User talk:Jimfbleak

Welcome to my talk page. Please add your comments to the end of this page and sign using four tildes (~~~~) I will reply on your talk page. Thank you.

Page Deleted

Hi Jim. I was surprised that you deleted the Page for WikiJob. This page just stated the facts - what the website is. Is this not allowed? Could you please explain? Redsuperted (talk) 18:21, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

OK Jim - Please check my improvements - I can add more references if required!! ...also - our web address www . wikijob . co . uk has been blacklisted on wikipedia. Is there any way I can de-black list it? I appreicate your help and support - really. I love wikipedia - the reason I made a wiki site! - and want a page on here more than anything! Yours Redsuperted (talk) 19:04, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Thats useful Jim thanks - I will no longer input links to wikijob because of the COI. However - can you tell me how I can go about returning the wikijob link to normal. It is blacklisted... how can I appeal this for the benefit of others? Redsuperted (talk) 19:48, 13 April 2008 (UTC) Redsuperted (talk) 19:49, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Jim I just saw you deleted the WikiJob page again even though I just spent an hour making it abide by every rule in the wikipedia rule book! Is it not possible for WikiJob to even have a page? That was a very well written page - what will happen now?! Thanks for your help - please explain.... Redsuperted (talk) 19:52, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Page Deleted

Hi Jim. I recently wrote a page about the Board of Certification and it was deleted on Friday. I was curious as to what I could do to improve this page. I would like something posted on Wikipedia about this topic, and I am a new user looking for suggestions. Thanks! Nmallie (talk) 15:06, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

You may use warning templates

Hi Jim. Just a friendly reminder, when you warn a user, you may use user warning templates. They are a lot quicker than just typing out warnings. It saves a lot of time, and it won't be so exhausting. I have noticed that in your recent warnings to User talk:LowLester, and User talk:Westvoja. Also, don't forget to use edit summary's on your edits. Because vandals don't use edit summary's, which makes it very clear to spot on the recent changes. Just a friendly reminder. Take care. King Lopez ^Contribs 07:58, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

for all the work on Bury St. Edmunds witch trials. To have someone read and evaluate from outside the subject has been incredibly useful. I have learnt more about wikipedia and the subject. Ta Edmund Patrick ( ^confer _work) 11:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Protecting titles

Was there a special reason for using {{protectedpage}} on Acorn Healing Foundation? We can now protect empty titles from creation. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 14:55, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Tim Clue

Hi there. You deleted the subject's article earlier today according to the logs. I just wanted to let you know that an Afd on the subject had (just) opened here, I went ahead and did a nonadmin close. Take care, Xymmax (talk) 15:25, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. That should take care of it, it was an obvious case of a guy evading his block. The report is here. Xymmax (talk) 16:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Sonoma Country Day School

Please restore page and EDIT what you think is a pitch. Completely deleting the page is not respectful; for example, the table is located on other school sites and should have been left alone. The accreditation info is factual as it other info. Thanks, Ed

Scds_org (talk) 18:27, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Taft family

I can't figure out what happened with the Taft family page. You have left a note that it was "blatant advertising"? The Taft family is an important political family in Ohio and the United States and there were dozens of prominent historical, political, religious, and business figures linked together on that page. 149.79.35.227 (talk) 17:46, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

User with page protection

User:JoshValov has his page protected. Is there a reason? Or did he add it himself? I don't think his personal page is a candidate for protection. Undeath (talk) 01:51, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

I just noticed that it was the padlock sign only, I failed to see it wasn't a real protection. But, thanks anyway for removing it. Undeath (talk) 16:44, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

deleted: toronto wedding photography

I was creating about me page on MYTALK..which is supposetely is about me. Why was it deleted. I've seen Moderators having links,pointing to their own sites. Why can't I? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmitri1999 (talk • contribs) 03:32, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

deletion of burda:ic entry

Hi there,

you have deleted burda:ic because of blatant advertising as i see in the logs. Where was there so much advertising? It contained less adv then blizzard entertainment. The Burda:ic article was just explaining a short info about the corporation itself and had small infos about theyr games. Nothing else is blizzard ent. doing, but theyr page is not going to be deleted?

regards

cracky

crckdns (talk) 12:59, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

New bad user page

Look at Tomg-unit and his talk page. They are exact copies of Raymond Washington and Xzibit. Including the non free images. Undeath (talk) 16:17, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

• I found this recently, I don't know if it's basis to delete the above pages or not. I'll let you decide. Here it is.

