Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 24

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion‎ | Log

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by XMcan (talk | contribs) at 17:19, 29 March 2024 (i hate the ai for reminding me how stupid sometimes i can be ;)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

March 24

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 24, 2024.

MT25i

"MT25i" not mentioned at the target. The letters "MT" are never said together, and the number "25" is not present anywhere at the page. This may be a model number, but it's unclear how useful of a redirect this is as the title is never mentioned as a synonym. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:23, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MT25i is the model number of Sony Xperia neo L. S03311251 (talk) 01:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:40, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'ma Chargin Mah Lazer

Related mem; not mentioned in page or anywhere else on wikipedia. Rusalkii (talk) 23:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remove:clearly unrelated and not appropiate.--ReyHahn (talk) 00:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pierre Connes

There are about 6 articles linking to Pierre Connes, the problem is that the article currently leads to Janine Connes, his wife. It would be better to either take the time to create the article (I am not up to it), or just delete the redirect so that the red link appears. An {{ill}} template has been put in place in the concerning articles if the redirect gets deleted. ReyHahn (talk) 22:55, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per WP:REDLINK. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 15:37, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bang and the dirt is gone

Meme not mentioned in page. Section isn't about the meme or even the commercial the meme is from, but a related blog marketing campaign. Note that this is by a user who has created a number of recently-nominated redirects. Rusalkii (talk) 21:45, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This redirect is a quote from Kitchen Gun, a parody of the Cillit Bang marketing campaign that is mentioned in the Wait no, scratch that, this isn't the Kitchen Gun meme- it's the slogan from this ACTUAL ad for Cillit Bang. Shows how familiar I am with Cillit Bang's advertisements, lol. In any case, what I do find odd is that that section is... honestly rather confused? It's titled as if it's all about the viral marketing controversy, starts out talking about the television ad campaign instead, switches gears and talks about the viral marketing, then switches gears AGAIN to suddenly talk about Kitchen Gun, which is inspired by the television ads, not the blog. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 00:03, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Steelmate

Search results are various companies non of which are mentioned onwiki. Unlikely & confusing error. Rusalkii (talk) 21:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Black Scrubs

Search results are entirely for black scrubs (clothing). Rusalkii (talk) 21:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Target is... a black character from Scrubs (TV series)? ...That's not enough to support the redirect. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 17:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Surikiña

Delete per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 16#Lake Surikiña, closed as delete, (and I aplogise for not bundling these together at that time). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:21, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would Template:Db-xfd apply here? Consensus has already established that there's no info on this lake; might not need to go through song and dance for another week if it's avoidable. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:57, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per previous consensus. I fail to see how any of these are any different from the one we just deleted. I'll also note that save for Surikina, which was made by a bot to redirect to Surikiña and then immediately avoided-double-redirect by a second bot, every single one of these redirects were made on the same day by the same author. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 18:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
HOLD ON WAIT. THAT WASN'T IMMEDIATE. HISTORY DIIIIVE
--Okay, so, Surikiña was actually made first to be a dab page between three pages that... are redlinks (Surikiña, Bolivia; Surikiña River; and Lake Surikiña, which at the time was actually a circular redirect), NONE of which were Taypi Chaka Quta. All of the others were originally made as redirects pointing to this dab page. This existed for 11 years, before it was BLAR'd to Taypi Chaka Quta with the explanation as to why being... WP:PRIMARYRED?? Which also doesn't explain why Taypi Chaka Quta was chosen as the target, given-- as noted in the RfD discussion for Lake Surikiña-- Taypi Chaka Quta is NOT Lake Surikiña. The others were then scooped up by a bot and avoided-double-redirected as a group to Taypi Chaka Quta.
...This doesn't really change my recommendation; the old DAB page was nothing but redlinks, that's not enough to support the DAB. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 18:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chaos muppet

Not mentioned at target article. Originally was a redirect to Muppet Theory, which was BLAR'd as a non-notable neologism, leaving this redirect without a home and undiscussed at the current target page. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:51, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete muppet as per nom. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 15:40, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Roguevania

Roguevania is not mentioned anywhere at the target page, although the concept does receive a smatter of mentions across different other games' articles. Only usage of "vania" is talking about Deadcells being a roguelike / metroidvania, but not a combination of these two terms. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:39, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Soulsvania

A game-genre neologism which is not mentioned at the target article. Is only mentioned once on Wikipedia (but would likely be inappropriate to redirect a concept to one usage of such concept). Dark Souls is mentioned as being "loosely considered a Metroidvania", and Soulslike is listed in the see also section. However, the subsection that this redirect was initially pointed to no longer exists, so it does not seem as if this redirect has a great use anymore if the concept is not discussed anywhere else. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:37, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DNA Lover

