Jump to content

Theological veto: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
m Dating maintenance tags: {{Rewrite}}
Line 18: Line 18:


=== The theological veto is immoral ===
=== The theological veto is immoral ===
While its high aspiration is to warn against human [[pride]], its supporters are guilty of the highest form of pride: They claim that they know the mind of God{{citation needed|date=January 2011}}.
While its high aspiration is to warn against human [[pride]], some say its supporters are guilty of the highest form of pride: They claim that they know the mind of God{{citation needed|date=January 2011}}.


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 00:55, 8 February 2012

The theological veto[1] is the concept in philosophy of religion that philosophy and logic are impious and that God, not reason, is sovereign. This concept is held as true by some theists. The idea is derived from a belief that mankind is depraved, and his intellect is a flawed product of this fallenness. In this view conversion, not reason, is the way to the truth; preaching, not argument is the way to persuade; and grace, not evidence is the way belief is confirmed. Also, in this view, natural reason is so profoundly hostile to the divine that holding it above faith is tantamount to worshiping a sinful creature as an idol.

An early use of the phrase is reported from a 1925 critique of opponents of evolution: "They meet the accumulating evidences of the descent of man with a theological veto. They set the limit to science by the quotation of a verse from the creation legend "Genesis.""[2]

Even the use of reason on behalf of faith is rejected under the theological veto, as it shows faithlessness. It presupposes by practice that faith can be benefited by reason.

The theological veto is logically irrefutable, in the same way that there can be no game winner without entering into some kind of game.

Rejecting the theological veto

There are several reasons put forth by those who reject the theological veto.

The theological veto is futile

One way to reject the theological veto is to understand that one cannot isolate reason from faith. Intelligible use of language commits one to consistency[citation needed]. To reject reason is to refuse to make sense. Even the theological veto itself must be consistent with itself and inconsistent with reason[citation needed].

The theological veto is self-defeating

Another way the theological veto is rejected is to understand that rejection of critical control over one's beliefs, as for instance by the requirement of evidence, lowers the barrier against all forms of bigotry, fanaticism, and persecution[citation needed].

The theological veto is immoral

While its high aspiration is to warn against human pride, some say its supporters are guilty of the highest form of pride: They claim that they know the mind of God[citation needed].

References

  1. ^ Frederick Ferré, Basic Modern Philosophy of Religion
  2. ^ American Ethical Union, The Ethical Outlook, Volume 12, 1925, page 67.