Jump to content

User talk:Ultraexactzz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jsarvey (talk | contribs) at 20:05, 12 May 2008 (→Campus Outreach Opportunity League: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to my User Talk page. I'll reply to any message you leave here on your talk page, unless you wish otherwise and say so. If I haven't answered you in a short time, it's possible that I am away from a computer at the moment - I assure you, I will get back to you. If you came here because of a deletion I performed, please make sure to note which article or image I deleted, as there's no way I can reply unless I know. Thanks again, UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence

Balachandran AfD

I don't see what the problem could be. It looks like the usual discussion. Do you think it should be kept? Make an argument and I could change my mind. Did someone mess with your account, or someone else's? Are you surprised that I actually made my 3rd AfD nom in 13 months? :-) Bearian (talk) 15:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Following your blocking of Clem32 (that was of course not created by me), I have to show you 2 things. The first is in French, the discussion with other administrators about the problems with Boubaker and Mario Scolas. The second is in english, m:Vandalism reports/BogaertB, talking about what Mario Scolas has done on the French and Dutch WP. 260 vandal accounts on the sole french, 400 approx on all different WP. If you know how I should proceed to get the permanent blocking of this guy on en:WP do tell me. I'm ready to give any necessary information for a check-user (I'm a check-user myself) or to other admins. If you can do something, thanks in advnce. On the other hand, if you can't I do not blame you, I've stopped counting the hours that I lost because of Scolas, his vandalisms and his socks. See you. Clem23 (talk) 22:02, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

be aware

Sir ! be aware from Clem23 propsals, they caused damage to Droop and many other! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonton Bradipus (talk • contribs) 13:06, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for deletion

Many thanks for deleting my user page as requested.

If you agree with my rationale, would you consider deleting my user talk page as well?

Also it worries me a bit that it's still possible for someone to create a new user page for me - is there any way to prevent that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Csymeonides (talk • contribs) 13:46, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning the delete

I have posted my reply to the deletion of the "Beyond protocol" article, I would be very happy if a discussion could be held.

Here are 4 link, do you think this is enough? I will continue to look for more anyway.

http://www.mmortsgamers.com/content/view/168/1/ http://www.mmortsgamers.com/content/view/167/1/ http://beyondprotocol.wikidot.com http://www.beyondprotocol.com

Thank you for the help, just tell me what you think after reading these.

Rolles (talk) 15:46, 29 February 2008 (UTC)rolles[reply]

Your opinion about the article is clear

that is your right.. but when you allowed the first part of the discussion remain in this page you made voters badly informed, so continue to be honest...Citypark2008 (talk) 15:03, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Ok; Thank you for all.Citypark2008 (talk) 15:31, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Before saying good bye ,we tell you that we would have been really upset if you resonded positively to the following request :

..... If you know how I should proceed to get the permanent blocking of this guy on en:WP do tell me. I'm ready to give any necessary information for a check-user (I'm a check-user myself) or to other admins. If you can do something, thanks in advnce. On the other hand, if you can't I do not blame you, ... Clem23 (talk) 22:02, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your human reaction.Citypark2008 (talk) 15:39, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The only one who replies to my reports are him.

HE did violate 3rr correct? Uconnstud (talk) 18:12, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I understand. I'm hoping something can be worked out. He has been warned on so many occasions and uses so many different sockpuppets on the same article. A clear violation, but thanks for writing back. Uconnstud (talk) 18:47, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recommending a page for deletion

I see you are an admin, so I am bugging you with this question. There's a page I'd like to recommend for deletion (Grayson Boucher), but I don't know how to go about doing so. Based on the talk page, it looks like there was some discussion before about deleting it, but nothing was resolved. If you could point me in the right direction, I'd greatly appreciate it. Thanks. Tool2Die4 (talk) 20:19, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, thanks! Tool2Die4 (talk) 20:47, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Boubaker polynomials (2nd nomination)

Many thanks for all your "clean-up" work on that page. After Clem23, it seems it's my turn to be dirtyed by user:Mario Scolas's socks.

