User talk:Bluerasberry

Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #104

Cardio First Angel - continuation

Hi Bluerasberry, Thanks for your advice. I have use three sources from which I wrote an article. I wasn't sure where to put this article, if in the sandbox or somewhere else. I still find orientation in Wikipedia rather confusing. So, I am sending you my article as part of my message below. I wanted to inclose also a picture of the Cardio First Angel, so people would see how it looks like (my picture), but have no idea where to enclose it. Please let me know the outcome. Thanks Animall

The Article:

The Cardio First Angel

The Cardio First Angel is a medical device which was co-invented by the cardiologist Prof. Dr. Christian Hagl. It has been developed to improve the consistency and quality of manual chest compressions during administration of a heart massage. There was conducted a clinical trial or a Pilot Study of the effect of a Cardio First Angel (CFA) device on CPR. The goal was to find out what was the effect by using a Cardio First Angel on patient survival. The CPRs were randomly performed on various patients using Cardio First Angel. It was concluded that with a Cardio First Angel used by the manufacturer’s guidelines a quality CPR was performed with consistency of the chest compressions. The Pilot Study was provided by Baqiyatallah Medical Sciences University. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT02394977?view=results

There was a study in Herzchirurgische Klinik des Universitätsklinikums München, Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE) where 205 people performed CPR. Firstly they performed CPR just with their knowledge using their hands only. The second time they were using the Cardio First Angel for resuscitation without any instruction how to use it. 38% achieved improvement with compression depth and 33.3% of these people had visible improvement in compression rate when used the Cardio First Angel. 66.2% of people said that they would be happy to use it again, because they didn’t need to be in a physical contact with the patient and because Cardio First Angel was very easy to use even without any prior knowledge. 100% of people placed Cardio First Angel in its correct position.

Christian Heinrich wrote an article in Spiegel Online about Cardio First Angel (CFA) expressing a view that this medical device is a great help in saving people’s lives after a heart attack. The main reasons being that it not only eliminates laymen worry in regard where to place hands or how strong should be a chest compression, but that there is no need of a contact with a patient. The Cardio First Angel consists of combination of springs, when correct pressure is delivered audio feedback by “klick” is heard. When the springs are released, another sound “klack” is heard. The bottom of CFA is from foam surface. On the top is a large red button on which lay rescuer applies pressure by hands. This device is purely mechanical and no batteries or electricity is present. This means that Cardio First Angel is always ready to use. Mr. Christian Heinrich believes that the Cardio First Angel should be placed in the public places, businesses, homes as well as in cars due to its small size and easy transportation. http://www.spiegel.de/gesundheit/diagnose/reanimation-cardio-first-angel-fuer-bessere-wiederbelebung-a-992407.html

DYK for Amos Yee

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 07:50, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Campus ambassador application

Hello Bluerasberry! I noticed on your user page that you are a campus ambassador, and I was wondering how exactly the process is supposed to be carried out in order to receive the title of campus ambassador for McGill University in Montreal. I filled out the application form on the Education noticeboard; however, there is currently no action on that page... Thank you for enlightening me! --Spyder212 (talk) 03:20, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

June 10: WikiWednesday Salon / Wikimedia NYC Annual Meeting

Wednesday June 10, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon / Wikimedia NYC Annual Meeting

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our next evening "WikiWednesday" salon and knowledge-sharing workshop by 14th Street / Union Square in Manhattan. This month will also feature on our agenda: recent and upcoming editathons, the organization's Annual Meeting, and Chapter board elections. We also hope for the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects. We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming editathons, and other outreach activities. After the main meeting, pizza and refreshments and video games in the gallery! Wednesday June 10 WikiWednesday Salon / Wikimedia NYC Annual Meeting (RSVP on-wiki or at meetup.com). 7:00pm - 9:00 pm at Babycastles, 137 West 14th Street Featuring a keynote talk this month to be determined! We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 15:50, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Thanks

Virtually everything in the series of Afghan-Mughal wars is either copied from other sources or is copied from our articles without attribution - I've left the latter alone hoping that the articles would get deleted, which seems less likely now. I couldn't identify a little bit but it is almost certainly still copied from elsewhere. Dougweller (talk) 21:08, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Merging material copied from other articles without attribution seems likely to completely lose any chance of attribution, a double copyright violation. Dougweller (talk) 11:06, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

thank you

I wanted to personally thank you for your kind gesture, both articles look great!...Best--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:24, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Q

Nice hamster! Bluerasberry, I may have a few questions in the next couple of days, and here's one to start off: do students have to have an account to go through Wikipedia:Training/For students? I'm doing it now, and I'm logged in, and it talks about "getting an account". I'm asking also because I'm trying to figure if I should tell my students to get an account first, or to just go through the slide show. Thanks, Dr Aaij (talk) 02:45, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

• Nevermind--my question was answered. Thanks, Dr Aaij (talk) 03:11, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

16:28:19, 19 May 2015 review of submission by 1heyheymikey

• 1heyheymikey (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Danny Boockvar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi Bluerasbery! Thanks for your volunteer work for Wiki. You keep the world spinning.

