Jump to content

Talk:Al Gore

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleAl Gore has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 26, 2006Good article reassessmentDelisted
July 21, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
July 30, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
November 4, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
January 21, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
August 22, 2008Good article nomineeListed
August 24, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Good article

Category to add

There is a category to add on the page: Category:Honorary degree recipients from the École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne. Thanks! S. D. Évid (talk) 21:15, 15 October 2013 (UTC).[reply]

See also

Perhaps add Eduardo Braga in the see also section; he's called the "Brazilian Al Gore" KVDP (talk) 12:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the wording on his Tennessee home's electricity use from "high amounts of electricity" to the more accurate "more than 20 times as much electricity as the national average."

The article had stated that Gore was criticized because his Tennessee home used "high amounts of electricity."

I changed this to the more accurate "more than 20 times as much electricity as the national average."

I made this change for two reasons.

First, all of the sources specifically cited the fact that his home used more than 20 times as much electricity as the national average.

Second, the wording "high amounts" is more of an opinion, whereas the wording "more than 20 times as much electricity as the national average" is a reliably sourced fact.

Chucky Cheerio (talk) 02:11, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lawrencekhoo reverted my edit, and commented, "Overweight for a minor factoid."
I disagree with this revert, because #1 Wikipedia articles are supposed to reflect the source, and #2 "more than 20 times as much" is a fact, whereas "high amount" is an opinion.
I also have to question the meaning of User:Lawrencekhoo's comment. How is it "overweight" to have the article match what the source says?
I am in favor of reverting User:Lawrencekhoo's reversion of my edit, but I would like to hear what other editors think before I do this.
Chucky Cheerio (talk) 20:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]