Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Misza13

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for adminship

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Vilerage (talk | contribs) at 09:06, 20 July 2006 (/usr/sbin/support). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Misza13

Discuss here (122/0/0) Ending 18:06, 2006-07-21 (UTC)

Misza13 (talk · contribs) – I think Misza13 is quite ready for adminship. He has been with us for almost a year, and in that time he has accumulating over 6,200 edits doing vandal fighting, creating user scripts, contributing to articles, and performing other activities for the benefit of Wikipedia. He has also created 2 bots, MiszaBot, which has done work in bypassing redirects, among other things; and WdefconBot, which allows people to easily alert other editors about vandalism problems by allowing the Wiki-defcon to be changed via IRC. Most importantly, however, Misza13 has shown that he is a kind user, and I think that he would be a great admin. -- Where 17:48, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept. Misza13 T C 18:06, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support
  1. First support per my nom -- Where 18:08, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Second support - no need to even read the statement :) —Xyrael / 18:10, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. I always support good bot programmers. And this one has been around for awhile. --Cyde↔Weys 18:18, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Merovingian (T, C, @) 18:20, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support looks like a fine contributor to me.--Andeh 18:33, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support, looks good to me. SorryGuy 18:46, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support - looks like a conscientious editor with a good attitude. --Aguerriero (talk) 19:12, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Obligatory cliché THAW support. --Sam Blanning(talk) 19:16, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support A great editor. --Siva1979Talk to me 19:24, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Hrm, thought he was already an admin Support hoopydinkConas tá tú? 19:35, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support, obviously. --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 19:46, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Strong Support This Fire Burns Always 20:04, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support. Talented editor. He is also Polish, like me. :) -- Darwinek 20:18, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support. I like the gnomish aspects, very much the kind of disposition needed in admins. Themindset 20:30, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. digital_me(TalkˑContribs) 21:00, 14 July 2006 (UTC) — just give him the tools already![reply]
  16. Support. Promptly delivered newsletters are no accident. RyanGerbil10 (Drop on in!) 21:08, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. {{RfA-cliche1}} Highway Batman! 21:17, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. 01010100 01100001 01110111 01101011 01100101 01110010 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01110000 01101100 01100101 01100001 01110011 01100101 01100100 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01110011 01110101 01110000 01110000 01101111 01110010 01110100 00100000 01001101 01101001 01110011 01111010 01100001 00110001 00110011 -- Tawker 21:34, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    What on earth does that mean? --Alex9891 (talk) 22:07, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Tawker is pleased to support Misza13 ;) (Yes, the smile is mine) fetofs Hello! 22:33, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    576f756c646e2774206974206265206d6f726520656666696369656e7420696620796f7520757365642068657869646563696d616c3f -- Where 01:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    111 040 141 147 162 145 145 056 040 117 162 054 040 150 145 040 143 157 165 154 144 040 150 141 166 145 040 164 162 151 145 144 040 157 143 164 141 154 041 146 145 164 157 146 163110 145 154 154 157 041 15:00, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    .... . -..- .- -.. . -.-. .. -- .- .-.. ... - .. .-.. .-.. .--. .- -.-. -.- ... -- --- .-. . -.. .- - .- .. -. - --- ... .- -- . ... .--. .- -.-. . .-.-.- -- .. ... --.. .- .---- ...-- - -.-.
    V guvax ur zrnag gung bpgny fgberq zber guna ovanel. Nalubj, guvf sbezng vf rira zber pbzcnpg. -- Jurer 15:46, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Ppfpmpmmmffm. Mpppppppffmfmfmmfp fmmmffpmfpmfmffpppmppfmmfmm, mmpmppmpfppfpffmpp fmmppfppmmppppfpppmpp ppfpfmpfmppffmmmppfmm mpfppfpff mfffmp. Ppmmfffmmffpmmm13 Fmp Mmf
    If any of these are in Klingon can somebody please translate to Clanger and upload a whistled .ogg file. Thanks. --Cactus.man ✍ 18:13, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support do we even need an RfA for this user!? Freddie Message? 21:35, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support A good addition to the ranks.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  22:17, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support. I approve! :) RandyWang (raves/rants) 22:34, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support This user seems to have all the skills to be an administrator and is also very kind. PerfectStorm (Hello! Hallo! Bonjour! Holla!) 22:37, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support; hard working user, good question answers, excellent user scripts. smurrayinchester(User), (Talk) 22:40, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support, of course. --Elkman - (Elkspeak) 22:54, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Strong support. I'm tempted to resort to the old cliche, but I'll stay serious and say that Misza is an incredible user and a great asset to the project. Few times in my wikilife I've found somebody so professional in his editing and at the same time, so deeply kind to his fellow users. He has my most wholehearted support, if I've ever given one. Phædriel ♥ tell me - 23:42, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Oh. My. God. Is this user not an admin yet?! Strong Support. ~Chris (squirrels!!) 