User talk:Legolas2186

Hi all!!! This is Legolas and welcome to my talk page. Leave a message for me. Assume good faith Archives 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 26 · 27 · 28 · 29 · 30 · 31 · 32 · 33 · 34 · 35 · 36 · 37 · 38 · 39 Time for another block? I like his "I'm a victim here" performance. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:35, 28 August 2011 (UTC) Already filed at SPI. Oooh where did it play the part? Was it Oscar-worthy? — Legolas (talk2me) 04:37, 28 August 2011 (UTC) At all, but I see three Razzies coming... Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:40, 28 August 2011 (UTC) I saw it in MArk of the Beast's talk page. The nerve of this one is going to be on par with CharlieJS I'm telling you. — Legolas (talk2me) 04:48, 28 August 2011 (UTC) At least Charles' motivation is makes me drop this project, something that won't happen, but why this uploading nonsense? If someday you ask yourself why I hate fans, ElPiloto is a good beginning. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:51, 28 August 2011 (UTC) This one's psychosis is to have his imprint all over Madonna articles. Since he is probably crap in editing, what option is there? Images. Fast and easy, and would have probably worked if it conformed to WP:NFCC. But he kissed NFCC's ass goodbye with his first few edits and still does. So lame or not, we seriously don't need him. And yes, I hate uber fans as well as uber haters too. If you should know, I'm very very popular with the haters even outside wiki. People actually want to kill me and hang me till death. — Legolas (talk2me) 04:59, 28 August 2011 (UTC) We have something else in common :). The best to do is keep an eye in this guy. At first I didn0t bother me but well he is banned, let's keep him away. Images can be protected against him as well. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:03, 28 August 2011 (UTC) We all have our demons, our angels, lol. You remember that Catherine Huebscher (talk · contribs) thing? Seems like this one has opened a forum against me, and I have a personal YouTube channel against me. Axl baby, are you mad, sad, upset?? :P — Legolas (talk2me) 05:06, 28 August 2011 (UTC) lol, I can't believe this. It is nice how Wiki help you to be famous XD. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 01:03, 30 August 2011 (UTC) Shocked Avi. Is Barayatuda a sock of Blue? :( I am honestly so upset. Barayatuda has been nasty and edit-warring with me for months. I knew something was fishy. His edits were always aimed at reverting or joining discussions (remember, I too was once a sock-master). He was always impossible to work with and very mean and rude to me; I had many issues with him. Then on the other hand you have Blue acting like a friend while his sock goes and insults us and acts like total crap to me. You know, he lost all my respect and more. One thing is to use a sock to sway a discussion, but to be mean and nasty to you're friends. I'm baffled :'(--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 21:02, 28 August 2011 (UTC) Ask Hersfold, she did the CU. — Legolas (talk2me) 11:47, 29 August 2011 (UTC) I guess you just simply don't want to talk about it. That's fine. Are you still on track for the Bio?--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 16:14, 29 August 2011 (UTC) Ya. As I said in an above section, I took a printout instead of editing in sandbox. — Legolas (talk2me) 11:45, 30 August 2011 (UTC) Where is this coming from "Donot hardcode the pixels of music video images", I've seen a couple cases of this lately; users removing the sizing claiming MOS. Nowhere in MOS:IMAGES#Images, Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(layout)#Images or Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(accessibility)#Images is there any text stating that resizing images should not be done; we have this option for a reason so images are not incredibly huge or small; the only actual rule is what size you should not cross. So I'm wondering if there is a rule somewhere that I'm missing since you've started implementing it too. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 06:43, 29 August 2011 (UTC) Simple reason is that not all users watch with the same screen resolution. I have experimented with different screen types and every case, teh hardcoded pixel images come across as fine in larger screens, but too big for smaller screens (640x480). Hence, removing the hardcoding allows the screen to choose its own image size according to the desktop, palmtop, notebook screen resolution. Try this at home, you will get clearly what I mean. — Legolas (talk2me) 11:47, 29 August 2011 (UTC) ☆ Barnstar ☆ The Special Barnstar I hereby award you, Legolas2186, the The Special Barnstar for your absolutely outstanding work on Lady Gaga related articles. There is no point in me saying "keep up the excellent work", because I and many others know you certainly will. Thank You! -- MelbourneStar☆ (talk to me) 13:33, 29 August 2011 (UTC) Thank you MS. — Legolas (talk2me) 11:45, 30 August 2011 (UTC) Grammy FLC Hi Legolas. Since you have reviewed Grammy lists in the past, is there a chance you might be able to review this Grammy list currently at FLC? I'd be much appreciated--the list needs reviews badly. --Another Believer (Talk) 14:41, 29 August 2011 (UTC) Yes I can. — Legolas (talk2me) 11:45, 30 August 2011 (UTC) Still Breathless I've answered you above. Well? Alecsdaniel (talk) 22:26, 29 August 2011 (UTC) Each of those samples are being discussed in the article, backed by reliable sources, which is not the case for I'm Breathless. — Legolas (talk2me) 11:45, 30 August 2011 (UTC) Yes, it is the case, half of the article talks about "Vogue", the Academy Award winning torch song 'Sooner or Later' is mentioned a couple of times. Alecsdaniel (talk) 12:10, 30 August 2011 (UTC) Only talking about the song doesn't make it pass NFCC, there needs to be critical analysis, why the sample added can increase reader's understanding of the article, and also backing of those from a reliable source. The samples in I'm Breathless fails. I don't understand why are you pushing for the inclusion of the samples? — Legolas (talk2me) 12:15, 30 August 2011 (UTC) Alecs, non-free content, as I'm sure you realise, can be used only if some deliberately strict criteria are met. When considering whether to use non-free content, the question has got to be, not "can I get away with using this?" but "can I get away with not using this?" If you are certain that the media is needed, the purpose of a rationale is to explain to everyone else why that is the case, with reference to the specific article in which it is used; copy-paste rationales, as are used on the samples previously in I'm Breathless, are not at all helpful. What you need to be trying to do is minimising the amount of non-free content, but keep the article as useful and educational. Edit warring is not useful, and, concerning non-free content, you really should err on the side of caution; that is, keep it out until there is a clear consensus that it should be in the article. I advise this is taken to the article talk page, so that others can easily follow the discussion. Alecs, the burden of proof falls on you to show why the non-free content is a useful addition to the article. J Milburn (talk) 13:30, 31 August 2011 (UTC) Well, the album mixes pop/dance/torch ballads/house/jazz/swing and other genres. Don't you think people from 2011 want to know how one recorded a 40s album in the 90s? All articles about albums need to have one-two sample from songs, to show the general idea of the album. People should guess it or what? I'm not for using a big number or samples [two-three are enough], but not at all is not the right way either. Alecsdaniel (talk) 22:15, 31 August 2011 (UTC) Q Hello! Hope you're doing well. I have a question. If I asked the owner of this image if they could allow its use on Wiki and they do, can I use it? The pic of MC in it is from the Tour edition of Charmbracelet and its a tour notice/poster. Is it free or does it contain non-free items? Novice7 (talk) 11:17, 31 August 2011 (UTC) Its non-free. Its a copyrighted work of art, whose owner is MC and her Japanese record label. If you can forward permission from them to OTRS, then its fine, else it fails NFCC. — Legolas (talk2me) 11:20, 31 August 2011 (UTC) Okay, thanks. I saw another poster just like this one, containing album art/DVD art etc. Thanks for clearing up my doubts Legolas :) Novice7 (talk) 11:22, 31 August 2011 (UTC) Q2 What kind of sources do you need? All the reviews of the album criticise the fact that the songs were remixed in Q Sound [or even more], you have the sources all over the article. What more do you need?Alecsdaniel (talk) 22:10, 31 August 2011 (UTC) It's amazing how so many of Madonna's albums don't have songs notable enough to be featured in their articles. I say we delete the articles altogether. Alecsdaniel (talk) 10:23, 1 September 2011 (UTC) What load of crap is that? Of course the articles are notable, and of course the samples can be included. You are just looking for simple answer. You must find critical analysis on the song and post in depth description of why the sample is needed. Not just "her friend died".