Allegedly a TV drama, which is not listed at the target article, nor anywhere on Wikipedia. We have no content for this topic. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Twenty-Five Years' War

This war was not 25 years. This title does not appear anywhere at the target page, and is confusable with The 25 Year War. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:25, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete It looks like the phrase probably originated with this article. There is a Russian Twenty-five Years' War which redirects to Livonian War, whose dates more closely align with those given in the article. Still, neither term doesn't appear to be a commonly-used synonym. (Most of the Google hits seem to be random instances where "twenty-five years" and "war" appear close together). There doesn't seem to be enough here to warrant keeping the redirect. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The title refers to Russo-Swedish wars fought in 1570-1595, see fi:Pitkä viha. In English-language sources they may be referred to as "Nordic/Northern 25 Years' War". Without a specifier the title is ambiguous. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 07:40, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Further comment on the relationship between the Livonian War (1558–1583) and the "25 Years' War" (1570-1595) which may appear confusing. The Livonian War features prominently in Russian historiography since it lead to a loss of territory. The "25 Years' War", or the Long Wrath [fi] as it is called in Finnish historiography, overlaps with the Livonian War, but puts more emphasis on the guerrilla warfare in the Finnish front, which continued even after 1583. Based on this pdf such term is absent from the Russian historiography. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 09:12, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marching Band (band)

I've been getting very tripped-up with this redirect, but I feel this title can easily (and more likely) be used for Marching band, which is, by nature, a band. The page for Marching band has the disambiguation page linked to access other uses. But technically speaking, a marching band is still a band. (This reminds me of the Climber (climbing) situation...) Utopes (talk / cont) 20:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Killdren

This is a group that used to be, but is no longer mentioned at the target article, and not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. Currently unhelpful redirect as we don't have any material on this subject. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the Redirect (Before it Deletes You) as per WP:REDLINK. As noted by the older version(s) of the article that mention Killdren, this is the name of a British electronic punk band, whose only link to this article is that they have a song titled "Kill Tory Scum (Before They Kill You)". That's not really enough to support anything at all-- not the reference being kept in the article, and not the redirect. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 22:34, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Raman Raheja (entrepreneur)

This is a weird case. The only reason this page exists is due to the creator working around the Raman Raheja title salt. The base name had been speedily deleted 3 times for A7 and G11, and this variant title lasted less than 24 hours as an article, before being WP:BLAR'd into the cricket league. Because there is only a passing mention of Raheja at the target, and no indication that Raheja is an entrepreneur, this redirect does not seem very useful without any content about Raheja being an entrepreneur at the cricket league page. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2020–2023 global chip shortage

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was wrong venue. Per the instructions, if you want to move a page but a redirect is in the way, do not list it here. Place a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. Thryduulf (talk) 21:20, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect should be deleted so its target article can be moved back under its title. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 19:54, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

SOUND OF BERBERIA

Unlikely search term, not mentioned with this stylization at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 19:32, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

10-year-old Ohio rape victim required to cross state lines to obtain abortion

Nominating for deletion. The redirect is overly specific and too long and is therefore an unlikely search term. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 19:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:
  • Keep. Nothing has changed since the discussion closed a year ago last week. Thryduulf (talk) 21:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Keep per Thryduulf and WP:CHEAP. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Close I didn't realise that their had already been a previous discussion on this redirect, I was kind of tired when I nominated it and forgot to check. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 10:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not mentioned anywhere in the article, but most importantly, not mentioned ANYWHERE on the Internet. If this was a news headline that could be hypothetically copied in, that'd be understandable(??) but still incredibly unlikely to be naturally searched. This is just, bits and pieces of the articles opening sentence and lead, but as a redirect. Restating the prose of the article, but as a redirect, makes these specific 14 words a novel and obscure synonym for the subject, (evidenced from no user on the Internet has said this ever with zero results outside of Wikipedia). It can't even be a synonym, it's a synopsis. It's unsearchable as a string of words that exists nowhere else, and a year later has STILL never been stated anywhere else on the Internet. The alternative redirect being: 10-year-old (the rest of the title) "from Ohio to Indiana" already exists and is the stylization that seemingly headlined in reports. I don't really like that redirect either, but at least the title benefits from existing, and can be copied into the search bar and/or can appear first when users start typing this in, if they happen to start their search with "ten-dash-year-dash-old" exactly. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:13, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Redirects are not the way to promote very tenuous news reporting. See the NPR reporting in some detail on (probably?) this case, [1]. Essentially, we will most likely never get the facts straight (whatever the truth is, due to privacy concerns), so there is nothing of notability here for the article. Redirecting a headline of a single-source new story with no corroboration to our article where for this very reason the story cannot be published does not seem to be useful for anyone. --Викидим (talk) 07:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

