User talk:Graphium
 | This user is having exams till 20 May 2013 and activity may be intermittent as such. |
 | he is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
| This user is busy at school and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
If you stalk my talk page, please add your name to this list. Thanks. 
Arctic Kangaroo 15:09, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=small} | Beware! This user is a known talk page stalker. |
| Beware! This user's talk page is patrolled by talk page stalkers. |
Status: Unknown 
|
|
My current time (Singapore) --- Please to update
   |
Speedy deletion declined: Starcraft2 Achievements
Hello Arctic Kangaroo. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Starcraft2 Achievements, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 doesn't apply to game guides. Thank you. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 15:12, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
About Vandalism.
Sorry but why didn't you remove what he said too? if a vandal is reporting a vandal then his comment should be removed too. --HistoryofIran (talk) 15:27, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- I only saw his report after I reverted yours. But seriously, his edits were not vandalism. So, I don't see any point entertaining a troll/vandal like you. Period. Arctic Kangaroo 15:34, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- But he broke the three revert rule and removed much info and sources from this page 2011-2013 Iranian protests, and i am not a troll, i am acting good to you so please do the same. --HistoryofIran (talk) 15:35, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- I will let the admins settle it. Edit warring is wrong anyway... Arctic Kangaroo 15:39, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
To that end, I have started Irānshahr and HistoryofIran on 2011-2013 Iranian protests on ANI. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:33, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Reverting on others' talk pages, reverting at WP:AIV, and not assuming good faith
Using Huggle like this to revert a comment off another editor's talk page is not very wise. There are instances where trolling is so outrageous that it's justifiable to remove it off someone else's talk page, but this was not one of them. As far as other people's talk pages are concerned, you would be better off only removing obvious personal attacks, obvious vandalism, and edits made in evasion of a ban.
Also, this removal of another editor's AIV report, and this dismissal of the editor as "a troll/vandal like you" were unnecessary. The editor has been editing for four months and been blocked once; they may well get blocked again, but unilaterally deciding they don't have the right to post on noticeboards because you've judged them guilty without a trial, is a failure to assume good faith on your part. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 16:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| For being a Winner. Irānshahr (talk) 21:13, 7 April 2013 (UTC) |
Article
I have this one for review http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Joseph_Collins_(American_football) 173.78.231.251 (talk) 23:21, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hougang, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rio Vista and Evergreen Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:09, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low 
to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:39, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 April 2013
- Wikizine: WMF scales back feature after outcry
- WikiProject report: Earthshattering WikiProject Earthquakes
- News and notes: French intelligence agents threaten Wikimedia volunteer
- Arbitration report: Subject experts needed for Argentine History
- Featured content: Wikipedia loves poetry
- Technology report: Testing week
Talkback
Message added 11:23, 10 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 11:23, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Your revert on my talk page
I appreciate the reverts you have been doing on my talk page. But this is a good edit, infact that was the reply to my answer. Anyway, keep up the great work on dealing with vandalism. Tolly4bolly 15:51, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Tolly, thanks for the encouraging words. What's "JMM"? Arctic Kangaroo 15:53, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- I have no idea what that means. Tolly4bolly 15:56, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hmmm... Arctic Kangaroo 15:56, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Submission
I have this article here and I hope it's good enough. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/D._J._Bryant 173.78.231.251 (talk) 22:16, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Reviewed and passed Arctic Kangaroo 09:21, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
| I should award you this early. "But better late than never." Recently you have crossed 10,000 edits. Many users can't go that distance. So for this tireless working for Wikipedia I award you this. Pratyya (Hello!) 10:58, 12 April 2013 (UTC) |
- Thanks Pratyya. But I'm still a long way to go from many other Wikipedians.
