Wikipedia:Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive: Difference between revisions
→[[Photography]]: updating tally |
|||
Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
#[[User:Salix alba|Salix alba]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]) 13:04, 20 October 2006 (UTC) |
#[[User:Salix alba|Salix alba]] ([[User talk:Salix alba|talk]]) 13:04, 20 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
#[[User:Exteray|Exteray]][[User_talk:Exteray|<sup>T</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Exteray|<sup>.C</sup>]] 01:45, 23 October 2006 (UTC) |
#[[User:Exteray|Exteray]][[User_talk:Exteray|<sup>T</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Exteray|<sup>.C</sup>]] 01:45, 23 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
#[[User:Nicholassayshi]] 11:45. October 24, 2006 |
|||
; Comments: |
; Comments: |
||
*Embarassing. This is hardly better than a stub. [[User:Sarge Baldy|Owen]] 21:16, 1 September 2006 (UTC) |
*Embarassing. This is hardly better than a stub. [[User:Sarge Baldy|Owen]] 21:16, 1 September 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:42, 24 October 2006
The Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive is a fortnightly collaboration to improve articles to featured article status.
- /History - For past collaborations.
- /Removed - For removed nominations.
- /Maintenance - ACID upkeep.
![]() | Though this project is inactive, you can help with : Dan Lim (random unreferenced BLP of the day for 6 Sep 2024 - provided by User:AnomieBOT/RandomPage via WP:RANDUNREF). |
Collaborations |
---|
Articles |
Science and technology |
|
Miscellaneous |
Introduction
To vote or nominate you have to be a registered user with at least one contribution that is not a vote. Anyone who does so is encouraged to make at least one edit per vote or nomination to the currently chosen article, Dan Lim (random unreferenced BLP of the day for 6 Sep 2024 - provided by User:AnomieBOT/RandomPage via WP:RANDUNREF). Any and all articles may be nominated except:
- Articles that are currently at featured status
- Articles in edit wars
How to nominate
I | Add nomination
Copy and paste the following template to the bottom of the list of nominations on this page and fill it out. ==={{la|Article}}===
{{acid|start=September 6, 2024|votes=1}}
<!-- Remember to update the vote counter when you place your vote! -->
; Support:
# ~~~~
; Comments:
* (put your reason for nomination) --~~~~
----
Under "comments" section put explanation of what work is needed. |
---|---|
II | Notify
After submitting the new nomination, go to the nominated article's talk page and put this at the top: {{ACIDnom}} |
How to vote
Sign with "# ~~~~" on the end of the list of the article you want to vote for and then update the vote count in the subhead. Opposing votes are not counted; see approval voting. You can vote for as many articles as you like. Additionally you can give a comment in the comment section; use terms such as appalling and shocking sparingly, remember that every editor that has ever edited a nominated article probably did so to the best of his of her ability.
How the article is selected
Article with the most votes every two weeks or so is selected as "The current Article Improvement Drive article". If two articles have same number of votes, the nominee with the higher number of hits per day over the previous month wins. The following template:
{{Template:ACIDcur}}
is placed atop the article talk page.
How an article is removed from the list
Nominated articles remain on this page for three "selections", after which that article entry is removed from and moved to the page for removed nominations.
Notes
New nominiations go *AT THE BOTTOM* :-)
Nominations
- 45 votes, Nominated August 25, 2006; needs at least 48 votes by November 17, 2006 Overdue
- Support
- ClockworkSoul 21:50, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
- Iolakana•T 16:51, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
- mirageinred 23:35, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
- RayBirks 15:04, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
- Espresso Addict 21:26, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
- Daniel Collins 19:15, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- Speedystickd 03:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Tjss(Talk) 03:33, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- TransNique 04:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- andrew 08:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Durova 15:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- warpozio 08:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- Okinawadude 16:06, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- Felixboy 19:34, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- Hawkestone 10:53, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- JoeSmack Talk 17:13, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Tarret 21:52, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- CloudNine 11:09, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
- Pedro 13:40, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Manney 17:08, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Robinoke 22:04, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Daniel5127 (Talk) 02:42, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 12:10, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- ZeWrestler Talk 20:00, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- Samsara (talk • contribs) 14:15, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- Gray PorpoisePhocoenidae, not Delphinidae 00:33, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Kyoko 19:28, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- Winterus 16:11, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delta Tango | Talk 22:35, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- _N_e_g_r_u_l_i_o 05:46, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- Dylan Lake 23:26, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
- Ixistant 12:45, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- Mack stevens 16:12, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- H4cksaw 16:47, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- Phoenix2 20:47, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- Eyu100(t|fr|Version 1.0 Editorial Team) 01:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- sendai 01:59, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Nicholassayshi 13:01, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- AuldReekie 21:39, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- Runa27 06:34, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Daniel11 19:57, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- KP Botany 21:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Wikipediarules2221 00:57, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- UnusualHero 09:50, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- →AzaToth 11:32, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comments
- This is a subject very near and dear to my heart. coffee's peer, tea, is already a featured article. Now that the FA nomination of the previous object of my obsession, caffeine, seems to be coming to a successful conclusion, this article seems like a logical followup. The current status of the article is only barely acceptable in its current form, so it needs quite a bit of work to reach FAS.
