User talk:CosmicEmperor

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, CosmicEmperor. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 11:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Some bubble tea for you!

The red heart at the top of user pages make you able to give some wiki love. It can be food, barnstars, kitten or even your own design. When the food thing started I do not know. Probably pretty early just like the barnstar thing started pretty early. I thought this was an easier answer to show you instead of posting back at the teahouse. NathanWubs (talk) 08:27, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

POTD template

It looks like it's updating. Have you tried clearing your browser's cache? Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 13:20, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Cuerden ^(talk) Actually if you check my User Page revision History The Herald helped a bit by doing this https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3ACosmicEmperor&diff=653124662&oldid=653110724

@Adam Cuerden:As I had posted a help question here after that The Herald changed the capital P to small p.Cosmic Emperor (talk) 13:33, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough! If there's more issues, let me know. Preferably while it's still showing the wrong day. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 15:49, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chingri Malai curry has been accepted

Chingri Malai curry, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

wia (talk) 15:27, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Cosmic Emperor. Well done! Kautilya3 (talk) 16:25, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi CosmicEmperor! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

Masala Dosa

Looks fine to me. Cheers, Acroterion (talk) 11:49, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Acroterion: a redirect Masala Dosa already exists to Dosa . But I am sure Masala Dosa requires a separate page .--CosmicEmperor (talk) 11:58, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then I'd suggest a little greater emphasis on the fact that it is a variation on dosa right up front. One could argue that it might be a subset of dosa, to be included there, but I think you have a case for a stand-alone article. I don't have enough experience of food-related topics to have a sense of how we determine whether a separate article is useful for a variation on a culinary theme. Acroterion (talk) 12:09, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright issue on Image upload

Regarding: File:Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar harvard.jpg

Your rationale is "... The picture is too old and the copyright has expired..."

Do you know how old it is? Are you sure it is now in the public domain? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:26, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Anna Frodesiak:I found the date as 1938 here - http://www.nbi.dk/cgi-bin/search-nba?form=1&katAll=1&katS=on&mode=Search%20archive&search . the person who took the picture can be an unknown photographer who is completely forgotten .

Source is AIP is American Institute of Physics , and this is the page - http://www.aip.org/history/acap/biographies/bio.jsp?chandrasekhars

This is the policy for usage of that pic - https://photos.aip.org/use-policy --C E (talk) 08:48, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I asked a few folks at the IRC commons channel. They think it is likely PD because of no "Notice or Renewal", but not 100% sure. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:13, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse Badges

While trying to give barnstars to others, I couldn't find teahouse barnstar in my list. But i saw that on other user's talk page. Or only tea house Hosts can give it?

You can find teahouse badges here. I would think that the status quo would be that only hosts give them, but don't let the status quo stop you! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 07:28, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A WikiCookie for you!

wia (talk) 16:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

There is a lot to tell about notes: but consider reading WP:NOTES. It will give the answer you want.
aGastya ✉ Dicere Aliquid :) 17:31, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep your cool

You absolutely must remain on the right side, i.e. Wikipedians who protect the project. This puts you on the other side. Return to this side and stay here. Tell me you definitely understand. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Special Barnstar for you for your contribution to WikiProject Food and Drink. Thank you, keep it up!!. Human3015 Say Hey!! • 04:27, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IPv6 Addresses

It is, indeed, as you say, very hard to remember IPv6 addresses. That isn't the fault of Wikipedia, and it isn't the fault of IPv6, which is a necessary upgrade to the structure of IP addresses. To the extent that anything can be done, it is to encourage the IPv6 editors even more strongly to register accounts, precisely because it is impossible to remember IPv6 addresses, as well as in order to get the privileges of registered editors. Why don't you take that to WP:VPP? Robert McClenon (talk) 14:59, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Article

