User talk:Sander.v.Ginkel

dab solver

Hello, Sander.v.Ginkel, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 20:14, 25 April 2012 (UTC) Hello SwisterTwister, Thank you for your comments. My excuses for didn't fill in the edit summary fields. I'll fill in a summary of changes next time! Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 17:58, 1 May 2012 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Dutch National Track Championships – Women's individual pursuit, Sander.v.Ginkel!

Wikipedia editor Go Phightins! just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice start as far as a list, but some prose might be helpful to provide some context.

To reply, leave a comment on Go Phightins!'s talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Dutch National Track Championships – Women's scratch, Sander.v.Ginkel!

Wikipedia editor Go Phightins! just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Same thing, prose might be helpful, but certainly not a bad start.

To reply, leave a comment on Go Phightins!'s talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Ellen van Dijk Good Article Review

Hello, Sander.v.Ginkel. You have new messages at Talk:Ellen van Dijk/GA1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A barnstar for you

		Moves like Kim Little Barnstar
		As a recipient of the Kim Little barnstar, we'd like to thank you for make amazing Kim Little-like contributions to articles related to women's football (soccer) and WP:WOSO. Thank you for your diligent work!

Thank you and invitation

Thank you for your contributions to women's football/soccer articles. I thought I'd let you know about the Women's Football/Soccer Task Force (WP:WOSO), a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women's football/soccer. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Members page. Thanks!

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Tatsiana Piatrenia, Sander.v.Ginkel.

Unfortunately Lucifero4 has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

ok.

To reply, leave a comment on Lucifero4's talk page.

Thank you + invitation

Thank you for your contributions to articles related to women in sports!

We'd like to invite you to learn more about Wikipedia:WikiProject Women's sport, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in sports. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Participants page or visit one of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Women's sport/Task forces for specific sports. Thanks!

Wikipedia Asian Month 2017: Invitation to Participate

Hello! Last year, you signed up to participate in Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) 2016 on the English Wikipedia. The event was an international success, with hundreds of editors creating thousands of articles on Asian topics across dozens of different language versions of Wikipedia.

I'd like to invite you to join us for Wikipedia Asian Month 2017, which once again lasts through the month of November. The goal is for users to create new articles on Asian-related content, each at least 3,000 bytes and 300 words in length. Editors who create at least four articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard!

Also be sure to check out the Wikipedia Asian Art Month affiliate event - creating articles on Asian art topics can get you a Metropolitan Museum of Art postcard!

If you're interested, please sign up here for the English Wikipedia. If you are interested in also working on other language editions of Wikipedia, please visit the meta page to see other participating projects. If you have any questions, please visit our talk page.

Thank you!

- User:SuperHamster and User:Titodutta on behalf of The English Wikipedia WAM Team

This will be the last message you receive from the English Wikipedia WAM team for being a 2016 participant. If you sign up for WAM 2017, you will continue receiving periodic updates on the 2017 event.

Your draft article, Draft:Ailish Nolan (New Zealand artistic gymnast)

Hello, Sander.v.Ginkel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ailish Nolan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 19:06, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andreas Neitzel has been accepted

Andreas Neitzel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

97198 (talk) 14:22, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bernd Metzke has been accepted

Bernd Metzke, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~ Winged Blades^Godric 11:24, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello!

Good to see you back. Hope you're well. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 15:18, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

• @Lugnuts:, yes thank you! But it still hurts 10.000 pages have been deleted, in my opinion way too fast. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 13:58, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Pierre Le Roux

Draft:Pierre Le Roux, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Pierre Le Roux and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Pierre Le Roux during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 02:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Ismael Esteban Agüero

Draft:Ismael Esteban Agüero, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ismael Esteban Agüero and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Ismael Esteban Agüero during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 02:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rina Bjarnason has been accepted

Rina Bjarnason, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kb.au (talk) 05:45, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Janni Bach has been accepted

Janni Bach, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kb.au (talk) 05:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Rina Bjarnason for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rina Bjarnason is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rina Bjarnason until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 15:41, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Janni Bach for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janni Bach is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janni Bach until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 15:42, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Bernd Metzke for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bernd Metzke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernd Metzke until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 15:43, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Andreas Neitzel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andreas Neitzel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andreas Neitzel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 15:43, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Sanne van Kerkhof for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sanne van Kerkhof is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanne van Kerkhof until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 16:40, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandra Bowen (February 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sandra Bowen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sandra Bowen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:57, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Sander.v.Ginkel! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:57, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For writing so many articles about Olympic sports competitors. Ga zo door. Donald Trung (Talk) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 10:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

P.S. Did you know that Slowking4 has been defending your work? They've written several essays about you which you could find at Commons:User:Slowking4. It's a shame that content editors like you are discouraged here. --Donald Trung (Talk) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 10:17, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Christian Scheffler has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Christian Scheffler. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 15:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