--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me So it should sound something like this: "Despite the fact that in the early '90, AIDS was still a tabu subject, Madonna was one of the few entertainers to talk about it, going as far as paying tribute, on this album, to two of her friends who died because of AIDS; the critics gave the song good reviews." ? Alecsdaniel (talk) 21:30, 1 September 2011 (UTC) Do you really think that's critical analysis? — Legolas (talk2me) 11:37, 2 September 2011 (UTC) And this is: "This song hit the first position in several countries including Canada and the UK, and became Madonna's first number in France. "La Isla Bonita" went on to become one of Madonna's most performed song on her tours", right? [Taken from the GA rated True Blue). Alecsdaniel (talk) 14:10, 2 September 2011 (UTC) "La Isla Bonita" is being critically analyzed by reliable sources in the composition section, including its structure, layer, theme etc. Don't try to throw shady bull-shit on me. If you want to learn about NFCC, I'm willing to, but try to act smart, you can get the hell out of my talk page. — Legolas (talk2me) 14:29, 2 September 2011 (UTC) So are "Vogue" and the other samples from the I'm Breathless article. Alecsdaniel (talk) 16:41, 2 September 2011 (UTC) You still have no clue about NFCC. Where are these fabulous sources discussing what the sample shows? "Vogue" is limited to its impact. You dont need a sample for that. "More" is omnipresent and "Sooner or Later" is absent from analysis. NFCC fail again. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:51, 2 September 2011 (UTC) WikiCup 2011 July newsletter The finals are upon us; we're down to the last few. One of the eight remaining contestants will be this year's WikiCup champion! 150 was the score needed to progress to the final; just under double the 76 required to reach round 4, and more than triple the 41 required to reach round 3. Our eight finalists are: Casliber (submissions), Pool A's winner. Casliber has the highest total score in the competition, with 1528, the bulk of which is made up of 8 featured articles. He has the highest number of total featured articles (8, 1 of which was eligible for double points) and total did you knows (72) of any finalist. Casliber writes mostly on biology, including ornithology, botany and mycology. PresN (submissions), Pool B's winner and the highest scorer this round. PresN is the only finalist who has scored featured topic points, and he has gathered an impressive 330, but most of his points come from his 4 featured articles, one of which scored double. PresN writes mostly on video games and the Hugo Awards. Hurricanehink (submissions), Pool A's runner-up. Hurricanehink's points are mostly from his 30 good articles, more than any other finalist, and he is also the only finalist to score good topic points. Hurricanehink, as his name suggests, writes mostly on meteorology. Wizardman (submissions), Pool B's runner-up. Wizardman has completed 86 good article reviews, more than any other finalist, but most of his points come from his 2 featured articles. Wizardman writes mostly on American sport, especially baseball. Miyagawa (submissions), the "fastest loser" (Pool A). Miyagawa has written 3 featured lists, one of which was awarded double points, more than any other finalist, but he was awarded points mostly for his 68 did you knows. Miyagawa writes on a variety of topics, including dogs, military history and sport. Resolute (submissions), the second "fastest loser" (Pool B). Most of Resolute's points come from his 9 good articles. He writes mostly on Canadian topics, including ice hockey. Yellow Evan (submissions), who was joint third "fastest loser" (Pool A). Most of Evan's points come from his 10 good articles, and he writes mostly on meteorology. Sp33dyphil (submissions), who was joint third "fastest loser" (Pool B). Most of Phil's points come from his 9 good articles, 4 of which (more than any other finalist) were eligible for double points. He writes mostly on aeronautics. We say goodbye to our seven other semi-finalists, Another Believer (submissions), Piotrus (submissions), Grandiose (submissions), Stone (submissions), Eisfbnore (submissions), Canada Hky (submissions) and MuZemike (submissions). Everyone still in the competition at this stage has done fantastically well, and contributed greatly to Wikipedia. We're on the home straight now, and we will know our winner in two months. In other news, preparations for next year's competition have begun with a brainstorming thread. Please, feel free to drop by and share any thoughts you have about how the competition should work next year. Sign ups are not yet open, but will be opened in due course. Watch this space. Further, there has been a discussion about the rule whereby those in the WikiCup must delcare their participation when nominating articles at featured article candidates. This has resulted in a bot being created by new featured article delegate Ucucha (talk · contribs). The bot will leave a message on FAC pages if the nominator is a participant in the WikiCup. A reminder of the rules: any points scored after August 29 may be claimed for the final round, and please remember to update submission pages promptly. If you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 00:06, 1 September 2011 (UTC) Another help Hey Avi! Can you add alt text for Charmbracelet? Thanks in advance. Also, what about your injury? Are you okay now? Have you recovered fully? Novice7 (talk) 15:03, 1 September 2011 (UTC) Thanks for adding the ALT. Novice7 (talk) 06:37, 2 September 2011 (UTC) Help Could you please check in "Love on Top" has bubbled under the Billboard Hot 100 chart this week? Jivesh • Talk2Me 19:36, 1 September 2011 (UTC) Did you see my post? Jivesh • Talk2Me 11:58, 2 September 2011 (UTC) I have no idea whether it has charted. — Legolas (talk2me) 12:38, 2 September 2011 (UTC) Thanks anyway. Jivesh • Talk2Me 10:28, 3 September 2011 (UTC) Now its showing. Its charted at #22. — Legolas (talk2me) 14:52, 3 September 2011 (UTC) How reliable is Softpedia for news? —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 22:54, 1 September 2011 (UTC) Softpedia is grossly, and disgustingly unreliable. — Legolas (talk2me) 11:35, 2 September 2011 (UTC) Useful RS links for W.E. article It's not really good news though 0_o. Deadline has full coverage (http://www.deadline.com/2011/09/death-in-venice-madonna-movie-bombs-will-weinstein-still-give-it-an-oscar-push/) and The Huffington Post's piece has some review excepts along with external links to the actual reviews (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/01/madonna-we-review_n_945467.html) Crystal Clear x3 06:54, 2 September 2011 (UTC) Well what did you expect? Its Madonna after all. If it didn't bomb, I would have shaved my head. Yes, I'm in the process of sorting through these reviews. Thanks Crystal. — Legolas (talk2me) 11:36, 2 September 2011 (UTC) W.E Hello. I have asked for a third opinion regarding the dispute at W.E (film) that you have been involved in. The listing can be found here. Hopefully the dispute can be resolved according to policy by a non-biased third party. Jsayre64 (talk) 17:11, 2 September 2011 (UTC) 3RR report Hello Legolas2186. You are mentioned in a 3RR report at WP:AN3#User:Legolas2186 reported by User:ItsZippy (Result: Protected, warnings), which is now closed. I am puzzled by all the blanking by IPs, and notice you use fairly strong language on the article talk page. I have applied three days of protection, which can be lifted if the editors on the talk page agree that it's not needed. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:44, 3 September 2011 (UTC) Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/The Simpsons (season 10)/archive2 Hi! Are you satisfied with my changes? Theleftorium (talk) 09:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC) Love on Top and 1+1 I have no idea how to add the information on the page for LOT. Can you help? Would you have time to copy-edit "1+1"? Nathan asked for it in the GAN. Jivesh • Talk2Me 05:19, 4 September 2011 (UTC) How to add information for the page? I don't get you. — Legolas (talk2me) 09:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC) I was talking about the bubbling under chart. Anyway, it's done. Can you please do the c/e for "1+1"? Jivesh • Talk2Me 10:54, 4 September 2011 (UTC) What kinda c/e are you looking for? — Legolas (talk2me) 11:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC) Please have a look at the GA review. Perhaps this will help you to understand better. Jivesh • Talk2Me 12:00, 4 September 2011 (UTC) Born This Way lead paragraph re-vamp Hi, I was just thinking that the Born This Way lead paragraph needs a re-vamp, as there are a few problems within it, such as consistency, amount of info, etc. This was my version. Would you mind telling me if you think it's worthy to be put into the actual article or if the current one is better? (Some content is copied from the current revision of the Born This Way page [1]). Born This Way is the second studio album by American recording artist Lady Gaga. It was released on May 23, 2011 by Interscope Records as a follow up to her internationally successful debut, The Fame (2008) and the extended play The Fame Monster (2009). Gaga wrote or co-wrote all the songs, as well as being the co-producer of every track in the album. In Born This Way, Gaga collaborated with numerous producers, such as DJ Snake, DJ White Shadow, Jeppe Laursen, RedOne, Fernando Garibay, Robert John "Mutt" Lange and Clinton Sparks; RedOne and Ferdinando Garibay were the only producers with whom Gaga had previously collaborated. Gaga collaborated artists such as The E Street Band saxophonist Clarence Clemons and Queen guitarist Brian May on tracks from the album. Production first took place in early 2010 and recording sessions at various recording studios around the world. The title was revealed by Gaga in September at the 2010 MTV Video Music Awards after her win of the Video of the Year Award for "Bad Romance". A week before the album's scheduled release, the contents were leaked online, but were shortly removed due to copyright violations. The music of Born This Way is rooted in the synthpop, electropop and dance-pop-oriented styles of her previous releases, The Fame and The Fame Monster, yet, also incorprates a broader range of elements of several musical genres such as opera, heavy metal, disco, and rock and roll. The album also draws inspiration from the pop, rock and electronic music of the 1980s and 1990s, as well as recording