Jump to content

Enlightenment in Buddhism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Rescuing 1 sources, flagging 0 as dead, and archiving 14 sources. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Line 180: Line 180:
* {{Citation | last =Kalupahana | first =David J. | year =1992b | title =A history of Buddhist philosophy | place =Delhi | publisher =Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited}}
* {{Citation | last =Kalupahana | first =David J. | year =1992b | title =A history of Buddhist philosophy | place =Delhi | publisher =Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited}}
* {{Citation | last =King | first =Richard | year =2002 | title =Orientalism and Religion: Post-Colonial Theory, India and "The Mystic East" | publisher =Routledge}}
* {{Citation | last =King | first =Richard | year =2002 | title =Orientalism and Religion: Post-Colonial Theory, India and "The Mystic East" | publisher =Routledge}}
* {{Citation | last =Lai | first =Whalen | year =2003 | title =Buddhism in China: A Historical Survey. In Antonio S. Cua (ed.): Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy| publisher =New York: Routledge | url =https://web.archive.org/web/20141112205228/http://cw.routledge.com/ref/chinesephil/Buddhism.pdf}}
* {{Citation|last=Lai |first=Whalen |year=2003 |title=Buddhism in China: A Historical Survey. In Antonio S. Cua (ed.): Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy |publisher=New York: Routledge |url=http://cw.routledge.com/ref/chinesephil/Buddhism.pdf |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/20141112205228/http://cw.routledge.com/ref/chinesephil/Buddhism.pdf |archivedate=12 November 2014 }}
* {{Citation | last =Lusthaus | first =Dan | year =1998 | title =Buddhist Philosophy, Chinese. In: Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Index | publisher =Taylor & Francis}}
* {{Citation | last =Lusthaus | first =Dan | year =1998 | title =Buddhist Philosophy, Chinese. In: Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Index | publisher =Taylor & Francis}}
* {{Citation | last =Low | first =Albert | year =2006 | title =Hakuin on Kensho. The Four Ways of Knowing | place =Boston & London | publisher =Shambhala}}
* {{Citation | last =Low | first =Albert | year =2006 | title =Hakuin on Kensho. The Four Ways of Knowing | place =Boston & London | publisher =Shambhala}}

Revision as of 05:12, 19 October 2015

For other uses, see Enlightenment (disambiguation).
Part of a series on
Buddhism
History
Buddhist texts
Practices
Nirvāṇa
Traditions
Buddhism by country

The English term enlightenment is the western translation of the term bodhi, "awakening", which has entered the Western world via the 19th century translations of Max Müller. It has the western connotation of a sudden insight into a transcendental truth.

The term is also being used to translate several other Buddhist terms and concepts used to denote insight (prajna, kensho and satori);[1][dead link] knowledge (vidhya); the "blowing out" (Nirvana) of disturbing emotions and desires and the subsequent freedom or release (vimutti); and the attainment of Buddhahood, as exemplified by Gautama Buddha.

What exactly constituted the Buddha's awakening is unknown. It may probably have involved the knowledge that liberation was attained by the combination of mindfulness and dhyāna, applied to the understanding of the arising and ceasing of craving. The relation between dhyana and insight is a core problem in the study of Buddhism, and is one of the fundamentals of Buddhist practice.

In the western world the concept of (spiritual) enlightenment has taken on a romantic meaning.[2][3][4][5] It has become synonymous with self-realization and the true self, being regarded as a substantial essence being covered over by social conditioning.[2][3][4][5]

Translation

Robert S. Cohen notes that the majority of English books on Buddhism use the term "enlightenment" to translate the term bodhi.[6] The root budh, from which both bodhi and Buddha are derived, means "to wake up" or "to recover consciousness".[6] Cohen notes that bodhi is not the result of an illumination, but of a path of realization, or coming to understanding.[6] The term "enlightenment" is event-oriented, whereas the term "awakening" is process-oriented.[6] The western use of the term "enlighten" has Christian roots, as in Calvin's "It is God alone who enlightens our minds to perceive his truths".[7]

