User talk:Sue Gardner
Welcome!
Looks like you've never been welcomed! :-(
Welcome!
Hello, Sue Gardner, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Cbrown1023 talk 15:43, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Gender gap propaganda
Inspired by Sarah's work on gender issues, I thought I'd make a nice propaganda poster...
—Tom Morris (talk) 20:40, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
I put her up at DYK. Happy days, Drmies (talk) 04:32, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Blocking policy
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Blocking policy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 08:15, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Emo
Nice to see you in the article space. I moved your link. Cheers --Guerillero | My Talk 01:35, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Laura Zigman
On 14 March 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Laura Zigman, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that chick lit author Laura Zigman once described herself as a lonely loser? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Laura Zigman.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 15:12, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Woohoo! Yay for chicklit! Drmies (talk) 15:13, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Editor's Barnstar | |
For your editing spree this weekend, and the great article Emo killings in Iraq. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 16:23, 14 March 2012 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 12 March 2012
- Interview: Liaising with the Education Program
- Women and Wikipedia: Women's history, what we're missing, and why it matters
- Arbitration analysis: A look at new arbitrators
- Discussion report: Nothing changes as long discussions continue
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Women's History
- Featured content: Extinct humans, birds, and Birdman
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in 'Article titles', only one open case
- Education report: Diverse approaches to Wikipedia in Education
The Signpost: 19 March 2012
- News and notes: Chapters Council proposals take form as research applications invited for Wikipedia Academy and HighBeam accounts
- Discussion report: Article Rescue Squadron in need of rescue yet again
- WikiProject report: Lessons from another Wikipedia: Czech WikiProject Protected Areas
- Featured content: Featured content on the upswing!
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence 'review' opened, Article titles at voting
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Categorization
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Categorization. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 09:04, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 March 2012
- News and notes: Controversial content saga continues, while the Foundation tries to engage editors with merchandising and restructuring
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Rock Music
- Featured content: Malfunctioning sharks, toothcombs and a famous mother: featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review at evidence, article titles closed
- Recent research: Predicting admin elections; studying flagged revision debates; classifying editor interactions; and collecting the Wikipedia literature
- Education report: Universities unite for GLAM; and High Schools get their due.
Homophobic attacks and abuse on Wikimedia projects
Hi Sue,
I asked Jimbo the following question on his user talk page but he has declined to answer and instead collapsed the discussion:[1]
- Jimbo, this was a blatant and malicious homophobic attack, discrediting an editor's opinion during a community consensus process. Regardless of all other considerations of claims about Russavia's involvement in difficult topics (such as the Zhirinovsky's ass nonsense), the wider community and the Wikimedia Foundation does not accept any form of homophobic abuse against volunteers on our projects and must be seen to take action. You know I am a long term active supporter of the Wikimedia movement who happens to be openly gay, and as a result I have been subject to nasty on-wiki and off-wiki homophobic attacks, stalking and abuse in sustained attempts to frighten me off the projects. I look forward to your public statement supporting and valuing LGBT contributors to Wikipedia and your personal active involvement and leadership in this case.
I would be interested to hear if you or the Foundation has a position on the general issue and if you have any current plans to make Wikimedia projects, including Wikipedia, a safer environment for our LGBT editors who currently fear attack, stalking and harassment merely for improving our open knowledge content on gay related topics. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 13:58, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- As someone involved with Wikimedia LGBT outreach efforts and third-party wiki projects that support Wikimedia Projects whenever they can - I would also be interested in any response to this. --Varnent (talk) 20:32, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Sue, as an illustration of what can happen when Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Foundation have no firm position on homophobia, you may want to see the problems that offensive essays such as WP:HOMO created by Wikid77 cause for our editors, as per the discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Avoid word homophobic. It has been 10 days since my first note here, I know you have been very busy (it was lovely seeing you in Berlin), but I am certain you understand why this issue is highly significant for many of our contributors. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 03:14, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- To deter abuse and drama, I have removed redirect "WP:HOMO" (now "WP:Homophobic"). -Wikid77 (talk) 18:53, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, Fæ. I just wanted to let you know that Sue has not yet returned to the office after the Berlin meetings. She is not expected back to work until next week, and may be spending some time catching up before she is able to turn her attention to her talk page. --Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 13:19, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the update Maggie. When Sue has caught up, she might enjoy taking a look at outreach:LGBT Outreach Project where things are progressing in this area. Cheers --Fæ (talk) 13:27, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Sue, as an illustration of what can happen when Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Foundation have no firm position on homophobia, you may want to see the problems that offensive essays such as WP:HOMO created by Wikid77 cause for our editors, as per the discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Avoid word homophobic. It has been 10 days since my first note here, I know you have been very busy (it was lovely seeing you in Berlin), but I am certain you understand why this issue is highly significant for many of our contributors. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 03:14, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Sue, well, it's been more than a month since my original post here so reluctantly I'm going to assume that for reasons I do not understand, either you to prefer to be seen as not saying anything on the issue of homophobic attacks on Wikipedia, or at least it is not a personal priority for you. If over the coming months you do find enough time to reply, don't forget to email me a note as I'll probably miss it otherwise. You may see me at Wikimania, by then I might be wearing a highly visible teeshirt as part of the LGBT Outreach Project in order to draw more public attention to these problems, and to bring them into sharp focus for the Wikimedia Foundation. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 06:24, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Fæ. Sorry for not responding -- I saw your note and meant to reply, but got caught up in other things and forgot. Sorry about that. (I also know that other Wikimedia Foundation staff have been talking with you about this issue, and figured you might have gotten what you were looking for from them.) So, I am sure you know that the Wikimedia Foundation has always encouraged editors to collaborate with each other in healthy ways, and to maintain a safe and civil environment for everyone. The Code of Conduct on the Wikimedia Foundation wiki is explicitly intended to provide guidance for volunteers as well as to regular staff and contractors, and it calls for respectful treatment for everyone, without discrimination on the basis of a number of factors including gender and sexual orientation. The newly adopted Terms of Use policy, which goes into effect on May 25, also encourages civility and politeness and forbids harassment. But as you know, we rely on the volunteer community of editors to set and enforce local policies based on these general principles. I'm not familiar with the Russavia situation you mentioned on Jimmy's talk page, but I'm sure you know the Wikimedia Foundation does not typically get involved with editorial or behavioural disputes: there are community mechanisms for handling that kind of thing, as there should be. I have a lot of faith in editors, and I am confident they will listen and adjust the current policies/practices if that's needed. I'd encourage you to work through those normal channels. Thanks Sue Gardner (talk) 18:39, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Sue, thanks for getting back to me. I read your reply as that the Foundation has the code of conduct and the terms of use, but has no plans, such as a communications or outreach programme, to take any direct action to implement these to make Wikimedia projects, including Wikipedia, a safer environment specifically for our LGBT editors who currently fear attack, stalking and harassment merely for improving our open knowledge content on gay related topics. Rather, you have faith that the community will find a way to take this responsibility upon itself. No doubt you will see the LGBT Outreach Project as such a community initiative to address that gap (apparently the first one), and when I and my colleagues ask for it to be funded, you will be able to personally support the justification based on the fact that it is a clear way for the community to implement Foundation policy for itself and for the Foundation immediately to benefit by being able to demonstrate compliance of its projects against its existing policies. Thanks again. --Fæ (talk) 20:57, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Fæ. Sorry for not responding -- I saw your note and meant to reply, but got caught up in other things and forgot. Sorry about that. (I also know that other Wikimedia Foundation staff have been talking with you about this issue, and figured you might have gotten what you were looking for from them.) So, I am sure you know that the Wikimedia Foundation has always encouraged editors to collaborate with each other in healthy ways, and to maintain a safe and civil environment for everyone. The Code of Conduct on the Wikimedia Foundation wiki is explicitly intended to provide guidance for volunteers as well as to regular staff and contractors, and it calls for respectful treatment for everyone, without discrimination on the basis of a number of factors including gender and sexual orientation. The newly adopted Terms of Use policy, which goes into effect on May 25, also encourages civility and politeness and forbids harassment. But as you know, we rely on the volunteer community of editors to set and enforce local policies based on these general principles. I'm not familiar with the Russavia situation you mentioned on Jimmy's talk page, but I'm sure you know the Wikimedia Foundation does not typically get involved with editorial or behavioural disputes: there are community mechanisms for handling that kind of thing, as there should be. I have a lot of faith in editors, and I am confident they will listen and adjust the current policies/practices if that's needed. I'd encourage you to work through those normal channels. Thanks Sue Gardner (talk) 18:39, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Feedback for Wiki Ambassador Program Student
