User talk:Reaper Eternal
Feel free to reverse my administrative actions; however, please let me know why you did it, especially if I made a mistake! |
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Help
Hello I was wondering how to claim that a file is breaking copyright will you help me? http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brunouvini.jpg The.aviation.expert (talk) 02:34, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- It's already deleted. :) Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:14, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Centercode
Hi there, noticed that you deleted the Wikipedia page for the company I work for, Centercode, citing A7: No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content). I'm not familiar with the contents of the page off-hand, since I didn't write it, but I'm confident we could made revisions to establish significance. We're a growing company with a long list of major clients like Adobe, Logitech, etc.; we recently acquired another company in the beta management space; we maintain a community of over 50,000 beta testers from all over the world; and so forth. With a little guidance on what would satisfy A7, I'd be happy to make some changes. Thanks. Awright415 (talk) 19:03, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
- I don't know what page you are talking about, as this is your only edit. Did you perhaps have another account? Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:03, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey
Hey Reaper, do you know if I am able to remove my username change request and request a new one? Second thoughts. Also, is it possible to get a userpage back through Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion? ℥nding·start 00:14, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- I've just removed it myself. Thought maybe it might mess up since a bot went through it. But then I remembered that users have to do it manually. xD ℥nding·start 00:30, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- What userpage do you want back? Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:13, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- I just went ahead and requested it, and got it back. ℥nding·start 20:38, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- What userpage do you want back? Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:13, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
User:90.199.34.136
Having some civility and edit warring problems with the aforementioned IP. If you could review his edits to Fortran, and his talk. I'd appreciate it. Falcon8765 (TALK) 00:32, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- He's already on WP:AN3, so there doesn't seem to much for me to do. Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:12, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks
...for the talkpage protection. Jarlaxle is such a little baby. Every time he doesn't get what he wants, he goes running to /b/ and says "waaah! Say mean things to the people who won't let me do what I want!"NawlinWiki (talk) 02:22, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- hehe, quite true. For the reason I came here, though...I was already impressed, but your deny at rfpp was quite the good idea. Cheers, and keep up the good work! —DoRD (talk) 02:29, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- I've noticed :P, and no problem! Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:09, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Fuck you.
You abuse the speedy deletion process as if you were some sort of god, but in fact are a lowly asshole like everyone else. Speedy deleting something after others have made arguments for noteworthiness without addressing them is unilateral, douchebag behavior. --X883 (talk) 23:17, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- I suppose the nice way to say "we can't be arsed to be a trash can for your self-promotion" didn't work on you. --Σ talkcontribs 23:51, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
GOCE barnstar
The Modest Barnstar | ||
This barnstar is awarded to Reaper Eternal for efforts during the GOCE July 2011 copy edit drive. Thank you for participating! Dianna (talk) 23:21, 6 August 2011 (UTC) |
Hello
so it works like this? Corridor56 (talk) 01:36, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- Yep, that's how you edit! :) Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:39, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
ah good. I get it. A bit more. Interested to do some copy editing. Where to start? And thanks for the cookiesCorridor56 (talk)
- Well, there's a large class of them in Category:Wikipedia articles needing copy edit. I generally just pick a random one out and start working. Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:43, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
grand. thank you. harder than I thought.
YGM (not in any way urgent)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:09, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Nature's Army Page
The Nature's Army Page that you deleted was that of an NGO. Please revert it. It clearly mentioned that it was an organization (active), yet you say that there was no mention of it. I think, it should have been mentioned in the sidepane. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amitashsam (talk • contribs)
- Could you please clarify which page you are referring to (perhaps by linking to the now-deleted page)? I cannot see any page that you have ever edited which I have deleted. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:09, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Deletion of article "Ruparelia"
Eternal Reaper, please justify the reason for the deletion of the article "Ruparelia". There was no good reason for it, please I ask of you to restore the page. Saxin00 (talk) 11:50, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- The article was proposed for deletion seven days earlier, during which time no objection was made to its deletion. I then deleted the page because the PROD notice expired. As you are now contesting the deletion, I will restore the article. Please be aware that it may be taken to AFD to decide whether it is notable enough for Wikipedia. Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Good block. I would have indeffed myself but figured it was bad form right after warning him, which I did before fully investigating his history. I agree that there's little chance of valid edits coming from that account. --Golbez (talk) 16:58, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:12, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for the quick block of the editor and rev del of the lewd material from my page history. Shadowjams (talk) 20:16, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 August 2011
- News and notes: Wikimania a success; board letter controversial; and evidence showing bitten newbies don't stay
- In the news: Israeli news focuses on Wikimania; worldwide coverage of contributor decline and gender gap; brief news
- WikiProject report: Shooting the breeze with WikiProject Firearms
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Manipulation of BLPs case opened; one case comes to a close
- Technology report: Wikimania technology roundup; brief news
Deleteion of WikiAlpha
Aren't you supposed to give the creator of an article a chance to contest deletion? I check my account prety much daily and by the time I read the message about it being deleted it was already gone. Thanks Alicianpig (talk) 12:12, 9 August 2011 (UTC)