a mescaline extraction without needing high proof alchahol.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Snowmansnowman (talk • contribs) 16:15, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Steve McKeown

You have deleted Steve McKeown for reasons that are incorrect.

Steve McKeown is a therapist in the UK, please see his personal website www.themckeownclinic.co.uk, please also see the organisation that he is affiliated to www.theiah.com.

Steve McKeown will be publishing his new book in 8 weeks time. There will be media attention.

Steve McKeown is officially engaged to Michelle Bass, Big Brother and Glamour Model, please see her official website www.michellebassofficial.com for proofe.

Please un-delete this profile as your reasons are not justified or correct and only your assumption with no evidence of research, only your personal oppinion, again incorrect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.135.93.12 (talk) 11:51, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

The article was properly deleted under guidelines at WP:Proposed deletion. However, if the deletion of articles in this process is contested, it can be automatically undeleted, so I have done so. Since the subject of the article does not appear to meet Wikipedia's notability criteria outlined at WP:BIO, I have moved the article to Articles for deletion instead. Please feel free to make a comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve McKeown‎. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:52, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD

Cheers! --Dweller (talk) 13:16, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

so, welcome back to me!

i know i told Redfarmer to do this but i just couldn't resist.

Remember Leonhart178 that you blocked? i need info on him.

please leave any available info on my Talk Page or just click talk down there.

Zbeeblebrox278 (talk) 02:18, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

This is a sock of User:Leonhart178, a user you blocked for gross incivility and threats back in March. There has been a sockpuppetry case opened at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Leonhart178. Redfarmer (talk) 02:41, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Beta-Benzenehexachloride

Hi Ed, Would you think the article Beta-Benzenehexachloride reliably named? This isn't about a benzene but about a hexane. You were the first editor to do something about this article, therefore I ask, before I suggest some bold action for it. Wim van Dorst (talk) 21:10, 21 June 2008 (UTC).

Confusingly, "benzenehexachloride" is used as a common name for the isomers of hexachlorocyclohexane (as can be seen at PubChem or AlanWood.net), but now that you mention it, I think it would be a good idea to move that article to a title with a systematic name or a less confusing common name. What title would you suggest? -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:29, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Actinidain

Hi, can you add a diagram for Actinidain? Badagnani (talk) 23:18, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I don't have the tools to make protein images like that. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:35, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

I've added one—saw this thread, couldn't help myself. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:45, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

 Done

It looks great! Thanks. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:41, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Ctoads

Good morning.

Kindly give a look at the recently deleted "Ctoads" entry. This entry is relevant for a number of reasons. First, it is truly unique in the space. There is nothing like it both in design, content and function. The site is technologically unique in the world.

There are a number of functionalities on the site that are unique to it, not found anywhere else in the space. It is a "first" in many ways.

Thank you.

Steve. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sjmanning (talk • contribs) 16:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

The subject of the article does not appear to meet notability criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:Notability (web). -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:59, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you...

Thank you... - Adolphus79 (talk) 17:04, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:05, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Ctoads

Hi Edgar.

Please give the Ctoads page another read. It has been edited to address the issues you raise. I would appreciate you re-instating the page.

Thanks.

Steve (sjmanning) 65.37.182.201 (talk) 18:50, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

I've looked at the article, but I'm sorry, it seems clear to me that it does not contain any content that suggests that Ctoads meets Wikipedia's notability requirements. Can you please specify how you think it meets any of the three criteria at Wikipedia:Notability (web)? -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:10, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Edgar.

I have made numerous lookups in Wikipedia. I confess that I am absolutely confused by your refusal to include this page among the 2.4 million entries in Wikipedia, thus far. Ctoads is absolutely unique in the world. With due humility, Its creator, Steven J. Manning, is an internationally known and respected authority in a couple industries, as well as a speaker on a wide variety of subjects. To all who read Ctoads and Steven J. Manning, this site absolutely satisfies your requirements.

Perhaps you will spend some time on the site. And contribute to it as well.

Thanks.

Steve. 65.37.182.201 (talk) 19:19, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

If you believe that the article meets criteria at Wikipedia:Notability (web), you may make a request at Wikipedia:Deletion review that other editors review my decision to delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Cefonicid.png

Hey Ed, the core amide doesn't quite look itself in this structure :) Should be an easy fix. Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:49, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Fixed. Thanks for catching it and letting me know. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:31, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

 Done

Thanks for the quick action! Fvasconcellos (t·c) 00:45, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Acetildenafil

Hi Edgar. I don't suppose you would be able to come up with a chemical name for this compound? My drawing software unfortunately lacks a structure-to-name function, and the compound is not on the PubChem database. It's also a nice illustration of how advanced the illicit drug designers are becoming now days... Meodipt (talk) 06:29, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Done. It's an interesting compound. That's not an easy synthesis - I'm surprised it's worth the trouble to make it and secretly add it to a product, rather than just adding a marketed ED drug. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:34, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

