Jump to content

User talk:Eagles247

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Juanes11 (talk | contribs) at 16:47, 22 January 2012 (→‎Mississippi Queen (Band): new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to Eagles 24/7's talk page!

Please add your comments at the bottom of this page. If I leave you a message on your talk page and you reply there, please do not leave a {{talkback}} template on this page, because there is a good chance that I have watchlisted your talk page. Thanks, Eagles 24/7 (C)

About deleted article "Celebrate Your Life"

Things That Make You Go Hmmm...

Just sayin', is all... --Shirt58 (talk) 13:15, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sugggesting sockpuppetry? Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:33, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
無--Shirt58 (talk) 11:54, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'll keep an eye on it. Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:41, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am nominating Birbal Jha for speedy deletion, but am not sure if I am doing it correctly. As you seem to have had experience with this set of articles, maybe have a look ? Pardon my German (Fiiiisch!) (talk) 00:38, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You tagged the page correctly, but in the future, if you need to explain your rationale in depth as you did, it should probably go through a different deletion process. I would recommend taking that article to Articles for deletion instead of marking it for speedy deletion. I'm not seeing the blatant promotion, and A7 may be invalid due to at least the New York Times featured article about Jha (thereby passing WP:GNG). Of course, you could wait for another admin to review the page per your speedy deletion tag, but I am unsure it currently meets the criteria for speedy deletion. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:19, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Update: I have deleted Birbal Jha per WP:G12 as a copyright infringement. I've also blocked User:TTTTim as an advertising/spam-only account. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:22, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Looked at objectively, I'm not quite sure if this is the best outcome. Still, glad to be credited with an "assist". --Shirt58 (talk) 11:35, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Addendum: The 2003 NY Times ref did suggest that an article about Jha may possibly pass WP:GNG. I'm more than happy to work on an article for Jha that is not overtly promotional; see this userspace draft. --Shirt58 (talk) 12:30, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good, an article written by a third-party editor is always better than an article written by someone with a COI, no matter their understanding of NPOV. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:32, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
From what I remember of the deleted article, Jha is of some significant influence in post-compulsory level English teaching in India. It would appear to me that neither WP:DRV nor addition to the userspace draft of the deleted article might not be the best way forward here, due to the COI and COPYVIO problems it may re-raise. If you think it appropriate, could you possibly email me a copy of the deleted article? (I also can't see who the user who started the article is, but that information is quite possibly on a "need to know" basis at present. And at present, I do not need to know.) Thanks again! --Shirt58 (talk) 09:58, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've e-mailed you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:29, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you deleted it??

What are the negative things I've said in the article?? If you believe so, message me describing why exactly, you deleted it and, list the statements (Direct copy and, paste) in which you deem to be negative! (EminamaDron) (talk) 02:45, 31 December 2011 (UTC) 02:43, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uhh What you did not notice is that I was simply making a reference that, Thunderf00t made to Venomfangx (the articles subject) as a nickname and, what he is, usually called on youtube. I wasn't posting any hateful content, to Venomfangx (the subject's article) directly towards him. You cannot state other statements that I have made, in the articles, that are negative 'assuming', there isn't any. I demand you restore my page, back to it's rightful place so I can, edit it. It has been deleted for no good reason. And...Happy new year to you. (EminamaDron) (Talk to me) 04:28, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly you won't. but, then again we can both agree that you had no good reason to delete the page and, you are violating your admin privileges and, using it, in wrong. Read this now it says that Wikipedia isn't a place where discrimination shall be allowed. I wasn't discriminating I was making a reference of what someone else nicknamed the subject of the article, and what the subject is most commonly known for, on the YouTube community. You are making a category mistake by taking a common nickname/reference as an insult to the subject of the article. (EminamaDron) (Talk to me) 07:49, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What you are not getting is that in G10 it says that;

These "attack pages" may include libel, legal threats, material intended purely to harass or intimidate a person or biographical material about a living person that is entirely negative in tone and unsourced.

