Jump to content

Linux kernel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Spelemann (talk | contribs) at 13:22, 2 October 2007 (new preview version). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Linux
Original author(s)Linus Torvalds
Developer(s)Linus Torvalds (author) and many others
Initial release1991
Stable release
Preview release
2.6.23-rc9 / 1 October 2007[2]
Repository
Written inC
Operating systemLinux
TypeKernel
LicenseGNU General Public License
Websitehttp://kernel.org/

The Linux kernel is a Unix-like operating system kernel. It is the namesake of the Linux family of operating systems. Released under the GNU General Public License (GPL) and developed by contributors worldwide, Linux is one of the most prominent examples of free and open source software.[3]

Linux was written by Linus Torvalds in 1991. Early on, the Minix community contributed code and ideas to the Linux kernel. At the time, the GNU Project had created many of the components required for a free software operating system, but its own kernel, GNU Hurd, was incomplete and unavailable. The BSD operating system had not yet freed itself from legal encumbrances. This meant that despite the limited functionality of the early versions, Linux rapidly accumulated developers and users who adopted code from those projects for use with the new operating system.[4] Today the Linux kernel has received contributions from thousands of programmers.

History

Main article: History of the Linux kernel

In April 1991, Linus Torvalds, then 21 years old, started working on some simple ideas for an operating system. He started with a task switcher in Intel 80386 assembly and a terminal driver. Then, on, 25 August 1991, Torvalds posted to comp.os.minix:

I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing since April, and is starting to get ready. I'd like any feedback on things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat (same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons) among other things).

I've currently ported bash(1.08) and gcc(1.40), and things seem to work. This implies that I'll get something practical within a few months [...] Yes - it's free of any minix code, and it has a multi-threaded fs. It is NOT portable (uses 386 task switching etc), and it probably never will support anything other than AT-harddisks, as that's all I have :-(.

[...] It's mostly in C, but most people wouldn't call what I write C. It uses every conceivable feature of the 386 I could find, as it was also a project to teach me about the 386. As already mentioned, it uses a MMU, for both paging (not to disk yet) and segmentation. It's the segmentation that makes it REALLY 386 dependent (every task has a 64Mb segment for code & data - max 64 tasks in 4Gb. Anybody who needs more than 64Mb/task - tough cookies). [...] Some of my "C"-files (specifically mm.c) are almost as much assembler as C. [...] Unlike minix, I also happen to LIKE interrupts, so interrupts are handled without trying to hide the reason behind them.[5]

After that, many people contributed code to the project. By September 1991, Linux version 0.01 was released. It had 10,239 lines of code. In October 1991, Linux version 0.02 was released.[6]

In December 1991, Linux 0.11 was released. This version was the first to be self-hosted - Linux 0.11 could be compiled by a computer running Linux 0.11. When he released the next version, Torvalds adopted the GNU General Public License (GPL) over his previous self-drafted license, which did not permit commercial redistribution.[7]

A newsgroup alt.os.linux was started, and on January 19 1992, the first post to alt.os.linux was made.[8] On March 31 1992, alt.os.linux became comp.os.linux.[9]

The X Window System was soon ported to Linux. In March 1992, Linux version 0.95 was the first to be capable of running X. This large version number jump (from 0.1x to 0.9x) was due to a feeling that a version 1.0 with no major missing pieces was imminent. However, this proved to be somewhat overoptimistic, and from 1993 to early 1994, 15 development versions of version 0.99 appeared.

On March 14 1994, Linux 1.0.0 was released, with 176,250 lines of code. In March 1995, Linux 1.2.0 was released (310,950 lines of code).

Linus decided, on May 9 1996, to adopt Tux the penguin as mascot for Linux.

Version 2 of Linux, released on June 9, 1996, was a landmark. Strong development continued:

Pronunciation

In 1992, Torvalds explained how he pronounces the word Linux:

'li' is pronounced with a short [ee] sound: compare prInt, mInImal etc. 'nux' is also short, non-diphtong, like in pUt. It's partly due to minix: linux was just my working name for the thing, and as I wrote it to replace minix on my system, the result is what it is... linus' minix became linux.

