Hello, Buh6173, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck or looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Help Desk, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, or ask the people around you for help -- good Wikipedians don't bite the newcomers. Keep an open mind and listen for advice, but don't hesitate to be bold when editing!
If you'd like to respond to this message, or ask any questions, feel free to leave a message at my talk page!
Once you've become a more experienced Wikipedian, you may wish to take a moment to visit these pages:
You are going to have to assert why this is notable if you want it to be on Wiki. Anyway, I see that your Youtube user name is in the list so you are probably just trying to blatantly advertise on Wikipedia. Gdo0121:27, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. JuJube20:49, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. JuJube04:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image (Image:ShinigamiEyes.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:ShinigamiEyes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot01:07, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
License tagging for Image:Aizawa.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Aizawa.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:05, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Spider-Man
Please keep your personal observations to yourself, they have no place on Wikipedia. We deal in verifiable facts. Brock and the symbiote were destroyed. In the world of movie magic, yes, they could come back, but that is for another film, and not this one. Bignole00:49, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that his skeleton was seen wasn't proof enough? Where would his body go? There isn't any speculation going on, other than your own, and you're instituting it as fact. Bring it up on the talk page if you think otherwise, it's been discussed before. Bignole00:55, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
First, if you don't remember, there were different bombs for different things. Second, you are really grasping at possibilities that aren't there. Bring it up on the talk page. Bignole01:02, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
License tagging for Image:Watari.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Watari.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:11, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:DNOSTIII.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DNOSTIII.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Regarding ALL of your edits to every Zatch Bell Article
Ok, this has been really bothering me, and I can't figure out how to revert everything you did. You changed the template, and I cannot figure how to change it back, and you've recently been making brand new pages for all the characters except making all of them japanese names. Why have you been doing this? There is nothing wrong with using the dubbed names for characters with dubbed names, and the system has been working smoothly since it was created. -XxKibaxXTalk13:20, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I understand your point, however, as the dubbed versions of animes are being released, the pages have been slowly been converted to versions using dubbed names (example Naruto Uzumaki.) I see no problem with having a set of pages with the japanese version of everything, in fact it may be a good idea! Just, the dubbed pages should really be left alone. -XxKibaxXTalk19:29, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is the English Wikipedia, so English names are used, period. The issue was decided a long time ago. I'm not pressing the issue since I don't edit Wikipedia anymore, but you really need to lay off with the Japanophilia. 71.110.2.11105:39, 17 August 2007 (UTC) (artist formerly known as JuJube)[reply]
FE10
Please do *not* overwrite legitimate redirects without handling them properly (e.g. dab line on new redirected article).
In fact, please don't do that to FE10 at all; FE10 was the actual *name* of a relatively famous camera.
Your use is an informal abbreviation for a relatively new game. Yes, I'm sure that more people will probably play the Fire Emblem 10 game, but the issue here is use of the abbreviation itself. "FE10" isn't mentioned in the Fire Emblem article, and there's no indication that it's common.
("FE10" with "Fire Emblem" gets 631 unique Google hits; "FE10" with "Nikon" gets 35,600).
Please leave this and stop arrogantly assuming that because *you* like something it is more important.
