Jump to content

User talk:129.33.19.254

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 96.238.36.171 (talk) at 19:39, 3 February 2012 (→‎Maggia (comics)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:IBM IP Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

  • The use of a username of your choice, provided that it is appropriate.
  • The ability to view all your contributions via a "My contributions" link.
  • Your own user page.
  • Your own talk page which, if you choose, also allows users to send you messages without knowing your e-mail address.
  • The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you.
  • The ability to start new pages.
  • The ability to rename pages.
  • The ability to edit semi-protected pages.
  • The ability to upload images.
  • The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website.
  • The eligibility to become an administrator.
  • The right to be heard in votes and elections.
  • Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia and that you choose to become a Wikipedian by creating an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, you should sign your name to your posts and comments with ~~~~. --LV (Dark Mark) 01:45, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

Hello, I would like to refer you to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy, with regards to your recent edits of Media bias in the United States. Whatever your personal beliefs, wikipedia is not the place for them. Please refer to the above policy for how you can make sure articles remain neutral and unbiased. Repeated failure to observe NPOV is seen as vandalism. Thank you! -Kasreyn 21:39, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Note

Politicians editing their own Wikipedia articles is not in itself notable. Please do not add such comments to Wikipedia. Thank you. DS 17:37, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing information

Hello (or should I say hello again?) - we cannot accept your edits to Tom Harrison and Reading Eagle because of our strict policy on biographies of living persons. We are very sensitive to the possibility of libel and slander, and require reliable sources to document any information, especially of a pejorative nature, about a living person. Please don't add it again. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:38, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, thanks for checking back but our policies still haven't changed. Source it or forget it. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:20, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Reading Eagle

It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from Reading Eagle. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. mattbr30 18:05, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Steel 18:10, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding reversions[1] made on July 3 2006 (UTC) to [[2]]

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning, but aviod making any reverts within 24 hours of this warning in order to avoid any confusion. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:23, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

If you can't tell the difference between describing the statements of another user and accusing users of unsubstantiated crimes, you will be blocked for personal attacks. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:46, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

October 2006

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's NPOV policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Washington Park, Chicago, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Vectro 21:19, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


March 2007

With regards to your comments on Popping (dance): Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. K.Z Talk • Vandal • Contrib 21:29, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice


May 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Chiranjeevi. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Caltas(talk) 19:24, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page No Country for Old Men (film). Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. In the future, please do not experiment on article pages; instead, use the sandbox. Thank you. clpo13(talk) 18:50, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2008

Friday, August 22

Re: C Sharp (programming language)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to C Sharp (programming language). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 21:47, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Your edit to Rickey Henderson was obvious vandalism. Please find something better to do with your time. Timneu22 (talk) 00:04, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Schreyer Honors College has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Avono♂ (talk) 13:50, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. I notice that you removed topically-relevant content from Cary Grant. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. You have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Yworo (talk) 17:27, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

A tag has been placed on a page you created requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hang on}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Jayjg (talk) 01:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Expand

Please stop using the "expand" template. It's deprecated. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 19:38, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 19:46, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ultimate Iron Man (character), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 17:19, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeing the problem here - please explain? 129.33.19.254 (talk) 17:22, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Gloom (comics) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Snowolf How can I help? 15:45, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I redirected that one because it was PRODded and was about to be deleted. Better to redirect it in case the information is needed in the future at some point, I figured. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 16:02, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, 129.33.19.254. You have new messages at Talk:Kender.
Message added 05:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I just had a quick question on how to use the word kender. Details are on the talk page... Pax85 (talk) 05:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Foster

I agree with your edit that the information needs issue citations, but you were a little excessive. You can limit the issue tag to one for every sentence at the very most (you had two per sentence a few times there) or even one for every paragraph. The article still has to be readable with the tags in place and the excessive amount of tags made it harder to read. Spidey104 13:54, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Arashikage

Thank you, I had no idea we had this page! I'll try to do some sourcing and expanding as I get time. Thanks, --Cerebellum (talk) 21:26, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Christopher Kubasik has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://newmediamatters.wordpress.com/about-christopher-kubasik/.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:55, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

