Jump to content

User talk:Newhoggy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 11:17, 6 March 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome

Hello Newhoggy,

Welcome and enjoy Wikipedia. Your edits are much appreciated.

These links might help you with your contributions:

For Wikipedia-wide involvement, visit the Community Portal and the Village Pump.

Be sure to check out Australian resources, like The Australia Wikiportal, Australian Wikipedians' Notice Board, Australian Collaboration of the Fortnight, New Australian Articles and Australian stub articles. You can list yourself at Australian Wikipedians.

By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Preferably, use four tildes (~~~~), which produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page.

Again, welcome.--Cyberjunkie | Talk 12:53, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RE: LGAs and suburbs

That's okay. There isn't an alternative for suburbs, and I don't really think there needs be. Melbourne suburbs use an adjacency template which indicates neighbouring suburbs, but that's about it. We do have various city infoboxes, as can be seen in Adelaide and Canberra, but none have been adopted as standard, as with the US.

There can be some confusion between LGA's and suburbs when the posses the same common name. Where there is such an incident, the LGA's official name is used. At least, that's the case for New South Wales I think. For South Australian LGA's, we use the official name regardless. There also cases where the suburb or town article is also the article for the corresponding LGA. It's a shame that we do not have consistency or a stated convention for this yet. Perhaps this is something you might like to raise at the Australian Wikipedians' Notice Board.--Cyberjunkie | Talk 13:37, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have just raised this issue at Talk:List of Sydney suburbs -- Ianblair23 01:33, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Testing

Testing -- 203.217.18.60 07:08, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well done...

... great work on Bankstown, New South Wales! It's great to see such diligent work being done. Would you be able to get any info on the history on Bankstown? You could use the article I worked on (Municipality of Strathfield) as an example if you'd like. There is also a failed FAC nomination at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Municipality of Strathfield - hopefully you can learn from my mistakes :-) Ta bu shi da yu 02:30, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the encouragement for my work on Bankstown. I haven't yet got any material on the history of Bankstown, but I am planning to work on it. Maybe a visit to the local library and a search around on the internet will do the trick. I've just been spending the morning taking snaps on Salt Pan Creek.
Your article on the (Municipality of Strathfield) is awesome. Looks like I have a lot of catching up to do ;-)
By the way, does your username mean "he is not a big fish" or is that just my imagination?
Newhoggy 05:30, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

Yep. There's a k5 post somewhere that explains it. Alph a x ^τεχ 03:02, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suburbs infobox

Hi Newhoggy. It seems I was wrong in saying there was no suburbs infobox. There is one, created at the beginning of August, in use in Macquarie, Australian Capital Territory. This isn't a parameterised template, however, and it seems to be used in that article only. If you intend to use it, you can find information from the ABS for each suburb quickly by searching "POA{{{postcode}}}". However, you need to either pay ($10) for the information resulted from such a search, or access it as a university student or from some libraries. Alternatively, you might be able to find relevant information elsewhere on the ABS website, or by other means entirely. I might add that this infobox is not yet recommended by any of the Australian city WikiProjects (save maybe Canberra). --Cyberjunkie | Talk 13:09, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages. That page discusses customisation of signatures. I use a fairly common format. As the abovelinked page will tell you, that format is achieved by typing the following "nickname]] [[User_talk:UserName|(talk)", reconfigured with your username of course. Some Wikipedians are quite creative with their signatures. I myself used a "rich format" sig for a while. Good luck, --Cyberjunkie | Talk 09:40, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Testing -- Newhoggy (talk) 11:36, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Testing -- Newhoggy]] | Talk 09:17, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I see you're testing and I realise I gave the wrong format. My format is "nickname | [[User_talk:UserName|Talk".--Cyberjunkie | Talk 12:49, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Side project

I will be working on the asio C plus plus library page when I need a break from the City of Bankstown work.

Re: Syntax change?