- Unfortunately Tea is no longer a Featured Article. It could use some TLC also. -- Paul 17:28, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- This nomination now has 36 votes =). Eyu100(t|fr|Version 1.0 Editorial Team) 01:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- How could anyone not vote for coffee? I've had so much coffee today, I may have to vote several more times. ;)
- Just thinking of this makes my heart race. :) Durova 15:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- You might want to take a look at caffeine... it's almost a featured article! – ClockworkSoul 17:41, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- There are few things as close to my heart as coffee. Robinoke 22:04, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Whoa! I'm a deciding vote for a change! :D An important and internationally known concept such as this definitely deserves to have an FA! Runa27 06:34, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- One of the most important thing in the world, needs to be FA! →AzaToth 11:32, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- 31 votes, Nominated September 1, 2006; needs at least 32 votes by October 27, 2006 Overdue
- Support
- Owen 21:16, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- Aled Dilwyn Fisher 22.44, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- mirageinred 21:58, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- Starghost (talk | contribs) 23:08, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- --Samweber 23:29, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- JQF 03:35, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- Durova 23:55, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- Some P. Erson 13:44, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
- Un sogno modesto 17:04, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
- JMcD 13:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- --Howrealisreal 20:36, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- Gray Porpoise 17:06, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
- Solar 15:11, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Duran 01:42, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
- User:didimos--didi 02:56, 24 September 2006 (UTC) 01:42, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
- User:Loperco--Loperco 02:56, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 09:03, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- C-squared 00:43, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thereen 02:03, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- Benbread 15:06, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- Seadog.M.S--a.k.a The Dog 00:35, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Daniel Collins 04:52, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Kyoko 19:28, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- Vsion 07:37, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- Lex 07:40, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- Punkmorten 09:24, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- Mack stevens 16:12, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- sendai 02:05, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- mennonot 04:54, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves/Saoshyant talk / contribs 12:52, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Salix alba (talk) 13:04, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- ExterayT.C 01:45, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- User:Nicholassayshi 11:45. October 24, 2006
- Comments
- Embarassing. This is hardly better than a stub. Owen 21:16, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- As an environmentalist, and a believer in the Wikipedia project, I agree totally that this is, simply, an embarassment. It needs serious work and I will try to help as best I can. Aled Dilwyn Fisher 21:47, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- A three line stub with lists is far too little for such an important topic. Durova 23:55, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- It has now grown beyond that, but it still needs lots of work. --Gray Porpoise 17:05, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
- I agree that it has major problems and that it's not very comprehensive, but length should not necessarily be a goal. It was longer before, but much, much more embarrassing, misleading, and inaccurate than it is now. --Loperco 02:56, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Personally doubt the value of improving articles about such vast and ill-defined subjects. Improving sustainability would add more value to Wikipedia. But then, we all like writing summary sections, don't we? Because it's so easy... - Samsara (talk • contribs) 14:24, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- Definitly needs help honestly.--The Dog 00:35, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- 16 votes, Nominated September 25, 2006; needs at least 20 votes by October 30, 2006 Overdue
- Support
- Davodd 21:14, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- Durova 01:44, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- C-squared 17:08, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- LordHarris 19:59, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Cory Liu 00:06, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- andrewI20Talk 01:31, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Duran 19:04, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- ragesoss 01:58, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- Wikiwacko 21:32, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- mirageinred 03:12, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- Winterus 21:06, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- Phoenix2 20:45, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- TestPilot 20:08, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Dylan Lake 08:25, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- Runa27 06:30, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- †he Bread 23:25, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comments
- Former featured article demoted for lack of citing sources. Also a former COTW - was a very fun and popular collaboration a while back. Needs some fact checking and some sourcing of material. Should be a fun and easy-to-accomplish project to regain Featured Article status.