— Linus Torvalds, comp.os.linux newsgroup[10]

Torvalds has made available an audio sample which indicates his own pronunciation, in English and Swedish.[11][12] However, an interview from the 2001 documentary Revolution OS indicates that his preferred pronunciation has slightly changed.[13]

Many English speakers tend to pronounce the name as [ˈlɪnʊks] or [ˈlɪnəks].

Licensing terms

Initially, Torvalds released Linux under a license which forbade any commercial exploitation. This was soon changed to the GNU General Public License (GPL). This license allows distribution and sale of possibly modified and unmodified versions of Linux but requires that all those copies be released under the same license and be accompanied by the complete corresponding source code.

Torvalds has described licensing Linux under the GPL as the "best thing I ever did."[14]

GPL version 3

Currently, Linux is licensed under version 2 of the GPL, and there is some controversy over how easily it could be changed to use later GPL versions such as the new version 3 (and whether this is desirable).[15] Torvalds himself specifically indicated upon the release of version 2.4.0 that his own code is only under version 2.[16] However, the terms of the GPL state that if no version is specified, then any version may be used, and Alan Cox pointed out that very few other Linux contributors have specified a particular version of the GPL.[17] One blogger concluded that around 40% of Linux code is specifically "GPL 2 or above", and another approximately 10% is "GPL" (with no version specified), making for about half of the kernel, put together.[18] In September of 2006, a survey of 29 key kernel programmers indicated 28 preferred GPLv2 to the then-current GPLv3 draft. Torvalds commented, "I think a number of outsiders...believed that I personally was just the odd man out, because I've been so publicly not a huge fan of the GPLv3."[19]

Loadable Kernel Modules and firmware

It is debated whether Loadable Kernel Modules (LKMs) should be considered derivative works under copyright law, and thereby fall under the terms of the GPL. Torvalds has stated his belief that LKMs using only a limited, "public" subset of the kernel interfaces can sometimes be non-derived works, thus allowing some binary-only drivers and other LKMs that are not licensed under the GPL. Not all Linux contributors agree with this interpretation, however, and even Torvalds agrees that many LKMs are clearly derived works, and indeed he writes that "kernel modules ARE derivative 'by default'". On the other hand Torvalds has also said that "one gray area in particular is something like a driver that was originally written for another operating system (ie. clearly not a derived work of Linux in origin). [...] THAT is a gray area, and _that_ is the area where I personally believe that some modules may be considered to not be derived works simply because they weren't designed for Linux and don't depend on any special Linux behaviour."[20] Especially proprietary graphics drivers are heavily discussed. Ultimately, such questions can only be resolved by a court[dubious – discuss].

One point of licensing controversy is Linux's use of firmware "binary blobs" to support some hardware devices. Richard Stallman claims that these blobs make Linux partially non-free software, and that distributing Linux may even be violating the GPL (which requires "complete corresponding source code" to be available).[21]

Trademark

Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States and some other countries. This is the result of an incident in which William Della Croce, Jr., who was not involved in the Linux project, trademarked the name and subsequently demanded royalties for its use. Several Linux backers retained legal counsel and filed suit against Della Croce, who agreed in 1998 to assign the trademark to Torvalds.

SCO litigation

Further information: SCO-Linux controversies

In March 2003, the SCO Group (SCO) filed a lawsuit against IBM claiming that IBM had violated copyrights that SCO claimed to hold over the Unix source code, by contributing portions of that code to Linux. Additionally, SCO sent letters to a number of companies warning that their use of Linux without a license from SCO may be a violation of copyright law, and claimed in the press that they would be suing individual Linux users. This controversy has generated lawsuits by SCO against Novell, DaimlerChrysler (partially dismissed in July, 2004), and AutoZone, and retaliatory lawsuits by Red Hat and others against SCO.

In early 2007 SCO filed the specific details of the purported copyright infringement. Despite previous claims that SCO was the rightful owner of 1 million lines of code, they specified only 326 lines of code, most of which were uncopyrightable [1]. In August 2007, the court in the Novell case ruled that SCO did not actually own the Unix copyrights to begin with. [2]

Technical features

Linux supports true preemptive multitasking (both in user mode and kernel mode), virtual memory, shared libraries, demand loading, shared copy-on-write executables, memory management, the Internet protocol suite, and threading.