00:25, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support. ~ PseudoSudo 00:44, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Support. DarthVader 01:07, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support --lightdarkness (talk) 01:44, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support--Jusjih 01:59, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support, nominator told me enough. Roy A.A. 02:04, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. oh my yes. Great editor. "More candidates like this one, please!TM Support ++Lar: t/c 02:26, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Support everything looks great. -- joturner 02:45, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Support per, well, everything. --WillMak050389 03:36, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Support 6 Portal Talk edits!!! How can I oppose?? ;) --Srikeit (Talk | Email) 03:47, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Support per Srikeit ~.^ — Deckiller 03:53, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Support I've seen enough of Misza13's work to know that making this user an admin will improve Wikipedia. Gwernol 04:30, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Strong Support, my interactions with him on IRC have been great, will make a great admin. P.S. He did my userpages for me :D --Terence Ong (Chat | Contribs) 04:35, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Jaranda wat's sup 05:04, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Support per nom. Also because of the good responses to the standard questions. --David Mestel(Talk) 06:32, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Support per nom. Love 'pedians who think edit warring is as pointless as I do. -- Baseball,Baby! balls•strikes 07:06, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Support? Zort Alphachimp talk 07:10, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Strong Support - very valuable addition to the admin team abakharev 08:09, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Support. What else is there to do? Kalani [talk] 08:33, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Support - Can't find a reason to oppose. --WinHunter (talk) 09:25, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Rather redundant but still support Crazynas t 09:28, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Support Damn I can't of anything witty to say for this nom..hmm...oh well, I support anyway! TruthCrusader 09:35, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Looks good to me. Mostly Rainy 11:00, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Useless pile-on support. <Andy123> ;) --Nearly Headless Nick 11:24, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. (edit conflicted) Strong support from the bottom of my heart. You can't be serious? He's been an admin for at least 6 months hasn't he? Kind, civil, highly useful and active. What more might one want? —Celestianpower háblame 11:26, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Support: --Bhadani 12:26, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Support Come on! --Terrancommander 13:27, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Support. — FireFox 13:34, 15 July '06
  54. Pile-on support. Nothing to increment to the above. fetofs Hello! 15:00, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Piling on support top quality mop candidate. MLA 15:48, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Support' -- thunderboltza.k.a.Deepu Joseph |TALK15:56, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Furry Orange Support - Bring forth the mop. --Alf melmac 16:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. 54 68 61 6e 6b 20 67 6f 6f 64 6e 65 73 73 20 47 48 65 20 73 74 72 6f 6e 67 6c 79 20 73 75 70 70 6f 72 74 65 64 20 74 68 69 73 20 52 66 41 20 62 65 66 6f 72 65 20 69 74 27 73 20 63 6c 6f 73 65 64 21 21 20 3a 29 G.He 16:51, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Support as per above. Dionyseus 17:17, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Support Most absolutely! -- Natalya 18:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Support Naconkantari 18:46, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Strong Support during it's days of activity, Misza13 was a principle member of Concordia. Fantastic user! Computerjoe's talk 21:53, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. support goddamit, so many people have beaten me here, however mizza is a kind a thoughtful person that stays cool under pressure and has a good knowledge of polices, and as such will make a superb admin Benon 23:48, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. support Very good editor. [Dure] 01:51, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Support. Reggae Sanderz 02:19, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Orane (talk • cont.) 02:54, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Yes please - CrazyRussian talk/email 04:33, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Support. Superb candidate. Rockpocket 06:49, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Support An excellent vandal fighter! Abcdefghijklm 15:16, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Support Looks like a good choice. ---J.S (t|c) 17:05, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Support Excellent, does some great work, the tools will only help. --Cactus.man ✍ 18:09, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Support. I thought Misza13 was already an admin.--Tachikoma 19:36, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  73. 73rd Support I recognized the name right away because of the bot. I've seen this user in action, and didn't know that he wasn't an admin. He'll be one now. Thistheman 19:59, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Strong Support Nothing but pleasent dealings with this user. Already thought he was an admin, etc. --D-Day I'm all ears How can I improve? 20:30, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  75. YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS --Pilotguy (roger that) 21:42, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Support --Jay(Reply) 22:45, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Support Excellent, trustworthy user, and friendly fellow. Xoloz 23:07, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Support; great userscripts and alternate Wdefcon template. CaptainVindaloo t c e 23:28, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Strong support. "Quite ready for adminship" is an understatement. Misza13 has made an overwhelming number of tedious edits to expand and preserve Wikipedia's content. --Gray Porpoise 01:35, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Support I really like Misza13's work on the Article Improvement Drive. A true asset to Wikipedia. Agne27 04:18, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Confused support. Really, not an admin yet? continues to stumble around the room in a seemingly drunken state Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 04:51, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Support, not that it really matters anymore. Excellent user. BryanG(talk) 04:59, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Support. --Klemen Kocjancic 07:12, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Support per above, and soon below.