@Legacypac:, what is wrong with this sourcing? Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 15:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

I habe no opinion on the specific source, just postponing deletion so the sourcing can be verifoed and improved. Legacypac (talk) 15:31, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

OK thanks. I will verify it myself. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 15:33, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Dagmar Stelberg has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dagmar Stelberg. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 15:26, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

For your information

You are subject of an AN/I discussion here. Please respond there. The Banner talk 15:57, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

I moved your reply to this from AN to ANI, as you posted it on the wrong noticeboard. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:23, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Sander.v.Ginkel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I used the other account, and told it without having to had an investigation. I used another account MFriedman at the time I was blocked. I used it including review my own articles I created. You can all check them and you won't find any main problems. When something was not in the reference, I added them. See as example here, here, here, here, here, here etc. It was months ago, but yes, I know it is wrong. I know that. I was not allowed to make those edits, altough there were of addition for WP. I just couldn't let it happen that so many good stubs were deleted (in my opinion way too fast, but that's another story). But the deletion made that I'm doing the job here with even more care. See also the barnstar above. Please check my recent contributions, and you will see that it is great added value for WP. Also; I wasn't aware how bad it is to use another account. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 16:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I used the other account, and told it without having to had an investigation. I used another account MFriedman at the time I was blocked. I used it including review my own articles I created. You can all check them and you won't find any main problems. When something was not in the reference, I added them. See as example [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andrea_Coppolino&diff=prev&oldid=767068909 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%C3%89ric_Casimir&diff=prev&oldid=767068677 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Florent_Mar%C3%A9e&diff=prev&oldid=767068264 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Johan_Mounard&diff=prev&oldid=767068066 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruslan_Myezyentsev&diff=prev&oldid=767067544 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aleksey_Sinkevich&diff=prev&oldid=767066568 here] etc. It was months ago, but yes, I know it is wrong. I know that. I was not allowed to make those edits, altough there were of addition for WP. I just couldn't let it happen that so many good stubs were deleted (in my opinion way too fast, but that's another story). But the deletion made that I'm doing the job here with even more care. See also the barnstar above. Please check my recent contributions, and you will see that it is great added value for WP. Also; I wasn't aware how bad it is to use another account. [[User:Sander.v.Ginkel|Sander.v.Ginkel]] <sup>([[User talk:Sander.v.Ginkel|Talk]])</sup> 16:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I used the other account, and told it without having to had an investigation. I used another account MFriedman at the time I was blocked. I used it including review my own articles I created. You can all check them and you won't find any main problems. When something was not in the reference, I added them. See as example [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andrea_Coppolino&diff=prev&oldid=767068909 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%C3%89ric_Casimir&diff=prev&oldid=767068677 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Florent_Mar%C3%A9e&diff=prev&oldid=767068264 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Johan_Mounard&diff=prev&oldid=767068066 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruslan_Myezyentsev&diff=prev&oldid=767067544 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aleksey_Sinkevich&diff=prev&oldid=767066568 here] etc. It was months ago, but yes, I know it is wrong. I know that. I was not allowed to make those edits, altough there were of addition for WP. I just couldn't let it happen that so many good stubs were deleted (in my opinion way too fast, but that's another story). But the deletion made that I'm doing the job here with even more care. See also the barnstar above. Please check my recent contributions, and you will see that it is great added value for WP. Also; I wasn't aware how bad it is to use another account. [[User:Sander.v.Ginkel|Sander.v.Ginkel]] <sup>([[User talk:Sander.v.Ginkel|Talk]])</sup> 16:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I used the other account, and told it without having to had an investigation. I used another account MFriedman at the time I was blocked. I used it including review my own articles I created. You can all check them and you won't find any main problems. When something was not in the reference, I added them. See as example [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andrea_Coppolino&diff=prev&oldid=767068909 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%C3%89ric_Casimir&diff=prev&oldid=767068677 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Florent_Mar%C3%A9e&diff=prev&oldid=767068264 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Johan_Mounard&diff=prev&oldid=767068066 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruslan_Myezyentsev&diff=prev&oldid=767067544 here], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aleksey_Sinkevich&diff=prev&oldid=767066568 here] etc. It was months ago, but yes, I know it is wrong. I know that. I was not allowed to make those edits, altough there were of addition for WP. I just couldn't let it happen that so many good stubs were deleted (in my opinion way too fast, but that's another story). But the deletion made that I'm doing the job here with even more care. See also the barnstar above. Please check my recent contributions, and you will see that it is great added value for WP. Also; I wasn't aware how bad it is to use another account. [[User:Sander.v.Ginkel|Sander.v.Ginkel]] <sup>([[User talk:Sander.v.Ginkel|Talk]])</sup> 16:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}