This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Parenting, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ParentingWikipedia:WikiProject ParentingTemplate:WikiProject ParentingParenting articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
A fact from Girl soldiers appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 February 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that former girl soldiers may face higher rates of community rejection than former boy soldiers?
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
New enough (created today) and long enough. There is no image and both the article and hook are NPOV. The hook is interesting and inline cited to The International Journal of Human Rights which is an indexed, peer-reviewed journal and WP:RS. (Submitter, please note that the URL to this source has been malformed and currently points to the Wikipedia Library. That's not a criteria for DYK rejection since the citation otherwise provides sufficient information for WP:V, but you may want to fix this at your convenience.) Earwig returns a score of 8.3% indicating WP:COPYVIO "violation unlikely". I was not familiar with the terms "girl soldiers" and "boy soldiers", however, the references clearly establish these are used terms for gender categorization of "child soldiers". No QPQ required on this. All in all, everything looks fine to me. Chetsford (talk) 07:03, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Chetsford: appreciate you pointing out that I'd forgotten to replace the Wikipedia Library links I used for my convenience while writing with normal links once done. Source you pointed out is not the only reference with such malformation. Will fix in a moment. AddWittyNameHere09:40, 1 February 2024 (UTC) ETA: And fixed. :)[reply]
,_early_1900s,_Central_Africa,_Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo,_Pende_people,_wood,_fiber_-_Cleveland_Museum_of_Art_-_DSC08700.JPG){kind=small}
New enough (created today) and long enough. There is no image and both the article and hook are NPOV. The hook is interesting and inline cited to The International Journal of Human Rights which is an indexed, peer-reviewed journal and WP:RS. (Submitter, please note that the URL to this source has been malformed and currently points to the Wikipedia Library. That's not a criteria for DYK rejection since the citation otherwise provides sufficient information for WP:V, but you may want to fix this at your convenience.) Earwig returns a score of 8.3% indicating WP:COPYVIO "violation unlikely". I was not familiar with the terms "girl soldiers" and "boy soldiers", however, the references clearly establish these are used terms for gender categorization of "child soldiers". No QPQ required on this. All in all, everything looks fine to me. Chetsford (talk) 07:03, 1 February 2024 (UTC)