User talk:Rt66lt

I moved my older talk to this archive: User talk:Rt66lt/Archive

Radial word association

The rules for the radial ultra cross game are "identical to the radial ultra game". The rules for the radial ultra game are "The rules are identical to the ultra game, except that the starting point begins in the centre of the box, and words expand out from the centre, associating to all the adjacent cells.". The rules of the ultra game say that you cannot add a word if there is a black space above or to the left. For the radial games this applies to the bottom right area, for the bottom left (where you put your word) there can be no space above or right, the top two areas is are the same, but the gap cannot be below. The only exception to these rules for table games is the psychedelic game, I will make this clearer though. Thryduulf 23:16, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Can I have permission to add a MO State Highway Project banner to the Missouri State Highway 221 page? Marikun 19:16, 24 March 2006 (ETC)

RFC

Yup, feel free to comment at RFC page. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 04:08, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Missouri

Dear Rt66lt, I am beginning the process to create a wikiproject for Missouri. in order to do so i'm required to show that there is a base of at least 5-10 people who would be interested in contributing to such a project. the project would serve to aid in the creation and editing of articles related to the U.S. State Missouri, its cities, counties, geography, transportation, culture, history, education, and so on. It aims to expand Wikipedia's resources on Missouri in a fair and accurate manner. Since you're stated as being a wikipedian in missouri, i wanted to see if you were interested. if you are, please add your username at Wikipedia:Wikiproject/List_of_proposed_projects#Missouri and User:Preschooler.at.heart/Missouri. thanks for your consideration. --preschooler.at .heart my talk - contribs 15:55, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and please consider signing and joining. in order to create it I need to prove there's ample support. thanks.--preschooler.at.heart my talk - contribs 16:11, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- oh, sorry you did, i just didn't see it in time.
  - Thank You for your support. WikiProject Missouri is now online. please feel free to contribute, and add your name to the list of members. --preschooler @heart my talk - contribs 23:25, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. good work on the unincorporated communities. are you using a bot program? and if so, which one? --preschooler @heart my talk - contribs 04:40, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say so. really, if it has to do with missouri, feel free to be bold. also, try to focus on articles in category:Missouri. --preschooler @heart my talk - contribs 23:14, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yo

bypass route could use a rewording. "an alternate route of a highway that goes around the highway"? not sure what that is (as differentiated from "bypass" in 2nd paragraph). thanks, Ka-zizzl Mc 15:08, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:MOMap-doton-Zanoni.png

Thanks for uploading Image:MOMap-doton-Zanoni.png. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:04, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Missouri 122.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Missouri 122.PNG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sue Anne 23:14, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

US 66 final route

How much do you know about the final (1976-1985) routing of US 66? I've found nice sources for Texas and Oklahoma (and California), but nothing for other states. --SPUI (T - C - RFC - Curpsbot problems) 06:05, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:MOMap-doton-Longrun.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:MOMap-doton-Longrun.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Hetar 04:42, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The same map that all of the other cities have on them? Looking at other cities reveals sources simillar to "Modified from a map on Wikipedia." This is unacceptable. Please include a link to the original image, that states who owns the copyright to it. Copyright needs to be verifiable by other editors, to prevent the foundation from running into copyright problems. Thanks. --Hetar 04:49, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

song titles in word association games

The convention, at least in the word association games, has always been that song/book/film titles, etc are italicised not quoted. I'll change the entries back to the convention as I spot them when editing the games. Thryduulf 23:14, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why it is convention, it just seems to be. If you want to enquire further I suggest bringing it up on the talk page, if someone does know that is where they are most likely to see it. Thryduulf 08:16, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deist... perhaps PanDeist?

Friend, I see that you class yourself as a Deist - might you also be a PanDeist? I have just begun speak on such things at length on my MySpace blog [1].

//// Pacific PanDeist 03:10, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Final state highway naming conventions debate

Rt66lt, your participation is welcome in the Wikipedia:State route naming conventions poll. Please give your input as to the process by 23:59 UTC on August 8.