Arctic Kangaroo 12:52, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
- No fair! I haven't even reached 9,000! (I think) Automated edits. Argh. Congrats, though! ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 11:58, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Like for Bonkers.--Pratyya (Hello!) 09:53, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
- No fair! I haven't even reached 9,000! (I think) Automated edits. Argh. Congrats, though! ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 11:58, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
I'm fine leaving the talk page blanked. Otherwise we'll just be babysitting that page until they're blocked, and like you said it's all in the history. Cheers! —Ignatzmicetalkcontribs 13:31, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
- User has already been blocked before you posted this message. Gee. Arctic Kangaroo 13:33, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
- And I was just going to say that I spoke too soon, but you beat me to it! —Ignatzmicetalkcontribs 13:37, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
- And I was just going to say that I spoke too soon, but you beat me to it!
I see that you commented at the AfD. Just a question: Have you actually read the oh-so-famous book? If you haven't, you should. Cheers, ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 12:01, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Deaths in 2013
The article about the person says he was born in 1936 so he couldn't have been 68. 76.190.215.98 (talk) 16:51, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
- I checked his article. Then it means that the two sources contradict. Arctic Kangaroo 15:06, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:27, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 April 2013
- WikiProject report: Unity in Diversity: South Africa
- News and notes: Another admin reform attempt flops
- Featured content: The featured process swings into high gear
Re: April 2013
Sorry, the edit to 2012 AFF Suzuki Cup was meant to be to Category:2012 in Thai football; that or Category:2012 in Thai sport are more appropriate for a sports event than Category:2012 in Thailand Hugo999 (talk) 00:00, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, I do agree with you on this. And, I find that Category:2012 in Thai football is the best out of the three. Cheers.
Arctic Kangaroo 14:09, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Apologize
Please recive my apology for such words. Both me and HistoryofIran don't have history of modest behavior (like his supporters of the Islamic republic can get out of here), but I tried to explain on talkpage that my intentions are good. Users and administrators should judge about result, I'm not one.
--46.239.23.12 (talk) 15:45, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
- I'm accept the apology on behalf of the Wikipedia community. But, please don't repeat the same mistake again. Arctic Kangaroo 15:47, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
About the Iranian protest article
Hello again, well since that the admin is no longer helping in the Talk:2011-2013 Iranian protests, do you think it would be a good idea if the discussion should continue in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents? and by the way, he kinda insulted me again, take a look on my talk page, he also wrote this to me on his talk page [1], i don't mean to sound like a kid that tells everything to his mom, i just wanted to tell you this, because he keeps doing that. --HistoryofIran (talk) 21:41, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Submission
I got this article here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Jewel_Hampton 71.180.91.32 (talk) 01:42, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
MOWAG Shark
Hello can you be more specific why you declined this article? This article is about a Tank prototype and it is in size simelar and also the informations it contain simelar to many other aricels about such topics in wikipedia. You have the message i have to Add citations. But I don't understand why you write this, because they are allready done you can see witch part of the articel refer to Books.. To 2 diffrend Books from 2 differend authors and publisher, they are listet with the tittle of the Book , autohr ISBN. such references are good enough. also The Military Museum Full is listet as refernce, everyone can go to the Museum annd see this Vehicle in Real and read about it.