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

If a visit a featured article, how can I find the editor who contributed enough to turn that article into featured article. I don't want to know who reviewed it; I want to know who is responsible for making the article as featured. As i have seen the latest edits are made by Ips and new users.C E (talk) 18:03, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you go to the article's talk page, there's a link to the featured article candidate page. There, you can see who the person was that nominated the article for FA. For example, for Albert Speer, go to Talk:Albert Speer, click on "Featured article candidate" under Article Milestones, which takes you to Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Albert Speer. Nominator and primary author for this example was Wehwalt. -- Diannaa (talk) 18:21, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:LoverBoyInGarden

Is there a reason you have made 231 edits to this page? It's odd considering it's previous account of yours (diff) which hasn't been active in a year. You're basically posting warning and welcome messages to yourself and I wondered if there was an explanation for this. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 11:06, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: I don't know why you are interested in my old account, whose password I forgot.

Check the end of this page.

But this might answer your question.

And sometimes i like using specific options which cannot be used frequently in reality, as most people vandalize. You see Twinkle has many options which i don't get the chance to use. Look i am not an old man, always i can't be mature. Sometimes i visit Wikimedia commons and spend my time watching pictures. I edit movie pages. You can guess i am younger than most people here.

And why were you checking through my edits after months.?

If i give those excessive messages to others; i will be blamed for personal attacks.Cosmic Emperor 11:28, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't questioning that you had created a new account, no problems there. I just didn't understand why you had made 231 edits to the talk page of your old account, including sending yourself warnings. It doesn't make any sense.

As for how I came across it, I often look at the Edit Counts/breakdowns of editors, usually every day, to see what subjects they work on and I noticed you had made more edits to User talk:LoverBoyInGarden than to User talk:CosmicEmperor which I thought was interesting. I thought you might have an explanation but I guess not. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:52, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: I was practiSing "Twinkle".Cosmic Emperor 02:01, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's as good an explanation as any. Thanks, CE! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:44, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Errr....

A random sock just showed up on my talk page to slander you. They're blocked but...that was weird. Keep an eye out. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 19:17, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I also get a lot of troll accounts that come to my talk page and talk trash about CE. I don't know why they come to me. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:54, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

How to give Orange coloured big arbitration warnings . I have seen them on talkpages. Is there any list of such Orange arbitration warnings?Cosmic Emperor 07:28, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean Template:Ds/talk notice? If so, there is a list of all the current variants in that template's documentation. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:26, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just occurred to me that you might want {{Ds/alert}}, which is for making users aware on user talkpages. It's not orange (at least not on my monitor), but that might actually be what you're after instead. Again, the variants are listed in the documentation. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:53, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your nominations at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion

Please read my comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Ananny and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Ararat arev. This appears to be a very ill-thought out campaign to circumvent piece by piece, the strong consensus at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long-term abuse (2nd nomination) to keep all LTA pages, especially those with ongoing abuse. Given the backlog at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion and the potential editor and administrator time these nominations are going to waste, I strongly suggest that you not nominate any further LTA pages until these two are closed. Voceditenore (talk) 12:06, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Please don't nominate any more. I'll note it's hard to understand why you chose two active long term abusers. Doug Weller (talk) 12:43, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: and Voceditenore (talk) read my second and third comment there.--Cosmic Emperor 12:50, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DENY is about trolls who feed off recognition, not POV-pushers (such as Ararat Arev) or spammers (such as Ananny) who do not care about recognition. I almost have to ask if you bothered to actually read any of those three pages. Even if those two users are blocked and act in bad faith, it was as appropriate to apply it to our logs about their activities as it would be to apply it to... Why, your talk page. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:08, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ian.thomson (talk) What do you mean by Why, your talk page.?Cosmic Emperor 15:12, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page is used to convey information to users, not seek recognition, right? Ian.thomson (talk) 15:14, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ian.thomson (talk) You think I was seeking recognition? I don't know which country you are from, but you must use formal English. What exactly are trying to say? I understand your first lines. Now the last line: i understand this part Even if those two users are blocked and act in bad faith, it was as appropriate to apply it to our logs about their activities as it would be to apply it to..., but how this has connection to your previous statements- Why, your talk page. Cosmic Emperor 15:23, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Where did I say you were seeking recognition? WP:AGF. Those two pages are to convey information to other users about those users. Your talk page is here to convey information between you and other users. I'm merely trying to point out how ridiculous it was to nominate those pages for deletion, especially on the grounds of WP:DENY. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:29, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ian.thomson (talk). There must have been a reason why articles are created about vandals. I found a shortcut to know the reasons. I nominate for proposed deletion::people vote keep, keep giving reasons.