RE:User

I don't know if it's vandalism or not, that's why I consulted you. But, the image use is not allowed. Non free media is not allowed on the users page with out a fair use rationale describing why it's there. Also, the use of the complete article for one's user page should not be allowed due to the simple fact that the user is not the person he is saying he is when he copies that information to his userpage. Undeath (talk) 16:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Notability question

Is this notable? It states it a almost fiction, and the only source is an urban legend type of book. Undeath (talk) 01:52, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Deleted: American Technologies Network Corporation

Hi. You deleted article i've created and reported that it was a blatant advertising. Can you give me an example (a link to some article) that you think is appropriate one. Please give example about maybe some optics companies, sights manufacturers. And could you say to me where in my article the adversing was? Thanks. YGelfman (talk) 08:04, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Deleting S. R Govt College for Women, page

Dear Sir, U have deleted my page S. R. Govt College for Women, Amritsar for being the adverisement, but that was actually not the case. The information I have provided was for the students of my region. The reputation the institute does not require any advertisement as we are the largest women institute in State of Punjab, India. And Do you think we need advertisement? Where as u have left the pages other colleges if ours is the ad then what are they. Plz clarify Srgcwasr (talk) 08:57, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

First pass

Let me know what needs altering - it's a rough interpretation of the green map with a few of the orange details added, but it is probably over- or under-extended in various places. Yomangani^talk 11:07, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

About American Technologies Network Corporation

Could you give me some links to articles i asked you in order that i see how those articles were created, because many of what you remarked are merely facts or logical things? Thanks. YGelfman (talk) 13:24, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Beissaoryx3a.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Beissaoryx3a.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:33, 31 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 21:33, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

3RR

An editor, User:Cooljuno411 has violated the three revert policy here. Undeath (talk) 23:26, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Money Store

What's up with deletion of this article? It wasnt'y sales-y, and considering all the folks that deal with them I think it's a worth while article. Please advise.Deuces are wild! (talk) 07:57, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

American_Technologies_Network_Corporation

Please, take a look at a new version American Technologies Network Corporation Thanks. --YGelfman (talk) 12:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

ATN

Thanks. Could you show me the places where you couldn't make sense of the English? --YGelfman (talk) 12:40, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

ATN

Is this variant better? American_Technologies_Network_Corporation#Night_optics
--YGelfman (talk) 13:28, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Don't delete NE articles!

Please do not delete not English articles, as you've done to Banda Boca de Sino. Wikipedians have to have 2 weeks to translate (see WP:PNT) ! Please restore this article to User:Kubek15/totranslate. Kubek15 ^{(Sign!) (Contribs) (UBX)} 13:47, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi Jim, I am trying to create a Moving Arts Dance Wikipedia... students often request info from us for school articles so this seems like a great solution (objectified by the public forum).

You deleted it as "blatant adertising". Would you please specify? I will delete whatever material is offending this criteria. I did try to include lots of references, and based this page on other similar wikipedia articles (but obviously not closely enough). Just let me know what to delete so that it is not advertising (we have nothing to sell).

I saw a mention that bios of living persons are not acceptable as an article, should I delete that from the Moving Arts Dance page as well. And probably not even mention classes? Although part of what is unusual is that we are creating a new philosophy in the blending of a professional dance company in a community environment in order to develop dance in the entire region.

I can rewrite everything if needed. We will do whatever is necessary. Please help me understand the advertising guidelines. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Movingarts (talk • contribs) 17:31, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD

Please take a look at this and check the new user who posted. I'm a bit suspiscious of sock puppets working on this one. Also, if you would want, voice your opinion on the AfD. It's not going anywhere and that is partly due to what I think of as a sock puppet. (the user in question has done very little edits, and has already got involved on an AfD with the same basis to keep the article as a user who had posted before) Undeath (talk) 22:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Birds April 2008 Newsletter

The April 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:56, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Amflamingo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Amflamingo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jeekc (talk) 03:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Lava Studio