Architecture

Simplified Linux kernel diagram in the form of a matrix map

Linux is a monolithic kernel. Device drivers and kernel extensions run in kernel space (ring 0), with full access to the hardware, although some exceptions run in user space. Unlike Microsoft Windows, the graphics system most people use with Linux doesn't run in the kernel.

Kernel mode preemption allows device drivers to be preempted under certain conditions. This feature was added to handle hardware interrupts correctly and improve support for symmetric multiprocessing (SMP). Preemption also improves latency, increasing responsiveness and making Linux more suitable for real-time applications.

The fact that Linux is a monolithic kernel rather than a microkernel was the topic of the Tanenbaum-Torvalds debate[22] between Andrew S. Tanenbaum and Linus Torvalds. The debate started in 1992 about Linux and kernel architecture in general on the Usenet discussion group comp.os.minix.[23] Tanenbaum argued that microkernels are superior to monolithic kernels and that therefore Linux is obsolete. Unlike traditional monolithic kernels, device drivers are easily configured as Loadable Kernel Modules, and loaded or unloaded while running the system. This subject was revisited on 9 May 2006,[24] and on 12 May 2006 Tanenbaum authored a position statement.[25]

Kernel panic

Kernel Panic
Main article: Kernel panic

In Linux, a "panic" is an unrecoverable system error detected by the kernel as opposed to similar errors detected by user space code. It is possible for kernel code to indicate such a condition by calling the panic function located in the header file sys/system.h. However, most panics are the result of unhandled processor exceptions in kernel code, such as references to invalid memory addresses. These are typically indicative of a bug somewhere in the call chain leading to the panic. They can also indicate a failure of hardware, such as a failed RAM cell or errors in arithmetic functions in the processor caused by a processor bug, overheating/damaged processor, or a soft error.

Programming languages

Linux is written in the version of the C programming language supported by GCC (which has introduced a number of extensions and changes to standard C), together with a number of short sections of code written in the assembly language (in GCC's "AT&T-style" syntax) of the target architecture. Because of the extensions to C it supports, GCC was for a long time the only compiler capable of correctly building Linux. Recently, Intel claims to have modified its C compiler so that it is also capable of correctly compiling it.[26]

Many other languages are used in some way, primarily in connection with the kernel build process (the methods whereby the bootable image is created from the sources). These include Perl, Python, and various shell scripting languages. Some drivers may also be written in C++, Fortran, or other languages, but this is strongly discouraged. Linux's build system only officially supports GCC as a kernel and driver compiler.

Portability

Ipod linux booting kernel
Main article: Linux kernel portability and supported architectures

While not originally designed to be portable, Linux is now one of the most widely ported operating system kernels, running on a diverse range of systems from the iPAQ (a handheld computer) to the IBM System z9 (a massive mainframe server that can run hundreds or even thousands of concurrent Linux instances). Linux runs as the main operating system on IBM's Blue Gene supercomputers. As of June 2007, Linux is the OS on more than 75% of systems on the Top 500 supercomputers list.[27]

Virtual machine architectures

See Comparison of virtual machines for more details on product support for Linux.

See Hypervisor for more details on terminology used with virtual machines.

The Linux kernel has extensive support for and runs on many virtual machine architectures both as the host operating system and as a client operating system. The virtual machines usually emulate Intel x86 family of processors, though in a few cases PowerPC or AMD processors are also emulated.

Supported binary formats

Linux 1.0 supported only the a.out binary format. The next stable series (Linux 1.2) added support for Executable and Linkable Format (ELF), which simplifies the creation of shared libraries (used extensively by modern desktop environments like KDE and GNOME[28]). ELF is the default format used by gcc since around gcc 2.7.0[29], so a.out is now rarely if ever used, and ELF is now the primary binary format.

Linux supports many other binary formats, including binfmt misc for associating files to a program (such as an interpreter) to run or display that file.