VGA (dis)

Improper disambiguation redirect. Utopes (talk / cont) 19:14, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Christian People's Party of Saarland

Redirect went to a different party (that in turn was an early name for yet another party in a WP:FORK). An article is possible, so WP:R#DELETE #10. Викидим (talk) 19:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Christliche Volkspartei des Saarlandes

Redirect went to a different party (that in turn was an early name for yet another party in a WP:FORK). An article is possible, so WP:R#DELETE #10. Викидим (talk) 18:53, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bud Man

Not mentioned in redirected article. GnocchiFan (talk) 16:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Budweiser#Marketing. It would be more appropriate to redirect to the drink that the mascot ("Bud Man") is advertising, rather than the company that produces the drink. Also the Marketing section contains some information on this mascot. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 10:02, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget as per GoldenBootWizard. Nice find! 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 15:41, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 conspiracy theories, speculation and controversy surrounding the health, period of convalescence, public absence and Mother's Day photograph of Catherine, Princess of Wales; or, Where is Kate? (Kategate)

this title is way too long for a redirect, thank you Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as an implausible search term, created from a humorous alternative title suggestion at the target talk page. See also the redirect 2023 Mother's Day photograph by Catherine, Princess of Wales, created by the same user. IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 13:41, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vos iz dos

"Voz is dos" is "what is it?" in Yiddish. There is a Yiddish song with this title, not mentioned in the target article. Article about the song can be created, so WP:R#DELETE #10. Викидим (talk) 09:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revenge of the Baby-Sat!

The exclamation mark at the end appears to be not used by Watterson. Revenge of the Baby-Sat is already present as a redirect. Most likely, a typo by the editor. Викидим (talk) 08:56, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aquariub

Misspelling reflecting mispronunciation by Calvin in a single strip of the comics. Calvin wears a snorkeling mask with water in it. Highly improbable to occur in internet searches for Calvin and Hobbes. Викидим (talk) 08:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kansas City shooting

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

This redirect should be deleted mainly because as was said last time, shootings in Kansas City are frequent, including one literally today. The Super Bowl parade shooting IMO should just be merged into Super Bowl LVIII#Aftermath because gun violence is an everyday occurance in America and one fatality is not notable enough for an article, but I digress. In any case, this is clearly not the most notable shooting of the name, and it being so high in the search results and not the Kansas City massacre is clearly WP:RECENTISM. 134.6.74.198 (talk) 20:38, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I understand an RM is underway for this article, but that being said, I feel that that shouldn’t impact this given how this is not a suggested name (I don’t think) and there have been RMs for this article since the day it happened. --134.6.74.198 (talk) 20:40, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:56, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would it really be helpful to send readers looking for encyclopedic content, to an unfamiliar page such as a category? This would be a deviation from the norm of, say, Chicago shooting or Nashville shooting among multiple others. The category can be linked from the hypothetical DAB if it needs to. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:14, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I oppose this - we have an article on the exact event the significant majority of people are going to be looking for (the current target, yes it's recent but that doesn't mean it's not the primary topic) that has a hatnote to the event most other people are going to be looking for. Retargetting to a category that is much broader and which doesn't help people who don't know that the Kansas City massacre was a shooting is actively unhelpful. Thryduulf (talk) 04:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There is a disambiguation draft at the redirect page now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 07:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have just checked again, and it is even more clear that the current target is the primary topic now than it was when this was last discussed - 100% of the results on the first five pages of my google search are about the 2024 event. The draft dab should be at Kansas City shooting (disambiguation). Thryduulf (talk) 12:44, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The #1 result I get now is this, and then this - two unrelated shootings. Yes, this is a significant shooting but it’s obvious it will not be the primary Kansas City shooting long term. Ten years from now, this will not be seen as the primary KC shooting. 24.89.159.222 (talk) 21:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, Hatnote to Disambiguation - It really does seem the 2024 shooting is the main topic here, but it might not always be the main topic... and clearly it wasn't always the main topic previously, so searching based on historical references might be misleading. Because it's the main topic RIGHT NOW, the redirect should probably stay where it is, but there should be a hatnote pointing to a separate disambiguation page. Fieari (talk) 01:45, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of "Cops/COPS/C.O.P.S." episodes