Hi Jimfbleak,

I noticed that you deleted the page linked in the title without citing a reason. I had declined an A7 speedy based on what I saw as a claim to notability in the article--did you delete it because you disagreed? I know I'm probably erring on the side of caution (I've had two of my declines questioned at the subsequent AfDs so far, although further discussion supported the decision in both cases), so any insight or advice you can give to a new admin would be appreciated! --jonny-mt 08:29, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi Jimfbleak,

you deleted my page in less than a minute when it was created and all information was lost. If you are going to delete the facts of my company with asking me then I suggest you delete every corporations pages of facts from wikepedia. As i suspect that is not going to happen leave my facts alone particularly while i'm constructing it! Not to mention maybe you should consider being open minded for more than 45 seconds. 20wide (talk) 05:32, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of GuitarPort

Hey Jimfbleak

Sorry to bother you and I know you were just doing your job but that GuitarPort article was for my University English class assignment. Please put it back so I can edit it. Its my first ever post so I didn't know. Or even if you could leave it up for a few days that would be awesome.

Please respond.

Engl112

Engl112 (talk) 07:07, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Restoration

Robb, which you speedied, had been vandalised, and was nominated by an inexperienced Twinkle user who didn't check the page history. Charles Matthews (talk) 08:14, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Danger Strikes Back

I was wondering how the Danger Strikes Back page differed from a page like this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ROH_Rising_Above which actually promotes an event that is still for sale? What can I do to restore the page so that results of the event can be listen on a public forum, such as Wikipedia? As of right now, results from the event are only available on private forums. Kaijubigbattel (talk) 13:20, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Jim, I have replied at the user's talk page. Feel free to add anything you like. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 13:49, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Article does not indicate subject's importance or significance

I wrote an article some time ago that was deleted for the reason shown in the above title. My question is what makes a subject important or significant, and could you supply some concrete examples?

Cliffburns (talk) 17:13, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Create-protecting pages

Hey there... just a friendly reminder... when you protect pages from creation using {{pp-create}}, don't slap it onto the page and create it, that was the ancient bootleg method of doing things. Now, you can salt the nonexistent page by hitting the "protect" tab after you delete it, and put {{pp-create}} in the "reason" field. I fixed a few pages you protected wrong, could you please go through and get the rest? east.718 at 18:59, April 3, 2008

After you delete the page, you have to go back to the nonexistent page. There'll be a protect tab there with a familiar interface. You can use any reason you want, but I prefer the fancy template because of some interface magic that happens if you do. east.718 at 17:20, April 4, 2008

Deletion of GuitarPort

Hello Jim,

I am asking you to please leave my article up until Friday. That is when this assignment is due. I did not take the article directly from a website and I had to include enough information on the object to cover the world limit. That is why the article seems to be promoting GuitarPort. I know there are no references and the article is not Wikipedia worthy, but I am asking you to do me favour and please just delete it on Friday and you will never hear from me or see another GuitarPort article written by me again.

Thanks

Engl112 (talk) 19:42, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Little Egret

Do you think that there should be more of a mention of the Little Egret being on the west coast such as So. Cal.? Because I live near Long Beach; and I've actually seen this bird in an aqueduct near my apartment. Let me know. Lighthead ^þ 23:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

That's exactly what I thought about after I wrote you the message... Lighthead ^þ 19:33, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

I guess I have a better question since I couldn't find any adequate references (you'd think I was hallucinating, but that's the bird! Down to the yellow feet!), like is there a society I could contact to tell them about it so that they can check it out? Lighthead ^þ 19:43, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Actually you can disregard that last message, I found an interesting website called, ebird.org. You can submit "observations" or what you might call...I don't know I'm at a loss of words. But thanks for the information that looks like an interesting website too. Thanks! Lighthead ^þ 06:15, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Chough call

Theres one at [1]. The licensing is however a little tricky but seems to be GFDL compatible. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/sampling+/1.0/ Shyamal (talk) 15:50, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

User:LightSpeed3 Conducting a biased crusade against Tesla Motors

Hi Jim. Please see this message I posted on the NPOV Noticeboard. I think this was not the right place for me to put it. Perhaps you could suggest how I might pursue this issue? Many thanks. Fbagatelleblack (talk) 03:53, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Some artistic bird pictures.