My main interest is to remove personal details, their cities, names from those articles. Few months ago Mark Nutley was changed to Darkness Shines 2. I want that to be done in this case. I don't care for Vandals with usernames with no personal details. But some names look like real persons and I don't want that vandal to be knpown by his real name.Cosmic Emperor 15:35, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That is WP:POINTy behavior. If you wanted to their personal details removed, you should have asked so on the talk page. Names you might have a shot of arguing for removing if you can demonstrate that they never released that information themselves, though location will likely be a little harder if they sock from IPs with a consistent location. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:50, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend avoiding nominating for deletion any pages in the Wikipedia space. They are for housekeeping and policy matters and Wikipedia doesn't have a shortage of space. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:46, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Guardians of the Galaxy 3 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Guardians of the Galaxy 3. Since you had some involvement with the Guardians of the Galaxy 3 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 17:57, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Big Hero 7 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Big Hero 7. Since you had some involvement with the Big Hero 7 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 17:59, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chrononauts (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chrononauts (film). Since you had some involvement with the Chrononauts (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 18:00, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Harbinger (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Harbinger (film). Since you had some involvement with the Harbinger (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 18:01, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for attempting to harass other users. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Z8

Spy 2 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spy 2. Since you had some involvement with the Spy 2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 18:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Predestination 2 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Predestination 2. Since you had some involvement with the Predestination 2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 18:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mesopotamia (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mesopotamia (film). Since you had some involvement with the Mesopotamia (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 18:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can i know why was i indefinitely blocked

I am not going to put unblock request right now. My intentions were misunderstood.--Cosmic Emperor 18:19, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Fluffernutter --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:22, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You were indefinitely blocked for creating pages that harassed and insulted another user. You're perfectly aware of the pages that you created (and I deleted) today calling GorillaWarfare all manner of things; if you don't understand how that's considered harassment and just generally not-a-good-thing-to-do, I'd be concerned about whether your level of competence is adequate for a cooperative project like this. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:24, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@NeilN: and @Fluffernutter: i have sent E-Mail to both of you. Please check it. If you think i was wrong, then i will apply for unblock.--Cosmic Emperor 18:30, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There can be few mistakes by CosmicEmperor, he is relatively new user and he is in learning phase, we can't ignore his positive contribution to Wikipedia specially articles related to Food items. I think admins should give him one more chance, he can improve himself, its not "vandal only" account. Thank you. --Human3015 Call me maybe!! • 18:35, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"I wanted to protect this person from harassment, so I harassed them first in a different way" is really not a good excuse for harassment. Again, the issue here might well be that you aren't aware of how to be helpful without harassing people...but if you can't tell the difference we really can't just turn you loose to continue accidentally harassing people. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:37, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser evidence also shows that you have created additional accounts for vandalism purposes. Mike V • Talk 18:38, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike V: I stay in a hostel. If my terminal was used by somebody, then what i will do. I always log out. And i carefully type my password to check my any other students are behind me. Now i understand that AHLM13 can be a victim. At that time i was making comments against him on his talk page. I never knew i will face the same problem like him. And i want to know the accounts that you think were created through my terminal. Cosmic Emperor 18:48, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I asked others , two of them told me that they used to use Wikipedia but are currently inactive. --223.176.14.221 (talk) 22:01, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above Ip is mine. I forgot to Login in tension.--Cosmic Emperor 22:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For starters, there's AlpacasRcoooool (talk · contribs), Phancylane (talk · contribs), and Champuraj (talk · contribs). Are there any other accounts you've created that you'd like to share with us? Mike V • Talk 19:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike V: What i will achieve through these socks? Strange thing is that all these time those accounts were previously blocked as some other sock masters's socks. This alpacas is the one who is different, other two is interested in Bollywood. My account was active at that time. Maybe i used the same IPs used by Theese account recently and you thought i am them. Look at their editing style. And I think there are a very few Wikipedia users who used those IPs. Once one month ago I was unable to edit as i saw you cannot edit this page as the IP you are using is blocked by "some administrator's name" . And the block was from 2013 to 2017. Sometimes i saw ips blocked only for one month, two weeks. If i would have edited through those IPs just after the block period was over( then check user evidence could have showed that I am a sockpuppet of those blocked account. It happens that sometimes an innocent user is blocked for sharing the same IP range. I read it at the case of Darkness Shines four months ago. This is just a coincidence that very few people used those particular IPs. I knew about check users long time ago when i posted this on Dangerous Panda's talk page. If i am that kind of user then i will not tell anybody that i am User:LoverBoyInGarden when i made my very first edit on my userpage.

