User talk:Lowkeyvision: Difference between revisions
→Award for Maria0333: new section |
→Thanks: new section |
||
Line 314: | Line 314: | ||
I've reverted you at [[User:Maria0333]]. There are only exceptional circumstances in which you should edit someone else's user page, and offering a barnstar is not one of them. Feel free to place such things at [[User talk:Maria0333]]. Please also note that it seems more and more likely that you are following me around and doubtless the "difficult people" you refer to in your barnstar text includes me. Just drop this attitude, please: there is not much more that I can do when I (and others) find problems with your contributions, other than to point out the error of your ways and offer some guidance. That you do not like what you are told by experienced contributors is not a justification for some of the stunts that you have been pulling, including the one for which you were recently blocked. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 17:46, 22 March 2013 (UTC) |
I've reverted you at [[User:Maria0333]]. There are only exceptional circumstances in which you should edit someone else's user page, and offering a barnstar is not one of them. Feel free to place such things at [[User talk:Maria0333]]. Please also note that it seems more and more likely that you are following me around and doubtless the "difficult people" you refer to in your barnstar text includes me. Just drop this attitude, please: there is not much more that I can do when I (and others) find problems with your contributions, other than to point out the error of your ways and offer some guidance. That you do not like what you are told by experienced contributors is not a justification for some of the stunts that you have been pulling, including the one for which you were recently blocked. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 17:46, 22 March 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Thanks == |
|||
Thanks for your appreciation. In the life some times you face a bunch of difficult persons who are ready to tease you at any cast. [[User:Maria0333|Maria0333]] ([[User talk:Maria0333|talk]]) 20:21, 22 March 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:21, 22 March 2013
Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Lowkeyvision! Thank you for your contributions. I am I am One of Many and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! I am One of Many (talk) 07:39, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
I have mentioned you on the talk page of Bhagyalakshmi temple, you accused me of vandalism while I had given proper explanation in the edit summary, I have taken the issue on the talk page. Do not revert until you give some proper explanation. --sarvajna (talk) 12:20, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
It is an important part of history. It should a period that the black & white view of the world that some people have of the world(where muslims were some kind of imperialists who didn't care about hindus) is not true. I consider it historical revisionism to take away good contributions muslims made towards peace and harmony with the community they lives with or ruled over. History is not perfect but the good must be reported with the bad.
File source problem with File:Aboobaker Osman Mitha.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Aboobaker Osman Mitha.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 01:00, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Here is the example of the book that contains the original image on the internet. http://aomitha.blogspot.com <--How do you cite something that is not in english?
There is no copyright for this image filed in the united states as far as I know. I am the creator of this portrait which is modeled after the original image and I uploaded it. The recreated portrait is based off an image of Major General A O Mitha in a book that is roughly translates to "Unlikely beginnings: a soldier's life". The original image is very old. I don't think there is US copyright on the original image because I dont see any marking on it that state copyright on the images
(Lowkeyvision (talk) 10:12, 1 February 2013 (UTC))
I have address the issue, made citations and filed my claim to the image (Lowkeyvision (talk) 03:26, 10 February 2013 (UTC))
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Aboobaker Osman Mitha.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Aboobaker Osman Mitha.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Aboobaker Osman Mitha.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Aboobaker Osman Mitha.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Aboobaker Osman Mitha.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Aboobaker Osman Mitha.jpg.
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.