Early 19th century bodhi was translated as "intelligence".[7] The term "enlighten" was first being used in 1835, in an English translation of a French article.[8] In 1857 The Times used the term "the Enlightened" for the Buddha in a short article, which was reprinted the following year by Max Müller.[9] Thereafter, the use of the term subsided, but reappeared with the publication of Max Müller's Chips from a german Workshop, which included a reprint from the Times-article. The book was translated 1969 into German, using the term "der Erleuchtete".[10] Max Müller was an essentialist, who believed in a natural religion, and saw religion as an inherent capacity of human beings.[11] "Enlightenment" was a means to capture natural religious truths, as distinguished from mere mythology.[12][note 1]

By the mid-1870s it had become commonplace to call the Buddha "enlightened", and by the end of the 1880s the terms "enlightened" and "enlightenment" dominated the English literature.[9]

Terms

Insight

Bodhi

Bodhi (Sanskrit, Pāli), from the verbal root budd, "to awaken", "to understand",[13] means literally "to have woken up and understood".[14] According to Johannes Bronkhorst,[15] Tillman Vetter,[16] and K.R. Norman,[17] bodhi was at first not specified. K.R. Norman:

It is not at all clear what gaining bodhi means. We are accustomed to the translation "enlightenment" for bodhi, but this is misleading [...] It is not clear what the buddha was awakened to, or at what particular point the awakening came.[17]

According to Norman, bodhi may basically have meant the knowledge that nibbana was attained,[18][19] due to the practice of dhyana.[17][16] Originally only "prajna" may have been mentioned,[15] and Tillman Vetter even concludes that originally dhyana itself was deemed liberating, with the stilling of pleasure of pain in the fourth jhana.[16] Gombrich also argues that the emphasis on insight is a later development.[20]

In Theravada Buddhism, bodhi refers to the realisation of the four stages of enlightenment and becoming an Arahant.[14] In Theravada Buddhism, bodhi is equal to supreme insight, and the realisation of the four noble truths, which leads to deliverance.[14] According to Nyanatiloka,

(Through Bodhi) one awakens from the slumber or stupor (inflicted upon the mind) by the defilements (kilesa, q.v.) and comprehends the Four Noble Truths (sacca, q.v.).[13]

This equation of bodhi with the four noble truths is a later development, in response to developments within Indian religious thought, where "liberating insight" was deemed essential for liberation.[15][16] The four noble truths as the liberating insight of the Buddha eventually were superseeded by Pratītyasamutpāda, the twelvefold chain of causation, and still later by anatta, the emptiness of the self.[15]

In Mahayana Buddhism, bodhi is equal to prajna, insight into the Buddha-nature, sunyata and tathatā.[21] This is equal to the realisation of the non-duality of absolute and relative.[21]

Prajna

In Theravada Buddhism pannā (Pali) means "understanding", "wisdom", "insight".[22] "Insight" is equivalent to vipassana', insight into the three marks of existence, namely anicca, dukkha and anatta.[22] Insight leads to the four stages of enlightenment and Nirvana.[22]

In Mahayana Buddhism Prajna (Sanskrit) means "insight" or "wisdom", and entails insight into sunyata. The attainment of this insight is often seen as the attainment of "enlightenment".[23][need quotation to verify]

Kensho and satori

Kensho and Satori are Japanese terms used in Zen traditions. Kensho means "seeing into one's true nature." Ken means "seeing", sho means "nature", "essence",[24] c.q Buddha-nature. Satori (Japanese) is often used interchangeably with kensho, but refers to the experience of kensho.[24] The Rinzai tradition sees kensho as essential to the attainment of Buddhahood, but considers further practice essential to attain Buddhahood.