— Wikipedia editors, G10

But, the things is, I wasn't doing any of the things listed in G10. I never made any statements to, harass,intimidate,bully,threaten and, humiliate the subject of the article. I was making a reference, to what the subject is mainly nicknamed for by another, YouTuber and, what the subject would be commonly called for in the YouTube community. For Ex Kent Hovind is known, by the name of, Dumb on purpose guy I wouldn't be harassing the subject, I would just be stating the nickname by which, the subject is known by. Harassing someone would be this, Kent hovinds dumb on purpose statements are full of stupidity. I would be making an Adhom to the person and in fact harassing the subject. Simply making a statement, in which, the subject is nicknamed for, isn't harassing it's just stating facts. (EminamaDron) (Talk to me) 18:16, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Need a recommendation

Which infobox template do you recommend for a consensus All-American college football player who had a substantial college career, but never played a single down of preseason or regular season professional football and is not a coach? I have several of these that are in need of an appropriate infobox, and "Infobox college football player" appears to be structured for current undergraduates. If we don't have an appropriate template, maybe we need to contemplate adding some new variables to "Infobox college football player," like degree, graduation date, post-graduation career, etc. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 02:44, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to work on an infobox similar in style to Template:Infobox college coach. Do you prefer that or the current player infobox? Also, if you would like to propose more parameters to add, feel free. Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Glad to see you've become our infobox/template guru. I remember when you used to defer these template problems to others! In answer to your question, as far as I can tell we have two clusters: (1) college studs who did something else with their lives other than coach or play professional sports after graduation–in some cases those post-graduation, non-sports careers were notable; and (2) college studs whose pro careers ended prematurely because of injuries or otherwise, and their non-sports career is non-notable. It would be nice if we could gin up something that felt like the NFL player infobox, but with some non-sports fields. In most cases, these All-American non-pros are still primarily notable for their college sports careers (see, e.g., Carlos Alvarez (American football)). I'll be interested to see what you can invent. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 03:40, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
So do you suggest a modification of Template:Infobox NFL player? (I just need a starting point.) Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:43, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm. Choices, choices. Let me review the existing parameters on these two templates, and I'll get back with you. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 03:45, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, I could also create a modified version of Template:Infobox college football player. Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:48, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cousin

Hello Eagles! I think Kirk Cousins was not yet a starting quarterback in 2007, or was he? Arbitrarily0 (talk) 22:02, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct, I have clarified the lead of the article. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:57, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, good work mate. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 23:20, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Further

Hello there. Thank you for the unblocking. I will agree and stay that way. Do you think it's possible to delete both of my former accounts Wooblz! and Thornofhate for any further confusion that still exist,and the future to come? --Chickensdoorknob (talk) 04:12, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is not possible to delete accounts, but you should probably leave a note on your userpage stating your relationship with those accounts. Eagles 24/7 (C) 04:20, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Norris Cole

FYI, at least one official source does list his weight as 175: [1]. I added a footnote to discuss the weight, because I don't want to fight over it anymore. That said, I won't revert you myself if you change the weight back to 170. Zagalejo^^^ 18:44, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've never seen such fuss over the weight of a player. I'll let it stay. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:46, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Chili Davis Wikipedia Page

Dear Eagles247,

First and foremost, I wanted to thank you for defending my work on the University of Georgia's Isaiah Crowell the other day ago. My name is Rod Hayes as it appears as <Rod hayes>. I created my account so fast I didn't realize my surname wasn't capitalized. Anyway, I love your work, and this may surprise you, but I am a Philadelphia Eagles fan too. Michael Vick has always been a favorite of mine.(not what he did to his pitbulls by any means of course) I also believe in my Lord and savior Jesus when it was said in the word of God, "And he lifted up himself and said unto them, 'He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.'" As you see, I believe in forgiveness.

However, my message to you now is actually about Chili Davis. Someone is using his Wikipedia article to slander and tear down Davis' good name. I don't know where to report such information here on Wikipedia, but I don't think the Wikipedia website should be the place for printing information that would best fit inself inside 'The National Inquirer.' What can be done to protect Chili's good name here in regard to the detailed information from a court case involving Davis some nine years ago or so? Davis has just taken a job with the Oakland A's as their hitting instructor. Something needs to be done about his Wikipedia? It has to be cleaned up. I'd be so grateful if you could assist me with this.