Hi Newhoggy. Yes, that happened with mine as well. As I've been on Wikibreak I haven't been bothere to go find out what the issue is, but I narrowed the signature flaw to the "raw" function. Go to your preferences page, uncheck "raw signature", and replace your signature with [[User:Newhoggy|Newhoggy]] | [[User talk:Newhoggy|Talk]] (or whatever variant you like). Basically, you have to type it out in full. Happy editing, --cj | talk 09:32, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it works. Thankyou. - Newhoggy | Talk 13:07, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Ritter

Hi Newhoggy, howz things? I've been spending some time on the Scott Ritter page which looks very messay and poorly written and maybe some POV issues happenning there. Maybe if you have some time and inclination you might like to have a look and see what you think. Cheers. --Wm 05:49, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wm, I'm not familiar with Scott Ritter, but I'll have a look at it. Another thing is that the Bob Brown has been officially elected as as the Parliamentary Party Leader, which is quite different role compared to the Party Leader of other political parties. The potential for confusion is unfortunate, but what can be done? It is the first time the Australian Greens has formalised a leadership role within the party and the wiki pages will need to be updated to reflect that. Newhoggy | Talk 11:16, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but someone has already attended to this? My problem is that I a bit (read "very") unclear myself about how the role is defined compared to other parties. --Wm 16:51, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Heya

Hope things are going well with you, Newhoggy :-) Did you ever get a change to do that dump of all the good info you got into the Bankstown page? I can still help out, if you'd like. - Ta bu shi da yu 14:06, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Good to hear from you. I haven't gotten around to the Bankstown stuff yet, but I'll do it soon. By the way, I have just uploaded a picture of Gowings. -- Newhoggy | Talk 11:34, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! Good work :-) Ta bu shi da yu 11:37, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Minutes

Hey, do you think you could put them at the end of the page instead of the top? That way, everything's in chronological order. Thanks for writing it up! enochlau (talk) 12:49, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what I can do in terms of refactoring it. enochlau (talk) 12:55, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome :) enochlau (talk) 10:34, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image on commons

No, when you upload an image to commons, you use it just like as if you uploaded it to Wikipedia:

Caption

[[Image:Council Chambers, Bankstown.jpg|thumb|Caption]]

Cheers. enochlau (talk) 12:12, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NSW electorates

Would you mind correcting the many stubs you've created? They all make it seem like the current member is the only one - could you please either make clear that this is not the case or add the past members, which are freely and easily available from the parliamentary record (downloadable from the NSW parliament website)? If not, this is going to be one hell of a cleanup job. Ambi 12:24, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, hell, I'm doing it, though it's already taken me an hour or so, and is set to take at least another one to finish the job. On top of what I said above, you haven't even checked your dates - you've marked a whole bunch of members as being elected in 2003 when they were actually elected many years previously, and you haven't checked to see if the links actually point to the people you intend them to go to. I'm sure you mean well, but please be more careful in the future - on Wikipedia, it is possible to create a very big mess very quickly, and you've done exactly that. Ambi 12:56, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the polite response - the Bankstown edits are great. There's only a couple of things - generally, we go by the most common names, so we leave out the middle names in most cases, and if the person is more well known by a shortening of their name (i.e. Douglas Shedden --> Doug Shedden) we use the latter. If you've never heard of the person before, a Google search or a Factiva search (if you have access to the latter) can sometimes clarify this. The other thing, though it's really finicky, is that most of the other articles take the format of "year-year" rather than "year to year", but it really doesn't matter. Ambi 07:01, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Newhoggy

Hey there, you've got a b'day just before mine! I'll have a read through your work too! Ben Raue (Talk) 13:15, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My user page

Thanks for reverting the vandalism. enochlau (talk) 12:29, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm...

... cool idea... only it looks, uh, like a bum-crack! And as I always say: say no to crack. - Ta bu shi da yu 12:45, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the Wikimedia Australia logo... good try though :) Ta bu shi da yu 00:20, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Haha! Yes, I suppose it does! -- Newhoggy | Talk 07:55, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: NSW electoral districts