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you move a page maliciously, as you did to Zatch Bell!, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You know well that the discussion is not going in your favor, so you decide to basically go against the arguments against you? I think not. Redirecting this page goes against WP:UE and WP:COMMONNAME, and, in my opinion, you are violating WP:POINT. -XxKibaxXTalk18:44, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edits
Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot20:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
WARNING
Please stop being an utter dick about Konjiki no Gash Bell. In fact, looking at this talk page; please stop being an utter dick altogether. Thank you.--131.172.4.4505:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image source problem with Image:Clear Note.png
Image Copyright problem
Thanks for uploading Image:Clear Note.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Proof? Also, don't think you can get away with sneakily arguing about "Gurabu" and "Keys" when you're really trying to replace "Zatch" with "Gash" again. JuJube (talk) 21:38, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Let me state my point in other words. Show a scan of the English-language manga that gives the name as "Keys" or "Gurabu" and it can stay. (Not a Japanese scan of English letters, they are notoriously inconsistent). But "Zatch" CANNOT be replaced with "Gash". JuJube (talk) 21:41, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, that is my point. Anime-Destiny is a fansub organization, there's nothing official about it. Although there might be a point to be made about the approximations used being sourceless, too, they have been in place since I arrived. ("Kiees" is a source of controversy in the fandom, AFAIK. It's been romanized to Keys, Kiss, and Keith, and A-D hasn't really settled the issue). JuJube (talk) 00:00, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think your intent with your response was to insult me, so I'm gonna just go ahead and give you a WP:NPA warning. I will also tell you to stop being a weeaboo and accept Wikipedia policy. The fact that YOU think "Keys" is the "right name" doesn't make it so. There's nothing left to talk about; an administrator has already said that English names are the ones that should be used, so I will consider further reverts to be vandalism. JuJube (talk) 06:37, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Booklet 01.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
Your edits all seem to be taken from the Anime-Destiny fansubs which, while well done, do not constitute a valid source for Wikipedia. JuJube (talk) 15:40, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The only one I see to be blatantly incorrect is 137, most likely because it was Babelfished. The others are fine. The policy problem here is that you're taking your information right from the (sadly illegal) fansub, and that can cause some legal problems. Could you start a topic on the talk page about it? JuJube (talk) 16:27, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Behave
Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 1 day. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.
Thanks for uploading File:FireEmblem3DS.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Problems with upload of File:FireEmblem3DS title card.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:FireEmblem3DS title card.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free media (File:Fire Emblem Kakusei Japanese box art.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Fire Emblem Kakusei Japanese box art.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:15, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free media (File:Fire Emblem Awakening English box art.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Fire Emblem Awakening English box art.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:27, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
April 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ViperSnake151 Talk 20:13, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Proposed deletion of Konjiki no Gash Bell!! Movie 2: Attack of the Mecha-Vulcan
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Konjiki no Gash Bell!! Movie 2: Attack of the Mecha-Vulcan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 19:59, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Old Fashioned (film). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
I back it up by the multiple claims you've received, as well as the fact that from your edits, it's pretty clear you're trying to cherry pick criticism of a negatively reviewed movie by promoting one of its few positive reviews and including a "mixed" review while quoting one of its few positive quotes (in other words, providing nothing but positive quotes for a primarily negatively reviewed movie). If you don't have a COI, then in the very least you have a clear bias towards it and don't want to see it portrayed as negative despite that being the reception it has received. Unfortunately, Wikipedia is not a place where one can promote movies they like; it is an objective grounds. Buh6173 (talk) 02:51, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Have you actually read COI? What you mean is bias. What you're trying to make a case for is bias. I suspect you haven't actually given it thought and just blurted out "COI". Try actually reading COI and then tell me which of the criteria you think you can prove. If you honestly think you can make that case, I invite you to go to ANI and make it. In fact, if you think you can make a COI case, I strongly encourage you to make the ANI complaint. I haven't "promoted" anything. I've simply tried to present the part that hasn't been presented. Niteshift36 (talk) 02:57, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Which you already did with a singular positive review. But burying criticism will do nothing but warp the truth, so knock it off. And like I said, regardless of whether or not you have a COI, it's clear that in the very least you are showcasing bias towards the film.Buh6173 (talk) 03:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