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

I know we just had a discussion for List of Cops episodes (and I participated in the respective discussion), but I made my comment in that discussion prior to noticing the existence of List of COPS episodes. The problem here is that WP:SMALLDETAILS probably does not differentiate the two topics enough, given that Cops (TV program) can be stylized as "COPS" and COPS (animated TV series) is apparently stylized as "C.O.P.S.". In addition, at Cop#Television, there are additional TV show/program subjects listed which include an inline list of episodes. So, with all that said, I'm not sure what is the best path here. (I've also added List of C.O.P.S. episodes for completion of this nomination so others know of its existence, but I'm "weak keep" on that per my previous statement about the "C.O.P.S." stylization; either way, List of C.O.P.S. episodes is a {{R with history}}.) Steel1943 (talk) 18:18, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for a stronger consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 04:18, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to dab page. Create a list of episode redirect for each series using their main article title and disambiguation. Gonnym (talk) 10:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 15:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on Pppery's suggestion?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes (talk / cont) 05:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gillanwali (Dera Baba Nanak))

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD G6 Liz Read! Talk! 08:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely extra trailing parenthetical, at this title for under an hour. Rusalkii (talk) 04:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Inecraft and etc.

Following the closure of the Minecrat RfD with a deletion result, the last and WP:POINTiest outcome of that discussion I'd expect to see is the mass creation of all other variations of this deleted redirect. Creating redirects for every typo-instance of a word pre-emptively, especially a week after the deletion of the last one, is not useful. Minecraft is not hard to spell; these redirects don't provide any benefit besides clogging technical pages (not a benefit). Utopes (talk / cont) 03:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, then WP:TROUT user:I am RedoStone. Minecraft is a great game, that gives you the ability to build anything and also make your player character look like anyone using skins. That said, this build and this skin do not go together.
I'm not entirely certain how applicable that actually is, but couldn't pass it up lol 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 05:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all as unlikely typos and per previous RfD. Unnecessary maintenance. —  HELLKNOWZ ∣ TALK 09:36, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all, these redirects are unnecessary. Suonii180 (talk) 11:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Being sick

There are hundreds of different ways to interpret being sick, with a massive list of symptoms and/or other characteristics to choose from. Taking this hyper-generic phrase and targeting at one outcome of being sick, is not helpful as a redirect. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:46, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Disease, which seems (at least to me) like the best fit we have. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 05:14, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
to the dab at Sick#Medical conditions as per Thryduulf, Rusalkii, and Fieari. I'll note that vomiting is one of the three targets listed in that specific section of the dab, which should ameliorate concerns about the current target being technically correct. (It also happens to have Disease right there!) 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 15:44, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cadenhead's old raj

I see only a loose connection between this redirect and the target article. There is a link with the Cadenheads but "old raj"? But I might not be up on lingo for distilleries. I came upon this redirect, one of many created by this editor while tagging some of their category creations. Liz Read! Talk! 03:13, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete google results make it clear that (Cadenhead's) Old Raj is a gin bottled by Cadenhead's. The only connection is that Cadenhead's is owned by J & A Mitchell & Company, who also own the target distillery, but there is no information about this product at the target (and there shouldn't be) or anywhere else on Wikipedia (I have no opinion whether there should be) making the redirect unhelpful. Thryduulf (talk) 12:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bagel Figglehorn

No mention of "Bagel" anywhere at the target article, no mention of this particular offshoot character anywhere on Wikipedia, apart from a contextless one-off name-drop in the Fred: The Show cast. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Puyallup Resvn

Not sure why this was created as it seems implausible that anyone would ever make that typo (Puyallup Reservation > Puyallup Resvn), "Resvn" isn't any slang I know, and nothing links to it, so I feel like it should be deleted. I would have marked it for speedy deletion but it's been around for two years. The only edit besides its creation was from a bot fixing a double redirect a few months ago. PersusjCP (talk) 02:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flying Theme

Multiple flying themes exist inside and outside of soundtracks. Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (soundtrack) describes a flying theme, The Matrix Reloaded mentions a flying theme, Flying (Taehyung Theme) exists as a redirect to BTS World: Original Soundtrack, as well as any other theme that plays while flying. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to a disambiguation page (yet to be created) consisting of the aforementioned pages. signed, Pat talk 01:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Genocide Joe

