Jump to content

Housing in Pakistan: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
* reducing its [[profit margin]]; and
* reducing its [[profit margin]]; and
* increasing [[land-use density]].
* increasing [[land-use density]].
housing in pakisyaqn is unqiue
During the 1970s, '''M.Y Corporation''','''Rukunuddin Construction Company''' and '''Hasan''' '''Associate''' come in to construction arena with a commitment to provide low cost housing and followed Al Azam's footstep. The company, which was formed by a retired [[Supervisor|overseer]] from the Pakistan Works Department (PWD), also introduced low-cost [[Prefabrication|prefabricated]] housing units, in addition to their regular low-priced apartments. The quality and safety of their units, however, were generally viewed as inferior.
During the 1970s, '''M.Y Corporation''','''Rukunuddin Construction Company''' and '''Hasan''' '''Associate''' come in to construction arena with a commitment to provide low cost housing and followed Al Azam's footstep. The company, which was formed by a retired [[Supervisor|overseer]] from the Pakistan Works Department (PWD), also introduced low-cost [[Prefabrication|prefabricated]] housing units, in addition to their regular low-priced apartments. The quality and safety of their units, however, were generally viewed as inferior.

Revision as of 16:15, 8 June 2015

As per Google stats, the total population of Pakistan in 2011 was 176.74 million [1] which means Pakistan real estate holds immense potential because of its population density.[2] This article deals with topics pertaining to housing in Pakistan, and more specifically, the trend of low-cost housing.

Low-cost housing

Private-sector Low Cost Housing in Pakistan was initially based on the concept of providing housing facilities to the general public, without making enormous profits. It was pioneered by Al Azam Limited Construction Company, a start-up construction company, that launched the "Low Cost Housing Society" in Karachi during the 1960s.

Al Azam built very low-priced residential- as well as commercial-type accommodations in Karachi and Hyderabad, using the apartment system. It managed to keep prices down, without sacrificing quality, by:

housing in pakisyaqn is unqiue

During the 1970s, M.Y Corporation,Rukunuddin Construction Company and Hasan Associate come in to construction arena with a commitment to provide low cost housing and followed Al Azam's footstep. The company, which was formed by a retired overseer from the Pakistan Works Department (PWD), also introduced low-cost prefabricated housing units, in addition to their regular low-priced apartments. The quality and safety of their units, however, were generally viewed as inferior.

Maymar, another construction company, entered the market in the late 70s, with residential apartments and housing units that were probably the best ever built, and they were highly successful. As demand for better housing accommodation increased, Maymar moved upmarket, leaving behind the low-cost housing sector.

Construction firms, such as Cellrock and Abidi, entered the industry in the early 1980s to focus on low-cost prefabricated housing units. As the quality of their construction was substandard, these efforts proved unsuccessful, causing serious financial losses.

There has been interest from Government organizations such as Council of Works & Housing Research (CWHR) from the stand-point of providing low cost material. The proposed construction of low cost housing at Ibrahim Hydery at Karachi pegs rate per square feet at only Rs. 387.

Companies like cooliobob and Maymar were able to evolve primarily due to the establishment of an institution by the name of Karachi Development Authority. It was entrusted with the task of making new development schemes for the city of Karachi and simultaneously the institution also established a wing by the name of Public Housing Scheme which was entrusted with the task of construction and selling finished housing in shape of flats/houses as the case may be. However since the need for housing was so much in the city that Public Housing Scheme could not have fulfilled on its own. This was the reason the Karachi Development Authority facilitated the builders like Al-Azam and Maymar with cheap lands to share its burden of providing finished housing to the people- the concept was considered noble and there was no risk of losses. However the chaos started when these cheap lands were distributed by corrupt bureaucrats to non professional builders. These corrupt and non professional builders not only damaged the industry but they also made the survival of companies making good quality housing difficult. On the other hand the Public Housing Scheme which was still succeeding in providing decently priced and decently quality housing to the city was hit hard by the collapse of utility companies who failed to provide them utility connections in time. Thus the last hope of people getting good quality housing with safety of investment also went down with the closure of Public Housing Scheme.

The construction industry began to mushroom towards the end of the '70s. Most of the new companies joined the industry merely to make a quick profit, without regards for the quality and safety of their buildings. Monthly installments were also too costly for most of the general public. As a result of corrupt administrative practices, public confidence in low-cost housing projects suffered after some low-cost buildings collapsed, due to poor construction and thieving of construction materials.

Firms such as Al Azam are nowadays very rare, as most construction firms still preoccupy themselves with traditional outdated modes of construction. As the general public becomes increasingly knowledgeable and affluent, housing and construction are increasingly focusing on high -end and high-quality deluxe housing, where profits are also better. Today, low-cost housing are largely confined to remote city and town areas, and are largely managed by the government.

References