- Article is on an important subject and should be the best it can be! Runa27 06:30, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- 18 votes, Nominated September 27, 2006; needs at least 20 votes by November 1, 2006 Overdue
- Support
- Chino 04:41, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Cory Liu 00:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Pedro 13:45, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- BorgQueen 12:45, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- Durova 06:29, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- Samsara (talk • contribs) 14:28, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- Daniel Collins 04:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- UFOPOLI 15:19, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Hannu 08:05, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- Hawkestone 14:17, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- Unterdenlinden 00:42, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- mirageinred 01:15, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Runa27 06:24, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Kyoko 01:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Cas Liber 04:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- JoJan 13:29, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- KP Botany 21:21, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- MPF 21:29, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comments
- Cactus is a topic which is familiar to a very large majority of the readers of English Wikipedia. The cactii are a fascinating group of plants which provide amble opportunities to demonstrate such phenomenona as evolution, ecophysiology, ecology, invasive species, adaptation to environment etc. They are also important and familiar as house plants, but what most people don't know is that they also provide food, dye and narcotics. Considering all of this, the article is definitely in need of some serious work! --Chino 04:41, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- It's not in too bad a shape. I think we can do this. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 14:28, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- There are few plants in the Featured Article list - would be good to get a few botanical FAs.Cas Liber 04:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Definitely a good point --Chino 07:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Agree with the above. My only fear is that adding too much might discourage people from reading it all (a common problem with long articles); maybe some aspects might be better given separate pages of their own? - MPF 21:29, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Definitely a good point --Chino 07:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- 12 votes, Nominated October 6, 2006; needs at least 16 votes by November 3, 2006 Overdue
- Support
- Gray PorpoisePhocoenidae, not Delphinidae 00:27, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Switchercat talkcont 00:31, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Hawkestone 14:18, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- Winterus 21:06, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- User A1 07:22, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Amadh 13:18, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Serinde 16:43, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- ClockworkSoul 18:22, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- C-squared 15:45, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- Runa27 06:26, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Doom777 00:13, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Kyoko 01:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comments
- How horrifying! An article of this importance has existed since December 2001, and it's only B-class! --Gray PorpoisePhocoenidae, not Delphinidae 00:27, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- 6 votes, Nominated October 12, 2006; needs at least 8 votes by October 26, 2006 Overdue
- Support
- Benbread 22:04, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- Jeltz talk 23:02, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- Dekimasu 11:49, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- ClockworkSoul 12:29, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Daniel11 20:04, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Abeg92 00:56, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comments
- Tiny, tiny article, not even any pictures and very little information. This article could be much better. Benbread 22:04, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- There has got to be much more to be said about yeast. Jeltz talk 23:02, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- I would prefer to clean up Saccharomyces cerevisiae first and then get going on the more general articles. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 18:14, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- No offence, but that picture sucks. Abeg92 00:56, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- 7 votes, Nominated October 13, 2006; needs at least 8 votes by October 27, 2006 Overdue
- Support
- --andrewI20Talk 06:25, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- Mack stevens 15:48, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- BigrTex 04:41, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- HusikaSN 18:10, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- ClockworkSoul 18:20, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- Jeltz talk 22:25, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- Runningonbrains 08:19, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comments
- Article is about everyday object that almost everyone has access to. It's very common in the United States, and is a measely stub. Really needs work. Adhesive tape is the general name of duct tape, masking tape, and scotch tape, if you don't relize the difference. So, that is why I am nominating this, because I believe we can have a lot more information about something so ordinary. --andrewI20Talk 06:25, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- I am only doing this because my parents made me for my home school project, which is supr sucky.Mack stevens 15:48, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- 9 votes, Nominated October 13, 2006; needs at least 12 votes by November 3, 2006 Overdue
- Support
- Dev920 (check out this proposal) 22:13, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- Kyoko 06:36, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
