User talk:Acalamari

edit count | edit summary usage

Hello Wikipedians and people who are not-yet Wikipedians.

This is my user talk page. You can contact me here. If you are a registered user who wishes to send an E-mail to me, please feel free to use the "E-mail this user" feature in the toolbox on the left side of this page. I also encourage everyone to read the contents of my talk page, and my archives, as well. Acalamari 21:56, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Notice: if you post a message on my talk page and don't receive a response, please be aware that I might have responded here. However, I'm likely to respond on both my talk page and yours anyway. I've learned that it's best to keep a discussion in the same place in order to avoid confusion.

Archives

Acalamari archive A Acalamari archive B Acalamari archive C Acalamari archive D Acalamari archive E Acalamari archive F Acalamari archive G Acalamari archive H Acalamari archive I Acalamari archive J Acalamari archive K Acalamari archive L Acalamari archive M Acalamari archive N Acalamari archive O Acalamari archive P Acalamari archive Q Acalamari archive R Acalamari archive S Acalamari archive T Acalamari archive U Acalamari archive V Acalamari archive W Acalamari archive X Acalamari archive Y Acalamari archive Z Acalamari archive 027 Acalamari archive 028 Acalamari archive 029 Acalamari archive 030 Acalamari archive 031 Acalamari archive 032 Acalamari archive 033 Acalamari archive 034 Acalamari archive 035 Acalamari archive 036 Acalamari archive 037

For your non-urgent consideration

For your non-urgent consideration. At your convenience, (and there is no hurry), I will take great interest in reading your reply.

In this edit, you state: Hello Ronz, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request.

I am very (inadequate) VERY (inadequate) extremely interested to understand why you did this. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:43, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Intervention by another user on another topic

I'm happy to discuss my use of rollback, in the context of Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Personal_attacks_and_harassment_by_Pdfpdf Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Personal_attacks_by_Pdfpdf or otherwise. --Ronz (talk) 16:56, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Dear Mr Ronz. Thank you for your offer, but I have no interest in your use of rollback - in any circumstances. Not that it's any of your business, but I was asking this gentleman why he granted it. Whether you have used it or not, and how you have used it or not, is of no interest to me. Pdfpdf (talk) 17:36, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Rollback button

Hi, can I please have the rollback button. I patrol RC a lot, and i would love to take my vandalism-fighting to another level. MichaelJackson231 (talk) 17:39, 25 July 2010 (UTC) I am also an RC patroller and I would like it if I could patrol with the rollback feature

Re-establishment

Hi there; I am waiting for and looking forward to your re-assertion of your position in wikipedia under your primary account. Best wishes. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:26, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi! I'm actually quite active under my alternate account, more so than I was expecting, and until I'm back on my own internet again, I'll be editing with this for the time being. At any rate, I don't mind editing without the admin tools for a bit anyway. Just so you know now, I'll be sending an E-mail to you later. Thanks for your kind words. Best. Acalamari (from Bellatrix Kerrigan) 09:22, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Survey on gender

Hi! I'm Liria Veronesi (User:Akoha77) and, together with Paolo Massa (User:Phauly), I'm starting an empirical research on "Gender and votes in requests for adminship". For this reason, we need to know the gender of Wikipedians who were candidated to become admins.

We tried looking for the templates User:UBX/male and User:UBX/female but only 4 admins use it. We also used the API for getting the gender field in the profile but, out of 1744 admins, only around 400 have filled this field. But we would benefit from a larger coverage, i.e. possibly knowing the gender of 100% of candidates.

So, after asking for advice to 3 admins and receiving 2 positive replies (1 and 2), we decided to try to ask directly to Wikipedians.

Thus, would you be so kind to write your gender [Male / Female / Other], together with a text comment if you want, on my talk page at User_talk:Akoha77? If you prefer to send me this information privately, you can send me an email, the information will be kept confidential and never shared.

Thanks! Akoha77 (talk) 12:49, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Added a line in "Chrismass"

Hi A, first let me thank you for your time, efforts and contribution to the wikipedia. I was very interested reading the Chrismass criticism and economics chapter, found there were some interesting elements in the economics chapter that support criticism against the whole monetization around the Chrismass period and since both chapters are quite far away/separated from each other, some readers might not find out about the interesting and complementary data in both chapters. So, I wanted to add a line "People interested in this section, might also be interested in reading this subject's section 6 Economics." Is that a good way of proceeding?