 Done

Bravo on this, Edgar! I've rarely seen a more complex compound name. It reminds me of that place in Wales with the longest place name ever. Badagnani (talk) 05:27, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Galactomannan

Hi, can you come up with a diagram for Galactomannan? Badagnani (talk) 05:27, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure what is the best way to represent a polysaccharide that can have variable structure, but I've come up with something that I think works well. Can you please let me know if it makes sense to you? -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:41, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

 Done

Ha, I don't know anything about such diagrams; I just notice that they're missing and know that you have the skills to add them. If you find information about obscure Asian musical instruments missing, I'd be happy to add it :-) Badagnani (talk) 05:42, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Calcium silicate

Hi, can you add a diagram to Calcium silicate? Badagnani (talk) 05:41, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Calcium silicate has a non-specific definition, and as far as I can tell is a mixture of different chemical compositions, so I don't think I diagram can be made to illustrate it. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:22, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Hexaware

I had requested on Talk:Hexaware that it should not be deleted, instead just put one liner stating it is an important IT company in India. I know the article was very much an advertisement written by some newbie. But I didn't have the time to correct it. So requested a hangon. But unfortunately it was deleted inspite of Keep request. --gppande «talk» 07:39, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

I deleted the article because the content was blatant advertising, full of PR doublespeak. There was no {{hangon}} on the article, but even if there was, it would still be appropriate to delete such an article. If you feel that it should be replaced with a "one liner stating it is an important IT company in India," please feel free to do so. In fact, it's better to do so now, after deletion of the inappropriate content. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:22, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

YKIP (Yayasan Kemanusiaan Kasih Ibu)

Hallo Edgar181, I (Ykipbali) apologize for remove the speedy deletion tag in YKIP’s article. I get wrong perception to add a hangon tag on the page, I think I must change speedy deletion with hangon tag. It’s my first time join to Wikipedia member. My article not finished, it’s still less information. I will fix and adding more information to this article. Please don’t delete the article and block my account (ykipbali), let me finish my article first.

203.153.101.210 (talk) 02:05, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Hydrate and Isohumulone

Hi, can you find some kind of diagram that would serve as an example of Hydrate? Badagnani (talk) 08:25, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Also Isohumulone. Badagnani (talk) 18:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Three more:

• Dicalcium citrate
• Calcium citrate malate
• Monocalcium citrate

Badagnani (talk) 04:21, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Two more:

• Boron triiodide
• Iodine oxide

Badagnani (talk) 04:23, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

TYSONDOG (THE NWOBHM) BAND

The article you blocked regarding the above heavy metal band getting back together was rather unfair i should know i`m a member of the band(and the original bassist on all recordings from the 80`s ) we are back together check out myspace/tysondogrock & www.tysondog.co.uk —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kjw1208 (talk • contribs) 14:44, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

The article was deleted because it lacked any information that demonstrated the notability of the band. Wikipedia's notability guidelines for bands can be found at Wikipedia:Notability (music). If you think the band meets this criteria and can supply references, feel free to recreate the article with that information. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:24, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Survey Request

Hi,
I need your help. I am working on a research project at Boston College, studying creation of medical information on Wikipedia. You are being contacted, because you have been identified as an important contributor to one or more articles.

Would you will be willing to answer a few questions about your experience? We've done considerable background research, but we would also like to gather the insight of the actual editors. Details about the project can be found at the user page of the project leader, geraldckane. Survey questions can be found at geraldckane/medsurvey. Your privacy and confidentiality will be strictly protected!

The questions should only take a few minutes. I hope you will be willing to complete the survey, as we do value your insight. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Professor Kane if you have any questions.

Thank You, Sam4bc (talk) 22:47, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

I wish you well on your project, but I prefer not to participate. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:25, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

WP:HAU, Status, and you!

As you may know, the StatusBot responsible for maintaining the status of the Highly Active Users was taken offline. We now have a replacement in the Qui status system. This semi-automatic system will allow you to easily update your status page found at Special:Mypage/Status which the HAU page code is now designed to read from. If you are already using Qui (or a compatible system) - great! - no action is needed (other than remembering to update your status as necessary). If not, consider installing Qui. You can also manually update this status by changing the page text to online, offline, or busy. While it is not mandatory, the nature of HAU is that people are often seeking a quick answer from someone who is online and keeping our statuses up-to-date will assist with this. Note if you were previously using your /Status page as something other than a one-word status indicator, your HAU entry may have been set to "status=n" to correct display issues. Please clear this parameter if you change things to be "HAU compatible". Further questions can be raised at WT:HAU. This message was delivered by xenobot 22:52, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

RE: Nedaplatin

Hi there. Could you draw a chemical structure for nedaplatin? The Pubchem compound ID for this drug is 72120. :-) Carlo Banez (talk) 13:29, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

 Done

OK, done. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:43, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Page deleted "Code Available Here" for mmckee17