East-Asian (Chinese) Buddhism emphasizes insight into Buddha-nature. This term is derived from Indian tathagata-garbha thought, "the womb of the thus-gone" (the Buddha), the inherent potential of every sentient being to become a Buddha. This idea was integrated with the Yogacara-idea of the ālaya vijñāna, and further developed in Chinese Buddhism, which integrated Indian Buddhism with native Chinese thought. Buddha-nature came to mean both the potential of awakening and the whole of reality, a dynamic interpenetration of absolute and relative. In this awakening it is realized that observer and observed are not distinct entities, but mutually co-dependent.[25][26]

Knowledge

The term vidhya is being used in contrast to avidhya, ignorance or the lack of knowledge, which binds us to samsara. The Mahasaccaka Sutta[note 2] describes the three knowledges which the Buddha attained:[27][28][29]

  1. Insight into his past lives
  2. Insight into the workings of Karma and Reincarnation
  3. Insight into the Four Noble Truths

Freedom

Vimutti, also called moksha, means "freedom",[30] "release",[30][note 3] "deliverance".[31] Sometimes a distinction is being made between ceto-vimutti, "liberation of the mind", and panna-vimutti, "liberation by understanding".[32] The Buddhist tradition recognises two kinds of ceto-vimutti, one temporarily and one permanent, the last being equivalent to panna-vimutti.[32][note 4]

Yogacara uses the term āśraya parāvŗtti, "revolution of the basis",[34]

... a sudden revulsion, turning, or re-turning of the ālaya vijñāna back into its original state of purity [...] the Mind returns to its original condition of non-attachment, non-discrimination and non-duality".[35]

Nirvana

Nirvana is the "blowing out" of disturbing emotions, which is the same as liberation.[web 1] The usage of the term "enlightenment" to translate "nirvana" was popularized in the 19th century, due, in part, to the efforts of Max Muller, who used the term consistently in his translations.[36]

Buddhahood

Anuttarā-samyak-saṃbodhi

Siddhartha Gautama, known as the Buddha, is said to have achieved full awakening, known as samyaksaṃbodhi (Sanskrit; Pāli: sammāsaṃbodhi), "perfect Buddhahood", or anuttarā-samyak-saṃbodhi, "highest perfect awakening".[37]

The term buddha has acquired somewhat different meanings in the various Buddhist traditions. An equivalent term for Buddha is Tathāgata, "the thus-gone". The way to Buddhahood is somewhat differently understood in the various buddhist traditions.

Buddha's awakening

Canonical accounts

In the suttapitaka, the Buddhist canon as preserved in the Theravada-tradition, a couple of texts can be found in which the Buddha's attainment of liberation forms part of the narrative.[38][39][note 5]

The Ariyapariyesana Sutta[note 6] describes how the Buddha was dissatisfied with the teachings of Alara Kalama and Uddaka Ramaputta, wandered further through Magadhan country, and then found "an agreeable piece of ground" which served for striving. The sutra then only says that he attained Nibbana.[40]

The Mahasaccaka Sutta[note 7] describes his ascetic practices, which he abandoned. There-after he remembered a spontaneous state of jhana, and set out for jhana-practice. After destroying the disturbances of the mind, and attaining concentration of the mind, he attained three knowledges (vidhya):[27][28][29]

  1. Insight into his past lives
  2. Insight into the workings of Karma and Reincarnation
  3. Insight into the Four Noble Truths

According to the Mahasaccaka Sutta these insights, including the way to attain liberation, led the Buddha himself straight to liberation.[41] called "awakening."[42]

Critical assessment

Schmithausen[note 8] notes that the mention of the four noble truths as constituting "liberating insight", which is attained after mastering the Rupa Jhanas, is a later addition to texts such as Majjhima Nikaya 36.[43][15][16] Bronkhorst notices that

...the accounts which include the Four Noble Truths had a completely different conception of the process of liberation than the one which includes the Four Dhyanas and the destruction of the intoxicants.[44]

It calls in question the reliability of these accounts, and the relation between dhyana and insight, which is a core problem in the study of early Buddhism.[16][15][20] Originally the term prajna may have been used, which came to be replaced by the four truths in those texts where "liberating insight" was preceded by the four jhanas.[45] Bronkhorst also notices that the conception of what exactly this "liberating insight" was developed throughout time. Whereas originally it may not have been specified, later on the four truths served as such, to be superseded by pratityasamutpada, and still later, in the Hinayana schools, by the doctrine of the non-existence of a substantial self or person.[46] And Schmithausen notices that still other descriptions of this "liberating insight" exist in the Buddhist canon:

"that the five Skandhas are impermanent, disagreeable, and neither the Self nor belonging to oneself";[note 9] "the contemplation of the arising and disappearance (udayabbaya) of the five Skandhas";[note 10] "the realisation of the Skandhas as empty (rittaka), vain (tucchaka) and without any pith or substance (asaraka).[note 11][47]

An example of this substitution, and its consequences, is Majjhima Nikaya 36:42-43, which gives an account of the awakening of the Buddha.[48]

Development of Buddhahood in Buddhist traditions

In Theravada Buddhism, reaching full awakening is equivalent in meaning to reaching Nirvāṇa.[web 2] Attaining Nirvāṇa is the ultimate goal of Theravada and other śrāvaka traditions.[web 3] It involves the abandonment of the ten fetters and the cessation of dukkha or suffering. Full awakening is reached in four stages.

In Mahāyāna Buddhism the Bodhisattva is the ideal. The ultimate goal is not only of one's own liberation in Buddhahood, but the liberation of all living beings.

In time, the Buddha's awakening came to be understood as an immediate full awakening and liberation, instead of the insight into and certainty about the way to follow to reach enlightenment. However, in some Zen traditions this perfection came to be relativized again; according to one contemporary Zen master, "Shakyamuni buddha and Bodhidharma are still practicing."[49]

But Mahayana Buddhism also developed a cosmology with a wide range of buddhas and bodhisattvas, who assist humans on their way to liberation.

Western understanding of enlightenment

See also: Buddhist modernism, Transcendentalism, and Perennial philosophy

In the western world the concept of enlightenment has taken on a romantic meaning.[2][3][4][5] It has become synonymous with self-realization and the true self, being regarded as a substantial essence being covered over by social conditioning.[2][3][4][5]

Enlightenment as "Aufklärung"

The use of the western word enlightenment is based on the supposed resemblance of bodhi with Aufklärung, the independent use of reason to gain insight into the true nature of our world. In fact there are more resemblances with Romanticism than with the Enlightenment: the emphasis on feeling, on intuitive insight, on a true essence beyond the world of appearances.[50]

Awakening

The equivalent term "awakening" has also been used in a Christian context, namely the Great Awakenings, several periods of religious revival in American religious history. Historians and theologians identify three or four waves of increased religious enthusiasm occurring between the early 18th century and the late 19th century. Each of these "Great Awakenings" was characterized by widespread revivals led by evangelical Protestant ministers, a sharp increase of interest in religion, a profound sense of conviction and redemption on the part of those affected, an increase in evangelical church membership, and the formation of new religious movements and denominations.

Romanticism and transcendentalism

The romantic idea of enlightenment as insight into a timeless, transcendent reality has been popularized especially by D.T. Suzuki.[web 4][web 5] Further popularization was due to the writings of Heinrich Dumoulin.[51][52][web 6] Dumoulin viewed metaphysics as the expression of a transcendent truth, which according to him was expressed by Mahayana Buddhism, but not by the pragmatic analysis of the oldest Buddhism, which emphasizes anatta.[53] This romantic vision is also recognizable in the works of Ken Wilber.[54]

In the oldest Buddhism this essentialism is not recognizable.[55][web 7] According to critics it doesn't really contribute to a real insight into Buddhism:[web 8]

...most of them labour under the old cliché that the goal of Buddhist psychological analysis is to reveal the hidden mysteries in the human mind and thereby facilitate the development of a transcendental state of consciousness beyond the reach of linguistic expression.[56]

Enlightenment and experience

A common reference in western culture is the notion of "enlightenment experience". This notion can be traced back to William James, who used the term "religious experience" in his book, The Varieties of Religious Experience.[57] Wayne Proudfoot traces the roots of the notion of "religious experience" further back to the German theologian Friedrich Schleiermacher (1768-1834), who argued that religion is based on a feeling of the infinite. Schleiermacher used the notion of "religious experience" to defend religion against the growing scientific and secular critique.