This is just a plain co incidence that i might have used the same IPs as used by them.

And please don't say for starters: if you have full list then tell me. as i don't like this suspense. You will not believe but the moment i saw that i was indefinitely blocked i developed acidity. I tried to sleep but got up.(I am not writing this to get sympathy).--Cosmic Emperor 20:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@NeilN: Captain assassin is nominating all my redirects for deletion. he wants to take credit as page creator. He will create the redirect himself after they are deleted. Can you just use these links. I cannot do anything: All of then appeared in google search news. Right now i am posting only about Big Hero 7 https://www.google.co.in/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&es_th=1&ie=UTF-8#q=big+hero+7&tbm=nws Cosmic Emperor 20:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You should focus on your own blocking situation. Worrying about who gets credit for a redirect should come a far second. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:21, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@NeilN: Right now an IP came out of nowhere to bait me on my talk page. If you see any IP or sock troll posing as CosmicEmperor, please block him. Thanks. I will not create any other account. And in those redirect for deletion if any IP comes in my support saying "keep"those redirects, remove their comments. AHLM13 was always saying that someone was posing as him, at first i didn't belive him as he was very abusive, but now i am concerned about myself. Cosmic Emperor 21:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note

I think you should consider what you were already doing here other than harrassment and socking. You have only stalked other editors and their edits and talked about the things you don't know about. Your 2 MFD for long term abusers were suspicious. Again[1]? User:NeilN told you to stop caring about others and concentrate on your block. Apparently you ignored it. You have language problems and you don't undestand the things. You should completely leave wikipedia for some years. 121.246.189.47 (talk) 06:37, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since no page watchers have reverted your comment, I will say this thing to you. "Use my gun to kill people and I become murderer, use my knife to stab and i become killer". Use my device for vandalism( Don't know how) and i am creating sockpuppets. I accept the personal attack part and also i take full responsibility for those accounts if the device for vandalism was mine not just IP addresses. But, I will never say that i did that with my keyboard and mouse myself. You are not able to see the person behind those IPs , you can only see the IP and you can match them with mine. --Cosmic Emperor 07:04, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question about edit summary "Trying to bait me when i am blocked"

What do you think TopGun is trying to bait you into doing?