First, I didn't bury criticism. the section leads with how it was pretty negative on RT. All I did was show that ALL critics didn't hate it. Second, I'm not "playing a game". Third, I posted a second review only because you made the claim that "If it's the only place giving the movie a good review...", so I demonstrated that it wasn't the only place. Otherwise, I wouldn't have added it. Lastly, I will ask once again: Back up the COI allegation or retract it. You made the allegation. If you made a mistake, show some good faith and admit you made a mistake. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, you appear to be developing a bias at this point, feeling you need to show a counter to every review. I note that you edit pretty infrequently, but your last edit was also a Christian film that you had issues with. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:09, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Buh6173. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Buh6173. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:16, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:08, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:10, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:14, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Daisy Super Smash Bros Ultimate.png
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Daisy Super Smash Bros Ultimate.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello, Buh6173. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The article was once tagged with the excessive plot tag due to the edits you recently made. That was one of the reasons it was shortened. For the article to be maintained, it is not recommended to mention every single moment in the manga and give a short summary of it, which is what the Premise summary does. -- 1989 (talk) 15:23, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't see any such tag. Was that added automatically, or did you add it? Either way is erroneous, as without it there is no plot summary. Buh6173 (talk) 07:14, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's not there now because of me. I made improvements to the article and made it up to standard. What you're adding is making that backwards. -- 1989 (talk) 07:17, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Because of the tags I linked here, I was the one that removed the plot summary and made a premise section. It would make more sense to have a overview of the manga instead of constantly updating the plot summary until the manga is over, which won't happen any time soon. The change was almost two years ago, and no one challenged my change because I knew what I was doing. And yes, I reverted you again because you made it seem you were refusing to discuss. I wasn't aware of your reply until now. -- 1989 (talk) 07:27, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Adding a summary is not "making the article backwards". The "Premise" only gives the bare bones outline. Again, look at any other similar manga series (Naruto, Dragon Ball, Bleach), and you'll see a full plot synopsis. Unless you can provide me with any kind of actual justification as to why One Piece would be exempt, I'm putting it back, because reversions without probable cause is essentially vandalism. Buh6173 (talk) 17:53, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You're basically edit warring if you keep readding it. I have already advised you to gain consensus for your bold changes as my concerns are valid here. You call it vandalism, I call it an revert from an editor who is experienced in editing the article longer than you. -- 1989 (talk) 21:11, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Link Super Smash Bros Ultimate.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Link Super Smash Bros Ultimate.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Link Super Smash Bros Ultimate.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
Thanks for uploading File:Pearl page image.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Thanks for uploading File:Pearl page image.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The House in Fata Morgana OST Disc 1-2 Cover.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:The House in Fata Morgana OST Disc 1-2 Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 09:24, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Justification was provided in the edit summary. Unless you can accurately dispute my issues, I'm going to revert the page to as it was. Buh6173 (talk) 04:39, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Pearl page image.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks!NEDOCHAN (talk) 10:20, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Technical move
Not done Hi! I contested your request for a technical move as I believe that it will need formal discussion regarding the move, you can take part here. Kadzi (talk) 09:27, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Pearl page image.png
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Pearl page image.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the Finding Nemo plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summaryedit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 04:16, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Your recent editing history at Spider-Man: No Way Home shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JOEBRO6412:40, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Orphaned non-free image File:Ridley Super Smash Bros Ultimate.png
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Ridley Super Smash Bros Ultimate.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Orphaned non-free image File:King K. Rool Smash Ultimate.png
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:King K. Rool Smash Ultimate.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Orphaned non-free image File:King K. Rool Smash Ultimate.png
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:King K. Rool Smash Ultimate.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
){kind=link}
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 20:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. JuJube (talk) 23:57, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Fire Emblem Kakusei Japanese box art.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ViperSnake151 Talk 20:13, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
![[1]](https://www.ssbwiki.com/File:Ryu_SSBU.png){kind=link}
![[2]](https://villains.wikia.com/wiki/File:Ganondorf_Ultimate_2018.png){kind=link}
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 09:24, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, you may be blocked from editing. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:52, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks!NEDOCHAN (talk) 10:20, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Not done Hi! I contested your request for a technical move as I believe that it will need formal discussion regarding the move, you can take part here. Kadzi (talk) 09:27, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