Hey Sue,
I am a student at Clemson University participating in the Wiki Ambassador Program and the page I have "taken under my wing" is Design elements and principles. I made my first edit tonight but there are many more changes to come. As I read on your page you are a fan of graphic design principals and this topic needs guidance of an expert. Thank you for you consideration hope to hear from you soon!. Andybolin (talk) 06:01, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, Andy. Welcome to Wikipedia! :) While I'm not Sue, I did want to let you know that she is in Germany attending meetings right now and may not be getting to Wikipedia for a while. In the meantime, you might want to pop in at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, where people should be able to respond to you quickly. Good luck with your work, and thanks for your interest in helping out that article! --Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 12:33, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- Andy, what a coincidence --- I happened to be reading that page a few weeks ago, when I was working on the article about the flexibility-usability tradeoff, and it did look like it could use some work. I'm really glad you're doing it -- I can tell it's significantly better already than it was a month ago. I don't think I actually could help much --- I am not at all a design expert and I've never studied design: I'm just an enthusiast. But maybe this weekend I can try to help a little :-) Thanks Sue Gardner (talk) 21:58, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 April 2012
- Interview: An introduction to movement roles
- Arbitration analysis: Case review: TimidGuy ban appeal
- News and notes: Berlin reforms to movement structures, Wikidata launches with fanfare, and Wikipedia's day of mischief
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
- Featured content: Snakes, misnamed chapels, and emptiness: featured content this week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review in third week, one open case
The Signpost: 09 April 2012
- News and notes: Projects launched in Brazil and the Middle East as advisors sought for funds committee
- WikiProject report: The Land of Steady Habits: WikiProject Connecticut
- Featured content: Assassination, genocide, internment, murder, and crucifixion: the bloodiest of the week
- Arbitration report: Arbitration evidence-limit motions, two open cases
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 April 2012
- Arbitration analysis: Inside the Arbitration Committee Mailing List
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Facilitator: Silver seren
- Discussion report: The future of pending changes
- WikiProject report: The Butterflies and Moths of WikiProject Lepidoptera
- Featured content: A few good sports: association football, rugby league, and the Olympics vie for medals
Barnstar and offer
Thanks so much I have been contacted by several WMF staff today and it's been overwhelming with the press and my personal correspondence as well. I've literally been doing interviews, e-mails, and texts since I awoke! Thanks for your kind words and for your offer--it's very generous. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:05, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
GOCE May copy edit drive
Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors
The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their May 2012 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on May 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on May 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goal for the drive will be to eliminate January, February, and March 2011 from the queue. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 5 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa, and Stfg. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:53, 22 April 2012 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 23 April 2012
- Investigative report: Spin doctors spin Jimmy's "bright line"
- WikiProject report: Skeptics and Believers: WikiProject The X-Files
- Featured content: A mirror (or seventeen) on this week's featured content
- Arbitration report: Evidence submissions close in Rich Farmbrough case, vote on proposed decision in R&I Review
- Technology report: Wikimedia Labs: soon to be at the cutting edge of MediaWiki development?
Wikimania
Hello Sue: apparently some people were crazy enough to give me a scholarship to go to Washington. I don't know what all's playing in July, but I've asked Sage Ross to reserve a box for you and me at the opera. Shall I ask him to make dinner reservations for us as well? Drmies (talk) 18:37, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Template messages
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Template messages. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 09:16, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 April 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Consultant: Pete Forsyth
- Discussion report: 'ReferenceTooltips' by default
- WikiProject report: The Cartographers of WikiProject Maps
- Featured content: Featured content spreads its wings
- Arbitration report: R&I Review remains in voting, two open cases
The Signpost: 07 May 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Communicator: Phil Gomes
- News and notes: Hong Kong to host Wikimania 2013
- WikiProject report: Say What?: WikiProject Languages
- Featured content: This week at featured content: How much wood would a Wood Duck chuck if a Wood Duck could chuck wood?