See my comment on the talk page. Also, in Electoral district of Bega, why isn't William Millard listed twice? Did he change party affiliations between elections? Alph a x ^τεχ 03:01, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're doing a great job with rolling out these member lists, but there's a couple of things you might want to watch. You've marked a couple of early 20th-century MPs as being from the Liberal Party of Australia, when they were actually from the Commonwealth Liberal Party (as they were active at different times it shouldn't be too hard to work out which was which). It's probably also a good idea to disambiguate Country Party to National Party of Australia so as not to point to a disambiguation page. Ambi 05:39, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful about naming members. It's Wikipedia practice to use the names most commonly used by the person concerned, and you've reverted these in a few places. Sometimes this is patently wrong - as in Bligh - where you changed it back to names that the members concerned didn't actually use. Ambi 07:36, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't find it - though it's often possible to do so via Google or (if you have access) Factiva - then by all means just add the formal name. However, when I or someone else has gone to the trouble of actually checking what name the person goes or did go by, please do not change that back to the incorrect name. Ambi 08:52, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your work on creating articles on Australian politicians, especially that you've added "(Australian politician)" to some of them for disambiguation. I would suggest, though, that you also check what links to a page once you've created it, in order to avoid further ambiguity. See my comment on Talk:Henry Peters. Ardric47 22:51, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Salt Pan Creek, beneath m5.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Salt Pan Creek, beneath m5.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 00:15, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Centro Bankstown

In case you don't have this on your watchlist, someone's put Centro Bankstown up for AfD. enochlau (talk) 04:18, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"is it okay to copy an image that has expired its copyright from a book that is still copyrighted?" - yes. enochlau (talk) 14:07, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

State MPs

I know you mean well, but it would really be helpful if you did some research before writing articles on MPs. "X was a member of the New South Wales Legislative Assembly" doesn't really tell anyone anything they probably didn't already know, where just including the party and term in office would make the article vastly more useful. This has also made some articles incorrect - you'd marked Peter Primrose as a past politician, when he's a current member of the Legislative Council. Ambi 12:05, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to have to concur here. Each article tells me almost nothing, and without a date, I don't even know which term to look in. Could you please include party and term, otherwise, they're useless and tell me nothing I couldn't get from a list entry. Night Gyr 06:14, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya, I'm planning on adding those later. The "What links here" is still useful and I was planning on using that to enter in district and term. Newhoggy | Talk 06:20, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you're adding lists of MPs to the talk pages of articles that already have them. What's that for? Rebecca 04:16, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heya Newhoggy

Thanks for the note of congrats :-) Guess what? My engagement is going to be in your neck of the woods: Bankstown! - Ta bu shi da yu 07:44, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Australian electorates

Hi Newhoggy. I caught your question to Bec and thought I'd point you in the right direction. Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian politics/Electorates was set up to deal with Australian electorates. Happy editing, --cj | talk 04:52, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks cj -- Newhoggy | Talk 05:09, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Brown

See my comments at Talk:Robert Brown (Australian politician) Rocksong 11:41, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aha. Did you mean the Robert Brown of the Shooters Party member who was appointed on 3-May-2006? Rocksong 12:42, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New South Wales Electoral Districts

Is there a specific reason that you have included the list of members at NSWLA electorates in the talk page rather than the article itself? (See, for example Electoral district of Upper Hunter). --Roisterer 13:01, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Those tables are incomplete, or unchecked. -- Newhoggy | Talk 22:39, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is it really necessary to have a new line in the members list when a member gains the title "honourable" at Electoral district of Marrickville?For one thing, other members on this list don't have their titles included. JPD (talk) 09:09, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have continued this discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian politics/Electorates#Titles in member lists, to get some more input. JPD (talk) 14:02, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request

I've no idea why you were caught up in a block, primarily because you did't post the information the block messages ask you to with the unblock tag, without it I'd have been unable to unblock you. Also in the block message is a section entitled "Innocent?" which gives you a bit of information for when you get caught by someone elses block. --pgk^(talk) 17:17, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks -- Newhoggy | Talk 23:11, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

State MP's: Use common names please

note your articles for Kimberley Yeadon etc are not in line with the convention of using the name the person most commonly uses. I will probably move it... Garrie 03:51, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you do find them, please do move it. A redirect from the original page will still be useful - except would they then become orphaned? -- Newhoggy | Talk 05:14, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Angela

Hi Newhoggy,

I saw your congratulation message on Angela's talk page but I'm not sure how to interpret it. Maybe she has just married? :) —Gennaro Prota ^•Talk 23:09, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ... no - I recently got news that she was living with him in Melbourne. Good guess though :-) -- Newhoggy | Talk 23:19, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok, thanks! :-) —Gennaro Prota ^•Talk 23:30, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Hills electoral district

Does this district exist since the 2004 redistribution? --Ga rr ie 03:39, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Use Common Names?