Thanks, Rod Hayes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rod hayes (talk • contribs) 02:08, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rod, I'm currently working on the article to conform to the policies of WP:UNDUE, WP:NPOV, and WP:GNG. If this is a notable controversy related to Davis, it has to (unfortunately) remain in the article in some form in keeping with NPOV. Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:41, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
How's this? Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:57, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks, Eagles247. I have thought about working in a "personal life" section for Chili that would mention his relationship with former girlfriend Tina - and how that led to the two breaking up - and court battle following that where Davis had to pay $350,000. Still, I will see what you are able to come up with. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rod hayes (talk • contribs) 03:14, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

Yes i do wish to continue with my run towards adminship. I have not done as much as you have, but I want to block some users from future vandalism. (AaronBok (talk) 23:13, 8 January 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Page move request

Do you think you can move Southern Highlands (New South Wales) to Southern Highlands, New South Wales, to the correct formatting? Currently Southern Highlands, New South Wales is redirected to Southern Highlands (New South Wales). In other words I am requesting the redirect to be the other way around. -- Chickensdoorknob (talk) 10:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And moved back to its correct disambiguation using brackets. Discussion on the talk page or an RM may have been appropriate here. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 19:52, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
See Category:Regions of New South Wales (New England (New South Wales), Monaro (New South Wales) etc.) Mattinbgn (talk) 19:55, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, that's an odd disambiguation, though. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:56, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
How so? Use of parentheses is the standard form of disambiguation across the encyclopedia. The only common exception I can think of is "settlements" (i.e. cities, towns and villages etc.) e.g. WP:Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)#Australia. Southern Highlands is a geographical region, not a settlement and thus is disambiguated in a similar way to other areas such as Victoria (Australia). -- Mattinbgn (talk) 23:07, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Eagles247. This way seems to be the correct way Southern Highlands, New South Wales. Mattinbgn, please explain how it's not odd. -- Chickensdoorknob (talk) 01:48, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Mattinbgn, I live in the United States and I'm not too familiar with provinces and territories. I trust your knowledge here. Chickensdoorknob, Mattinbgn is experienced in this area and I would go with his advice over mine in this regard. Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:57, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Marty Schottenheimer

Inside source reveals that Marty Schottenheimer had his interview with Tampa Bay today and is working on a three year deal to become next head coach of the Bucs as we speak. Tampa has cancelled all interviews with other candidates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MartyballTPA (talk • contribs) 03:18, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a written source for this information? If not, it is original research, a violation of WP:CRYSTAL, and I will continue to revert your additions of unsourced information regarding biographies of living persons. Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:21, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Wade Key

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

"Pro Bowler"

Re: "I don't see consensus against this change (using your logic to start the widespread cleanup after waiting a day or so), so I'm adding 'Pro Bowler.'" ---- Your edit summary on several of your NFL player edits from yesterday

E, I've worked with you too often and too productively to go looking for a fight, especially over something relatively trivial such as the presence or absence of two more or two fewer characters in NFL player infoboxes. That having been said, let's be clear on several points. On December 28, I asked for comments on the WP:NFL talk page regarding the use of the word "selection" following All-Pro, Pro Bowl and other honors listed in NFL player infoboxes. That was two weeks ago, not a "couple of days." Six registered users who are regular CFB/NFL editors weighed in against the use of the word "selection" in the infobox. One IP user, who can't string a coherent sentence together or form a logical argument, advocated for the continued use of "selection." You were notably silent on the issue for ten days, then raised an objection based on "parallelism" a couple of days ago. In response I pointed out that (a) perfect parallelism isn't possible in describing infobox honors unless we include other superfluous words like "winner" or "honoree" following other infobox honors, too; and (b) the emerging consensus after ten days was to omit the word "selection" from infobox honors. Frankly, I think the added "er" on "Pro Bowl" is unnecessary, but "Pro Bowler" takes up far less space and causes far fewer infobox line-wraps than using the words "Pro Bowl selection" instead. There is obviously no consensus to add the "er" because you are the only one who has commented on point. If you feel that strongly about it, I suggest you open a separate talk page section and ask for comments because I suspect your original comment may have been lost among all the incoherent nonsense written by the IP user. I can live with "Pro Bowler," but I will object to the continued use of "selection" and the addition of words like "winner" following trophy names, etc., in order to achieve some form of "parallelism." The original point was to remove unnecessary verbiage from the infobox honors, not insert more of it. I stand by that. Regards, Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:50, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. I lost it there a bit yesterday. I'll start a discussion for "Pro Bowler" in a new subheading. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:30, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not a problem. You're still the best admin we've got. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:40, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, E, can you have a talk with our favorite IP user? He's already off and running, adding "er" to every instance of Pro Bowl in infobox honors and random "1x" designators to every instance of Pro Bowl and All-Pro. (See [2].) As I understand it, one is yet to be decided and the other is not appropriate. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 00:28, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'll take care of him. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:34, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CSD removals