It was popularised by the Transcendentalists, and exported to Asia via missionaries.[58] Transcendentalism developed as a reaction against 18th Century rationalism, John Locke's philosophy of Sensualism, and the predestinationism of New England Calvinism. It is fundamentally a variety of diverse sources such as Hindu texts like the Vedas, the Upanishads and the Bhagavad Gita,[59] various religions, and German idealism.[60]

It was adopted by many scholars of religion, of which William James was the most influential.[61][note 12]

The notion of "experience" has been criticised.[3][65][66] Robert Sharf points out that "experience" is a typical western term, which has found its way into Asian religiosity via western influences.[3][note 13]

The notion of "experience" introduces a false notion of duality between "experiencer" and "experienced", whereas the essence of kensho is the realisation of the "non-duality" of observer and observed.[68][dead link] [69] "Pure experience" does not exist; all experience is mediated by intellectual and cognitive activity.[70][71] The specific teachings and practices of a specific tradition may even determine what "experience" someone has, which means that this "experience" is not the proof of the teaching, but a result of the teaching.[72] A pure consciousness without concepts, reached by "cleaning the doors of perception" as per romantic poet William Blake[note 14], would, according to Mohr, be an overwhelming chaos of sensory input without coherence.[74]

Bodhi Day

Sakyamuni's Buddhahood is celebrated on Bodhi Day. In Sri Lanka and Japan different days are used for this celebration.

According to the Theravada tradition in Sri Lanka, Sakyamuni reached Buddhahood at the full moon in May. This is celebrated at Wesak Poya, the full moon in May, as Sambuddhatva jayanthi (also known as Sambuddha jayanthi).[web 9]

According to the Zen tradition, the Buddha reached his decisive insight on 8 December. This is celebrated in Zen monasteries with a very intensive eight-day session of Rōhatsu.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ See also Lourens Peter van den Bosch, Theosophy or Pantheism? Friedrich Max Müller's Gifford Lectures on Natural Religion: "The three principal themes of his Gifford lectures on natural religion were the discovery of God, the discovery of the soul, and the discovery of the oneness of God and soul in the great religions of the world."
  2. ^ Majjhima Nikaya chapter 36
  3. ^ See Encyclopedia.com, Vimutti
  4. ^ According to Gombrich, this distinction is artificial, and due to later, too literal, interpretations of the suttas.[33]
  5. ^ See Majjhima Nikaya chaper 4, 12, 26 & 36
  6. ^ Majjhima Nikaya chapter 26
  7. ^ Majjhima Nikaya chapter 36
  8. ^ In his often-cited article On some Aspects of Descriptions or Theories of 'Liberating Insight' and 'Enlightenment' in Early Buddhism
  9. ^ Majjhima Nikaya 26
  10. ^ Anguttara Nikaya II.45 (PTS)
  11. ^ Samyutta Nikaya III.140-142 (PTS)
  12. ^ James also gives descriptions of conversion experiences. The Christian model of dramatic conversions, based on the role-model of Paul's conversion, may also have served as a model for western interpretations and expectations regarding "enlightenment", similar to Protestant influences on Theravada Buddhism, as described by Carrithers:

    It rests upon the notion of the primacy of religious experiences, preferably spectacular ones, as the origin and legitimation of religious action. But this presupposition has a natural home, not in Buddhism, but in Christian and especially Protetstant Christian movements which prescribe a radical conversion.[62]

    See Sekida for an example of this influence of William James and Christian conversion stories, mentioning Luther[63] and St. Paul.[64] See also McMahan for the influence of Christian thought on Buddhism.[5]

  13. ^ Robert Sharf:

    [T]he role of experience in the history of Buddhism has been greatly exaggerated in contemporary scholarship. Both historical and ethnographic evidence suggests that the privileging of experience may well be traced to certain twentieth-century reform movements, notably those that urge a return to zazen or vipassana meditation, and these reforms were profoundly influenced by religious developments in the west [...] While some adepts may indeed experience "altered states" in the course of their training, critical analysis shows that such states do not constitute the reference point for the elaborate Buddhist discourse pertaining to the "path".[67]

  14. ^ William Blake: "If the doors of perception were cleansed every thing would appear to man as it is, infinite. For man has closed himself up, till he sees all things thru' narrow chinks of his cavern."[73]

References

  1. ^ Schreiber 2008, p. 5051, lemma "bodhi".
  2. ^ a b c d Carrette & King 2005.
  3. ^ a b c d e f Sharf 1995b.
  4. ^ a b c d Sharf 2000.
  5. ^ a b c d e McMahan 2008.
  6. ^ a b c d Cohen 2006, p. 1.
  7. ^ a b Cohen 2006, p. 2.
  8. ^ Cohen 2006, p. 2-3.
  9. ^ a b Cohen 2006, p. 3.
  10. ^ Cohen 2006, p. 9.
  11. ^ Cohen 2006, p. 4.
  12. ^ Cohen 2006, p. 6-7.
  13. ^ a b Nyanatiloka 1980, p. 40.
  14. ^ a b c Schreiber-Fischer 2008, p. 50.
  15. ^ a b c d e f Bronkhorst 1993.
  16. ^ a b c d e f Vetter 1988.
  17. ^ a b c Norman 1997, p. 29.
  18. ^ Norman 1997, p. 30.
  19. ^ Vetter 1988, p. xxix, xxxi.
  20. ^ a b Gombrich 1997.
  21. ^ a b Schreiber-Fischer 2008, p. 51.
  22. ^ a b c Nyanatiloka 1980, p. 150.
  23. ^ Fischer-Schreiber 2008, p. 281.
  24. ^ a b Kapleau 1989.
  25. ^ Lusthaus 1998.
  26. ^ Lai 2003.
  27. ^ a b Bikkhu Nanamoli 1995, p. 340-342.
  28. ^ a b Warder 2000, p. 47–48.
  29. ^ a b Snelling 1987, p. 27.
  30. ^ a b Bowker 1997.
  31. ^ Nyanatiloka 1980, p. 239.
  32. ^ a b Gombrich 2005, p. 147.
  33. ^ Gombrich 2005, p. 147-148.
  34. ^ Park 1983, p. 126-132.
  35. ^ Park 1983, p. 127.
  36. ^ Scott 2009, p. 8.
  37. ^ Mäll 2005, p. 83.
  38. ^ Warder 2000, p. 45-50.
  39. ^ Faure 1991
  40. ^ Bikkhu Nanamoli 1995, p. 259.
  41. ^ Bikkhu Nanamoli 1995, p. 342.
  42. ^ Warder 2000, p. 47-48.
  43. ^ Schmithausen 1981.
  44. ^ Bronkhorst 1993, p. 110.
  45. ^ Bronkhorst 1993, p. 108.
  46. ^ Bronkhorst 1993, p. 100-101.
  47. ^ Bronkhorst 1993, p. 101.
  48. ^ Bronkhorst 1993, p. 102-103.
  49. ^ Harris 2004, p. 103.
  50. ^ Wright 2000, p. 181-183.
  51. ^ Dumoulin 2005a.
  52. ^ Dumoulin 2005b.
  53. ^ Dumonlin 2000.
  54. ^ Wilber 1996.
  55. ^ Warder 2000, p. 116-124.
  56. ^ Kalupahana 1992a, p. xi.
  57. ^ Hori 1999, p. 47.
  58. ^ King 2002.
  59. ^ Versluis 2001, p. 3.
  60. ^ Hart 1995.
  61. ^ Sharf 2000, p. 271.
  62. ^ Carrithers 1983, p. 18.
  63. ^ Sekida 1985, p. 196-197.
  64. ^ Sekida 1985, p. 251.
  65. ^ Mohr 2000, p. 282-286.
  66. ^ Low 2006, p. 12.
  67. ^ Sharf & 1995-C, p. 1.
  68. ^ Hori 1994, p. 30.
  69. ^ Samy 1998, p. 82.
  70. ^ Mohr 2000, p. 282.
  71. ^ Samy 1998, p. 80-82.
  72. ^ Samy 1998, p. 80.
  73. ^ Quote DB
  74. ^ Mohr 2000, p. 284.