Hi On the now-defunct Electoral district of The Hills there is a table which refers to each of the following by common names: Max, Fred, Tony.

Member Party affiliation Period Maxwell Ruddock Lib. 1962-1976 Frederick Caterson Lib. 1976-1990 Anthony Packard Lib. 1990-1993

You have the above table on the talk page each with blue-linked articles. So in the main article I put in Maxwell Ruddock|Max Ruddock etc.

If you created each of the articles for max, fred, & tony, can you please confirm they are/were KNOWN BY their expanded names? To be honest I don't know which is correct for these people but the convention is to use common names and for a person to use the name Frederick is pretty rare these days.

I'm fed up with having to clean up the utter mess you've created. You've created literally thousands of completely useless substubs, most of which will never be expanded, and many of which are so useless that it would take quite a bit of research to find out which politician the article was meant to be referring to in the first place. Worse than that, you've now created many pointless substubs at names never used by those people (since you didn't even bother to do the most cursory of Google searches by unleashing this torrent of excrement), even when there was actually useful articles located at the names they actually went by. I've had to spent at least eight hours cleaning up this mess at various times over the last couple of months, and it's still nowhere near fixed. Frankly, it would be nice to have a bit of help from the person responsible. Rebecca 05:50, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Viney

Arthur Viney has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this person might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:Notability (people) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" template, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but if an editor is still not satisfied that it meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NickelShoe (Talk) 01:48, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hundred Family Surnames

I left a question at [[Talk:Talk:Hundred Family Surnames]] about a duplicated character. Just wondering if you know anything about it. Thanks. --Yuje 09:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on LUGs in Australia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 220.227.179.4 07:52, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jimbo is coming to Sydney

Sorry to spam you if you aren't interested. See Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney#April 25th for more info if you are interested. - Ta bu shi da yu 08:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strange Sign

It's instructions for a station on one of those fitness courses built out of treated pine logs. I'm guessing its a stick figure, the big circle is its head, the small circles are the logs and the arrows are telling you which way to move your legs. John Dalton 08:44, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment

Hello. I was wondering if you would consider contributing to this discussion to aid in coming to a consensus, something I think it's important to do before the coming federal election. Thanks! Frickeg 23:36, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Wikimedia Australia incorporation meeting

Dear Wikimedian,

I am writing to you as your named is listed at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Australia under "People interested in helping to create a local chapter". Wikimedia Australia's draft rules have been approved by the Wikimedia Foundation, and we now intend to incorporate in the state of Victoria. You are hereby informed of the intention to hold a Wikimedia Australia meeting on 20th April 2008 with the intention to

(a) authorize a person who has attained the age of 18 years and who is resident in the State to incorporate Wikimedia Australia under the Victorian Associations Incorporation Act 1981; [that is, elect a Public Officer] (b) approve a proposed statement of purposes of Wikimedia Australia; and (c) approve the proposed rules of Wikimedia Australia.

A majority of members must vote to pass the motion to incorporate as an association, for it to meet the requirements of the Act.

The proposed rules, and proposed statement of purpose, can be found here:

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Australia/Draft_Rules_for_Wikimedia_Australia_Inc

Details of the incorporation meeting, including local meetings (to be joined up by teleconferencing, with any luck) and the agenda, can be found here:

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Australia/Incorporation

In particular, you are invited to attend the Melbourne meeting:

Time: 3pm
Date: Sunday 20th April 2008
Location: Computerbank, North Melbourne
RSVP (optional): at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Australia/Incorporation/Melbourne or http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=12283635078

I also encourage you to take part in discussion on the mailing list: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/Wikimediaau-l

If you are unable to attend, you can vote by proxy. Please copy the proxy form at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Australia/Proxy_form and send it to me in an email. (It is better to appoint a generic member, e.g. "Meeting Chair" or "Acting Secretary", both of whom will be of Melbourne, rather than a specific member, but the choice is yours.)

If you have any questions please don't hesitate to ask.