Regards, Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 21:36, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Using SVG instead of PNG

I've noticed that the files representing the state highways are in PNG format. Most of the files that have been recently uploaded use SVG.

In the interest of changing to the SVG format, I present an SVG version of the state highway signs. Don't forget to remove the cyan guidelines maorking the top and bottom of the characters.

Tell me what you think.

--Bushido Hacks 06:02, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Almost forgot! This file I created created, based on one of you PNG images, was created using Inkscape. There is a Windows's version of this program available at http://www.inkscape.org/download.php

Wikipedia:WikiProject Fire Service

Hello, I was browsing WikiPedia and noticed that you are/were a firefighter. I highly encourage you to stop by and check out our WikiProject relating to the Fire Service around the world. We are in need of many editors and administrators to help the cause. Stay safe, Daysleeper47 18:58, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Roads Newsletter Issue #1

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter

Volume 1, Issue 1

10 February 2007

About the Newsletter

Departments:	Features:
Project News	Notability of state highways is challenged
Important deletion debates
Featured subproject
Featured member
From the editor

Archives | Newsroom

Shortcut : WP:USRD/N

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 20:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images listed for deletion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them.

Thank you. Bigr Tex 18:21, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:State highways shorter than one mile

I've nominated Category:State highways shorter than one mile, a category you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Category:State highways shorter than one mile satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 February 14#Category:State highways shorter than one mile and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Category:State highways shorter than one mile during the discussion but should not remove the category for deletion template from the top of the category; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --Vossanova ^o< 14:26, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Roads Newsletter Issue #2

File:New Jersey blank.svg

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter

Volume 1, Issue 2

24 February 2007

About the Newsletter

Departments:	Features:
Project News	Notability of state highways is upheld
Deletion debates	Kansas Turnpike is now a Good Article
Featured subproject	U.S. Roads IRC channel created
Featured member	Infoboxes and Navigation subproject started
From the editors

Archives | Newsroom

Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

Apologies for the late delivery. Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 05:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USRD Newsletter - Issue 3

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter

Volume 1, Issue 3

10 March 2007

About the Newsletter

Departments:	Features:
Project news	Inactivity?
Deletion debates	Article Improvement Drive
Featured subproject	Good and Featured Articles
Featured member
From the editors

Archives | Newsroom

Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

Active user verification

Hello, Rt66lt. Due to the high number of inactive users at WP:USRD, we are asking that you verify that you are still an active contributor of the project. To do so, please add an asterisk (*) after your name on Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Newsletter/List. Users without one by the next issue in 2 weeks will be removed off the list and off the respective road projects as well. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks. Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 22:56, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Roads Inactivity notification

You have been declared an inactive user and your name will be removed from the newsletter distribution and the projects you were a member of. If this is in error, please contact me on my talk page. Do not restore your name to the list. Regards, Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 21:10, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Randy Orton

What would you rate it in the Missouri quality scale? Just wondering. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:39, 03 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Route 66 on the Air!

Route 66 on the Air!, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Route 66 on the Air! satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Route 66 on the Air! and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Route 66 on the Air! during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 16:24, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:User categories for discussion on -isms

Hi. A user category that you are in has been proposed for deletion at Wikipedia:User categories for discussion. You are welcome to comment. Cheers! bd2412 T 02:20, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Stars on 45 Medley.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Stars on 45 Medley.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Missouri

There hasn't been much activity at WikiProject Missouri or any of its child projects lately, and I saw your name on the list of active participants. If you are willing to jump in again, please consider helping to revive the project:

Put {{WikiProject Missouri}} on the talk pages of articles involving Missouri. This helps to categorize articles
Write, cleanup, or expand an article about Missouri
Source a Biography of a living person living in, born in, or otherwise affiliated with Missouri
Help spread the word about the project
Update the project page or the portal
Watchlist or check the project talk page for updates
Join one of the child projects:

If you know anyone who might be interested in Missouri (its history, culture, sports, people, places, architecture, etc.), please pass this message along to them! If you are still interested in the project but aren't currently active, please add yourself to the list of inactive participants at the bottom of this list. Thanks!