Darkoneko (talk) 06:42, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


TiconderogaCCB

Keeps deleting opinions that are contrary to his opinion in an attempt to build a consensus. It can be seen here [1] where this opinion was deleted "J.Delany agreed to this verions [2] - I agree to this verion as well [3] 63.113.199.109 (talk) 12:35, 2 March 2008 (UTC)" his reason was vandalism and he says discussion was deleted when it was simply moved from the top to the bottom to go in chronological order(after he moved it). Also he asked for an opinion on which version is better [4] to which i was notified [5] and so was he [6] . When the third opinion came in [7] he simply ignored what the third opinion was and simply reverted the page [8]. I thought we had a compromise and would listen to the 3rd opinion, but now i'm really starting to wonder if there can be any compromise with him. Uconnstud (talk) 02:38, 3 March 2008 (UTC) I could mention the fact that he has been going to articles thru my history and stalking me commenting after me when he was never ever ever in the previous listed article at all. [9] Uconnstud (talk) 02:41, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


[10] Uconnstud (talk) 16:52, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The supposed "deletion" was the deletion of duplicate text. No comments were deleted, and why would I have done so given that the comments were in my favor. Further, I have commented on J.Delany's third party opinion as has J.Delany, and we are now taking a poll to see what other editors prefer. Please ignore UConnStudd, he is simply trying every avenue to get me into trouble because he wants to vandalize the SJU article. See his history for more understanding of his relentless pursuit. - --TiconderogaCCB (talk) 20:13, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also Note: An editor using 150.210.176.81 IP address posted the following extremely offensive comments on my talk page and user page [11][12]. These comments included, "you are one poor sarcastic sucker! have you ever gotten laid or have you always paid for it you sonnuva bitch!". This IP is part of Baruch College, the same source for IP's used by User:Uconnstud in past comments in which he did not use his user name, see User talk:150.210.176.218 & User talk:150.210.226.6. - --TiconderogaCCB (talk) 02:57, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


That is pretty funny considering that the only thing that any of those IP address and I have in common is that we've edited on the St. John's page. You do know that Baruch College has about 15,000 students. St John's has about 15,000 too. I've always used my username. You on the other hand.. are famous for not using it [13]. Its funny how we now see random IP address who are suddenly coming out of nowhere and agreeing with you. When they have no history of editing at all [14] and [15]. All supporting "option 1." Uconnstud (talk) 03:27, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixer-Upper

nope, that's fine. Thanks for checking! I withdrew since it was going to close per WP:SNOW and we moved the discussion to Talk:Fixer-Upper TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 21:57, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dictionary AfD

Thank you very much. Basketball110 will you sign? ♣ 02:57, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Hidden Barnstar
This user has found Basketball110's secret hidden sub page! Can you find it?

Basketball110 will you sign? ♣ 02:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fizber (internet company)

I disagree with your close at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fizber (internet company). There was a large amount of canvassing by the person who created the article and no reliable third-party sources about the subject were presented. --- RockMFR 21:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My request for bureaucratship

Dear Ultraexactzz, thank you for taking part in my RfB. As you may know, it was not passed by bureaucrats.
I would, however, like to thank you for taking the time to voice your support, despite concerns cited by the opposition. Although RfA/B isn't really about a person, but more about the community, I was deeply touched and honoured by the outpouring of support and interest in the discussion. I can only hope that you don't feel your opinion was not considered enough - bureaucrats have to give everyone's thoughts weight.
I also hope that the results of this RfB lead to some change in the way we approach RfBs, and some thought about whether long-entrenched standards are a good thing in our growing and increasingly heterogenous community.
I was a little miserable after the results came out, so I'm going to spread the love via dancing hippos. As you do. :)
I remain eager to serve you as an administrator and as an editor. If at any point you see something problematic in my actions, please do not hesitate to call me out. ~ Riana ⁂ 11:49, 10 March 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sleaze rock