Web references

  1. ^ Berzin Archives, Nirvana and enlightenment
  2. ^ Kusala Bhikshu (3/2008), Buddhist Enlightenment vs NirvanaAs of September 2010
  3. ^ "David Loy (2010), Enlightenment in Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta: Are Nirvana and Moksha the Same?As of September 2010
  4. ^ Robert H. Sharf, Whose Zen? Zen Nationalism Revisited
  5. ^ Hu Shih: Ch'an (Zen) Buddhism in China. Its History and Method
  6. ^ Critical introduction by John McRae to the reprint of Dumoulin's A history of Zen
  7. ^ Nanzan Institute: Pruning the bodhi Tree
  8. ^ David Chapman: Effing the ineffable
  9. ^ Vesak full moon poya day

Sources

  • Batchelor, Stephen (1998), Buddhism Without Beliefs: A Contemporary Guide to Awakening
  • Bhikkhu Nanamoli; Bhikkhu Bodhi (1995), The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha. A New Translation of the Majjhima Nikaya
  • Bowker, John (2007), The Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Religions, Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press
  • Bronkhorst, Johannes (1993), The Two Traditions Of Meditation In Ancient India, Motilal Banarsidass Publ.
  • Carrette, Jeremy R.; King, Richard (2005), Selling Spirituality: The Silent Takeover of Religion, Psychology Press
  • Carrithers, Michael (1983), The Forest Monks of Sri Lanka: an anthropological and historical study, New Delhi: Oxford University Press
  • Cohen, Robert S. (2006), Beyond Enlightenment: Buddhism, Religion, Modernity, Routledge
  • Cousins, L. S. (1996), "The origins of insight meditation", in Skorupski, T. (ed.), The Buddhist Forum IV, seminar papers 1994–1996 (pp. 35–58) (PDF), London, UK: School of Oriental and African Studies {{citation}}: line feed character in |title= at position 48 (help)
  • Dumoulin, Heinrich (2000), A History of Zen Buddhism, New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
  • Dumoulin, Heinrich (2005a), Zen Buddhism: A History. Volume 1: India and China, World Wisdom Books, ISBN 978-0-941532-89-1
  • Dumoulin, Heinrich (2005b), Zen Buddhism: A History. Volume 2: Japan, World Wisdom Books, ISBN 978-0-941532-90-7
  • Faure, Bernard (1991), The Rhetoric of Immediacy. A Cultural Critique of Chan/Zen Buddhism, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, ISBN 0-691-02963-6
  • Fischer-Schreiber, Ingrid; Ehrhard, Franz-Karl; diener, Michael S. (2008), Lexicon Boeddhisme. Wijsbegeerte, religie, psychologie, mystiek, cultuur an literatuur, Asoka
  • Gregory, Peter N. (1991), Sudden and Gradual (Approaches to Enlightenment in Chinese Thought), Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 8120808193
  • Gombrich, Richard F. (1997), How Buddhism Began. The Conditioned Genesis of the Early Teachings, New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
  • Gombrich, Richard (2005), Kindness and compassion as a means to Nirvana. In: Paul Williams (ed.), "Buddhism: The early Buddhist schools and doctrinal history ; Theravāda doctrine, Volume 2", Taylor & Francis
  • Harris, Ishwar C. (2004), The Laughing Buddha of Tofukuji: The Life of Zen Master Keido Fukushima, World Wisdom Books, ISBN 978-0-941532-62-4
  • Hart, James D. (ed) (1995), Transcendentalism. In: The Oxford Companion to American Literature, Oxford University Press {{citation}}: |first= has generic name (help)
  • Hori, Victor Sogen (1994), Teaching and Learning in the Zen Rinzai Monastery. In: Journal of Japanese Studies, Vol.20, No. 1, (Winter, 1994), 5-35 (PDF)[dead link]
  • Kapleau, Philip (1989), The three pillars of Zen