Estimated cost to redevelop

The cost to redevelop the Linux kernel version 2.6.0 in a traditional proprietary development setting has been estimated to be US$612M (467M €) in 2004 prices using the COCOMO man-month estimation model.[30] In 2006, a study funded by the European Union put the redevelopment cost of kernel version 2.6.8 significantly higher, to 882M € (US$1.14B).[31]

Versions

Further developing his own code and integrating changes made by other programmers, Linus Torvalds keeps releasing new versions of the Linux kernel. These are called "vanilla" kernels, meaning they have not been further modified by anyone. Many Linux operating system vendors modify the kernels of their product, mainly in order to add support for drivers or features which have not officially been released as stable, while some distributions rely on vanilla kernels.

Version numbering

The version number of the Linux kernel currently consists of four numbers, following a recent change in the long-standing policy of a three-number versioning scheme. For illustration, let it be assumed that the version number is composed thus: A.B.C[.D] (e.g. 2.2.1, 2.4.13 or 2.6.12.3).

  • The A number denotes the kernel version. It is changed least frequently, and only when major changes in the code and the concept of the kernel occur. It has been changed twice in the history of the kernel: In 1994 (version 1.0) and in 1996 (version 2.0).
  • The B number denotes the major revision of the kernel.
    • Prior to the Linux 2.6.x series, even numbers indicate a stable release, i.e. one that is deemed fit for production use, such as 1.2, 2.4 or 2.6. Odd numbers have historically been development releases, such as 1.1 or 2.5. They were for testing new features and drivers until they became sufficiently stable to be included in a stable release.
    • Starting with the Linux 2.6.x series, there is no significance to even or odd numbers, with new feature development going on in the same kernel series. Linus Torvalds has stated that this will be the model for the foreseeable future.
  • The C number indicates the minor revision of the kernel. In the old three-number versioning scheme, this was changed when security patches, bugfixes, new features or drivers were implemented in the kernel. With the new policy, however, it is only changed when new drivers or features are introduced; minor fixes are handled by the D number.
  • A D number first occurred when a grave error, which required immediate fixing, was encountered in 2.6.8's NFS code. However, there were not enough other changes to legitimize the release of a new minor revision (which would have been 2.6.9). So, 2.6.8.1 was released, with the only change being the fix of that error. With 2.6.11, this was adopted as the new official versioning policy. Bug-fixes and security patches are now managed by the fourth number, whereas bigger changes are only implemented in minor revision changes (the C number).

Also, sometimes after the version there will be some more letters such as 'rc1' or 'mm2'. The 'rc' refers to release candidate and indicates a non-official release. Other letters are usually (but not always) the initials of a person. This indicates a development branch of the kernel by that person. e.g. ck stands for Con Kolivas, ac stands for Alan Cox, whereas mm stood for Andrew Morton.

The development model for Linux 2.6 was a significant change from the development model for Linux 2.5. Previously there was a stable branch (2.4) where only relatively minor and safe changes were merged, and an unstable branch (2.5), where bigger changes and cleanups were allowed. This meant that users would always have a well-tested 2.4 version with the latest security and bug fixes to use, though they would have to wait for the features which went into the 2.5 branch. The downside of this was that the "stable" kernel ended up so far behind that it no longer supported recent hardware and lacked needed features. In the late 2.5.x series kernel some maintainers elected to try and backport their changes to the stable series kernel which resulted in bugs being introduced into the 2.4.x series kernel. The 2.5 branch was then eventually declared stable and renamed to 2.6. But instead of opening an unstable 2.7 branch, the kernel developers elected to continue putting major changes into the 2.6 "stable" branch. This had the desirable effect of breaking changes into smaller and easier to test batches, making new features quickly available, and getting more testing of the latest code.

However, the new 2.6 development model also meant that there was no stable branch for people just wanting security and bug fixes, and not needing the latest features. Fixes were only put into the latest version, so if a user wanted a version with all known bugs fixed they would also get all the latest features, which had not been well tested, and risked breaking things which had previously worked. A partial fix for this was the previously mentioned fourth version number digit (y in 2.6.x.y), which are series of point releases created by the stable team (Greg Kroah-Hartman, Chris Wright, maybe others). The stable team only released updates for the most recent kernel however, so this did not solve the problem of the missing stable kernel series. Linux distribution vendors, such as Red Hat and Debian, maintain the kernels which ship with their releases, so a solution for some people is to just follow a vendor kernel.