That would be great; thanks.Tlogmer ( talk / contributions ) 22:11, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please inform me as to how sleaze rock is not a valid genre but grunge is? thankyou (Cfr63 (talk) 16:57, 12 May 2008 (UTC)).[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Democracy of information

Thanks, and sorry you had to clean up after me! That template got speedied for whatever reason. --Prewitt81 (talk) 01:56, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

*cough*

Have a look? ~ Riana ⁂ 16:48, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not anymore. Ah, blissful silence :D ~ Riana ⁂ 16:51, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Pearson

All state legislators, past and present, by definition have been declared inherently notable. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:32, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The same editor created the Bizzaro article, and after I deleted it, with a nice little note about notability, he recreated it. I've re-deleted it. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:40, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blackest Night close

Thank you for a careful and well-reasoned AfD closure. If AfDs were routinely treated with that much attention and nuance the page would be considerably less dysfunctional. Phil Sandifer (talk) 22:48, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

rofl

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. Also for updating my vandalism count. I reloaded my watchlist and saw the "ding" edit summary. After I realized what was going on I literally laughed out loud and my sister asked me what was so funny. That was great!! Have a good day, and may the vandals fail... J.delanoygabsadds 17:04, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

J.delanoygabsadds has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Please accept my apology for the Katol Chandikadevi Picture comment

I am sorry for the uncivil comments.But a user GPPande who I think merits the use of those comments is being disruptive with my work for reasons beyond my comprehension.The picture being discussed is of my "family deity" and Katol is my native place.I have clicked that image with my own camera and I want other people who are from Katol to have a glimpse of this fine deity.No one in his/her right mind would remove such an image which is released into public domain with such good intentions.If you are an administrator or a powerful person on wikipedia you can request GPPande to edit only those pages about which he has some knowledge to contribute/or simply ban him if you can.He is editing the Nagpur and Vidarbha page and he doesn't even live there.If such people are not stopped wikipedia will become a timepass for out of work people.I apologise again for the bad language -Niranjan Deshmukh —Preceding unsigned comment added by Niranjandeshmukh (talk • contribs) 17:40, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A sincere question

I have noticed that during my interaction with people on wikipedia,the admins or people like you intervene and give very good advice.Advice which can be used in the real world also.I want to know the source of your wisdom."Walk away" is sound advice.Is there a book or a manual where I can find it? Sincerely,Niranjan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Niranjandeshmukh (talk • contribs) 17:53, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heads-up

Thanks for the heads-up regarding the AN/I thread! --Kralizec! (talk) 13:10, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Advice on article

Hi. I need some admin advice on a new article - The day in the life of a forensic entomologist. Is it unencylcopedic? I wasn't sure so I haven't tagged it. Take whatever action you think. It is more of a diary than an encylcopedia entry. If you think it's alright, it just needs some cleanup. Thanks Olly150 18:57, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, just wanted to make sure Olly150 10:24, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Socks

Thanks for your message - I'd be inclined to leave the original report alone, but tag the user page of the newly blocked sock with {{sockpuppet}} - anyone wanting to know the reason for the block can click through to User:Erwin Morland where there's a convenient link to the evidence page from WP:SSP. Thanks. GBT/C 17:39, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, in cleaning up the category when creating it, I accidentally did the tagging of William K. Reed for you. Wasn't meaning to tread on your toes! Regards. GBT/C 17:42, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WHY

WHY ARE YOU REMOVING/REDOING MY EDITS. SO WHAT YOU'RE TELLING ME IS THAT YOU RATHER LIKE INCORRECT GRAMMAR RUN-ON SENTENCES AND FALSE INFORMATION, BECAUSE THATS WHAT YOU ARE SHOWING ME. RUN ON's are not correct sentence structure. and the information about the uncut-bilingual being illegal in the united states is sourceless and false, also looking at the history that information was added by a IP user. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.208.73.158 (talk) 18:02, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sir I have edited this users content, but the user kept reverting