And as I was doing some previews and improving the editing and in-article hot-linking, I noticed "your" "Note: This page has been semi-protected so that only autoconfirmed users can edit it." That's a new notice for me, and I hope you don't mind me asking you here if I can find out if I'm such a autoconfirmed user or not? Do I meet the quality criteria or not? I'm not in some research center surrounded by intellectuals/phd degree people that I hope are massively contributing to Wikipedia via their publications, but just like you started out, I do try to help out to improve typo's and rephrasing things, though I'm known to make slip from time to time when I'm tired and frustrated about something that I've heard or read and wanting to check what wikipedia would say on the subject and then inserting something of low quality.

And thirdly: "I'm likely to respond on both my talk page and yours anyway. I've learned that it's best to keep a discussion in the same place in order to avoid confusion." I'm a bit frustrated with the discussion tools offered by the wikipedia's software. I'm very familiar with the google discussion groups and yahoo's mailing-list tools and they seem better. Can you indicate where I can read how I'm supposed to discuss something or get involved in a discussion? Maybe you can add a link to your line mentioned to such a place as I feel you're familiar with it but I have a hard time understanding your line as on one hand you say: you copy an answer and here in your page I guess below my "talk" and you do the effort of going to my "talk" page and copy/pasting that same Q&A then? What an effort, where do you get the energy from, what food to you eat, exercises, do you also have a 3 yr old challenging me to adapt continuously etc.? hihihi, looking forward reading you.

And four: How much do I violate good behaviour standards when asking 4 questions/raising 4 topics in one chapter? Shouldn't I have made a separate chapter for every one of them in this "talk" page? Thank you so much for enlightening me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SvenAERTS (talk • contribs) 09:18, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Template:Infobox mountain

You are using {{Infobox mountain}} on your sub page User:Acalamari/Dutchman Peak. Currently, that infobox uses deprecated parameter names. In the near future the template is to be updated and those parameter names will not work. I updated the template for you. I hope that was OK. –droll [chat] 19:01, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/2010 ArbCom election voting procedure

You are invited to participate in the Wikipedia:Requests for comment/2010 ArbCom election voting procedure which is expected to close in a little over a week. If you have received this message, it is because it appears that you participated in the 2009 AC RfC, and your contributions indicate that you are currently active on Wikipedia. Ncmvocalist (talk) 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Vote in the ArbCom elections

Acalamari, someone using the User:Bellatrix Kerrigan account appears to have cast a vote in the ArbCom elections. While you can't retract it, you should know that voting with alternate accounts is frowned upon for future reference. Regards, Skomorokh 13:32, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi there. It is me who voted, and I e-mailed MBisanz on this subject prior to the vote beginning and he said I would be okay providing there was a clear link between accounts and I wasn't double voting. I'm about to go out so I'll go into more detail when I come back if you like. Acalamari (from Bellatrix Kerrigan) 13:42, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Okay sorry for the inconsistency there, that's understandable. Regards, Skomorokh 13:45, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Don't worry! I don't mind being asked about this, especially since it's unusual. Since I'm not on my own internet at the moment, I'm using this account, but I will go back to my regular account when I have my own internet again, though that won't occur before the voting ends, and even if it did, I wouldn't be voting with it (I see you made this edit, and in the interests of transparency, I think that's a good idea). Thanks for your work in this Arbcom season. Best. Acalamari (from Bellatrix Kerrigan) 15:56, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your support at my RfA last week. I'll do everything I can to live up to your expectations and trust. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 21:36, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Your main account

Hi there; I keep hoping to see you at your main account, and keep on not doing so. I do know that having a bit of a break from admin hassle is good for you, and you will recall that I took three months off earlier this year. But come home now, eh? You are needed. A lot of the senior admins seem to have vanished lately. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:56, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Merry, merry

Bzuk (talk) 22:46, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Happy, happy

Happy New Year, and all the best to you and yours!