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. Discussion taking place about whether to include this nickname, which the existence of this redirect is tied to. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 02:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A non-neutral nickname which is not discussed at the target list of nicknames. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It was removed from the list with the rationale "WP:BLP violation seems to imply that Biden did genocide" by @Isla despite having a copious amount of sources pointing to its usage. I restored the mention of the nickname. The fact that it's pejorative is irrelevant- most of the nicknames there are. HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 02:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What is relevant is that it's not mentioned at the target. Was simply setting the stage on what the redirect is, a non-neutral nickname, often deletable via WP:RFD#DELETE reason #3. It seems that this was unfortunately poor timed on my part as there was a talk page discussion deciding on whether or not to include this nickname at the target list, which was dormant until a couple hours before this RfD. No need to split the discussion between here and the talk page; as this seems to be a content debate, I'll be closing this. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:57, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per HadesTTW PersusjCP (talk) 02:36, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hasya Movies

Hasya Movies or "Hasya" not mentioned at the target article, unclear connection to subject based on article contents, external searches did not show Razesh. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:05, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete!

The word "delete" is only mentioned once in passing, never with an exclamation point, and never referred to as a possible chant of such word. Because the word "delete" is very often stated on its own, as a command verb, this stylization I feel can be used in many other contexts present on the Delete disambiguation page. There is currently not a strong justification from the Cyberman article's content to prioritize this usage over the others. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:48, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nanomachines, son

An r from meme catchphrase, not mentioned at the target article. Wikipedia is not a compository of meme-to-source redirect connections. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you toon enough

A catchphrase that is not discussed at the target article. Searching for this specific quote instead of the service itself is an intentional decision that should be reflected in content, but is not present. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wowee

The word "wow" is not mentioned at the target, much less "wowee", also not mentioned. I find it extremely far-fetched to believe that people would search for Mario by typing in "wowee" instead of "Mario". For people that would make the decision to use the phrase "wowee", it would seem expectable to have some content about the phrase "wowee" as a target, which we do not have on Wikipedia. There's plenty of other mentions of "wowee" across Wikipedia; it could be worthwhile to delete this and let the Wikipedia search do it's thing. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It's likely meant to be in reference to "Wowee Zowee!" which the characters say in Super Mario Bros. Wonder. Not sure why it redirects here either way, but thought I may as well clear up confusion. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 23:25, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It was first done in 2021, so it can't be that. Sergecross73 msg me 02:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This got me to do a history dive on this one. Redirect was originally created in 2008 targeting WoWee, then retargeted to WowWee near immediately by its creator, with indication that the latter was the intended target. It stayed at that target until 2021, when it indeed was retargeted to Mario by user:Rng0286 under the stated belief that this was a quote from Mario.
For the record, I'll note that the original target of WowWee is ALSO a bad target for this redirect, and would probably generate a fair bit of WP:SURPRISE. My vote will stay on Delete. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 15:53, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Waterfalls

Nobody named "Jason" is mentioned at the target page of this R from catchphrase redirect. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Chasing" is also not mentioned at the target, which I would've expected Chasing Waterfalls more if anything. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:45, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that is surprising. It's part of the chorus and central to the concept of the song, so it seems like it could pretty easily be included. Sergecross73 msg me 01:57, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mom, Phineas and Ferb are building an invention!

I don't think "building an invention" is ever said by Candace; this is a genericized version of a specific opener that is unlikely to be predicted as a search term; the full deal is not mentioned at the target, and I don't imagine it would be used as a replacement search term for Candace. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not quite my tempo

An unmentioned catchphrase from the movie Whiplash, a phrase that is never alluded to at the target page. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fire and water cannot be together

Quotes from the movie Elemental, neither of which are mentioned at the target. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:20, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Wasn't the first one also a plot point in an episode of Lilo and Stitch: The Series? 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 05:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like a Jelly Baby?

An R from catchphrase not mentioned at the target article, not a likely search term for the Fourth Doctor. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:12, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete. I am EXCEEDINGLY surprised that that catchphrase ISN'T mentioned in the target article, given how ingrained said catchphrase is to the Fourth Doctor's character-- it's as Fourth Doctor as his scarf. If someone were to add it to the article, I don't think I'd support deletion anymore. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 05:22, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am the one who knocks!

An R from catchphrase that is not listed at the target article. Creator banned for sockpuppetry has had similar deleted catchphrase redirects in the past. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:11, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good night, Chet. Good night, David. And good night, for NBC News

An r from catchphrase from a news report closer that is no longer mentioned at the target. Catchphrases, similar to r from lyrics, are not useful as redirects on a general basis. People searching specifically for a catchphrase are looking for information about this specific search term, which the target does not contain. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:09, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_March_24&oldid=1216193626"