- Durova 14:40, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- Wiki-newbie 15:10, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- ClockworkSoul 18:24, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- AuldReekie 21:41, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- Adderbak 09:19, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- C-squared 15:47, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- Daniel5127 (Talk) 03:22, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comments
- The basics are there. I am peer reviewing to see if any relevant parts have been missed out. It just needs copyediting and referencing. A vital article for Wikipedia in today's world. Dev920 (check out this proposal) 22:13, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- I feel as an enclycopedia we need a FA for such a misunderstood religion. Wiki-newbie 15:10, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- 5 votes, Nominated October 16, 2006; needs at least 8 votes by October 30, 2006 Overdue
- Support
- Dekimasu 11:42, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Serinde 16:41, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Daniel11 20:12, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Gray PorpoisePhocoenidae, not Delphinidae 22:24, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- Kyoko 01:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comments
- This is a high-traffic article often linked to in the leads of biographies. It is in need of cleanup and a full content check. Parts of the history section and demographics appear to contradict other articles on Japan and Japanese history. It has a questionable section on nonverbal language that is more thorough than the section on Japanese itself. The pictures chosen are also questionable. This needs a lot of help. Dekimasu 11:42, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- 5 votes, Nominated October 17, 2006; needs at least 8 votes by October 31, 2006 Overdue
- Support
- Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves/Saoshyant talk / contribs 10:34, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Dylan Lake 08:23, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- C-squared 15:46, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- Sam 21:02, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Daniel11 01:50, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comments
- Vorbis is the media format used for all Wikipedia audio. I therefore think it is vital that its article becomes a featured one. Plus, it teaches people about alternatives to MP3. Hope more people agree with me.--Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves/Saoshyant talk / contribs 10:34, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Vorbis is an important player in digital multimedia formats. It's widely used in Linux distributions and other open platforms as the default lossy format and is gaining ground in commercial usage. In fact, a lot of consumer hardware supports Vorbis playback. Some parts of the article could use some TLC and expansion. Sam 22:13, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- 8 votes, Nominated October 17, 2006; needs at least 12 votes by November 7, 2006 Overdue
- Support
- Atomic1609 16:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- YankeeDoodle14 21:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Daniel5127 (Talk) 03:27, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Jeffklib 23:18, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Gray PorpoisePhocoenidae, not Delphinidae 22:22, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- Starghost (talk | contribs) 23:12, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- Kyoko 01:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- BigrTex 14:34, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comments
- Jupiter is by far the largest of the planets in the solar system and has a massive influence on all the objects around it. Also, Jupiter is a Vital Article and has so far not reached good article status.
Atomic1609 16:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Jupiter is one of the largest planets in the Solar System and not reached good article status. Daniel5127 (Talk) 03:33, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- 2 votes, Nominated October 17, 2006; needs at least 4 votes by October 24, 2006 Overdue
- Support
- Comments
- An awesome, very famous song, yet its article is tiny. --YankeeDoodle14 18:41, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- 1 vote, Nominated October 18, 2006; needs at least 4 votes by October 25, 2006 Overdue
- Support
- Comments
- As quoted before this article needs expert attention, an expansion in list of artists, and a clear definition of acid blues. As the founder of the article, I'd request this article for improvment. Showmanship is the key 23:13, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- 1 vote, Nominated October 18, 2006; needs at least 4 votes by October 25, 2006 Overdue
- Support
Comments:
- "This article has virtually no organisation. I moved some external links to their proper section and consequently removed the See Also section. Also, the article needs to cite where references were used in the article and not just have a collection of websites listed as references. The Biography section also contains too many quotes, perhaps consider renaming that section. It any case it needs to be cleaned up. I also counted three different ways of plugging his MySpace profile, all of which linked to a nonexistent profile anyway. I added a proper link. Ray Cash deserves a proper article."
BTW the reason why the quality of the article is poor is because I could not find accurate references to use. Please help this article and fast. Showmanship is the key 23:25, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- 2 votes, Nominated October 19, 2006; needs at least 4 votes by October 26, 2006 Overdue
- Support
- Comments
- Important storm of the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season that still has a fairly messy article. Being (arguable) the 2nd or 3rd most important storm of the year, it warrants a much better article. I'd like to find out what all needs to be added and cleaned up. I'd like it to follow in the footsteps of the Hurricane Katrina article and become an FA. CrazyC83 19:49, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- 6 votes, Nominated October 20, 2006; needs at least 8 votes by November 3, 2006 Overdue
- Support
- --Mark J 17:18, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- --Runa27 06:21, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- --andrewI20Talk 06:30, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- --Abeg92 00:53, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- --Random89 06:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Davodd 20:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comments
- Should be a massive article, but it's not. Something go wrong here?