From what I can see of the nomination, TopGun believes your sandbox does not belong because it is material that can be viewed as attacking other editors, including the recording of perceived flaws and he does not think you are preparing for the timely use of it in a dispute resolution process. If you want to make your case for keeping the page, you can put it here and I will copy it over to the MFD page. -- GB fan 13:08, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)Thanks for raising this. My notification to him was an automated twinkle notification which I left checked as a courtesy; I had already implied to CE that I would be nominating this page when I CSD'd it. I recently saw this sandbox hosting accusations without ever filing a report (and infact ones that never involved him and were stale) and found it fit for deletion. Furthermore, as he's been indeffed, the list no longer serves a remotely positive purpose anyway. --lTopGunl (talk) 13:21, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I had suspicion that Mar4d, TopGun and Faizan had form a tag team to push their POv and ciurcumvent the 3 revert rule. Without any evidence i can't accuse any old user of such things. For last two days i was collecting their behavioral evidence. And sandbox is the perfect place to keep it. Everything that i have said in that page is backed by evidence. Whether the evidence is enough or not is not my decision. Administrators will decide that. I don't have any interest to save that page at a time when i am blocked. I will not tell you to keep it. I can only ask you whether the accusation TopGun is making that it's an attack page is right or wrong. I was thinking of going to arbitration, but i never did any arbitration report before, i don't have experience. So, i was waiting. Before that i got blocked. You can delete that page or keep it. It's my least concern right now. TopGun or captain assassin can't just post messages on my talk page asking me to comment there when i am blocked. I am worried about my block not my sandbox.--Cosmic Emperor 13:16, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are incorrect about your assumption that "sandbox is the perfect place to keep it". It is not unless you are already in process of a dispute and want to organize it in short term. Secondly I've never had any behavioural disputes with you so I don't see what led to such stalking. PS. Stop canvassing multiple users to "save a redirect". You are blocked and it will not help your case to ask other users to save redirects on your behalf - if the wikipedia community thinks they are okay to stay, they will. While his offer to post your comments on the nomination of your sandbox was a courtesy, posting comments on RFDs for you is not. --lTopGunl (talk) 13:26, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@GB fan: if you want to help me then save this redirect Big Hero 7 with these links

http://www.vcpost.com/articles/76352/20150624/big-hero-7-confirmed-stan-lee-hiro-fight-tadashi-coming.htm

http://en.yibada.com/articles/39040/20150618/big-hero-7-confirmed-tadashi-alive.htm

http://www.realtytoday.com/articles/15635/20150610/big-hero-6-movie-sequel-updates-7-officially-confirmed-plot.htm

and post keep Cosmic Emperor 13:21, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will ask again, What do you think TopGun is trying to bait you into doing by nominating your sandbox for deletion at WP:MFD? -- GB fan 13:45, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The message he posted had these lines "Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:CosmicEmperor/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (Cosmic Emperor 13:52, 25 June 2015 (UTC)). "" He knows i am blocked. How can i comment there. As if someone is asking me to open sock accounts. That's what i meant. Yesterday he did the same thing. Now why will someone ask me constantly to comment there when i can't. I am worried about my block and all these unwanted messages are coming from captain assassin and TopGun. GB fan you are not understanding my mental problem. You have to think users as Human beings who have feelings. I am not a lifeless account CosmicEmperor. There is a Human being behind that. I hope you put yourself in my siyuation, then you will know my condition.Cosmic Emperor 13:52, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request style in Template:Unblock. I hope this request is Okay

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CosmicEmperor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I accept that my understanding of Wikipedia's no personal attack policy was wrong. I shouldn't have visited two blocked users talk page and commented all nonsense thinking I am trying to prevent vandalism while being wrong myself. And also i will stick to the ISP provider that i use. I am not going to experiment with other ISP provider that i normally don't use. I will not change my ISP provider for the time being. And in future if i change my ISP provider i will tell the details to any check user that I am changing my ISP, so my IP address will be different. I will not make such foolish mistake again. I will try to edit Wikipedia properly. I will stay away from blocked users's talk page.Whatever I did was wrong and it was a very bad mistake by me.--Cosmic Emperor 21:36, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I must respectfully disagree with Brad's comments below, while there may be good reason for a checkuser to look into your activities, there is no need to require a checkuser to review this particular request, which is declined because it fails to even come close to addressing the reasons for the block. If you're going to pretend this was all a big misunderstanding I see no reason to even consider unblocking you. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:25, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am not clear whether you are admitting the conduct you were blocked for, or still denying that while acknowledging you engaged in other undesirable behavior. Please clarify.