So I woould be happy if you can think about it and may change your minde or if not you can tell me what exactly i have to do that the article is well enough in your eyes. thank You. 2A02:1205:5014:B210:B4F0:D4E6:5BE0:316 (talk) 11:59, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Help test new SuggestBot design
We have developed an exciting new version of SuggestBot’s interface with some cool features! Volunteer to be one of the first users to try it and help us make it better by answering a short survey! If you’re interested in participating, leave us a message on SuggestBot’s user talk page. Regards from Nettrom, SuggestBot’s caretaker. 18:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:49, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Submitted Articles
I got these articles here for a review. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Mike_Golic_Jr. and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Travis_Johnson_(linebacker). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.180.91.32 (talk) 02:41, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
CSD
Please give a reason. "Obvious reasons" isnt much help when I'm trying to delete things as fast as possible while still being accurate.. DGG ( talk ) 03:33, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- The article is written like vandalism articles, and there is also something like "Myanmmar Trollers" at the bottom. Cheers. Arctic Kangaroo 03:35, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- Right, and I removed it as soon as I figured it out. YThe real junk like this needs to be removed quickly, and indicating the problem makes it go faster. Please do nominate for deletion everything of that sort you can find, new or old. Just say vandalism without specifying, and it helps. DGG ( talk ) 03:39, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks a lot :)
Hi Arctic Kangaroo,
Thanks a lot for creating user page for me. I am new to Wikipedia and I hope to contribute more
Sreiram (talk) 03:51, 24 April 2013 (UTC)Sreiram
Kekoo Gandhy
Hi Arctic Kangaroo Thanks for your input on this proposed page. You are of course correct in general about blogs. However, the reference used for the page in question rises beyond such generalisations, IMHO. First, it is on the Guggenheim website. Second, and more importantly, the author is a well-respected individual in the field of contemporary art, as you will see from her bio on the Guggenheim site: 'Nancy Adajania is a Bombay-based cultural theorist and independent curator. In 2012, she was artistic co-director of the 9th Gwangju Biennale. Adajania has written and lectured extensively on art in the public sphere and transcultural practice. She edited Shilpa Gupta (Prestel, 2010) and is co-author of “The Dialogues Series,” a set of conversations with contemporary Indian artists (Popular Prakashan/ Foundation B&G, 2011). She was research scholar at BAK, basis voor aktuele kunst, Utrecht (2010–2011).' (http://blogs.guggenheim.org/author/nancyadajania/) In light of this, perhaps you will reconsider and, I hope, agree with me that she is in fact a better than average source, certainly on a par with specialist journalists or academics. Kind regards Jim Moody — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimmo (talk • contribs) 08:02, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- happening to drop by, I think the Times of India & Art in America refs fully sufficient for notability, and the Guggenheim blog is an acceptable 3rd party source. It is not a blog, in the sense of reader contributed content, but a publication of the museum, a highly respected museum at that. Many things are nowadays called blogs that aren't, in the sense the term was first used. DGG ( talk ) 23:38, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Arctic Kangaroo Have you had a chance to re-view the page, as well as see the comments made by DGG above? Can you now approve the page? Regards Jimmo 11:35, 28 April 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimmo (talk • contribs)
I do not understand why you blanked the page and asked for deletion. Perhaps that was not what you intended to do, but just clicked the wrong button. DGG ( talk ) 23:31, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Miss Bono (zootalk) 12:33, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Malay/Indonesian
Hai! You speak Malay/Indonesian? ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 13:17, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
- Saya ms-0, id-0. That welcome, I pieced up using my lame knowledge of Bahasa Melayu, and the "in" as well as "find", I used Google Translate to translate. Anyways, I'm planning to start learning Bahasa Melayu ASAP, or by latest start next year as 3rd language. Arctic Kangaroo 13:26, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
- I was referring to that welcome... But how'd ya guess? 0.0 Anyway, have you considered the similar but slightly different Bahasa Indonesia? I'm thing that. :P cheers, ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 13:52, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
- I think that's the only proper Malay sentence that I've typed here. But I've also seen that Bahasa Indonesia is quite different from Bahasa Melayu, although the Malaysians on ms.wiki say that it is almost the same. Arctic Kangaroo 07:46, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, I tend to agree that it's more or less the same. Only a few phrases are different, e.g. "Delapan" (Indonesian for eight) and "Lapan" (Malay for eight). Nevertheless, the degree of difference is minute. After all, both languages originate from the even harder Arabic language. Cheers, ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 11:15, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- I think that's the only proper Malay sentence that I've typed here. But I've also seen that Bahasa Indonesia is quite different from Bahasa Melayu, although the Malaysians on ms.wiki say that it is almost the same. Arctic Kangaroo 07:46, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- I was referring to that welcome... But how'd ya guess? 0.0 Anyway, have you considered the similar but slightly different Bahasa Indonesia? I'm thing that. :P cheers, ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 13:52, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