D'oh! 129.33.19.254 (talk) 20:58, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hobgoblin

This image come from the Amazing Spider-Man 238's latest page. A splash-page. In these fistful of issues, penciler was John Romita Senior and his own son, JRJR, inker. Really, Amazing 238 credits number, reports "John Romita, Sr and John Romita, Jr, co-artists" and so, i'll write that it. References the next time, please!--151.66.189.157 (talk) 22:33, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Night's Dark Terror - verify tag

I should've specified better what I meant on the talk page or in a hidden comment. I removed the sentence directly in front of that citation, and I wasn't sure if it applied to the entire paragraph or just the sentence I moved. So, I wanted confirmation that it was sourcing the whole paragraph. Basically, I didn't want to leave it there without making a note that I wasn't sure if it was really the citation for those other bits. —Torchiest talkedits 23:10, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Living Tribunal has been reverted.
Your edit here to Living Tribunal was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://img543.imageshack.us/img543/4025/tribunalj.jpg) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:11, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Sorry, my mistake

Please disregard my last message to you. I reverted an edit of yours in error and the message was sent automatically. I do not believe your edit was vandalism and I was mistaken in reverting it. I've undone my revert. Sorry again, and don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 19:38, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's cool.  :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 19:39, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A little recognition

The Working Man's Barnstar

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
Now that you've caught my eye (well, mine and GLOO's), I 'm seeing just how much good work you've put in around here, so for your continued efforts in the improvement of Wikipedia, I hereby award you this Working Wikipedian's Barnstar! --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 19:51, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dwarf deities, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:27, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cyrrollalee. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Gscshoyru (talk) 19:38, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dividing an article into sections is vandalism? 129.33.19.254 (talk) 19:41, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oops. I hit the wrong button, wrongly reverted your edit and didn't notice. Sorry about that! My bad. Gscshoyru (talk) 19:44, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, thanks. :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 19:46, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Here are some other hints and tips:

  • I recommend that you get a username. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. (If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.)
  • When using talk pages, please sign your name at the end of your messages by typing four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username (or IP address) and the date.

If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} on this talk page and a user will help you as soon as possible. I will try to answer your questions as best as I can. Again, welcome, and I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. ScottSteiner ✍ 16:51, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 16:52, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cyber (comics)

Cyber's issue references are listed in their chronological order. He does not appear in any one singular issue alone, as all of his appearances were in multiple issue arcs. Much of his character was created through flashback and recollection sequences that I and some of the editors here decided years ago would be best summed up through referencing the the arcs themselves, rather than trying to flesh out and interpret what was actually revealed in one particular issue of the arc. This way we could list Cyber's issue references in their chronological order, otherwise some issues are referenced twice. I'm not an editor here, I just do this for fun, but some of these guys here were ready to strangle me over the smallest rules they see fit to enforce. There's an editor named "Odin's Beard" who watches these Marvel articles like a hawk, and he can answer any questions you have if you think the article should be revised to your liking. Look at Cyber's discussion page and you'll see the headache we both gave each other hammering down this article years ago. I'm making small revisions now because I'm going to appeal to the editors later on that I feel Cyber should listed as officially "dead". Sure to be a hornet's nest if not done precicely to the editors' approval.

Thanks. FA Shotgun (talk) 17:12, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Bulezau do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.  
Your edit here to Bulezau was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://d20npcs.wikia.com/wiki/D&D_Named_Demon_Project#Bulezau) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to an external Wiki, then please note that these links should generally not be included (see 'links to avoid' #12).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:28, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Okie dokie! 129.33.19.254 (talk) 20:28, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Dungeons & Dragons simulacrums

An article that you have been involved in editing, Dungeons & Dragons simulacrums , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. zorblek (talk) 05:37, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

wp:ani

Just an FYI, I've added what I believe is relevant info in a matter you commented on at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Bill_Slavicsek--Cube lurker (talk) 02:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Sorry about that. I fixed it. PTJoshua (talk) 16:52, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