I am the author of this code. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmckee17 (talk • contribs) 14:42, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Someone else marked Code available here as a copyright violation, which may or may not be true, but that's not the reason I deleted it. It seemed to me that you were just testing something because it only contained some source code, and therefore had no meaningful content as an encyclopedia article. If you are trying to simply share source code, there are other better places for that than Wikipedia. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:23, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Miraculin

Hi, can you come up with a diagram for Miraculin? Badagnani (talk) 20:06, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

As a protein, that's another one I don't have the tools to create. Perhaps User:Fvasconcellos can help out. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:08, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Idea

I have an idea: for compounds for which structures can't be created, could we have a field that says "Molecular diagram: none" or something similar, so people like me don't bother people like you when we find that there's no diagram at a particular article? Badagnani (talk) 20:37, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps it's something you can suggest at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemicals or Wikipedia talk:Chemical infobox, though I suspect it would be difficult to draw a line between those for which structure diagrams can't be created from those that are very difficult to create. But in any case, I'm not bothered at all by the requests. Also, are you aware of Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemistry/Image Request? Making requests there might be a good idea so that other chemists who may have different skills and/or tools than me for creating chemical diagrams can help out too. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:45, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Also, I left a question for you at talk:isohumulone, if you haven't seen it yet. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:47, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Great, thanks--no, I didn't know about that page, although I now know about the requested articles page for chemicals. Badagnani (talk) 20:50, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

thanks

thanks for the intervention with that IP that was getting abusive on my talk page - please feel appreciated! Sssoul (talk) 14:03, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:15, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

User:205.232.44.195

Hi. Did you notice that this IP had not edited since their final warning? Cheers TigerShark (talk) 23:25, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I did notice. But in my mind when one IP has made essentially the same vandalous edit six times over the course of a week and been warned multiple times about it, it is clear they are ignoring warnings and are likely to persist. A short block is warranted and likely to prevent further vandalism, in my opinion. -- Ed (Edgar181) 23:31, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

I would agree if they had been given a final warning, but they had only continued after being given a couple of requests to stop. Once they were given a final warning, they stopped (well, as far as we know, because of course they are now blocked). Why is this different to a user who makes the edits within a few minutes and receives the same warnings? There is, I guess, an argument that we are too lenient to wait for a final warning even in those cases, but that is fairly standard practice. Would be good to hear your thoughts. Cheers TigerShark (talk) 23:37, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

I understand your point. But I generally would block at the same point even if all the edits were made more rapidly, too. Admins have a range of attitudes about blocking IPs, and I'm sure I fall slightly towards the less tolerant end. For obvious persistent vandals such as this one and with a relatively short block, it probably doesn't make that much difference one way or another, though. -- Ed (Edgar181) 23:44, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Deleting

Hi there. I would just like to say thanks for your hard deleting work ^^ (especially the redirects). You might get this before you finish so if you do keep on going!

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		For all of your hard deleting work especially with my tagged redirects and other stuff. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 15:34, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 15:34, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome ... and thanks for the barnstar. Time to give my fingers a rest. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:39, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Microdispensing

Hy Edgar

I, (Peter Langer), am the author of this article, (microdispensing), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later.

I paste the sentence into page the as evidence —Preceding unsigned comment added by Josenmeir (talk • contribs) 16:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Best regards

PETER —Preceding unsigned comment added by Josenmeir (talk • contribs) 16:35, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Peter, I see that you have added the statement "I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later" to the webpage. But unfortunately, I think the next statement "Only for use on wikipedia!" is inconsistent with that. But I'm not all that knowledgable about this type of thing. I would recommend that you ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions what the best way is to release your website content to Wikipedia. Someone there should be able to help you more than me. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:47, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

User talk:165.29.106.3

This page was finally blocked by you and has been locked for editing for a while. I was wondering if you and I could come to some sort of agreement on this school's IP editing privileges. Perhaps the ban could be lifted and their page cleaned so the school could use Wikipedia? I would be more than happy to watch its contribution feed personally. Look forward to hearing from you. -Delux- DeluxNate (talk) 16:03, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

The school is not prevented from using Wikipedia - anyone can still access and read Wikipedia articles, and anyone can edit from that school if they sign up for a username. Only anonymous edits from that IP address are disabled. This is quite a routine situation for shared IP addresses that have been the source of persistent vandalism, such as this school IP. The current situation protects Wikipedia while only having a minimal impact on those that wish to contribute constructively; I believe it provides a good balance between the need for Wikipedia to protect itself and the ability of the school to access Wikipedia. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:37, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Oligomycin

Please see my comments on the structure of oligomycin. I think an incorrect absolute configuration has been reported in previous literature, and the current diagram on the article page reflects an incorrect structure.Dr.kwan (talk) 16:29, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I'll check with the references you have provided and see what I can find out. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:39, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

I have now updated the structure. Can you please doublecheck me to make sure it is correct now? So many stereocenters provide lots of opportunities for mistakes... -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:31, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

The structure that appears now appears to be in agreement to the two more recent sources.Dr.kwan (talk) 19:54, 19 July 2008 (UTC)