User talk:Peetlesnumber1
File copyright problem with File:Medicinestick.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Medicinestick.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 03:51, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
October 2009
You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
The article Libby Brown has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DMacks (talk) 01:45, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Cheltenham High School.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cheltenham High School.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY (TALK) 06:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
File:Tent6b.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tent6b.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 02:40, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from reverting my edits on the page for Cheltenham High School. I'm trying to settle this with civility, rather than having an edit war. My next step will be to report your editing to an administrator who, I assure you, will side with me. I'm not saying the information is completely out of context. I'm saying that it should be integrated into the larger article, and not included as an "epitaph".
There's also no need to make personal attacks. I assume you were using the word "ignorant" in a pejorative sense, rather than it's conventional meaning, "lacking knowledge, information, or awareness about something in particular". I assure you, I have knowledge and awareness of the effect these events had on the United States, and elsewhere. It is the reason why I chose my career path in national defense. But, you seem to lack knowledge and awareness about the purpose of this website. If you would like to learn more about Wikipedia (and why the way you are presenting this information is not appropriate for a Wikipedia article), there are plenty of pages on here about that.
Bmf 51 (talk) 23:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
I understand what you're reasoning behind including it was. It's wonderful that you take pride in your school, its alumni, and your country. There is nothing wrong with wanting to honor those people. Myself, I visit the 9/11 Pentagon memorial routinely. But, while you do seem aware of the purpose of Wikipedia, I humbly suggest you look at What Wikipedia is not, specifically that Wikipedia is not a memorial site.
If you would like to expand on what I've included about these two people, neither I nor anybody else will stop you, so long as it adheres to the policies listed above. However, anything more than the person's name, a few identifying bits of information, and the reason they are notable would be superfluous. Look at the "Famous People" section of the following article, if you want a good idea of how to rewrite the notable alumni section of the CHS article - University Park, Maryland#Famous_people. Specifically, note that the "September 11, 2001" section doesn't memorialize the victims. Also, it is written from a neutral perspective (while it mentions Americans, it is not blatantly obvious that the person writing it is American, as opposed to someone from another English-speaking country). Keep in mind that Wikipedia is an international site, and not specifically an American one.
Feel free to re-add the image of the plaque into the article. I think the most appropriate place would be the "Notable Alumni" section.
Bmf 51 (talk) 03:20, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Looks good. I changed the heading for the "December 21, 1988" section to "Lockerbie Bombing". September 11, 2001 is synonymous with the 9/11 attacks, but the Lockerbie bombing doesn't immediately come to mind for most people when you mention the date December 21, 1988. This way, people know what the section is about just from the title. That's not a big issue though. Bmf 51 (talk) 21:07, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 11:27, 9 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi Peetlesnumber1
Please review WP:N and WP:RS. The sources you added to the above-captioned article are either:
- not independent of the subject; or
- only trivial coverage of the subject (such as directory listings).
These do not establish notability.
Regards, Bongomatic 22:48, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Netop Summer Camp
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Netop Summer Camp, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bongomatic 01:20, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Please note that only one of the sources provided more than directory-style information on the camp (i.e., not significant coverage, as required under WP:N). The one source that could be argued to provide significant coverage was not independent of the topic, also a requirement of WP:N. Bongomatic 06:40, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Phillies Pictures added
Hello, I've noticed you've recently added a lot of pictures to Phillies-related articles. Not all of them are of the best quality as photographs themselves, or capture the essence of their subject very well, or are not located in the most appropriate place in the article (sometimes clustered around a lot of other photographs), or had not had the time to be formatted to the proper size so as to not run in with the extant text. Please use a bit more discretion with adding any more photographs and take your time using the "preview" function to make sure each one is well-suited and placed in the proper manner. Go Phillies! JesseRafe (talk) 17:46, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of County Club Swimming Association of Greater Philadelphia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article County Club Swimming Association of Greater Philadelphia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/County Club Swimming Association of Greater Philadelphia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Secret account 07:20, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Regarding Template:Wanamaker Athletic Award
A note to you: consensus exists and has held at many TfDs that navboxes like {{Wanamaker Athletic Award}} should not exist or be placed in articles unless there is a main list article linking them together. Furthermore, having an external link to a website of questionable reliability is, in my opinion, not appropriate. Perhaps you should consider creating a list for the lead article, Wanamaker Athletic Award, before adding the template to any more articles. Thanks, and happy editing. — KV5 • Talk • 01:46, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
An article entitled Philadelphia Sports Congress will be created soon, as that is the group that oversees the recipients of the Wanamaker Athletic Award. Peetlesnumber1 (talk) 01:54, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Template:Wanamaker Athletic Award has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:35, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Glenside, Pennsylvania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Golfer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
USRD WikiProject Newsletter, Winter 2012
 | ||
| Volume 5, Issue 1 • Winter 2011 • About the Newsletter | ||
| This edition is going out to all USRD WikiProject members (current, former, or potential) in addition to other subscribers as part of a roll call to update the participants list. Anyone that would like to continue to receive this newsletter in the future needs to update the subscription list if they are not already subscribed. | ||
|
|
|
| Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS | ||
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Springfield Township, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abington Township, PA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:04, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Butler rivalries
I saw your edit summary and want to offer an explanation as to why I'm an advocate of keeping the rivalry templates. I'm a recent grad who's also not very into some of these historic rivalries. That said, although current students and recent alums may not appreciate the rivalries that appear in the templates on the page (except for Xavier), they are absolutely historical rivalries that alumni, which make up the majority of the fan-base, recognize and are fueled by. There is a reason that the ISU game was a sell-out. The fact that the series include over 100 games played for each of the rivalries suggests that the schools are historic rivals, even if they have not played recently in the case of Indiana State. It is important that the article is up-to-date, and there is a lot of current info on there, but it is also important that it recognizes the history of the program, which includes a fierce rivalry with the other in-state schools from the old ICC days, the remnants of which can be seen in the fighting spirit of countless alumni at Hinkle Fieldhouse for every home game. City boy77 (talk) 03:10, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Cheltenham High School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abington Township, PA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Template:Wanamaker Athletic Award has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:02, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 6
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Cheltenham High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Harvey, Pippin, Golden, Fame, Good News, Hello, Dolly, AIDA, Dirty Rotten Scoundrels, Working, Fiorello, Kiss Me Kate, Mame, It Never Rains and Bye, Bye Birdie
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Template:CHS Alumni HOF has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bongomatic 05:47, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Seeking help with a College Basketball article
Hello, I'm currently working on an article for the 2003-2004 Saint Joseph's Hawks Mens Basketball and I was wondering if you were at all interested in helping me add to it. The url is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003%E2%80%9304_Saint_Joseph%27s_Hawks_men%27s_basketball_team , thanks for the help. 5hane2012 (talk) 01:27, 24 April 2012 (UTC)5hane20125hane2012 (talk) 01:27, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
RE:RE: Help
Thanks a lot for your help, I really appreciate it. Do you happen to know anything about the games they played in the NCAA tournament that year/any notable regular season victories they had? I was thinking it would be useful to add one or two of those. Let me know and thanks again. 5hane2012 (talk) 16:47, 24 April 2012 (UTC)5hane20125hane2012 (talk) 16:47, 24 April 2012 (UTC)