Welcome

Welcome back. It's good to see you again. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:30, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Happy 10th Anniversary of Wikipedia!

File:Verre de whisky.jpg

Happy 10th anniversary of Wikipedia!

HeyBzuk (contribs) has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy!

Spread the good cheer and camaraderie by adding {{subst:User:HJ Mitchell/WikiScotch}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Bzuk (talk) 15:32, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Happy Decade :)

File:Verre de whisky.jpg

Happy 10th anniversary of Wikipedia!

Baseball Watcher ^{Lets Chat} has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy!

Spread the good cheer and camaraderie by adding {{subst:User:HJ Mitchell/WikiScotch}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Message received at 23:21, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the Autopatrolled flag!

Though I suspect the New Page Patrollers were generally the only ones reading my stuff ;) Gonzonoir (talk) 12:36, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Well, I can always take it away again if you like. :D You're welcome for the userright: I was actually very surprised that you didn't already have it. Acalamari 12:42, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Autowotsit

I saw your comment on Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Autopatrolled_candidates_1#User:Rajasekhar1961 and offered a second opinion. Since you got there first and I don't feel strongly, I'll leave it up to you. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:42, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi HJ Mitchell! I was actually planning to come to your talk page soon, but it seems you got here first. :) Anyway, thanks for the comment, I'll take a look in a minute. I've answered a load of the listings (especially on the second page, which I'm still going through), but I did leave a few blank (I'm back here after a long break from the admin tools, so some of the more difficult ones I left), and on the second page I think I asked for input there too on one or two of them. Thanks! Acalamari 17:51, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks very much, Acalamari. I really appreciate you and HJ Mitchell going through the lists of candidates and reviewing them. You guys are going through the lists faster than I can make them. Thanks again. - Hydroxonium (H₃O⁺) 19:20, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome, but thank you for compiling the lists: it's much easier to go through a list of users to evaluate than going out searching for users to grant the rights to! Acalamari 20:08, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I think it's harder to do the reviewing rather than working on the list. I'm just going through a list from a year ago and checking basic things and formatting it with {{RfP}} requests. - Hydroxonium (H₃O⁺) 20:33, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Well, I'm happy to help review the users you've listed, though after spending quite a bit of time on it, it is nice to take a rest. :) I'll do some more tomorrow if there's more. Best. Acalamari 20:45, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Likewise. I've been hoping for a list like this for a while. Short of checking out experienced-looking editors on NPP or waiting for them to request it, it's difficult to find the people who would actually have a use for the permission. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:34, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

┌───────────────────────────┘
Thanks very much Acalamari and thanks very much HJ Mitchell. You've both been going to town on the lists and I really appreciate it. I don't think there is a rush for any reviews. I think you can do this as you have spare time, so please don't run yourselves ragged. Thanks again. - Hydroxonium (H₃O⁺) 23:31, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Upgrade

Hi there. Thanks very much for the upgrade to autopatrolled. Much appreciated. Regards Amsaim (talk) 20:25, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome! Acalamari 20:31, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

A well-deserved Barnstar

		The Admin's Barnstar
		In grateful appreciation to your dedication to Wikipedia, for reviewing hundreds and hundreds of candidates for Autopatrolled rights, and for reducing the workload at New page patrol, I hereby award the The Admin's Barnstar to Acalamari. Thank you so very much for all the many hours you have put in. Your efforts are truly awe-inspiring and I'm very thankful for all your hard work. - Hydroxonium (talk) 17:35, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

This is a well-deserved barnstar. Thank you very much. - Hydroxonium (H₃O⁺) 17:35, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

User Rights

Thank you for the Reviewer approval. Rollback was a pleasant surprise as well. I'm comfortable with Rollback as I intend to use it only in very apparent instances. Thanks again. Hazardous Matt (talk) 23:28, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

talk back

• Here. Cheers. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 05:53, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Your userpage

Hi there. As I said privately, I am more than happy to see you active once more with the mop. Just a tidy-up call - entirely up to you. In the light of information passing between us by e-mail, I think your userpage may be out of date. Obviously it is not for me to change it, but I wondered if it had occurred to you? --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:55, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

		Reducing the New Page Patrollers' Workload Barnstar
		Thanks for helping review several hundred candidates listed at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled candidates—and also for being willing to do it again! WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:41, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the reviewer rights

I'd like to thank you for granting me the reviewer rights. I'll strive to make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia! Once again, thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halemane (talk • contribs) 11:11, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrol list - May I ask a favor?