|
A thank you Cookie for reverting "the economist"'s rambling on my user page. If he's an economist then i'm Colonel Sanders...And this is a chicken nugget...Thanks ツ Jenova20 (email) 14:02, 25 April 2013 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 22 April 2013
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Editor Retention
- News and notes: Milan conference a mixed bag
- Featured content: Batfish in the Red Sea
- Arbitration report: Sexology case nears closure after stalling over topic ban
- Technology report: A flurry of deployments
Hello
Hi, How are you?--Pratyya (Hello!) 10:28, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Pratyya, I'm fine. Arctic Kangaroo 10:29, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Reply: Your userpage here
Thanks for your visit on my English Wikipedia userpage. I appreciate your help on fixing my grammar mistakes. I think there is no factual errors after the correction you have made. Irfanshaharuddin (talk) 10:37, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Tamerlan
Hello Arctic Kangaroo. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Tamerlan, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Tamerlan, Tamerlane are alternative names for Timur. Redirect is correct. use hatnote if you wish. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 16:48, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hello Alex, may I know what is hatnote? Thanks. Arctic Kangaroo 16:54, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- See: Wikipedia:Hatnote. For an example see the article we are talking about: Timur. -- Alexf(talk) 16:57, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for teaching me a new term today, cheers. :) Arctic Kangaroo 16:59, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
SuggestBot beta test
Hi, and thanks so much for participating in the SuggestBot beta test! You can find your suggestions and the survey on this page. Regards, Nettrom (talk) 17:59, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
|
The Special Barnstar | |
| A small token of appreciation for helping out with the SuggestBot beta test. Again, thanks so much for giving us feedback! Nettrom (talk) 18:54, 29 April 2013 (UTC) |
Unsourced paragraphs - Rafe Gomez
Arctic -
Thanks for taking a look at my article.
I'm in a bind here: the first reviewer of my article told me to remove citations. He felt that there were too many (I tried for approximately one per paragraph).
The second reviewer told me that everything looked good except the last two pargraphs, which I then combined into one along with one citation.
I'm happy to add citations to paragraphs, but I'm now antsy about having too many.
Can you please let me know which paragraphs could use citations, and I'll then insert them?
Thanks,
Thewikirap
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Thewikirap/sandbox
Thewikirap (talk) 20:11, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
ARCTIC -
I know you're busy, but I haven't heard back from you about this.
Should I try to revise per your suggestions and then resubmit, or can you give me some suggestions (as per the above)?
Thanks,
Thewikirap
Thewikirap (talk) 21:12, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Removal of post at the Teahouse
Hey Arctic Kangaroo. I wanted to let you know about this removal (see the edit summary). I always try to inform people when I do anything that in any way modifies material they posted. If you delve into the edits here, this was not any sort of good faith user and the post was pure trolling.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:13, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Fughettaboutit, thanks for letting me know about this. Yeah, when I saw one of the fella's edits, I found it quite vandalism. But, I did not bother to look at the other edits, and I also assumed good faith for that fella. Silly me. Arctic Kangaroo 11:46, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Submission
I don't know or remember if I post this or not about this article but can you review it? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Mike_Golic_Jr. 71.180.91.32 (talk) 01:45, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Bling
|
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Consider this a 'raving review' ;-) Yintan 21:02, 29 April 2013 (UTC) |
Help test new SuggestBot design
We have developed an exciting new version of SuggestBot’s interface with some cool features! Volunteer to be one of the first users to try it and help us make it better by answering a short survey! If you’re interested in participating, leave us a message on SuggestBot’s user talk page. Regards from Nettrom, SuggestBot’s caretaker. 18:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:16, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Wrong Information at Wikipedia About Kashimath
Kindly try to add correct informations in Wikipedia Mr.Granuator You can check and verify in various sites: http://kashimath.org/, http://www.gsbkonkani.net/Maths/SHRI%20KASHI%20MATH%20SAMSTHAN.htm , http://www.gosripuram.org.in/KashiMutt4.htm
The Information which shows in Kashi Math wikipedia is absolutely wrong. HH Raghavendra is got Reveled form Kashi Math. Current Utharadhikari is HH Samyamindra Thirtha Swamiji. Whenever we add details of HH Samyamindra Thirtha Swamiji you people are removing.