On behalf of the project, fetchcomms☛ 21:40, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bullshit in Article

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Madrid_County,_Missouri

This article's "history section" is full of a bunch of crap that doesn't belong here.

I am too not-bold to take care of this myself, could you delegate someone to trimming out what is several thousand words of stuff unnecessary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.62.194.224 (talk) 09:35, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fairway (disambiguation)

Please see Talk:Fairway (disambiguation)#Redeployment Peter Horn User talk 15:15, 4 May 2010 (UTC) Peter Horn User talk 15:17, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox MO Route

Template:Infobox MO Route has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. WOSlinker (talk) 08:52, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Connecticut Highway 16.PNG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Connecticut Highway 16.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:50, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming Wikimedia events in Missouri and Kansas!

You're invited to 3 exciting events Wikipedians are planning in your region this June—a tour and meetup at the National Archives in Kansas City, and Wiknics in Wichita and St. Louis:

Kansas City: Saturday, June 16, starting at 9 a.m. — National Archives in Kansas City

This full-day event will include a tour of the facility; presentations from National Archives Wikipedian-in-Residence, Dominic McDevitt-Parks, and Exhibit Specialist, Dee Harris; and time in the research room to work on projects. The focus of the projects will be scanning, writing articles, transcribing, or categorizing images on Commons.

Wikipedians from St. Louis and elsewhere in the region are encouraged to make a day-trip of it and come to Kansas City for this special opportunity!

And two local editions of the Great American Wiknic, the "picnic anyone can edit." Come meet (and geek out with, if you want) your local Wikipedians in a laid-back atmosphere:

Wichita: Saturday, June 23, starting at 1 p.m. — Central Riverside Park

Join the 1st annual Wichita Wiknic: The Sunflower State blooms Free Knowledge!

St. Louis: Saturday, June 23, starting at 11 a.m. — Forest Park Visitors' Center

Join the 2nd annual St Louis Wiknic: The Gateway to the West is now The Gateway to the Wiki!

Message delivered by Dominic·t 20:13, 24 May 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Hello!

Just wanted to see how you were doing and to say that we miss you! --Rs chen 7754 08:50, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Come to the First Topeka Meetup, January 15!

Come celebrate Wikipedia Day with other Kansas Wikipedians sponsored by Wikimedians Active in Local Regions in the United States (WALRUS) and hosted by the Topeka and Shawnee Public Library. Come chat, hang out and enjoy good company while find out more about Wikipedia in our regional community! RSVP at Wikipedia:Meetup/Topeka/Wikipedia_Day.

If you can't come, but still want to find out about events in the greater Topeka region (which may include KC, Manhattan, Lawrence, Salina, or other places where volunteers are interested) sign up for future notifications at Wikipedia:Meetup/Topeka/Invite list.

Hope to see you there Sadads (talk) 20:27, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Missouri geographical articles

A friendly reminder that it's a good time for you to check in because I'm adding history sections to dozens of articles of Missouri towns, many of which you started.- Gilliam (talk) 05:37, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Fire Service

Hello and good afternoon (at least it is afternoon where I am). I was looking at the Wikipedian firefighters category and noticed that you are one of the members of the Wikipedia community that lists yourself as being a firefighter. First and foremost let me say thank you for your service. While I myself am not a firefighter, I do work as a photographer with multiple local fire departments. I am honored to have firefighters as some of my closest friends.

I have been taking an active role in the Fire Service WikiProject and am trying to recruit more members to this cause. If this is something you have any interest in, please let me know? You can leave me a message on my talk page. Obviously there is zero obligation. An interest can be anything from helping out with a couple of pages in your local area to helping to overhaul major templates, and anything in between.

Once again, thank you for your service. Hope to hear from you soon. Stay safe! --Zackmann08 (talk) 17:56, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Castor Station, Missouri for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Castor Station, Missouri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castor Station, Missouri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm _Bacon 19:36, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aspenhoff, Missouri for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aspenhoff, Missouri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aspenhoff, Missouri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hog Farm _Talk 07:09, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Missouri 66D.PNG

The file File:Missouri 66D.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:MO-66 (1948).svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:43, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]