  • Kalupahana, David J. (1992a), The Principles of Buddhist Psychology, Delhi: ri Satguru Publications
  • Kalupahana, David J. (1992b), A history of Buddhist philosophy, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited
  • King, Richard (2002), Orientalism and Religion: Post-Colonial Theory, India and "The Mystic East", Routledge
  • Lai, Whalen (2003), Buddhism in China: A Historical Survey. In Antonio S. Cua (ed.): Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy (PDF), New York: Routledge, archived from the original (PDF) on 12 November 2014 {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  • Lusthaus, Dan (1998), Buddhist Philosophy, Chinese. In: Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Index, Taylor & Francis
  • Low, Albert (2006), Hakuin on Kensho. The Four Ways of Knowing, Boston & London: Shambhala
  • Mäll, Linnart (2005), Studies in the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā and other essays, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers
  • McMahan, David L. (2008), The Making of Buddhist Modernism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 9780195183276
  • Mohr, Michel (2000), Emerging from Nonduality. Koan Practice in the Rinzai Tradition since Hakuin. In: steven Heine & Dale S. Wright (eds.)(2000), "The Koan. texts and Contexts in Zen Buddhism", Oxford: Oxford University Press
  • Norman, K.R. (1992), The Four Noble Truths. In: "Collected Papers", vol 2:210-223, Pali Text Society, 2003
  • Nyanatiloka (1980), Buddhist Dictionary. Manual of Buddhist terms and Doctrines. Fourth Revised edition, Buddhist Publication Society
  • Park, Sung-bae (1983), Buddhist Faith and Sudden Enlightenment, SUNY Press
  • Samy, AMA (1998), Waarom kwam Bodhidharma naar het Westen? De ontmoeting van Zen met het Westen, Asoka: Asoka
  • Schmithausen, Lambert (1981), On some Aspects of Descriptions or Theories of 'Liberating Insight' and 'Enlightenment' in Early Buddhism". In: Studien zum Jainismus und Buddhismus (Gedenkschrift für Ludwig Alsdorf), hrsg. von Klaus Bruhn und Albrecht Wezler, Wiesbaden 1981, 199-250
  • Scott, Rachelle M. (2009), Nirvana for sale? Buddhism, Wealth, and the Dhammakaya Temple in Contemporary Thailand, SUNY Press
  • Sekida, Katsuki (1985), Zen Training. Methods and Philosophy, New York, Tokyo: Weatherhill
  • Sharf, Robert H. (1995b), "Buddhist Modernism and the Rhetoric of Meditative Experience" (PDF), NUMEN, vol.42 (1995)
  • Sharf, Robert H. (2000), The Rhetoric of Experience and the Study of Religion. In: Journal of Consciousness Studies, 7, No. 11-12, 2000, pp. 267-87 (PDF)
  • Snelling, John (1987), The Buddhist handbook. A Complete Guide to Buddhist Teaching and Practice, London: Century Paperbacks
  • Versluis, Arthur (2001), The Esoteric Origins of the American Renaissance, Oxford University Press
  • Vetter, Tilmann (1988), The Ideas and Meditative Practices of Early Buddhism, BRILL
  • Warder, A.K. (2000), Indian Buddhism, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers
  • Wilber, Ken (1996), The Atman Project
  • Williams, Paul (2000), Buddhist Thought. A complete introduction to the Indian tradition, Routledge
  • Wright, Dale S. (2000), Philosophical Meditations on Zen Buddhism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Wynne, Alexander (2007), The Origin of Buddhist Meditation (PDF), Routledge
  • Yen, Chan Master Sheng (2006), Boston & London: Shambhala {{citation}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Enlightenment_in_Buddhism&oldid=686451115"