As a response to the lack of a stable kernel tree where people could coordinate the collection of bugfixes, in December of 2005 Adrian Bunk announced that he would keep releasing 2.6.16.y kernels when the stable team moved on to 2.6.17 [3]. He also plans to include driver updates, making the maintenance of the 2.6.16 series very similar to the old rules for maintenance of a stable series such as 2.4 [4].

As of September 26, 2007, the latest stable kernel version is 2.6.22.9.

Maintenance

While Linus Torvalds supervises code changes and releases to the latest kernel versions, he has delegated the maintenance of older versions to other programmers:

Kernel series Maintainer
2.0 David Weinehall[32]
2.2 Marc-Christian Petersen[33] (former maintainer Alan Cox)
2.4 Willy Tarreau[34] (former maintainer Marcelo Tosatti)
2.6.16 Adrian Bunk[35]
2.6 Andrew Morton / Linus Torvalds

Other Linux kernel programmers include Robert Love and Ingo Molnar.[36]

Stable version history

  • Version 1.0 of March 1994 supported only single-processor i386 machines.
  • Version 1.2 of March 1995 added support for Alpha, Sparc and MIPS.
  • Version 2.0 of June 1996 included SMP support and added support for more processors.
  • Version 2.2 of January 1999 (The Wonderful World of Linux 2.2).

