User talk:Paws N Claws: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:11, 7 April 2020


Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #291

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Aaron Justin Giebel! Thank you for your contributions. I am Dreamy Jazz and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 21:48, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Aaron Justin Giebel, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 21:48, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Paws N Claws. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ariconte (talk) 21:36, 22 November 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Aaron Justin Giebel! You created a thread called How do you add a section to an article? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:06, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Aaron Justin Giebel! You created a thread called How do you reply to someone on your talk page? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:07, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Name change of Oath Inc.

Hi there. I know you meant well in renaming the article "Oath Inc.", but I wanted to let you know that I requested that the move of the article be reverted because the name change won't be official for a couple of weeks. In addition, when the name change does become official, the article should probably just be moved to "Verizon Media Group" (instead of "Verizon Media Group (Oath Inc.)" since parentheticals in article titles are usually used only for disambiguation purposes, which doesn't seem necessary here. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Aoi (青い) (talk) 03:49, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Kiddle, from its old location at User:Aaron Justin Giebel/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:06, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kiddle (January 22)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Boothsift was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

It's Boothsift 05:44, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Kiddle

Draft:Kiddle, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kiddle and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Kiddle during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:41, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kiddle (search engine) has been accepted

Kiddle (search engine), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:32, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kpedia section on Kiddle

Hi, Aaron. First, welcome to Wikipedia, and congratulations on creating your first articles - Kiddle and KidzSearch! Since you are new to Wikipedia, I'd like to discuss this sentence in the Kpedia section of the Kiddle article: "It is currently competing with KidzSearch to dominate the market in kid friendly search. Wiki's are no exception." It was removed by one of the senior editors (X-Editor) on April 11, and you added it again. Now it was removed by me again for the following reasons: Besides being overpromotional (as X-editor mentioned), it makes little sense to put statements like "currently competing with KidzSearch to dominate the market" because it's a never ending process. Since it's "currently" competing when will the competition officially "end", and who will decide if this ever ends? The traffic difference is substantial, and it makes little sense to mention all the small and big "competitors". Otherwise you might have as well mentioned a long list of sites including Britannica Kids (kids encyclopedia), Study.com (kids encyclopedia), KidRex (kids search), and others. Links to KidRex and KidzSearch are already included in the article "See also section", and there's no need to go on about them in the article itself. I've also removed the sentence about Kiddle from the KidzSearch article for the same reasons. Great job on the Kiddle and KidzSearch article otherwise. Cheers. AlexBern73 (talk) 06:29, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Got it.

Got it. Thanks

You are most welcome ) AlexBern73 (talk) 23:48, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, when you reply to someone's post it's easier to just add a message starting with a colon (add more colons to make more "nested replies"). (You can click edit and see how I posted replies to your post here.) No need to start a new section for replies. Cheers AlexBern73 (talk) 00:54, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spam note on Mojeek

Hi Aaron, you just recently reverted my removal of the {{Spam note}} template from the top of the article Mojeek. The original reason I removed it is because the template, as stated at Template:Spam note is meant to be placed on a user's talk page, which is also evident from the text that it creates which is written as a directly addressing someone, something that Wikipedia should not do as stated in WP:NOTADVICE. Is the a line of reasoning that I am missing for which the template should be kept on the page? Regards.—T.E.A. (Talk•Edits) 18:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Hello, I'm Samf4u. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to KidRex— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Samf4u (talk) 01:55, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on your talk page. --Aaron Justin Giebel (talk) 16:19, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kiddle intro section

Hi again, SafeSearch is a set of technology algorithms, it has nothing to do with “look and feel.” Kiddle indeed uses bigger icons and fonts but they have nothing to do with SafeSearch, rather the user interface. If you want to talk about the look and feel, please don't make it seem like they are some refinements of SafeSearch, as this makes the article flawed. The Format section is a better place to discuss the look and feel.

Please read more here: SafeSearch

Thanks. AlexBern73 (talk) 00:39, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

They do modify safe search by restricting more websites. I agree, it is better to place look and feel in the format section, but the article is not "flawed" Aaron Justin Giebel (talk) 02:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It’s just that readers could get a wrong idea what SafeSearch is. Anyway, it reads well now. AlexBern73 (talk) 10:12, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@AlexBern73

I left a message on your talk page. Aaron Justin Giebel (talk) 03:15, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Aaron, Wikipedia is about creating articles together, where new and old editors write informative and correct articles that are valuable to Wikipedia readers. You made a great article and 80 percent of what you wrote was unchanged, the other 20 percent was improved by other editors including me. Every editor has some edits corrected or improved by others - this how Wikipedia works. Look at all the edits by you and others and see how the article greatly improved since it was started. Thanks again and don’t take some corrections the wrong way - I was only trying to help and correct what would sooner or later be corrected by other editors anyhow. Cheers. AlexBern73 (talk) 07:26, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I understand --Aaron Justin Giebel (talk) 16:09, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. Aaron Justin Giebel (talk) 04:36, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello, I'm Samf4u. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Samf4u with this edit that didn't seem very civil, so I removed it. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Samf4u (talk) 14:46, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are mean and uncivil Aaron Justin Giebel (talk) 01:58, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Plus once u called me a liar which is also uncival and mean. Hypocrite Aaron Justin Giebel (talk) 02:05, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Portal:Kitten

Hello, Aaron Justin Giebel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Portal:Kitten".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Passenger pigeon (talk) 12:32, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wait I am still working on it! Don't delete it!!!!! Aaron Justin Giebel (talk) 07:14, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting edits

Hello, Aaron, Please make sure to read editor notes attached to each edit before reverting edits. Just for your information, citing Google search as reference is not acceptable on Wikipedia. The BBC article, in this case, is not an acceptable source either since it's based on a dead link. But I will keep the article as it is since you keep reverting my edits. Not trying to blame you or anything, just giving some tips as a new editor. Cheers. AlexBern73 (talk) 09:54, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was still an article. It is a good source. Aaron Justin Giebel (talk) 05:11, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 171: / Line 171: @@
 Hello, Aaron,
 Please make sure to read editor notes attached to each edit before reverting edits. Just for your information, citing Google search as reference is not acceptable on Wikipedia. The BBC article, in this case, is not an acceptable source either since it's based on a dead link. But I will keep the article as it is since you keep reverting my edits. Not trying to blame you or anything, just giving some tips as a new editor. Cheers. [[User:AlexBern73|AlexBern73]] ([[User talk:AlexBern73|talk]]) 09:54, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
+It was still an article. It is a good source. [[User:Aaron Justin Giebel|Aaron Justin Giebel]] ([[User talk:Aaron Justin Giebel#top|talk]]) 05:11, 7 April 2020 (UTC)