De nada. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 16:57, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Gem and the Staff

Hey there. I saw you re-added that line about the module being a tournament adventure for a DM and a thief PC. I originally removed that because it is pretty redundant. All that information is either mentioned in the intro or in the previous section, and it's sourced to the same reference. I just figured it was a bit repetitive. —Torchiest talkedits 18:39, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, good point. I didn't notice they were referring to the original versus the expanded module. I did a little rewrite to mix it up some. —Torchiest talkedits 18:53, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Kas the Bloody-Handed with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Trusilver 22:24, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ego

Thanks for pointing that out. I didn't even think about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Argento Surfer (talk • contribs) 13:03, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

De nada.  :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 14:04, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Iceman

When you consider that it changes the whole way you play another character and will effect all character choices when fighting against an Iceman knowing you can possibly kill the character easily that way, I don't consider that trival a tleast not less trival then the fact that he practically invincible against almost all other kinds of attacks.-71.202.72.88 (talk) 05:17, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing Man / Prince of Orphans

Agreed. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:00, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Octopus, Doctor Octopus, Doctor Octopus, Doctor Octopus, Doctor Octopus

I suggest trying to read that section and see how all those Doctor Octopii actually sound. If you still think it's better, fine, I'm not the type to edit war, and we can leave it like you want it. Vranak (talk) 22:05, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to edit war either, which is why I left it alone. It's generally my opinion that using nicknames like "Doc Ock", "Spidey", and "Cap" in place of the character's proper name is non-encylopedic and lazy, but YMMV. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 22:08, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oh but I think he's referred to that way in the canon. Couldn't say definitively but I strongly suspect so. Maybe you know better than me though. Vranak (talk) 23:04, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dungeons and Dragons articles

Hello! While I appreciate the good faith effort you've made, in adding D&D characters to {{WikiProject Fictional characters}}, please do not continue to add the template to EVERY SINGLE type of creature that exists in D&D. Your criteria for what constitutes a fictional character should be refined to only include unique characters in D&D. Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 17:31, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of minor Marvel Comics characters

Hi

You said to merge the following articles to List of minor Marvel Comics characters.

"After proposing the merger, place your reasons on the talk page."

I would like to know them especially for the orphan articles.

--Crazy runner (talk) 08:27, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stop being stupid / trolling

http://www.wolverinefiles.com/008-ogun/ if you missed it somehow when I was "rambling". --194.145.185.229 (talk) 16:30, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Original Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.
Thanks! Hopefully we will live in a world without such a restrictive law as the one proposed.  :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 19:41, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blastaar Appearances, Collected Editions Table

Greetings! I recently added a reference table to the entry for, "Blastaar", in order to begin cataloging Marvel's collected editions which feature this character. You deleted the table noting, "sections like this are for main characters". Can you please help me to find the guidelines for including tables in Wikipedia entries? I am rather new to editing Wikipedia articles, so I'm not sure where to locate this information.

The table was added under the presumption that a catalog of readily available publications containing appearances by this character would be of benefit to those researching this fictional character. Is there another preferred way to list such publications?

Thanks for your help! Muppet1962 (talk) 02:43, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Jean Wells do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.  
Your edit here to Jean Wells was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://grognardia.blogspot.com/2010/02/interview-jean-wells-part-i.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:15, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Hidden races (Marvel Comics)

I have placed them in order as Inhumans, bird-people and alpha primitves are all homo inhumanus. I also added homo mermanus as this includes Atlanteans and Lemurians. I have also added discription of the races such as Eternals and Deviants. I added Molans as they are a new subteranean races recently featured in Spider-Man. I also placed Savage land as a sub-category as Cat-People and the "People" reside there.Leowilk (talk) 00:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maggia (comics)

You want to talk about the articles for the branches there?96.238.36.171 (talk) 12:46, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You want to revert the articles back to what they're supposed to be?96.238.36.171 (talk) 19:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:129.33.19.254&oldid=474838653"