Jump to content

Talk:Super NES Classic Edition: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Accuracy: new section
m Accuracy: forgot to sign. :P
Line 63: Line 63:
== Accuracy ==
== Accuracy ==


I think this article would benefit from a section about emulation accuracy. I personally have no information about it, but I'm concerned about the topic.
I think this article would benefit from a section about emulation accuracy. I personally have no information about it, but I'm concerned about the topic. --[[User:Philippemorin123|Philippemorin123]] ([[User talk:Philippemorin123|talk]]) 22:28, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:28, 18 October 2019

WikiProject iconVideo games: Nintendo Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Nintendo task force.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Standard/HDTV resolution

Someone should mention how the console handles going from SDTV to HDTV. Is there any upscaling? SharkD  Talk  20:38, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

Currently the reception section only gives an overview on what happened on launch day (specifically in the US) and some advice for potential buyers. There really isn’t anything that is actually an overview on it's actual reception. There's nothing about the reactions to its functionality, design, price, comparison with the characteristics of its predecessor (e.g. difference in number of games provided). All in all, I feel this sections needs a major re-write.Tvx1 00:53, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Road to good topic

Let this be a working location for those interested in bringing the Super NES Classic to Good Topic status to collaborate and discuss. As of this writing, I have just finished working on Contra III and am debating what to improve next. I am leaning towards Star Fox 2 but if someone really wants to work that I may do something else. I know Joe is working on Kirby Super Star. Pinging users who expressed interest in the project as an FYI: @Abryn: @TheJoebro64: @Namcokid47: @Alexandra IDV: @KGRAMR: @Salvidrim!: TarkusABtalk/contrib 22:20, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I love Panel de Pon/Tetris Attack, so I'd be willing to do that one. Maybe Super Soccer if I feel like it. Namcokid47 (talk) 22:22, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I've started doing Tetris Attack. I've still got plenty of work to do, but it's getting close to completion. Namcokid47 (talk) 01:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm still planning on working on Super Ghouls 'n' Ghosts and Super Castlevania IV, though if someone wants to work on one of those I'd be willing to cede. As far as Super Soccer and Star Fox 2 @Namcokid47: @TarkusAB:, I have sources here. It's not necessarily the extent of sources, but it's a decent number. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 22:30, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Unless anyone else wants to, I can tackle the SNES Classic itself once I'm done with Super Star. JOEBRO64 22:47, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I said it before and i'll say it again: I would love to work on Kirby's Dream Course in order to explain everything about the game, especially its origins as Special Tee Shot, but i'm currently busy reworking the list of 3DO Interactive Multiplayer games and i'm also almost done with my work on Atari Jaguar-related articles, as there are 11 left to tackle... Roberth Martinez (talk) 23:24, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Accuracy

I think this article would benefit from a section about emulation accuracy. I personally have no information about it, but I'm concerned about the topic. --Philippemorin123 (talk) 22:28, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]