User talk:Geysirhead

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Geysirhead! Thank you for your contributions. I am Randykitty and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Randykitty (talk) 17:45, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the cookies, they go well with my black tea!Geysirhead (talk) 16:16, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Warm Showers

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Warm Showers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. VViking_TalkEdits 15:25, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Warm Showers is not unambiguously promotional, because Warmshowers.org already reached a certain level of fame, which exceeds the level of fame for hospitality networks with already existing Wikipedia articles. For instance, BeWelcome.org (alexa rank 507,989) with an already existing Wikipedia article BeWelcome has only half of the activity as can be measured on Warmshowers.org (alexa rank 184,760). Geysirhead (talk) 18:14, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warm Showers has been accepted

Warm Showers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 18:49, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Induction puzzles. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 15:09, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for hint!--Geysirhead (talk) 08:53, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Algorithmic regulation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Facial recognition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Idiocracy, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. You may also want to review WP:FILMPLOT, as the information you added did not appear to be crucial to understanding the film's narrative. DonIago (talk) 15:49, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your appreciation of my contributions! My problem is that there are actually some sources proving that Artificial intelligence is an issue in Idiocracy, and especially for its extensive use in gevornment and business. But, these sources are either recreational papers, presentations, blog posts or just comments — no reliable source. The fact that Idiocracy is partially about Artificial Intelligence appears to be so obvious that no serious source tries to prove it. My intention was to interconnect Idiocracy to Artificial Intelligence for those, who have not seen the movie yet. Geysirhead (talk) 16:53, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your thoughtful response. Unfortunately if it's true that no reliable source has discussed the connection between the film and AI, then as editors we really can't be making the connection ourselves; that would be the textbook definition of OR. I only saw the film once, and it was some time ago, so I'm not sure how helpful I can be here, but perhaps this might help? Good hunting, and please let me know whether there's anything I can do to help! Alternately, you might ask at the article's Talk page to see whether other editors might have better luck tracking down a source. Cheers! DonIago (talk) 20:13, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Government by algorithm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Negative (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:54, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Government by algorithm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Customs and Border Protection (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:27, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Tonje Hessen Schei

Hello, Geysirhead,

Thank you for creating Tonje Hessen Schei.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating this article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Abishe}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Abishe (talk) 20:20, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Social machine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Algorithmic regulation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cryptocurrency/blockchain standard notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions - such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks - on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- David Gerard (talk) 17:40, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the hint. Is it advisable for me to become an administrator? --Geysirhead (talk) 17:48, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello, I'm Nyook. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Government by algorithm have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Nyook ^✉ 06:41, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nyook This is not true. There have been subsections with only one sentence each. Add more sentences, and you are welcome to make subsections! --Geysirhead (talk) 06:47, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my bad. --Nyook ^✉ 06:51, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Auction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Wilson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 14 October 2020 (UTC) COooooCK SUSCKER — Preceding unsigned comment added by I like wiki how guys lol 3 (talk • contribs) 15:13, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

26 October 2020

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Armenian-controlled territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Please, try to achieve consensus on Talk page before editing. Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 08:17, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The statement is supported by dozens of scientific papers. A consensus is not democracy WP:NOTADEMOCRACY, where unsound arguments like Wikipedia:I just don't like it can negate scientific sources. Multiple editors interested in Nagorno-Karabakh conflict appear to be according to their contributions Wikipedia:Single-purpose_accounts, writing frequently tendentious Wikipedia:NPOV edits, supporting irredentist cause of a certain nation and participating in Talk page by expressing the earlier mentioned unsound arguments. Sorry, this is not a base for consensus.--Geysirhead (talk) 11:44, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Beshogur (talk) 17:54, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anita Schjøll Brede for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anita Schjøll Brede is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anita Schjøll Brede until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 21:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose This person has delivered 2 TED-talks. Important figure with connections to billionaires.--Geysirhead (talk) 20:40, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some falafel for you!

appreciate your contribution on Eva Chen!! HardeesCharred (talk) 08:29, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Page naming

Hey, Could you look into this: Talk:Government_by_algorithm#Page_name --Genetics4good (talk)

Speedy deletion of Category:Irrendentism in the Unites States

The page Category:Irrendentism in the Unites States has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

Misspelling and there is a category that already exists for this subject

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:51, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for deleting it! I wanted it to be deleted, but did not have any button for it.--Geysirhead (talk) 17:25, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Armenian-controlled territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh has been nominated for deletion

Category:Armenian-controlled territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:55, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Techno-populism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Podemos.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tacit collusion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:51, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mythical utopias has been nominated for merging

Category:Mythical utopias has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:26, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eutopia (disambiguation)

Geysirhead, if a disambiguation page has a primary topic, then that article is listed at the top of the page. If you feel that Eutopia shouldn't be the primary topic, then please begin a discussion on that article's talk page (or the DAB talk page). Leschnei (talk) 23:18, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eutopia is an EP. How can an EP be a primary topic?--Geysirhead (talk) 08:25, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit of Third International Theory

Hello, I'm PrimalBlueWolf. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Third_International_Theory seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. PrimalBlueWolf (talk) 10:36, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]