Thanks again for going through all those reviews. I would like to ask a favor. I noticed a number of them have not been notified of the their newly granted Autopatrol right. Would you mind leaving a whole bunch of talk page messages please?

I have set up a list here. Each user has a "Leave Autopatrolled granted message" link next to their username. Clicking the link brings up their talk page with a pre-filled in message. It should leave a message like this.

All you need to do is click the "save" button on the loaded talk page and it will leave the message and sign it for you. You should not need to type anything — not even a subject — just click "save". At least that's how it supposed to work. You may want to click "preview" on the first few and if it looks OK then click "save". Anyway, would you mind going through the list? Please let me know if it's not working. Thanks again for all the help. - Hydroxonium (H₃O⁺) 12:53, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi Hydroxonium, I will gladly do this for you. I'll let you know if anything goes wrong. Best. Acalamari 20:09, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

I just updated this. I hope it doesn't mess up anything. Please let me know. Thanks. - Hydroxonium (H₃O⁺) 20:26, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Just one thing though: I was actually planning to make an alternate account soon solely for the purpose of making semi-automated/automated edits (such as Huggle, or even things like this) and trying out monobook scripts (I now have better internet and a different browser than I used to, and can now use more scripts and things). Would you have a problem with me making all some-200 notices with such an account? (Everything will still re-direct to this account for the sake of transparency and decency, so don't worry) If you do, it's not a problem, and I'll just post the notices with this account. Thanks. Acalamari 20:47, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

That's OK by me. I'm just happy for all your help. Thanks again. - Hydroxonium (H₃O⁺) 21:04, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Okay then: I should have enough time to get it done tonight (my time), but anything I don't finish tonight I'll do tommorow. I'll get right to it. Acalamari 21:06, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

• Phew! I'm done. That was a much harder job than the initial handing out of the rights themselves was. Next time we should see if a bot can hand out the notices. Anyway, I'm back to articles...at least until the next group of users to change the rights of comes out! Thanks. Acalamari 22:03, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you - That was a good one. Thanks kindly. - Hydroxonium (H₃O⁺) 22:35, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome! :) Acalamari 22:37, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for granting rollback status

I just logged on now so just got your message Acalamari. I had a quick read of what rollback entails, and the use of one click to undo consecutive preceding edits does seem very helpful. I'm not that active a user (i tend to read more than edit) but i shall be sure to use rollback whenever i come across any article containing multiple edits of vandalism. Thanks again Acalamari.LisaSandford (talk) 17:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the Autopatrolled rights

Much appreciated, I will make a great use of it. --Gduwen (talk) 21:37, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome! Acalamari 22:03, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

U can haz Orange-Bar 2 ;)

Hi; Ya, I have that bit; it's not really for "me" as it has no effect whatsoever on my editing ;) It's just for those who like to 'patrol'. Cheers, Jack Merridew 21:54, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Heh, heh, sorry about that! I realized just as I pressed the button that I knew I hadn't been the one to change your rights. Thanks for the orange bar in return. :) Acalamari 22:03, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for knighting me an autopatroller

Thanks; it's also good to know you're not seafood.Foofbun (talk) 21:55, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Uh....thanks from me too --Smerus (talk) 21:56, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

And from me - it's nice to know someone has noticed my trustworthiness! Languagehat (talk) 22:01, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

You're all welcome! Acalamari 22:03, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks -- what's your rationale for giving this out...how'd you pick us? DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 02:53, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

New list of Autopatrol candidates

Please note this is a low priority task and can be done as time is available. I'm starting to post of HUGE list of Autopatrol candidates. I put the details at Wikipedia talk:Requests for permissions. Thanks. - Hydroxonium (H₃O⁺) 03:16, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll take a look at that later. Acalamari 09:06, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Re: Autopatrol

Thanks for the vote of confidence! Thmazing (talk) 03:46, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome! Acalamari 09:06, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Just....