I agree completely with your accusations, but you need to understand that this is why I have been requesting the blocks against the user Thegingerone in the first place.Kevin j (talk) 19:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In Response

No, I do not write like that kind of of person. The user harasses me, I respond. And no, the dispute will not be resolved for another day, because it needs to be resolved NOW. Read the content the user wrote earlier, because yes there is vandalism. Also, I only wrote the questions three times because it didn't seem like me voice was getting heard.Kevin j (talk) 20:42, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for your concern. To answer you questions, all I want is the administrators to enforce the content in the articles like they should be enforced. One crucial policy to me is the NPOV policy. I want the resolution to be resolved through this enforcement, and I want it to be made clear to Thegingerone that it will be enforced and that it must be followed, and that the user, like all other users, will be blocked if the vandalism continues. BestKevin j (talk) 20:55, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

Hi there Ultraexactzz. Just a note of thanks for your support in my recent unsuccessful RfA. I do appreciate your vote and advice. I'll be back in a few months with more experience and more coaching, so I hope to have your support again then. Thanks again - Tanthalas39 (talk) 18:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sharesource

Good job on cleaning the sharesource article.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 15:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I originally tagged it for advertising language before I applied the speedy tag. After a about fifteen minutes of good searching I couldn't find anything reliable so I speedy tagged it. I think the editor is going to be between a rock and hard place for sources and it might never make it past an AfD, but I'll keep my eye out for anything that might be of value.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 15:38, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Review for Magillem

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Magillem. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:34, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Quick question on policy

Lists like that aren't allowed - the relevant policy is WP:UCS. :D Just remove it and block away if they try to play Johnny Dangerous. east.718 at 02:26, March 26, 2008

Apollo 8

By all means put the text in as a seperate section, but for consistency with all other spaceflight articles the bulleted list should be kept in place at the start. Hammersfan, 26/03/08, 23.29 GMT

Not really, because, as I have stated, for concistency every manned spaceflight article would need to be so altered. Besides, having looked at the text in detail, much of what is relevant I have put in the bullet list or added as notes. I have listed below bullet points about my views on the text:
  • Date crew announced: Irrelevant - why should the date this crew was announced matter any more than the date any other crew was announced?
  • Crew: Bulleted alongside roles - what their previous flights were is irrelevant in the context of this flight; all that is needed is the number of flights they have made as with all other missions.
  • Swapping of Collins and Lovell: Mention made in the brief note I have left, along with the reason and the reference.
  • Reason for Backup crew: Irrelevant, because that comes under the heading of "the blooming obvious" - for such a task, there are always backups.
  • Haise being drafted in: Mention made in the brief note I have left.
Putting in a standard crew bullet list with notes, as is the case on other manned spaceflight articles, does not detract from its status as a featured article, but to me the whole point is that related pages should follow certain standards of concistency - manned spaceflight missions have similar layouts, and this mission, important as it was and well written as it may be, should follow these also. Hammersfan 27/03/08, 00.12 GMT

User:Pope Barry George

On top of the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muscle derived stem cells that you commented, he also posted this: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Jordan (singer) and please notice my comment about that "Jimbo" comment. Something need to be done.SYSS Mouse (talk) 15:58, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{subst:Vangel}}! Nburden (T) 16:49, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How Do You Submit An Entry In Checkuser

I haven't so long I forget how to add Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mr Bullockx to the main checkuser page. -WarthogDemon 20:31, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. This is just ridiculous and I hope I can remain civil about it all. Happy editing! -WarthogDemon 20:52, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You said it! But, I will not vent my frustration here. I will vent it by playing a computer game. There's nothing like causing death and destruction to entire civilizations, just because you feel like it. :) -WarthogDemon 21:35, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Suciindia

