Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 20: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 17: Line 17:
* '''Deleeeeete''': implausible and unrelated to target. [[User:1234qwer1234qwer4|𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰]] ([[User talk:1234qwer1234qwer4|𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠]]) 14:48, 21 October 2020 (UTC) <!--VCB 1234qwer1234qwer4 Hungrrrrry-->
* '''Deleeeeete''': implausible and unrelated to target. [[User:1234qwer1234qwer4|𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰]] ([[User talk:1234qwer1234qwer4|𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠]]) 14:48, 21 October 2020 (UTC) <!--VCB 1234qwer1234qwer4 Hungrrrrry-->
* '''Delete''': Implausible, and also not very plausible for hungry or hunger either [[User:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b>]][[User talk:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#000000">2302</b>]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk)]] 14:50, 21 October 2020 (UTC) <!--VCB Joseph2302 Hungrrrrry-->
* '''Delete''': Implausible, and also not very plausible for hungry or hunger either [[User:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b>]][[User talk:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#000000">2302</b>]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk)]] 14:50, 21 October 2020 (UTC) <!--VCB Joseph2302 Hungrrrrry-->
* '''Delete and do not retarget to hunger''' since I can’t see how adding 4 extra Rs to hungry as being a plausible misspelling.--[[Special:Contributions/76.67.169.43|76.67.169.43]] ([[User talk:76.67.169.43|talk]]) 23:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
* '''Delete and do not retarget to hunger''' since I can’t see how adding 4 extra Rs to hungry could be considered a plausible misspelling.--[[Special:Contributions/76.67.169.43|76.67.169.43]] ([[User talk:76.67.169.43|talk]]) 23:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)


====Bootstrapping (corporate finance)====
====Bootstrapping (corporate finance)====

Revision as of 23:10, 21 October 2020

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 20, 2020.

Hungrrrrry

Seems completely unrelated to target article. CycloneYoris talk! 23:53, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bootstrapping (corporate finance)

The target does not really describe "bootstrapping" in the context of corporate finance, and may be ambiguous with Bootstrapping (finance). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:57, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 18:35, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wug·a·po·des 23:08, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Michi Saagiig Anishinaabe

Not mentioned at the target or the about page of the subject's own website. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 18:26, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wug·a·po·des 22:56, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hades (imprint)

These redirects point to sections long since removed, and without a mention a reader is left confused. Furthermore, hades (imprint) is ambiguous with Hades Publications. Unless a mention is restored, I suggest delete and remove the hatnote. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:53, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. These three titles are label names for specific book series of the former publisher Harri Deutsch. They are needed to catch these terms, f.e. when they are used in citations, so that the reader gets redirected to the proper article about the publisher. Nothing was removed from the target article, the target anchors for these terms continue to exist in the article and could be expanded (which, however, is not a requirement for the redirects to exist). This is well covered by the purposes and reasons for redirects to exist per WP:REDIR, and it was deliberately set up for this very purpose (and is not the remnant of some random edit-history that would need to be cleaned up).
I oppose the OP's proposal to remove the hatnotes because the hatnotes deliberately exist to avoid confusion rather than to create it. We have a publisher named "Hades Publications" and we have an imprint Hades formerly used by the publisher Harri Deutsch, that's why the redirect is named Hades (imprint) rather then Hades (publisher). Since an imprint and a publisher are two different things, Hades (imprint) rightfully points to Verlag Harri Deutsch. If Hades Publications would publish under the imprint Hades as well (which, according to the article, it does not), we would need additional disambiguation rather than than deletion of already existing disambiguation aids.
The redirects and hatnotes exist for good purpose, removing them would be counter-productive and create exactly the confusion that the OP seeks to avoid.
--Matthiaspaul (talk) 12:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Matthiaspaul: thank you for your explanation: I made an incorrect assumption about removed sections. But the situation is still confusing, with one anchor in external links and 2 right at the top: if I am redirected to an article it needs to be clear why I am there. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:15, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Building up infrastructure and improving article contents are independent of each other and do not necessarily happen at the same time. I checked the ref, and since it also mentiones the hades cliXX and DeskTop labels, I have moved the other two anchors down there as well. At a later stage this could be expanded and moved into the body of the article.
--Matthiaspaul (talk) 15:11, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 20:46, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
At least there is some info about them. The surprise would be much larger for readers if they don't find any information about hades in our encyclopedia at all, or even worse, if hades (imprint) etc. would be deleted and people would start to mix this up with hades (publisher)...
WP:R#KEEP #2 ("They would aid accidental linking"), #3 ("They would aid searches on certain terms"), #4 ("You risk breaking incoming or internal links by deleting the redirect") and #5 ("Someone finds them useful") all apply pro keeping the redirects.
Nevertheless, following your proposal, I have now added a paragraph on hades, cliXX and DeskTop to the article body, hopefully solving the issue.
Sooner or later, this should have happened anyway, but, again, building up infrastructure and improving article contents are independent of each other and do not necessarily happen at the same time (or even by the same people). Therefore, it is counter-productive to nominate redirects for deletion just because these processes are not in sync for some while - in order not to waste efforts and trash useful contributions we have to base such decisions as if viewed from the perspective of the potential end result.
--Matthiaspaul (talk) 15:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would dispute that those external link listings constituted information about the imprints, but it's moot given your improvements to the article. Thanks for that—changing my vote. --BDD (talk) 18:29, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wug·a·po·des 22:52, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. In order to address the "surprise" argument, I added a paragraph discussing the hades label and cliXX / DeskTop series now. I hope, this will, in a never ending continual improvement process, once again raise the quality of the encyclopedia a tiny bit and settle the issue.
--Matthiaspaul (talk) 15:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep My concerns have been addressed, and these are now discussed in the target article. Let's keep an eye on the first of these, since the distinction between a publisher and an imprint are not always clear. Since it's redirecting to an anchor, there's no elegant way to hatnote it, so we shouldn't necessarily write off the idea of retargeting it to Hades (disambiguation). --BDD (talk) 18:29, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Buffalo Williams