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in Rich Farmbrough, two open cases
- Technology report: Search gets faster, GSoC gets more detail and 1.20wmf2 gets deployed
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Indentation
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Indentation. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 10:15, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 May 2012
- WikiProject report: Welcome to Wikipedia with a cup of tea and all your questions answered - at the Teahouse
- Featured content: Featured content is red hot this week
- Arbitration report: R&I Review closed, Rich Farmbrough near closure
GOCE May mid-drive newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors May 2012 backlog elimination drive mid-drive newsletter
Participation: Out of 49 people signed up for this drive so far, 26 have copy-edited at least one article. It's a smaller group than last drive, but we're making good progress. If you've signed up but haven't yet copy-edited any articles, please consider doing so. Every bit helps! If you haven't signed up yet, it's not too late. Template:J Progress report: We're on track to meet our targets for the drive, largely due to the efforts of Lfstevens and the others on the leaderboard. Thanks to all. We have reduced our target group of articles—January, February, and March 2011—by over half, and it looks like we will achieve that goal. Good progress is being made on the overall backlog as well, with over 500 articles copy-edited during the drive so far. The total backlog currently sits at around 3200 articles. Hall of Fame: GOCE coordinator Diannaa was awarded a spot in the GOCE Hall of Fame this month! She has copy-edited over 1567 articles during these drives, and surpassed the 1,000,000-word mark on May 5. On to the second million! – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa and Stfg >>> Sign up now <<<
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:49, 15 May 2012 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 21 May 2012
- From the editor: New editor-in-chief
- WikiProject report: Trouble in a Galaxy Far, Far Away....
- Featured content: Lemurbaby moves it with Madagascar: Featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: No open arbitration cases pending
- Technology report: On the indestructibility of Wikimedia content
You're invited: San Francisco WikiWomen's Edit-a-Thon 2!
San Francisco WikiWomen's Edit-a-Thon 2! You are invited! | |
---|---|
The San Francisco WikiWomen's Edit-a-Thon 2 will be held on Saturday, June 16, 2012 at the Wikimedia Foundation offices in San Francisco. Wikipedians of all experience levels are welcome to join us! This event will be specifically geared around encouraging women to learn how to edit and contribute to Wikipedia. Workshops on copy-editing, article creation, and sourcing will be hosted. Bring a friend! Come one, come all! |
Please comment on Template talk:Disambiguation
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Disambiguation. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
San Francisco Wiknic 2012
San Francisco Wiknic at Golden Gate Park | ||
You are invited to the second Great American Wikinic taking place in Golden Gate Park, in San Francisco, on Saturday, June 23, 2012. We're still looking for input on planning activities, and thematic overtones. List your add yourself to the attendees list, and edit the picnic as you like. —Max Klein {chat} 18:35, 21 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
If you would not like to receive future messages about meetups, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Meetup/San Francisco/Invite. |
The Signpost: 28 May 2012
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation endorses open-access petition to the White House; pending changes RfC ends
- Recent research: Supporting interlanguage collaboration; detecting reverts; Wikipedia's discourse, semantic and leadership networks, and Google's Knowledge Graph
- WikiProject report: Experts and enthusiasts at WikiProject Geology
- Featured content: Featured content cuts the cheese
- Arbitration report: Fæ and GoodDay requests for arbitration, changes to evidence word limits
- Technology report: Developer divide wrangles; plus Wikimedia Zero, MediaWiki 1.20wmf4, and IPv6
ahoy
GOCE May drive wrap-up
Guild of Copy Editors May 2012 backlog elimination drive wrap-up
Participation: Out of 54 people who signed up this drive, 32 copy-edited at least one article. Last drive's superstar, Lfstevens, again stood out, topping the leader board in all three categories and copy-editing over 700 articles. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: We were once again successful in our primary goal—removing the oldest three months from the backlog—while removing 1166 articles from the queue, the second-most in our history. The total backlog currently sits at around 2600 articles, down from 8323 when we started out just over two years ago. Coodinator election: The six-month term for our third tranche of Guild coordinators will be expiring at the end of June. We will be accepting nominations for the fourth tranche of coordinators, who will also serve a six-month term. Nominations will open starting on June 5. For complete information, please have a look at the election page. – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa, and Stfg To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 16:01, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
|
Thank you for minding the gap!
Mind the Gap Award | ||
Sue, great work on the catfight article and for all the great things you do to serve as an advocate for women, Wikimedia, and more. Thank you and I am proud to award you the Mind the Gap award! Sarah (talk) 02:57, 4 June 2012 (UTC) |
Tablets vs. laptops
Perhaps you should ask a sysadmin to measure whether long term editors decrease editing when they start using tablets. That shouldn't be too difficult to measure, but it would involve tallying fields from the squid logs which aren't available on the toolserver because of privacy concerns, so only a sysadmin could do it. 71.212.251.217 (talk) 21:41, 4 June 2012 (UTC)