In any event, this block must be reviewed by a checkuser only (preferably one who can review oversighted edits as well). Newyorkbrad (talk) 22:51, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

These comments were about my previous version of unblock not the current version

You say you accept for all your faults, what did you do wrong? -- GB fan 00:29, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CosmicEmperor, GB fan is right. You can't just say "Whatever I did was wrong and it was a very bad mistake by me" as if you don't know what you're being accused of. You're apologizing but just generally saying that you acted in violation of Wikipedia policies without being specific. You should read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks, it offers guidance on what admins would like to see in an unblock request. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:40, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Both GB fan and Liz are exactly right. Admins don't expect you to beg forgiveness, or to apologize, to be unblocked. What they do expect is for you to show an understanding of the specifics of why your behavior was not acceptable and why it was necessary to block you. I wouldn't expect any unblock request that does not explicitly do that to succeed. And even if you do manage that, then it will be time to call in a functionary with both checkuser and oversight access to examine the evidence and weigh it against your unblock request. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:58, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

CosmicEmperor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I read guide to appealing blocks. And i am going to put unblock request based on the second reason

"that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again, and you will make productive contributions instead".

Right now I feel my block was correct. I was blocked for personal attacks and sockpuppetry.

First I want to explain about personal attacks. But i need to mention what i was thinking at that time when i created those pages about Gorilla Warfare; and what i have understood and learned about my disruptive behaviour after getting blocked. Yesterday when i came across two pages which were like the names of Molly White. They were posting offensive comments about Gorillawarfare. I thought if i tell them that Gorilla Warfare is a 45 year old man not a girl , then they will stop trolling if they believe me. But that was a very very bad idea by me. I thought i was preventing personal attacks. But i myself created an attack page by accusing an arbitrator, administrator and check user of faking her personal details on her user page. I was no different than the vandal. In order to prevent personal attack i went on personally attacking a respected Wikipedian of things she had not done. At that time i should have thought that if someone is a check user, then her identity is verified by Wikimedia foundation. And when i wrote on the talk page of those two vandal accounts, that she is a man posting a girl's pic, i was also questioning the credibility of Wikimedia foundation. I don't know why i didn't think properly at that time. whatever i post, can be viewed by everybody. They will think bad about GorillaWarafre, in that sense fluffernutter's judgement was right. They might doubt about Wikipedians. I am sorry what i did at that time. I tried to stop a vandal by becoming a troll which was not right. First i was shocked about my indefinite block, but right now i feel fluuffernutter did the right thing, otherwise i wouldn't have thought whole night ; where did i go wrong. If she would have given me a plain warning, i would have felt i did the right thing.

Now coming to sockpupptry: If the check user have found solid evidence that My Ip address and my device was used for disrupting Wikipedia, Then i take full responsibility for the actions and vandalism performed by those accounts which were found by Mike V. Though i don't know the details. I will not use those excuses:I have littlebrother, My account was hacked and my hostel roommate logged in when i was in bathroom or having lunch. The details about this i will mention below as this is becoming too long unblock request.

Cosmic Emperor 23:58, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I read guide to appealing blocks. And i am going to put unblock request based on the second reason 

"'''that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again, and you will make productive contributions instead'''". 

Right now I feel my block was correct. I was blocked for personal attacks and sockpuppetry.

First I want to explain about personal attacks. But i need to mention what i was thinking at that time when i created those pages about Gorilla Warfare; ''' and what i have understood and learned about my disruptive behaviour after getting blocked'''. Yesterday when i came across two pages which were like the names of Molly White. They were posting offensive comments about Gorillawarfare. I thought if i tell them that ''Gorilla Warfare is a 45 year old man not a girl'' , then they will stop trolling if they believe me.  '''But that was a very very bad idea by me.''' I thought i was preventing personal attacks.''' But i myself created an attack page by accusing an arbitrator, administrator and check user of faking her personal details on her user page. I was no different than the vandal.''' In order to prevent personal attack i went on personally attacking a respected Wikipedian of things she had not done. At that time i should have thought that if someone is a check user, then her identity is verified by Wikimedia foundation. And when i wrote on the talk page of those two vandal accounts, that ''she is a man posting a girl's pic'', i was also questioning the credibility of Wikimedia foundation. '''I don't know why i didn't think properly at that time'''. whatever i post, can be viewed by everybody. They will think bad about GorillaWarafre, in that sense fluffernutter's judgement was right. They might doubt about Wikipedians. I am sorry what i did at that time. I tried to stop a vandal by becoming a troll which was not right. First i was shocked about my indefinite block, but right now i feel fluuffernutter did the right thing, otherwise i wouldn't have thought whole night ; where did i go wrong. If she would have given me a plain warning, i would have felt i did the right thing.