Can't find any evidence that this back-formation is commonly used. Hog Farm Bacon 20:21, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pico Creek Productions

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn, now mentioned. Thanks! (non-admin closure) 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:50, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:07, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Is or Isn't Entertainment

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn, now mentioned. Thanks! (non-admin closure) 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:51, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:06, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Green Door Pictures

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn, now mentioned. Thanks! (non-admin closure) 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:54, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:06, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

199 Productions

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn, now mentioned. Thanks! (non-admin closure) 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:56, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:05, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shoe Money Productions

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn, now mentioned. Thanks! (non-admin closure) 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:02, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:02, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Vicinio.com

Not mentioned at target. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:29, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 18:41, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete because it isn't mentioned so anyone using the search term who doesn't know the history will be confused. If this were mentioned at the target though then AngusWOOF's comments would be a solid reason to keep. Thryduulf (talk) 14:49, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 19:21, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Garage days revisited

The term "Garage Days Revisited" more correctly refers to the B-sides of the Creeping Death single. This is referenced in the article for the current redirect target: The $5.98 E.P. - Garage Days Re-Revisited. A source would be the website of the Riot Fest punk rock festival: https://riotfest.org/2018/04/revisiting-garage-days/. I believe that the redirect should be retargeted to the Creeping Death page. JJPMaster (talk) 16:04, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 19:19, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of works produced by Hanna-Barbera and Cartoon Network Studios

This redirects to a page listing productions from Hanna-Barbera only. Projects from Cartoon Network Studios are seperately listed on that company's article. IceWalrus236 (talk) 18:16, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Julius Seizer

A quite obscure pun on the pronunciation of "Caesar" in English. Not mentioned in target. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 18:13, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paradife loft.

Implausible with a full stop. We already have Paradife loft without full stop. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 18:06, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Santa Rosa de Lima ( Abiquiu, New Mexico)

This redirect was left over from a page move to make it "consistent with wide practice and U.S. city naming policy," and was part of this June 7 mass nomination. Plus, it presently gets WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY less pageviews than its correctly formatted target, so I'm not sure if it's really worth keeping Regards, SONIC678 17:42, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note the space after the first parenthesis. Also, delete for formatting error/spelling.--intelatitalk 20:47, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Environmental causes

"Environmental causes" is so broad that xenohormone is not the only possible target. Note that this redirect has historical content which appeared to be merged to Xenoestrogen. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 16:28, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thames foot tunnel

Thames Tunnel is not a foot tunnel anymore, so make sense to retarget to Tunnels underneath the River Thames, which clearly states which tunnels are foot tunnels Joseph2302 (talk) 16:24, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Asian Music Chart Top 40

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Opalzukor (talkcontribs) 13:17, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Circular redirect. Opalzukor (talk) 12:14, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, @Opalzukor: please withdraw nom. --Muhandes (talk) 12:18, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.