Hi Eagles. I noticed you've been involved with deleting one or more of Areebhts's pages. He has recreated a page which has previously been speedy deleted and now he is removing the speedy tags. Of course I don't want to break the 3RR so I am using this message to bring this to your attention, if it isn't noticed before you read this message. The relevant page is HackingTag Security. Thanks, Cloudz679 15:41, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reaper Eternal has deleted and salted the page from further recreation. I declined his recent AfC on the same subject. Just so you know, you are not violating WP:3RR in restoring removed CSD tags by the article's author as it is (to a degree) considered the equivalent of vandalism. If a user keeps removing a CSD from an article he/she created, just keep reverting and warning, and take it to WP:AIV if the user ignores your warnings. Thanks for the notice. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:23, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Check your edit history

This page has been censored. Carrite (talk) 04:17, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Block evading socks who attack me are not welcome here. Eagles 24/7 (C) 04:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is the message I got. I would recommend removing the praise and barnstar from your talk page as they were given in bad faith. Eagles 24/7 (C) 04:22, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The message is neither here nor there, the external alteration of the talk page is the point. Carrite (talk) 04:46, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If that user posted the message linked above on your talk page, you would not want another user to revert it? Eagles 24/7 (C) 04:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Because I don't like people censoring my mail. I'm perfectly capable of dealing with trolls by myself... Carrite (talk) 04:51, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I understand where you are coming from, but most users prefer messsages from socks removed immediately and this should be expected. Eagles 24/7 (C) 04:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Stan Walters

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Why are you deleting my comments about Mark Clayton

I have sufficient evidence that shows this is his clothing line. In addition, I am his good friend. Why are you deleting or undoing the edits I am making?

Regards, Jeremy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayquizzel (talk • contribs) 05:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Paterno--fired or resigned

The way I'm reading the BOT statement included in the CNN article I found, it sounds a lot more like Paterno was forced to resign. The statement by the board of trustees clearly says that Paterno is still a tenured faculty member. He wouldn't still be on the faculty if he were fired. HangingCurveSwing for the fence 20:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter what it "sounds" like to you, unless CNN comes out and says "Joe Paterno was forced to resign," we cannot assume he was per WP:OR. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I can acknowledge that. But the statement from the BOT clearly says he is being allowed to retire, so saying he was fired isn't accurate either. I think at the very least we can say he was ordered to leave immediately, pending settlement of the terms of his retirement. HangingCurveSwing for the fence 21:13, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't say anything about his being allowed to retire, they are putting together a retirement package for him. But they still fired him. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is what the statement says: "Coach Paterno remains employed by the university as a tenured faculty member. The details of his retirement are being worked out and will be made public when they are finalized. Generally speaking, the university intends to honor the terms of his employment contract and is treating him financially as if he had retired at the end of the 2011 football season." I still say that it's not really accurate to say he was fired--he wouldn't still be on the faculty if that was the case. I think it's best to just say he was stripped of coaching duties, pending settlement of his retirement package. HangingCurveSwing for the fence 21:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"Stripped of coaching duties" means "fired," unless he was forced to resign, which he did not. Again, interpretation of a source should not be subjective or open to argument. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nat Geo WILD

The previous talk page at Talk:Nat Geo WILD also needs moving. -- [[ axg ◉ talk ]] 23:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 January 2012

Paul Ryan (As the World Turns)

Thanks for your help on this article yesterday; it's good to know that I'm not the only one who wanted to improve the encyclopedia while it was locked down. Nyttend (talk) 05:17, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to do it, boredom got the best of me. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:23, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Both of you deserve this rather exclusive userbox for this.Jasper Deng (talk) 05:26, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'll get the t-shirts ready, too. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:22, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Slow-rolling edit war at Patrick Willis

E, I've got a slow-moving edit war with IP user 69.110.157.54 on the Patrick Willis article. IP continues to make edits regarding "first-team" and "second-team" selections that use non-standard capitalization and hyphenation. I've repeatedly attempted to engage the IP through user talk pages and edit summaries, but he refuses to engage in discussion and continues to make or restore earlier edits that include incorrect grammar, punctuation, capitalization, hyphenation. The IP apparently has a dynamic IP address (see article edit history), and I have attempted to engage him on at least three different IP user talk pages over the past week. These are, of course, small points, but it seems ridiculous to continually restore edits that use improper punctuation and non-standard capitalization. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 00:02, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Slap a {{uw-3rr}} on his talk page and I'll block him/protect the page if he persists. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:04, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a thing against me?