Yours sincerely, Brianna Laugher Provisional Secretary, Wikimedia Australia

special:emailuser/pfctdayelise skype/irc/wikipedia/meta/commons: pfctdayelise

Backstage Pass: Powerhouse Museum

-You are recieving this message because you are listed as interested in Wikimedia Australia and live in Sydney-

The Powerhouse Museum will be giving Wikimedia Australia members (and friends) a personal tour through their collections - much of it not on public display. They'll take photos for us and give us access to their curators. Afterwards, they give us a meeting room and we help improve articles about their items. 20people Max.

Would you like to come along?

Signup and learn more here: www.Wikimedia.org.au/wiki/backstage pass

Date & Time: Friday the 13th of March @ 10am. BYO laptop. Where: Powerhouse Museum, Ultimo. map

Hope to see you there, Witty Lama 06:48, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brian McGowan (Australian politician)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Brian McGowan (Australian politician), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No notability, possible POV problems, orphaned

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Tomdobb (talk) 19:34, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Newhoggy! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 453 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

George Torbay - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:26, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Packard Bell Navigator

The article Packard Bell Navigator has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Msnicki (talk) 01:10, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Packard Bell Navigator for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Packard Bell Navigator is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Packard Bell Navigator until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Msnicki (talk) 15:31, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney meetup

Hi, I got your name from this list, and thought you might be interested in a meetup in Sydney at the Alexandria Hotel tomorrow. I hope you can join us. Sorry for the late notice. --99of9 (talk) 11:12, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney edit-a-thon invitation

Sydney Meetup
Next: 13 October 2012
Last: 23 July 2012

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a classical music edit-a-thon Saturday week (13 October) in Sydney. The theme will be Music of France, to coincide with the ABC Classic FM countdown between 8-14 October. If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online during the countdown. Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/October 2012. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:31, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)

Sydney edit-a-thon invitation

Sydney Meetup
Next: 10 November 2012
Last: 13 October 2012

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a disability edit-a-thon Saturday week (10 November) in Sydney. If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online before, during and after the meetup. Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/November 2012. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 15:13, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)

Sydney meetup invitation: January 2013

Sydney Meetup
Next: 10 January 2013
Last: November 2012

Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Thursday 10 January 2013. Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/January 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:52, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)

Sydney September 2013 edit-a-thon invite

Sydney Meetup
Next: 21 September 2013
Last: Higher Ed Symposium

Hi there! You are cordially invited to an edit-a-thon this Saturday (21 September) in Sydney at the State Library of New South Wales (SLNSW), where you can collaborate with other Wikipedians throughout the day. Andy Carr, a senior librarian at SLNSW will also be helping out. The theme of the edit-a-thon is paralympics sports, but you are free to come along to meet other wiki contributors, and edit other topics.

If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online. Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/September 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:34, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Wikipedians in Sydney)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Proposed deletion of File:Salt-Pan-Creek,-graffiti.jpg

The file File:Salt-Pan-Creek,-graffiti.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Salt Pan Creek, bikeway.jpg

The file File:Salt Pan Creek, bikeway.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Salt Pan Creek, litter.jpg

The file File:Salt Pan Creek, litter.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Salt Pan Creek, vandalism.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Salt Pan Creek, vandalism.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:51, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Paul Keating Park.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Paul Keating Park.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Bankstown Civic Tower.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Bankstown Civic Tower.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ★ Bigr Tex 16:09, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Bankstown Plaza, Bankstown, NSW.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Bankstown Plaza, Bankstown, NSW.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ★ Bigr Tex 16:13, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Salt Pan Creek, stream.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Salt Pan Creek, stream.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ★ Bigr Tex 16:15, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Salt Pan Creek, storm water.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Salt Pan Creek, storm water.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ★ Bigr Tex 16:15, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Salt Pan Creek, railway bridge.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Salt Pan Creek, railway bridge.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ★ Bigr Tex 16:15, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Salt Pan Creek, litter.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Salt Pan Creek, litter.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ★ Bigr Tex 16:17, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Salt Pan Creek, mangrove swamp.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Salt Pan Creek, mangrove swamp.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ★ Bigr Tex 16:18, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Salt Pan Creek, beneath m5.jpg

The file File:Salt Pan Creek, beneath m5.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image. Absent uploader cannot clarify source - at upload stated "Courtesy of the Bankstown Greens," while in description stated "Photo taken by myself."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★ Bigr Tex 17:02, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Newhoggy&oldid=1143193960"