--Kungfu Adam (talk) 12:33, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Wonderful work for Wikipedia; certainly trustworthy. -- joturner 14:06, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    That's one too many, buddy... - CrazyRussian talk/email 14:32, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Ultra Support. I still can't figure out why he isn't an admin yet...™ - Tangotango 14:28, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Help reach WP:100 Support - BigDT 17:27, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Why-didn't-you-tell-me-STRONG-SUPPORT. Ian¹³/t 18:50, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Support. Can't believe I didnt see this one. Stellar editor, great guy, easy support. :) -- Banes 18:51, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Why not. //Halibutt 21:32, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  90. zOMFG übersupport Holy crap, no one told me this RfA was going on! I've been waiting for it to happen for three months! Misha's extensive knowledge about the technical goings-on, his civility, and everything else is completely up to par with what an admin should be.--The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 22:32, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  91. AAAAAAA. A aaaaa aaaa aaaa aaaaa aaaaa aa aa aaaaaaaaaaaaa. A aaaa aaaaa aaaa aa aaaaa aa aaaa aa aaaaaaaa. Aaaaaa aaaa A aaaa aaaaaaaaa aaaa aaaa aaaaaaa aaaaa. Aaa aaaa aaaaa, aa aaa aaaaa aaaa aaaa aa aaa aaaaa aaaaa, aaa aaaaa'aa aaaa aa aaaa aaa aaaaaaa. A aaaa aaaaa. --Aaaa Deskana (aaaa) 01:36, 17 Aaaa 2006 (AAA)
  92. Support per nom. I like chips too. RFerreira 00:06, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Support --A. B. 05:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Support MichaelZ526 06:55, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Strong Support Need anything more be said than what is above? Thε Halo Θ 10:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Support this is really a no-brainer (the RfA, not the candidate!)  Grue  11:53, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Support. - Mailer Diablo 12:04, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Support... no reason at all not to! :D Ansell 12:07, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  99. CoUldn't Resist Piling-on Support shows commitment and dedication to the project. Kimchi.sg 14:11, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Support! Level headed, good grasp of policy, no signs of incivility and plenty of experience... --JoanneB 16:49, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Support. 1ne 17:10, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Support per Deskana :) - Glen 17:40, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Support. --CharlotteWebb 18:29, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  104. 5upp0127. 19:33, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  105. Support. Pig pile! A very good contributor, who definetly deserves administrative tools. Picaroon9288 20:32, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Support: Looks like a person without malice. Enough experience, motivation and common sense to make good use of the tools. Stephen B Streater 20:53, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Support. Looks like a good solid editor, who will be an excellent admin. (mfp mpp / mfp mmm mpm / ppm mpp / mmm fmp / mpppppppffmfmfmmfp [1]. :) --Elonka 22:15, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Support. A good candidate to join the 'mop'n'bucket team'.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 22:47, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Support: nice bloke. Thumbelina 23:39, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Ongstray upportsay, your toaster is in the mail. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 00:49, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Support There, as of now we're tied for WP:100 :) It's always nice to see people even nicer than myself be put into a position of responsibility! ~Kylu (u|t) 01:56, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Support Joe I 02:46, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Support. Candidate seems to be qualified, and I don't see anything to indicate that their adminship would be harmful to Wikipedia. - Stephanie Daugherty (Triona) - Talk - Comment - 09:58, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Wah! Quite powderful eh?--Tdxiang 10:00, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Support - Iolakana|T 13:19, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Support desperately needs the power to block. AdamBiswanger1 15:57, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Support Geo. 20:38, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  118. Support; just about every reason why has already been said. :) The one and only Cliff 21:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Support. Seems unlikely to misuse the tools.--Firsfron of Ronchester 21:40, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Support per above. Bucketsofg✐ 23:39, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Support per what I said in the neutral category. Good luck, Misza13. --AaronS 00:52, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  122. support Blnguyen | rant-line 03:17, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose
Neutral
Neutral - I'm not very happy with the answer to Lar's question. I don't think that "open to recall" is noble; rather, it should be expected. Administrators should be confident enough in their abilities to subject themsevles to scrutiny. If I were sure that Misza13 would embrace this notion, I would have voted in support. --AaronS 14:06, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your comment has given me some second thoughts on this matter. My main concern was that even a small group of users could easily undermine/question an admin's competence even without a true reason (causing some unneeded stress), or with the only reason being revenge. But since the "recall" would've been considered by the whole community, I realize admins acting in good faith and to the best of their abilities should sleep well. That said, I now fully support the idea and will certainly add myself the the mentioned category. Misza13 T C 22:12, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support Looks good to me! --негіднийлють (Reply|Spam Me!*|RfS) 09:06, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
Username Misza13
Total edits 6277
Distinct pages edited 3225
Average edits/page 1.946
First edit 18:33, 23 July 2005
 