Hi, User:Suciindia posted some comments in talk page. The vandalism done by the IP 213.160.242.61 certainly does not belong to User:Suciindia. User:Suciindia is from India and the IP used by this account certainly will be of India. IP 213.160.242.61 is from Oslo [16]. This IP certainly does not belong to User:Suciindia. User:Suciindia is controlled by an Indian party. So can you review the block. Thanks. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 10:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 14 31 March 2008 About the Signpost
Wikimania 2009 to be held in Buenos Aires Sister Projects Interview: Wikisource 
WikiWorld: "Hammerspace" News and notes: 10M articles, $500k donation, milestones 
Dispatches: Featured content overview WikiProject Report: Australia 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 22:19, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Got the warning

The inclusion of the links along with my signature has discontinued... Can you please tell me what on earth the point thatHu12 is attempting to make? DrunkenDialer (talk) 08:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ECOLAS

Dear UltraExactZZ, I stand for ECOLAS which has an article in Wikipedia that was challenged by you. You are asking to provide references. However, I don't know which certain information shold be marked with source. We are only starting organization and there are not many paper or electronic sources yet. Anyway, I would like to add anything if possible. But I myself don't see the information in the article as of nature where external references would be appropriate yet. Show me in which I am wrong. Thank you in advance for informing me so that I can enhance article's quality. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrej blacky (talk • contribs) 11:28, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've made corrections according to your comment. Is that enough to take tags references and wikify away? Isn't it rude to do it myself? --Andrej blacky (talk) 12:58, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Acknowledgement

Sorry about the messages. I didn't mean to violate policy, I've interacted with the above admins and wanted them to have first notice. No canvassing meant. ESCStudent774441 (talk) 03:54, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it cool, okay?ESCStudent774441 (talk) 03:56, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.

Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 09:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 15 7 April 2008 About the Signpost
April Fools' pranks result in temporary blocks for six admins WikiWorld: "Apples and oranges" 
News and notes: 100 x 5,000, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Reviewers achieving excellence Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Volume 4, Issue 16 14 April 2008 About the Signpost
From the editor 
Interview with the team behind one of the 2,000th featured articles Image placeholders debated 
WikiWorld: "Pet skunk" News and notes: Board meeting, milestones 
Wikipedia in the News Dispatches: Featured article milestone 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For [17]. Missed that one. Darkspots (talk) 23:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"I need opinion on Mediation Cases and Point of view pushing"[18]

To your specific question, the creator of the above noticeboard post is most likely a sock of User:Mykungfu, and has been reported at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mykungfu (6th); he's just taking advantage of the backlog and his new proxy to be disruptive, which as been his MO for some time. Whenever he/she is found, the puppet uses administrative complaints as retaliation, usually targeting the same editors as before his previous socks. See [19],[20], and [21].-RoBoTamice 21:18, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thank spam

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed with 194 supporting, 9 opposing, and 4 neutral.
Your kindness and constructive criticism is very much appreciated. I look forward to using the tools you have granted me to aid the project. I would like to give special thanks to Tim Vickers, Anthony and Acalamari for their nominations.
Thank you again, VanTucky

WP:AN/I

Hey, I guess something went wrong and some current threads are lost [22]. Can you restore them please? Thanks Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 14:51, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rather curious as to why the editor (Jsn...) chose to censor all of my contributions from yesterday. I'm suspecting a bit of trollery. Orderinchaos 15:05, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't revert you as such - I was restoring a nearly 2-hour-old version which was still intact. For some reason the editor went in and surgically removed random comments - several of which were mine from earlier in the day. Apologies if my actions caused any confusion or offence at your end - was certainly unintended. Orderinchaos 15:10, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, I think what happens when something bizarre like that happens is that different people with different bits of the story try to figure out what went on and end up at seeming cross purposes with each other until they all figure out what happened :) Gotta love community editing. Thanks for sorting it out. Orderinchaos 15:34, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, my messages seem to have sorted right. Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 15:41, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

archiving accident

Please see my response on my talk page to your inquiry... and if you could help me find an explanation for what is happening with my ban and my comments being deleted out of AN/I threads before archiving I would greatly appreciate it. Jsn9333 (talk) 16:46, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Miria (singer) and Gayle Day - refimprove

Hi - thanks for changing the status on my Gayle Day article from db-person to refimprove - if you get a chance can you look at my Miria (singer) article and see if you would agree that it makes sense to change that status as well?