It's just that every single edit I make is scrutinised to the last detail by you and my talkpage and articles are getting filled with unfair remarks by you. Don't get me wrong, I can take critism, I just think that if it is not constructive, it is spiteful. Just saying... Androzaniamy (talk) 20:47, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are many links to policies on your talk page, but you choose to ignore them and continue creating articles for non-notable individuals with no references to comply with WP:V. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:49, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have read every single help link ever sent to me. Maybe I did not understand them all, but I did read them. Androzaniamy (talk) 20:58, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then please tell me why your articles do not pass WP:GNG. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:59, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They do, it's just that you d not trust the site I use. Androzaniamy (talk) 12:22, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More

Okay, I can see why you slapped that on me, but A) There is no copyright info, and B) the news IS verified (I said close too death, not dead). It says I can update it with recently verified info~ Correct?

Aimsplode (talk) 00:00, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition looks nearly exact to this, and the information is still in violation of WP:NOTNEWSPAPER due to its "multiple sources say" nature. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:04, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Paterno

Hey, have you considered reverting all of that, since there is the possibility that he might be alive? Thanks. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:17, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, nevermind. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:17, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to stop by and say that you're doing a great job on the Paterno article and don't let anybody tell you otherwise. Cheers, Mackensen (talk) 02:31, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, this is a very difficult situation all around. Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:32, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, could you add the following to the article, as we might as well clear up some confusion: "On January 21st, 2012, after it was reported that Paterno's health had taken a turn for the worse, it was incorrectly reported by CBS that he had passed away of lung cancer. It was later reported that CBS had learned of his purported death through an online tweet from Onward State, the online Penn State news outlet.[1]" Thanks! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:49, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure in the scheme of things that this death hoax will be notable. For now, I think it's best to leave things as they are for now, but if other users at the talk page agree with it, I'll add it. Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:51, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Heads up...forum shopper.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 02:58, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the notice and killing that thread immediately. Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:00, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You're quite welcome.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 03:06, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm honestly quite tired of the IP at the talk page. Calabe1992 03:31, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm involved, but I think I have addressed his concerns. Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:32, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Good enough. If it continues I will take it elsewhere. Calabe1992 03:34, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK, that was definitely enough. Good job here. Calabe1992 03:35, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
He restored again, and I've blocked him. I invite any admin watching this page to review my actions and reverse if they see fit. Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:36, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Importance

Hi there. Good morning. What precautions i should take to let know that the particular person is important. Ref: Vivek Savant article which was deleted. Please guide. Thanks --Abhijeet Safai 04:03, 22 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhijeet Safai (talk • contribs)

Hi Abhijeet. I deleted Vivek Savant, as there was no indication that he is notable. For someone to be notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia, he/she must be able to pass WP:GNG, which requires that an individual has "significant coverage" by third-party sources. Being the founder of an organization is typically not enough for someone to have an article, unless they are high-profile individuals such as Sergey Brin or Larry Page, the founders of Google. In the future, you can tell that a person is notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia if they have at least one featured article about them (typically two is safer) in newspapers or other media. Eagles 24/7 (C) 04:10, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok! Great to know that. I am so sure that he has many articles on him in newspapers. I will revert back soon with those references to you. Good morning and Thanks. --Abhijeet Safai 04:17, 22 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhijeet Safai (talk • contribs)
No problem. Eagles 24/7 (C) 04:20, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mississippi Queen (Band)

Hy, You deleted my article aboum Mississippi Queen (band) for nothing. I wrote that article on official site of Mississippi Queen, so i dont destroy any copiright rights.

  1. ^ Greenberg, Chris. "Joe Paterno Dead? Spokesman Denies Reported Death for headline". Huffington Post. Retrieved 22 January 2012.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eagles247&oldid=472634204"