...another thank you for granting me the Autopatrolled thingee. You seem like a sensible and friendly sort of editor, and, well, good on 'ya! --Lockley (talk) 07:45, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you! :) You're welcome for autopatrolled! Acalamari 09:06, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Re: Autopatrol

Thank you for granting me the Autopatrolled rights. --WlaKom (talk) 08:38, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome! Acalamari 09:06, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

You have made my work Autopatrolled. Thank you very much for helping me to work better.Dr. Rajasekhar A. 09:26, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Thank you for the honor and trust. I'm all subtleties are not too skilled, but simply will continue to expand our joint project:)--Noel baran (talk) 09:34, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks as well, unexpected :)). Kanatonian (talk) 14:12, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

It's nice I have been given this status, although sometimes I wonder if I'm submitting appropriate material. From time to time I hope my submission is notable enough or detailed enough but I have doubts. If no one flags it then I feel better. This is probably good news because I can feel more confident about what I do submit, rather than worrying someone will immediately tag it.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 16:46, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Greetings

Hello and thank you. If possible/appropriate and you are so inclined I would like to learn more. I've contributed here for a long time but I have never been a part of inner workings, direct collaboration with others, etc. Though busy much of the time, I would enjoy learning more. LanternLight (talk) 02:13, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

autopatrolled

cool, thanks. this is a good idea (not just for me, but in general). Gzuckier (talk) 03:33, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

thanks!

thanks for the autopatrol rights. i'm honoured :-) M Alan Kazlev (talk) 03:42, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

thanks me too :-) Moongateclimber (talk) 21:28, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

and I V. Joe (talk) 22:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the autopatrol rights! :-) Cls14 (talk) 23:40, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hi Acalamari, Thanks for the autopatrolled option! I appreciate it. I am officially on wikibreak for at least the next couple of months so I only check in every once and awhile. -Classicfilms (talk) 23:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi!

Do you think you could grant me the auto patrolled right? Thanks. SilverSoul91911 (talk) 20:14, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program is looking for new Online Ambassadors

Hi! Since you've been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, I wanted to let you know about the Wikipedia Ambassador Program, and specifically the role of Online Ambassador. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes.

If that sounds like you and you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors during the current term, which started in January and goes through early May. If that's something you want to do, please apply!

You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).

I hope to hear from you soon.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 00:53, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi there, thanks for letting me know. Acalamari 10:44, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for promoting me (I think) to autopatrolled. It was very considerate of you. Thanks again. Tony164 (talk) 15:23, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hi :) Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message}

reviewer status

Please review my application for becoming a reviewer. Thanks in advance Boolyme ^Talk!! 16:32, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick response. I guess it would be right to remove the request now as the Admin who last reviewed my request suggested me to wait for atleast one month. Boolyme ^Talk!! 16:40, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

New Autopatrol status

Thanks for giving me Autopatrol status. I wasn't aware of such a thing, but it sounds like a usefull service checking and performing classification of my newly created pages. FYI: I am now working on: Sigur Plateau .-Marcus334 (Talk) 19:20, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for giving me autopatrolled status.

I also thank you! Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 08:44, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

A small request

Hi Acalamari, I have a small request if you can do. Can you delete the previous versions of these files (this, this, this and this). I would be very grateful if you would do that, so I hope that you will do. Thank you in advance.  InfamousPrince  09:57, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

I'm afraid that images are not an area I work in. What would be the rationale for deleting these? Acalamari 10:54, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Because there is no need for previous versions to be visible when only one version is used. InfamousPrince  11:18, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

I've deleted the old versions of Winnie the Pooh and Prom, but I haven't deleted the other two yet: on the Elite Force image, the image you've uploaded says "Mac" on the box, while the description says it's for the PC; and the external link supplied for the 127 Hours poster shows the original image that was here. Shouldn't these be made consistent first? Acalamari 12:08, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrulled

Thanks for giving me autopatrolled status. --Puigsacalm (talk) 19:41, 29 January 2011 (UTC)