Thanks very much! Achyls (talk) 23:31, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you! I will endeavor to be a good WP citizen and find better sources. Achyls (talk) 18:27, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOYOLAMD1

Referring to Loyola College in Maryland and Loyola College Name Change, I am new to this, please specifically let me know what parts of my post seemed to carry a non neutral point of view as all of my comments were facts. Former Loyola College President Harold Ridley opposed a name change, that is a historical fact. The opposing view to the current name change are potential branding issues, that is a fact that this in an opposing view. Those with comments have been invited to contact the school directly by the methods I have mentioned.

I would be happy to change the references to academic programs at Loyola Universities if that was problematic. Please provide specifics as I am keen to have this page updates, this is relevant, newsworthy and timely information and that the public should know about in the event that they are seeking further information regarding Loyola College. Thank you. LOYOLAMD1 (talk) 15:06, 24 April 2008 (UTC)LOYOLAMD1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by LOYOLAMD1 (talk • contribs) 14:55, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fadiga and the Ip

It´s true that I have a discussion with Fadiga in a few articles but: Isn´t it a HUGE cheat to edit with an IP number and with a count created? Isn´t a HUGE cheat to do what he wants with an IP, CHEATING the warning he recives? Please, one thing is one thing, and another thing is another thing... Don´t mix the issues, please. We are talking about tow different things... I can´t discuss with users that cheats, breaking the wikipedia rules...

See you, --Ultracanalla (talk) 14:04, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 17 21 April 2008 About the Signpost
BLP deletion rules discussed amidst controversial AFD Threat made against high school on Wikipedia, student arrested 
Global login, blocking features developed WikiWorld: "Disruptive technology" 
News and notes: Wikimania security, German print Wikipedia, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Monthly updates of styleguide and policy changes WikiProject Report: The Simpsons 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:53, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Signpost

Thanks for the correction. It's a blind spot for the {{ffr}} OhanaUnitedTalk page 18:07, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Probably this article is the first time to go through FAR twice. I wonder what I should do if it becomes FA again and then delisted once again. OhanaUnitedTalk page 19:32, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Military history project

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Woody (talk) 18:30, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AIV

Hi. You reported an IP to AIV, and I have declined the report. While some of the IPs edits do not seem to be productive, and the IP is not discussing disputed edits in the proper way, there does not seem to be overt vandalism for which a block would be in order. I've cautioned the IP to discuss such disputed changes before making them, and I'll monitor as I can. If there are further shenanigans, please report them to the Administrator's Noticeboard for Incidents at WP:ANI, as this goes beyond the simple vandalism that AIV handles. Thanks, UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 13:37, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry we weren't able to help out this time around, and sorry you had to report multiple times. I've watchlisted some of the problem articles, and I'll keep an eye on the IP's contributions; If they revert without discussing, or if they revert a good faith edit as vandalism, ping me and I'll block if I'm around. For your reference, the report and discussion were moved to the talk page at WT:AIV. Thanks, UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 13:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much. ● 8~Hype @ 14:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Peteforsyth

Ooops, I forgot to change the vote. I did it now. Basically, I had the same concern, but realized it was not such a big thing. Bearian (talk) 18:31, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)

The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:38, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Project

Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 04:43, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:10dellis

hi there, this user 10dellis is reverting my edits and keeps writing spam and vandalism on your userpage Christopher140691 (talk) 14:42, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No idea why this user is so wanting to vandalise an Admins page. Bit foolish if you ask me Christopher140691 (talk) 14:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Didn't know if you had seen it thats why I thought I would tell you. Thats a good response to a problem user. Bloced indef. Christopher140691 (talk) 15:26, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Treelo