artists such as Madonna, Bruce Springsteen and Whitney Houston. Lyrically, the album is a departure from her previous work, which focused on fame, wealth and romance, concentrating mainly on social issues, most notably sexuality, religion and feminism. The album received generally positive reception from music critics; Gaga's vocals were praised, and reviewers applauded the album's varying musical styles, production, as well as the social issues raised from the songs. Despite this, some critics deemed the album's musical material to be unoriginal. Born This Way was also criticized by several religious commentators and organizations, who expressed discontent towards its numerous references to Christian figures and themes, as well as its supportive stance on sexuality. Similar to being critically acclaimed, the album was also an international success, topping the charts in over twenty-three countries including the Billboard 200 in the United States and the UK Album Charts. In the US, the album sold over 1.11 million copies in its first week, the largest first-week album sales in over six years. An estimated 440,000 of these sales were at a special price of 99 cents, which Amazon.com offered for two days during the album's first week of release. As of June 2011, Born This Way has sold 5 million copies worldwide. Three singles and one promotional single were released for the album. "Born This Way", the lead single, topped the charts in over eighteen countries including the Billboard Hot 100 in the United States. It would become the fastest selling single in iTunes history, having sold over one million copies within its first five days. "Judas" was the second single for Born This Way. The song peaked on the top ten in nineteen countries. "The Edge of Glory", originally released as one of two proposed promotional singles, was made as the third single of the album. The song debuted at number three on the Hot 100 and topped the charts in South Korea. Yoü and I was later released as the album's fourth single. The promotional single for the album, "Hair", peaked at number twelve on the Billboard Hot 100 and charted in sixteen different countries. What do you think? Yours, --&レア (talk) 09:45, 4 September 2011 (UTC) I JUST LOVEEEEE IT!!!! BRILLIANT — Legolas (talk2me) 10:47, 4 September 2011 (UTC) By the way, I was wondering, would you say PopCrush is a reliable source?--&レア (talk) 15:15, 4 September 2011 (UTC) Not at all and in any way. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:16, 4 September 2011 (UTC) Popcrush seems to be reliable, Amanda Degree in music journalism, Amy has written for "Kerrang! Spin, Revolver, Alternative Press, Noisecreep, Spinner, ARTISTdirect and Teen People". Not really seeing any negatives that would deem them unreliable. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 01:53, 5 September 2011 (UTC) Born This Way (song) Hello Legolas, ItsAlwaysLupus left me a message concerning Born This Way (song) and the use of the Oricon charts in the article. I have to admit that I'm out of my comfort zone here, but ItsAlwaysLupus pointed out that Oricon is on the list of recommended charts at WP:GOODCHARTS. I think I understand why it's being excluded based on your edit summaries, but I was wondering if that's a consensus that's been established somewhere? ItsAlwaysLupus feels intimidated by you, so I'd appreciate if you replied directly to me instead of ItsAlwaysLupus. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 21:39, 4 September 2011 (UTC) This is so bizarre and kinda weird. Well, actually IAL is probably not aware of the funda called component charts. These are the charts which are used for compiling a main chart. For eg: the Hot 100 Airplay, Hot Singles Sales and Hot Digital Songs make up the Billboard Hot 100. Hence if a song charts on the Hot 100, we do not include any of its component charts. This is the case of Japan Hot 100. The Oricon physical sales chart, although a completely valid chart, is compiled by SoundScan Japan and is one of the component charts of Japan Hot 100. Hence the reason why I excluded it. And yes, there's been a pretty strong consensus across the board about this. If you see the tab for Japan in the WP:GOODCHARTS, you will see that the Oricon is under sales column, along with RIAJ digital track, and Billboard sales chart. The Japan Hot 100 on the other hand is stretched across the sales + airplay column, denoting it is the all-encompassing chart. For a particular nation, any chart which combines sales + airplay is preferred over just sales, or just airplay cchart. If you want further clarification, User:Kww is there, along with all the music editors who follow this consensus. I can invite all of them if you want. — Legolas (talk2me) 12:42, 5 September 2011 (UTC) Thank you. That makes sense to me. I'll try to explain it to ItsAlwaysLupus. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 19:33, 5 September 2011 (UTC) Billboard Sorry to bother you, but do you know anyone that has the Fred Bronson Billboard Book of Number 1 Hits', the 2003 issue. I am trying to get as much information on; "Genie in a Bottle", "What a Girl Wants", and "Come On Over Baby (All I Want Is You)". Thanks in advance --FeuDeJoie (talk) 13:48, 5 September 2011 (UTC) User:Frcm1988 is your answer. :) — Legolas (talk2me) 13:50, 5 September 2011 (UTC) Thanks :) --FeuDeJoie (talk) 20:41, 5 September 2011 (UTC) Radar/Unusual You Hey Lego, could you comment here? Thanks, Xwomanizerx (talk) 17:27, 5 September 2011 (UTC) Not Afraid Hello, Legolas. I am working to expand the Not Afraid article and have prepared a sandbox at User:Wikipedian Penguin/draft. Whenever you are free, could you do a copy-edit of the prose in the article? If I must, yes, I can wait. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 22:13, 6 September 2011 (UTC) Probably tonight. :) — Legolas (talk2me) 02:16, 7 September 2011 (UTC) W.E Regarding W.E (film), I have the article on my watchlist due to the IP sock. However, regarding Kate Muir's review, the reference says, "The first notices are in... and most of them are not kind, to put it mildly. Kate Muir of our sister paper, The Times of London, reports that her romantic historical fantasy about the 'misunderstood' (as she put it at her press conference), Nazi-loving Duke and Dutchess of Windsor is 'screamingly, inadverdently funny in parts.'" The Wikipedia article says Muir "complimented some of the funny scenes of the film", but I think "complimented" is inaccurate in light of the context. The inadvertence needs to be more clear. What do you think? Erik (talk | contribs) 16:04, 7 September 2011 (UTC) Good catch. What do you suggest can be put in its place. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:06, 7 September 2011 (UTC) Not sure, but I see the IP sock is persistent. Let's figure it out after the sock's blocked. Erik (talk | contribs) 16:14, 7 September 2011 (UTC) Revert the sock wherever you see it. As for the article, its been protected fully. We can discuss the content. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:15, 7 September 2011 (UTC) It may be that Kate Muir's review should belong in the negative part of the reception section. I see that her review is not accessible online, and I assume that's why the New York Post is used instead. I think I can access the review through my university database; going straight to the source may be better. Erik (talk | contribs) 16:23, 7 September 2011 (UTC) If its a whole out and out negative review, I have no problem in moving it. Erik it would be a great help if you can see whether your Univ database has it. By the way, how do you feel teh article is shaping up? Also, hi to you since we have never met before . :) — Legolas (talk2me) 16:27, 7 September 2011 (UTC) Hello to you too! :) The article appears well-rounded to me, although I have to admit, I'm not seeing the so-called historical hook for this film. :) Anyway, I found the review and pasted it at TinyPaste. It seems pretty negative in general, though it is positive about some things. Maybe we could just drop Muir for now? The film will get more reviews in December, and they'll probably be more professional than Muir's review. (One thing I dislike about negative reviews, critics often seem to have fun with their own vocabulary in bashing a film, rather than telling straight-up what's wrong with it.) If you still want to implement the review, the top of the TinyPaste page has reference wiki-code you can use. Erik (talk | contribs) 16:47, 7 September 2011 (UTC) Lol. Did you guys know Madonna loathes Hydrangea? :)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 16:50, 7 September 2011 (UTC) J-Lo discography Hey old one :P. Lol kidding, that was about the conversation we had on Nath's page, I was just kidding. Hehe. Can you check the discography again and if it's all good with the n-dashes give your vote and if it's not explain on which other place should we add them. Thank You :) ! Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 18:12, 7 September 2011 (UTC) DYK Nomination of The Secret of the Nagas Well done on expanding The Secret of the Nagas. Excellent work. I've reviewed the DYK nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/The Secret of the Nagas and it passes in all respects expect maybe it is not the most interesting DYK hook ever. I don't know if there's something you can do about that? It may well get used anyway, but... best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:23, 7 September 2011 (UTC) Help Hi Legolas I was wondering if you have a help article that would tell me what things do. Eg. " | [[. Things like that. I want to try and fix up an Australian Singles chart to make it appear like the Billboard Hot 100 so it is easier to read but I think I need more knowledge to do this. If you could post it here or on my talk page that would be great. Thank You :) Muthamonster (talk) 01:06, 8 September 2011 (UTC)