This image has been deleted because you have copied it from a copyright book. Please don't do that any more. All books are copyright. Also, please do not remove speedy deletion tags from files; leave that to the reviewing administrator. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 21:29, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- The book has no copyright in the US, but I guess if all books have a copyright then I must delete it. Thank you (Lowkeyvision (talk) 21:31, 5 March 2013 (UTC))
Removal of content from talk pages
Please note you are not supposed to remove the contents from the talk page even if the issue is resolved, if you think that the page is large you can archive it, do not do it again. It amounts to disruption --sarvajna (talk) 08:51, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Feb 2013
Your recent editing history at Bhagyalakshmi temple shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Please note that you are not supposed to censor anything. Looks like you want to remove any references made about some political party --sarvajna (talk) 10:19, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
It appears that the article is trying to politiize and push a political agenda. It is biased and tiled towards one side. It does not have a neutral point of view as of now. Please explain why including so much information about recent events is relevant? (Lowkeyvision (talk) 10:23, 1 February 2013 (UTC))
- Tell me why you want to hide those events from the article, can you tell me how do we make the article neutral without excluding those events. Well may be its your point of view but please note that wikipedia is not censored --sarvajna (talk) 10:29, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Please see explanation on the article page. As I state before, it is recentism and it reserves it own section and does not have to be plastered on the main page of the article. See the example I provided to the example you gave. (Lowkeyvision (talk) 10:41, 1 February 2013 (UTC))
- I have replied on the article talk page. --sarvajna (talk) 10:45, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Talk page
The next time when you start a section on my talk page, please start it at the bottom of the page, you can use the button on the top right called "New section". I have reverted you again on Bhagyalakshmi temple page, as I have told you so many times you cannot censor things on wikipedia if you feel that a new page is required go ahead and create a new page. Coming to the page of RSS where does the RSS says that its opponents are Christians and muslim minorities? Stop pushing your POV. However I have kept the title of the section "Court rulings against RSS" intact, I am taking it to the talk page and want to see you logic on that.--sarvajna (talk) 06:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
This [1] revert of yours makes no sense, if you have ever cared to read my comment I said that there is a seperate section for the comment of Hindu Terrorism made by Shinde in the page itself, its here [2]. What you did was that you combined two different sources one is the google book that War at the Top of the World: The Struggle for Afganistan, Kashmir and Tibet and the remarks made by shinde and created some synthesised statements please read Wikipedia:SYNTH before you do such a thing. Please do not revert me. I will be explaining the same thing on the talk page. --sarvajna (talk) 07:43, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
- I am not trying to censor anything on wikipedia like you were trying to do on the another article, just to inform you again the Hindu terror remark by Shinde is very much part of the article here Rashtriya_Swayamsevak_Sangh#Alleged_involvement_in_Hindu_Terrorism. For god's sake read the article first. --sarvajna (talk) 07:49, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Once more
Can you really stop your nonsense on the page of Bhagyalakshmi Temple, on the one hand you accused me of censoring information on a different page where I did not censor anything and on the other hand you try to censor things on another article. This is simple logic, you were the one who claimed that the controversies needs another article not me so ONUS is on you (Its not exactly the right page but its very close). Your behavior is highly disruptive. Wikipedia is very vast, you can edit any other less controversial articles or may be create new articles, I am sure you will enjoy being here. If this goes on I will not find it difficult to seek an administrator's intervention. Again for the last time please give me any genuine reasons why you feel that those controversies should not be included in the article. Thanks --sarvajna (talk) 19:47, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hello once again please note that you should leave messages on talk page not on user page as you did it here [3]. I am not hounding you. If you think so you are very welcome to report me, to make your task easier I am letting you know that WP:ANI is one of the places where you can report user behaviors but please beware of WP:BOOMARANG before you report me.--sarvajna (talk) 06:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
If I wanted to report you I would have already. I am trying to be resolve this in the most civilized manner possible. (Lowkeyvision (talk) 20:48, 8 February 2013 (UTC))
You are dealing with Mahtma Ghandis disciple. I have patience and persistence. In the end truth prevails. (Lowkeyvision (talk) 21:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC))
- I know whom I am dealing with, I am dealing with a POV pusher if you are a mahatma Gandhi disciple you would have been on his page discussing page move as I am doing there. Do not insult Gandhi by calling yourself his disciple.--sarvajna (talk) 23:31, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
You are trying to cover up facts about an organization whose founding member and second president praised the Nazis and wished the RSS was like the Nazis. Your personal attacks are meaningless (Lowkeyvision (talk))
- Check the RSS talk page, I think we have a solution in sight, also please keep your personal opinions with you. Do not become biased because you have some opinion of RSS. --sarvajna (talk) 07:20, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
February 2013
Hello, I'm Jab843. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Talk:Nova Publishers, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jab843 (talk) 06:22, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Notice of Dispute resolution discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Saffron terror".
Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 05:25, 10 February 2013 (UTC) DRNNotice of Dispute resolution discussionHello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution.
|