I don't want to overstep, but in just the last 30-40 minutes, many of his/her reverts have been called into question. Is removal of rollback applicable at this point? At least until Treelo decides its time to discuss, maybe this will get his/her attention. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 13:34, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It appears Treelo has commented at the exact same time as I posted the above. Disregard at will :) SynergeticMaggot (talk) 13:37, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Olaf750

Just thought you might be interested in this. Don't know why the IP thought your name was a good one to use. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 13:26, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 20:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy means speedy

Thank you for your quick action. I found the page kind of horrifying. David in DC (talk) 20:57, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

F class

up to you, but I see from his talk page he's been given final warnings about this before. DGG (talk) 20:46, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 18 2 May 2008 About the Signpost
From the editor 
Wikimedia Board to expand, restructure Arbitrator leaves Wikipedia 
Bot approvals group, checkuser nominations briefly held on RfA WikiWorld: "World domination" 
News and notes: Board elections, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Did You Know ... Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Volume 4, Issue 19 9 May 2008 About the Signpost
Sister Projects Interview: Wikiversity WikiWorld: "They Might Be Giants" 
News and notes: Board elections, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Featured content from schools and universities Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:58, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fattyjwoods (Push my button) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Hi just to make sure you’re not too hungry, I would’ve given you milk – but the cow just died and I tried to milk the bull but it kicked me in the face. *sob*. Anyway, enjoy the cookie!! Fattyjwoods (Push my button) 01:42, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page deleted

Hi, I wanted to let you know that there is a page that has been used to attack me here User:Omero Tognon. The person who made it has been asked to discontinue the accusations by administrators. My user page also had to be protected. I appreciate the deletion of Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Libro0. I was hoping that this page Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Libro0 could also be deleted on grounds it is an attack in which the user was told to cease. Libro0 (talk) 21:31, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Thank you. Libro0 (talk) 18:15, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ꙏ

How was this patent nonsense? While admittedly I can't read cyrillic and don't have a font installed that displays this glyph, it looked like a perfectly comprehensible (if short) article, seemed consistent with both Ь and Ъ (which it linked to) and Cyrillic characters in Unicode (which links to it), and googles quite well, considering the obscure subject. —Cryptic 15:29, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rfb participation thanks

Hello, Ultra.

I wanted to personally thank you for taking part in the project-wide discussions regarding my candidacy for bureaucratship. After bureaucratic discussion, the bureaucrats decided that there was sufficient significant and varied opposition to my candidacy, and thus no "Ultra-Exact" consensus to promote. Although personally disappointed, I both understand and respect their decision, especially in light of historical conservatism the project has had when selecting its bureaucrats. If you have any further suggestions or comments as to how you think I could help the project, please let me know. Once again, thank you for your both your early and strong support, and your continued advice. -- Avi (talk) 16:36, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of template talk page

Hi, Ultraexactzz. I may have goofed the request for speedy deletion of Template talk:South Dakota college football venues. Actually, that one was supposed to stay and Template talk:South Dakota College Football Venues was supposed to be deleted. Could you take a look at that? --Gwguffey (talk) 18:43, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect. Thanks for fixing that. --Gwguffey (talk) 18:49, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Campus Outreach Opportunity League

You recently deleted an article that I was still in the middle of writing. Your comment stated that it looked like an advertisement. I was writing a historical record of a key national non-profit organization that existed for about 20 years. Since it no longer exists, it is definitely not an ad. I did not yet have a chance to add in references.

Here they are in case you want to check them first: http://www.learningtogive.org/papers/index.asp?bpid=181 http://www.bonner.org/about/WMeisel.htm http://www.wkkf.org/Default.aspx?tabid=97&CID=288&CatID=288&ItemID=2236&NID=96&LanguageID=0 http://servenet.org/Toolkit/Pages/OrganizationProfile/tabid/230/mygroupid/8/Default.aspx

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ultraexactzz&oldid=211943726"