I'm a bit confused on "notability," mainly because it appears that "Danny Boockvar" as a subject with the accompanying references is at least as notable as Jeff Henley. Sources cited are well-respected (Crains, Bloomberg, NYCgo). What am I still missing?

If you can answer, thank you! If not, I totally understand. Thanks for all your work. Have a great week! 1heyheymikey (talk) 16:28, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

1heyheymikey Bloomberg is hosting a database of self-provided information, and in that source, they reproduce this information without comment. The weight of their reputation is not behind this directory because this is not journalism. This is a lot like Linkedin, except with some automated data scraping.

The NYCGo source is reliable for what it is as a press release, and it can be cited, but it does not establish WP:N because this paper was created for the purpose of promoting an organization and the people listed. That makes it a WP:SPS rather than an WP:RS, and means that maybe it can be used to verify facts, but probably should not be used at all, and definitely is not part of the count to establish notability.

The Crains source is fine and one of the 2-3 sources which are required. I (and most other reviews) spot check a few, because the goal at this stage is meeting minimum requirements.

The Leaders article does not count because per WP:INTERVIEWS the author just asks questions without doing any journalism, then self-publishes the response without additional creative response. This makes the piece again close to being WP:SPS.

Please consider sticking around Wikipedia and contributing to any subject within your field of interest. Biographies are fine but mind the sources. Talk this through on the article review page if you dispute any of this. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:51, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

Thanks for blanking the promotional content on Kumoh National Institute of Technology too. TL22 (talk) 17:05, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Japan-related articles

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Japan-related articles. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Surreal Barnstar
	This might seriously affect the outcome of the discussion. I give you this award for your perfect summary and presentation of points. You do add a special flavor to the community :) — Yash! (Y) 21:21, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Industry funding and ghostwriting of sources

Hi Lane, I meant to ping you about this, so leaving this instead. In case you'd like to comment, I've opened a discussion about the above at Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)#Industry funding and ghostwriting of sources, with a view to adding something to the guideline. Sarah (SV) ^(talk) 22:10, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride!

You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!

• What? Wiki Loves Pride, a campaign to document and photograph LGBT culture and history, including pride events
• When? June 2015
• How can you help?

  1.) Create or improve LGBT-related articles and showcase the results of your work here

  2.) Upload photographs or other media related to LGBT culture and history, including pride events, and add images to relevant Wikipedia articles; feel free to create a subpage with a gallery of your images (see examples from last year)

  3.) Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing!

User:Another Believer and User:OR drohowa

Thanks for any contribution you may be able to make to this year's campaign, Lane! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 06:16, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

GM Food RfC

Note about this RfC where you !voted. I tweaked the statement to make it more clear that it is about eating GM food and health. I'm notifying each person who !voted, in case that matters to you. Sorry for the trouble. Jytdog (talk) 21:08, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Christina Novelli

Hi Blue, just wanted to know when it would be appropriate, or if it is appropriate to upgrade the article on Christina Novelli to C class. It seems as though it meets the criteria. Can I upgrade it myself even though I wrote it? Do I upgrade it in all 3 categories or just one? Photocyclone (talk) 21:30, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Peterchiapperino Yes it is a solid C-class article. You can give it this rating yourself. Notice that the grades are associated with WikiProjects. Another option is to go to those projects and ask someone else to re-grade the article. Probably biographies and electronic music would be more keen on this than Articles for Creation. If you do this, it is nice to do anything for those projects, like either grade any other articles in their domain or respond in an existing comment thread on the talk pages of those Wikiprojects.

If it is helpful then sometime I could meet you by video chat and give you a tour of how this could work, but otherwise - yes, you may re-grade. Blue Rasberry (talk) 23:01, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Yes, a video chat sounds awesome. I am a small user though, and concentrate on my own little universe of photography. I have lots of questions, If you have the time. How can we set this up? Photocyclone (talk) 14:42, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

user right issues

Hi Lane! Running into some issues creating new accounts from my computer, even though I have user rights. Any ideas?

Thanks! John — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jtsimons89 (talk • contribs) 20:04, 8 June 2015 (UTC)