(main) 2402
Talk 128
User 1569
User talk 1207
Image 11
Image talk 4
Template 148
Template talk 47
Help 2
Category 8
Wikipedia 598
Wikipedia talk 116
Portal 31
Portal talk 6
Added at 18:12, 14 July 2006 (UTC) by Andeh.
Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A: For start, I'd naturally contribute to areas that extend my work so far. That is, vandal fighting (fast rollback, blocking, monitoring WP:AIV, where I've seen lenghty backlogs at times of my activity); helping on CAT:CSD. Later I might extend to whatever areas I find needy of attention.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A: I'm rather a gnomish type of contributor rather than a classical editor. I mostly do maintenance tasks here, roaming the Wiki, fixing whatever I see broken, helping people, sometimes writing tools that aid me and others in editing. Still, I'm very pleased with my work.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: One benefit from being a WikiGnome is that my work is generally neutral, regardless of viewpoints/beliefs of others. Whenever during Recent Changes Patrol I notice something resembling an edit war, I rather tend to step back (or at most try to cool down the warring parties). Thanks to that, I've never involved myself in edit wars and neither have any users ever stressed me significantly over editing. Should this ever happen, I'd probably attempt a mediation of some sort, as I find edit warring pretty pointless, disruptive and tiresome.

Optional question from Lar:

4. (one big long question about categories of admins and your thoughts about them) Are you aware of Category:Administrators_open_to_recall? What do you think of it? Would you consider placing yourself (placement should only be done by oneself) in this category if you were made an admin? Why or why not? Are you aware of Category:Rouge admins? What do you think of it? Would you consider allowing yourself to by placed in this category (placement is traditionally done by someone else) if you were made an admin? Why or why not? (note: both these categories have some controversy attached to them, for different reasons, and note also, although I am a policy and process wonk I am in both categories, and finally, note that there is no wrong answer here, my comment is not dependent on your answers (if you choose to), but I think it's interesting to know views...) ++Lar: t/c 15:47, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the questions. They raise important issues and shouldn't be left unanswered. Yes, I am aware of the categories. Starting with the "Admins open to recall", I think it's a noble movement. After all, adminship is access to some priviledged tools, granted by earning trust of the community. It seems perfectly logical then, that should an admin lose this trust, the tools should've been taken away. I realize it's a controversial issue, but I'm leaning towards adding myself there should I become an admin, but neither do I condemn those refusing to join this movement. Let's move to "Rouge admins" now. I am a process wonk. Period. I have more than shown that during the February Userbox Wars, where I have endlessly defended the userboxes' "rights to TfD". ;-) I was in the camp that felt "hurt" by the deletionists' actions. Knowing what frustration it causes, I wouldn't fancy making such decisions myself (and hurting others). Still, WP:ENC has since become the single most important rule to me and I probably wouldn't hesitate long to invoke common sense and WP:IAR should the main goal of the Project be endangered. Misza13 T C 17:45, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Misza13&oldid=64819482"