See also

References

  • Torvalds, Linus (2001). Just for Fun: The Story of an Accidental Revolutionary. HarperBusiness. ISBN 0-06-662072-4 (hardcover); HarperAudio ISBN 0-694-52539-1. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help) (audio tape, abridged ed., read by David Diamond) - on the beginnings of the Linux kernel
  • [5], Nikolai Bezroukov. Portraits of Open Source Pioneers. Ch 4: A benevolent dictator (Softpanorama e-book).
  • "LinkSys and binary modules". LWN.net Weekly Edition. October 16 2003. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  • FreeBSD/Linux kernel source code cross-reference. Browsable Linux (and other operating system) kernel source cross-reference.
  • LXR: The Linux Cross-Reference project. Browsable Linux kernel source.
  • KernelHQ - a browsable kernel source tree - with all versions present, and with browsable diffs
  • For the love of Hacking
  • The LWN 2001 Linux Timeline
  • Everyone's Favorite Linux Mascot
  • Linux Timeline
  • History of Linux
  • Upgrade to 2.6 kernel
  • The Wonderful World of Linux 2.6; Joseph Pranevich; December 2003
  • Understanding the Linux 2.6.8.1 CPU Scheduler; Josh Aas, 17 February 2005
  • LinuxChanges
  • Seminar Paper on Linux Kernel 2.6
  • Linux Device Drivers, 3rd Edition
  • Understanding the Linux Kernel, 3rd Edition (Book)
  • Linux: The GPL And Binary Modules
  • Anatomy of the Linux kernel
  1. ^ Greg Kroah-Hartman (26 September 2007). "Linux 2.6.22.9". {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Text "accessdate 2007-09-26" ignored (help)
  2. ^ Linus Torvalds (1 October 2007). "Linux v2.6.23-rc9". {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  3. ^ Linus Torvalds (2006-09-25). "Re: GPLv3 Position Statement".
  4. ^ Free as in Freedom by Sam Williams. O'Reilly books, 2002
  5. ^ Torvalds, Linus Benedict. "What would you like to see most in minix?". Newsgroup: comp.os.minix. 1991Aug25.205708.9541@klaava.Helsinki.FI.
  6. ^ Torvalds, Linus Benedict. "Free minix-like kernel sources for 386-AT". Newsgroup: comp.os.minix. 1991Oct5.054106.4647@klaava.Helsinki.FI.
  7. ^ Torvalds, Linus. "Release Notes for Linux v0.12". The Linux Kernel Archives. Retrieved 2007-02-21.
  8. ^ Summers, David W (19 January 1992). "Troubles with Partitions". Newsgroup: comp.os.minix. 1992Jan19.085628.18752@cseg01.uark.edu. Retrieved 2007-01-07. {{cite newsgroup}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  9. ^ Clegg, Alan B (31 March 1992). "It's here!". Newsgroup: comp.os.linux. 1992Mar31.131811.19832@rock.concert.net. Retrieved 2007-01-07. {{cite newsgroup}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  10. ^ "Re: How to pronounce "Linux"?". 23 April 1992. 1992Apr23.123216.22024@klaava.Helsinki.FI. {{cite newsgroup}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |newsgroups= ignored (help)
  11. ^ "Howto pronouce Linux?". Retrieved 2006-12-17.
  12. ^ "Linus pronouncing Linux in English and Swedish". Retrieved 2007-01-20.
  13. ^ "Linux Pronunciation (Youtube)". Retrieved 2007-01-20.
  14. ^ Yamagata, Hiroo (1997). "The Pragmatist of Free Software". HotWired. Retrieved 2007-02-21.
  15. ^ Corbet, Jonathan (2006-01-31). "GPLv3 and the kernel". LWN.net. Retrieved 2007-02-21. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  16. ^ Torvalds, Linus (2000-09-08). "Linux-2.4.0-test8". Linux-kernel mailing list archive. Unix Systems Support Group of Indiana University. Retrieved 2007-02-21. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  17. ^ Cox, Alan (2006-01-20). "Re: GPL V3 and Linux". Linux-kernel mailing list archive. LWN.net. Retrieved 2007-02-21. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  18. ^ "How much Linux Kernel code is GPL 2 only?". Software Geopolitics. Blogspot. Retrieved 2007-02-21.
  19. ^ Shankland, Stephen (September 25, 2006). "Top Linux programmers pan GPL 3". News.com. Retrieved 2007-02-21. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  20. ^ http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0312.0/0670.html
  21. ^ Stallman, Richard (2006-10-11). "Linux, GNU, and freedom". Free Software Foundation. Retrieved 2007-02-21. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  22. ^ O'Reilly (1999). "The Tanenbaum-Torvalds Debate". O'Reilly. Retrieved 2006-11-22.
  23. ^ Tanenbaum, Andy (29 January 1992). "LINUX is obsolete". Newsgroup: comp.os.minix. 12595@star.cs.vu.nl. Retrieved 2006-05-10. {{cite newsgroup}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  24. ^ Torvalds, Linus (9 May 2006). "Hybrid kernel, not NT". Retrieved 2007-01-06. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  25. ^ Tanenbaum, Andy (12 May 2006). "Tanenbaum-Torvalds Debate: Part II". Retrieved 2007-01-06. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  26. ^ http://www.pyrillion.org/index.html?showframe=linuxkernelpatch.html
  27. ^ "Operating system Family". Top 500 Supercomputer Sites. 2007. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  28. ^ ldd /usr/bin/kwin lists 40 shared libraries (kwin 3.5.5a); ldd /usr/bin/gnome-panel lists 68 (gnome-panel 2.14.3).
  29. ^ Barlow, Daniel (1995-09-13). "The Linux ELF HOWTO". Retrieved 2007-07-19.
  30. ^ http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/linux-kernel-cost.html
  31. ^ Economic impact of FLOSS on innovation and competitiveness of the EU ICT sector, Table 3 on page 50.
  32. ^ David Weinehall (2004-02-08). "[ANNOUNCE] Linux-kernel 2.0.40 aka ``The Moss-covered Tortoise''".
  33. ^ Marc-Christian Petersen (2005-01-13). "Linux 2.2.27-rc2".
  34. ^ Willy Tarreau (2007-07-26). "Linux 2.4.35 released". linux-kernel (Mailing list). {{cite mailing list}}: Unknown parameter |mailinglist= ignored (|mailing-list= suggested) (help)
  35. ^ Adrian Bunk (2007-03-36). "Linux 2.6.16.45". linux-kernel (Mailing list). {{cite mailing list}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |mailinglist= ignored (|mailing-list= suggested) (help)
  36. ^ See the Linux MAINTAINERS file.
  37. ^ Wonderful World of Linux 2.4
  38. ^ The Wonderful World of Linux 2.6
The Wikibook [[wikibooks:|]] has a page on the topic of: Linux kernel
The Wikibook [[wikibooks:|]] has a page on the topic of: Inside Linux Kernel
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Linux kernel.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Linux_kernel&oldid=161782162"