Dunno if you are aware of these Von Wright images on commons, but i personally happen to think they are very cool. (But then, I am most definitely biased, since I learned the names of all the birds in the book before I learned to talk in sentences, by these self same images.) -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 07:19, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Nemo problemo, I saw that they aren't linked very well into the Aves category on commons. Most likely partly because the artist is known as both an ornithologist and a painter, though being Swedish the use of "fåglar" rather than birds in the title may play a part, too. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 07:33, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Women in Distress

I've recreated the page Women in Distress that you recently deleted per csd-spam, as I have removed the spam and am going to WP:AGF that this new editor is not familiar with WP:V, WP:N and WP:NPOV. If this still fails WP:N in a few days, I'll CSD it again. Could you undelete the talk page so that we can continue our discussion on improving the article? Thanks! (EhJJ)^TALK 15:58, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I was the one that put the csd tag on it; it was painfully bad! Many thanks for your help. (EhJJ)^TALK 16:07, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Mary Seacole

I have to get back to real life now, so I should be able to get the rest done later today. Rudget (review) 10:11, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

copy-edit service, not

Jim, I don't make a habit of copy-editing on WP. I see my role as a reviewer and as a contributor to style guides, by which I can exercise a greater influence in the limited amount of time I can devote to the project. I'm sorry to see that you're angry I did not copy-edit the article some time ago. I encourage you to cultivate a number of collaborators who can complement your skills in that article, and in future articles you choose to nominate. TONY (talk) 15:59, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of SEMBA, method for Business Analysis

In your comment on the article on SEMBA as a method for Business Analysis, you judged the article on being advertising and even suspected me of illegal use of copyrights. As I am new to this medium I am just triing to understand. First the copyright thing: I did not even get the chance to upload the mentioned picture, you already deleted the article within 30 seconds so it seemed. Second you judged the article as being advertising while it is a method which is to be given to the Open Group, so that everyone who is interested is able to use it when desired. Publication on Wikipedia was meant to give background information on the method in order to share the content. Can you give me specific feedback on the parts you think need to be changed to have this article published?

BR, Patrick. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pteters (talk • contribs) 10:56, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Jim for your feedback. Verification is a bit hard as SEMBA is newly developed. However I'll rewrite using your suggestions and try again later. Pteters (talk) 12:37, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Tim Roberts (Scientist)

Firstly, I did not create the topic, some editor at my high school created the link under notable alumni. Secondly, I do not know what makes you an expert on MY qualifications. How many pages are devoted to Star Trek? Then when someone actually involved in the privitzation of space creates a page you delete it? Tpproberts (talk) 14:49, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of ScriptWright entry

You were the admin that confirmed the speedy deletion flag on the page I created about my screenplay software.

It is certainly true that this page was a description of my product. But it was no more blatant advertising that than that found in the wiki for Final Draft, Sophocles, Scriptware and all the other programs for screenplay creation.

However, if you consider my page spam and inappropriate to wiki, then someone should examine ALL of the entries found under screenwriting software and list of screenwriting software.

I think it unfair that my page has been removed and these remain. They are no more encyclopedic than was mine.

Thanks. GGallo (talk) 16:54, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Tim Roberts (Scientist)

Do you know anybody in the Private space industry? Of course not - if you did you wouldn't have deleted my entry. If you want confirmation of my notability why not wait until I could list my curriculum vitae? I have been trying to avoid being personally insulted but this really blows my stack. Your actions seem to represent exactly the type of character who can find an instant flaw in anything but contribute nothing. Please respond with an explanation of why you feel empowered to judge my life achievements. Tpproberts (talk) 04:42, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

In case you have not seen this

Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Sabine's_Sunbird Shyamal (talk) 06:42, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Choughs

Let me know whether the scaling is right. I have not seen the species, but the alpine here looks a bit too buzzardy right now, but that is how my source photo looked. Shyamal (talk) 10:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

First attempt

I think the problem was that the Red-billed was looking a little too necky. I have reduced it and done some minor stretching based on your comments. See if you can spot the difference. The wing-tip to tail tip differences seems to vary across races. I only looked at Rasmussen and Anderton for the Indian races but saw some pictures on the net that showed differences there. Shyamal (talk) 16:01, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Sources seen [2],[3] Shyamal (talk) 16:07, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Pelican identity

I was about to upload this Pelican to commons, but I was not sure which species it was. Snowman (talk) 15:14, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply on my user page. I have uploaded it as Image:Brown Pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis) - upper body.jpg. I have tagged it for border removal, so I expect the border will be removed quite soon by someone on the commons who can do this lossless. Snowman (talk) 17:13, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

List of screenwriting software

I think you'll find that on the pages List of screenwriting software and Screenwriting software contain links to pages about many more than three software programs, and that all of them -- to one degree or another -- fail to rise to the level of encyclopedic. They are all descriptions of the programs, complete with screen shots, of the sort you would find on a file download aggregator.