- WHOA! I agree! For one thing, no mention of the Foley scandal (nor the weird controversy surrounding the fact that the guy who was picked to replace him when he resigned was told by the court that he did not have the right to put posters up at the polling stations notifying people that votes for Foley would go to him), no mention of OPEC crap, no mention of any ACTUAL national elections, either, though it does take the kindness of mentioning that "numerous national elections took place". Somebody PLEASE fix this poor baby! Runa27 06:21, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, I started work on the article. I made it match previous years in politics, and will continue to expand it. --andrewI20Talk 07:08, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- 1 vote, Nominated October 20, 2006; needs at least 4 votes by October 27, 2006 Overdue
- Support
- Comments
- I just stumbled across this and it's very interesting and it needs a lot of work! Dylan Lake 04:52, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- 3 votes, Nominated October 21, 2006; needs at least 4 votes by October 28, 2006 Overdue
- Support
- Gray PorpoisePhocoenidae, not Delphinidae 18:22, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- →AzaToth 13:37, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- BigrTex 14:45, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comments
- "This article has been identified by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team as a Core Topic, one of the 150 most important articles for any encyclopedia to have." Of all things, a Core Topic should not be left at Start-Class! --Gray PorpoisePhocoenidae, not Delphinidae 18:22, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- 4 votes, Nominated October 21, 2006; needs at least 8 votes by November 4, 2006 Overdue
- Support
- Daniel Collins 18:39, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Gray PorpoisePhocoenidae, not Delphinidae 22:23, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- Daniel11 01:52, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- BigrTex 14:45, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comments
- The water cycle is fundamental to Earth science and in understanding how the Earth works. It is the basis for understanding local and global water resources as well as the two most costly natural disasters - droughts and floods. The article would benefit from references, expansion of a few sections, perhaps graphics to replace the tables, and a little tidying up.
- 4 votes, Nominated October 21, 2006; needs at least 8 votes by November 4, 2006 Overdue
- Support
- YankeeDoodle14 03:27, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- Starghost (talk | contribs) 05:11, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- Kyoko 01:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Davodd 20:22, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comments
- One of the most important wars in Western Civilization. It deserves to be at featured status. --YankeeDoodle14 03:27, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- 11 votes, Nominated October 22, 2006; needs at least 12 votes by November 12, 2006 Overdue
- Support
- †he Bread 04:16, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- →AzaToth 13:54, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- Wiki-newbie 15:07, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- Jeltz talk 15:22, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- Gray PorpoisePhocoenidae, not Delphinidae 22:21, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- ClockworkSoul 01:08, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Kyoko 01:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Daniel11 01:52, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- jaco♫plane 12:48, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- BigrTex 14:46, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Davodd 20:18, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comments
- Pretty morbid I admit, but everyone and everything on earth does this, there is so much unsourced stuff in this article and there has to be so many sourceable things to say about this subject, this could easily be a GA and just as easily be an FA †he Bread 04:16, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- A couple of days ago when I found this article, it was worse (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Death&oldid=81816513), and as this is a "Core" topic, this should have at least GA-status, and id should have FA-status, so there is much to do. →AzaToth 13:54, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- 2 votes, Nominated October 22, 2006; needs at least 4 votes by October 29, 2006 Overdue
- Support
- Forgot to sign in Mitch 20:26, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- →AzaToth 14:54, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comments
- Needs work. There's not even a picture of the damn thing. With such a history, it should be FA status. Forgot to sign in last time Mitch 20:26, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- If it's true in it's assertion that it's the third largest in the world, a deecent article is appropriate. →AzaToth 14:54, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- 5 votes, Nominated October 23, 2006; needs at least 8 votes by November 6, 2006 Overdue
- Support
- -Gphoto 01:35, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Killick 02:22, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- BigrTex 14:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- YankeeDoodle14 23:56, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Imoeng 08:39, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comments
- Photography is very important, with a long history. It is one of the most important types of media. This article is not even a GA, but could be raised to FA status without too much effort. -Gphoto 01:35, 23 October 2006 (UTC)