I count 12.

Some have been deleted previously as "spam magnets." Some links don't even bother going to a wiki page, but jump directly to the external site.

Some are listed as part of the WikiProject:Films.

My point isn't that they must be deleted, just that if one such semi informative/semi promotional page is considered spam then they all should be. And if one is allowed then they all shuld be.

If they are allowed IF they are posted by a WikiProject:Films contributor, then that tag should be added rather than nuking it.

Thanks for looking into it. I can imagine it's hard to police such borderline cases. I stumbled on the list of all my competitors on Wiki from a legitimate article about film format. I felt my contribution to this field should be noted. Perhaps I can find a way to do so that falls within the guidelines. I'll study more what happens to these pages in coming weeks before (if) I try again.

GGallo (talk) 02:06, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Please review the voip.com page...

It has been edited as per your instructions.

Thanks Ficso72 (talk) 16:56, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Can you please delete one of the sandboxes, I was unaware there were two versions and I'll start over. Thanks Ficso72 (talk) 18:27, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Red-billed Chough

Congrats on the FA. Just a thought, now that the article is sitting at Red-billed Chough, wouldn't it make sense to have the article Pyrrhocorax sitting in the article space Chough (which is currently just a redirect?

Also, regarding the formatting of refs at Cattle Egret, I have to admit that is probably my fault. I loathe the cite template passionately because it is cumbersome and time consuming to add, and while I try to format the refs consistently I've never quite understood the importance of ndash's. Sabine's Sunbird talk 02:11, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

No worries about the rant, thanks for your support. I was wondering if you could do another move (I'm not there yet) Oriolidae back to oriole and the genus to Oriolus? Since oriole could be contested by new world birds too, it makes sense that the family should have priority, and all sides in the WP:BIRD talk page agreed at least with this idea. Sabine's Sunbird talk 21:06, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review

An article you deleted, Monsta, has been listed at Wikipedia:Deletion review because another editor felt that the deletion was inappropriate. Please comment at the discussion page. Stifle (talk) 12:00, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

List of screenwriting software - Delete review

Hi Jim. Looks like you removed a lot of pages linked to from the List of screenwriting software and Screenwriting software pages at the urging of GGallo. To be honest, I think he was just angry that his own page got pulled... the pages that were listed before were incredibly useful.

IMHO, the top screenwriting software tools in order are: Final Draft, Movie Magic, Celtx, and Montage, so it looks like you deleted the top two. Can we re-instate those?

For full disclosure, I worked on a product that was not deleted, so my goal in this is to maintain the integrity and utility of Wikipedia for budding screenwriters, nothing more. --Orionr (talk) 20:27, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

ATN

Hi. I've added 3 external links on ATN page. Are they OK? Also, i've deleted pictures, because Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) did not like them.
Can you tell me your opinion? --YGelfman (talk) 10:28, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

RE: List of screenwriting software - Delete review

In that case, it does sound like deleting the Final Draft and Movie Magic articles was the right thing to do. Unfortunately it means that they were poor articles to begin with, but I could have sworn the Final Draft was good at one point... In the meantime, I'll switch those links to point to external sources. By the way, is there a way for a normal user (me) to look at old revisions of a deleted article? Thanks for following up. --Orionr (talk) 17:33, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Jim - I'll take a stab at cleaning up the Final Draft article. --Orionr (talk) 20:35, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Identification

Do you known what this large bird with long curved beak is? Photo in Patagonia, Chili. Snowman (talk) 10:34, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply on my user page identifying it as a Black-faced Ibis. I have uploaded it to commons at Image:Black-faced Ibis (Theristicus melanopis) -Patagonia.JPG. --Snowman (talk) 11:58, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Screenwriting Software Deletion

I know that the screenwriting software articles weren't great, but did they have to be deleted entirely? As someone mentioned, the Final Draft article WAS good at some point ... before it good cleansed of criticism, and after the initial 'marketting' spiel.

It may not seem important for those not involved in Screenwriting, but it is quite interesting to see the way the software packages compare as examples of niche software - the way the Movie Magic & Final Draft were 'the big 2' until newer upstarts like Celtx & Sophocles started eating away at their market share.

150.101.206.3 (talk) 21:37, 13 April 2008 (UTC)