Now coming to sockpupptry: If the check user have found solid evidence that My Ip address and my device was used for disrupting Wikipedia, Then i take full responsibility for the actions  and vandalism performed by those accounts which were found by Mike V. Though i don't know the details. I will''' not''' use those excuses:I have littlebrother, My account was hacked and my hostel roommate logged in when i was in bathroom or having lunch. The details about this i will mention below as this is becoming too long unblock request.
 <span style="border:1px solid #0072BC;padding:1px;">[[User:CosmicEmperor|<span style="color:#0072BC;padding-left:1px;">Cosmic</span>]] [[User_talk:CosmicEmperor|<span style="color:#fff;background:#0072BC;"> Emperor </span>]]</span> 23:58, 24 June 2015 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I read guide to appealing blocks. And i am going to put unblock request based on the second reason 

"'''that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again, and you will make productive contributions instead'''". 

Right now I feel my block was correct. I was blocked for personal attacks and sockpuppetry.

First I want to explain about personal attacks. But i need to mention what i was thinking at that time when i created those pages about Gorilla Warfare; ''' and what i have understood and learned about my disruptive behaviour after getting blocked'''. Yesterday when i came across two pages which were like the names of Molly White. They were posting offensive comments about Gorillawarfare. I thought if i tell them that ''Gorilla Warfare is a 45 year old man not a girl'' , then they will stop trolling if they believe me.  '''But that was a very very bad idea by me.''' I thought i was preventing personal attacks.''' But i myself created an attack page by accusing an arbitrator, administrator and check user of faking her personal details on her user page. I was no different than the vandal.''' In order to prevent personal attack i went on personally attacking a respected Wikipedian of things she had not done. At that time i should have thought that if someone is a check user, then her identity is verified by Wikimedia foundation. And when i wrote on the talk page of those two vandal accounts, that ''she is a man posting a girl's pic'', i was also questioning the credibility of Wikimedia foundation. '''I don't know why i didn't think properly at that time'''. whatever i post, can be viewed by everybody. They will think bad about GorillaWarafre, in that sense fluffernutter's judgement was right. They might doubt about Wikipedians. I am sorry what i did at that time. I tried to stop a vandal by becoming a troll which was not right. First i was shocked about my indefinite block, but right now i feel fluuffernutter did the right thing, otherwise i wouldn't have thought whole night ; where did i go wrong. If she would have given me a plain warning, i would have felt i did the right thing.


Now coming to sockpupptry: If the check user have found solid evidence that My Ip address and my device was used for disrupting Wikipedia, Then i take full responsibility for the actions  and vandalism performed by those accounts which were found by Mike V. Though i don't know the details. I will''' not''' use those excuses:I have littlebrother, My account was hacked and my hostel roommate logged in when i was in bathroom or having lunch. The details about this i will mention below as this is becoming too long unblock request.
 <span style="border:1px solid #0072BC;padding:1px;">[[User:CosmicEmperor|<span style="color:#0072BC;padding-left:1px;">Cosmic</span>]] [[User_talk:CosmicEmperor|<span style="color:#fff;background:#0072BC;"> Emperor </span>]]</span> 23:58, 24 June 2015 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I read guide to appealing blocks. And i am going to put unblock request based on the second reason 

"'''that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again, and you will make productive contributions instead'''". 

Right now I feel my block was correct. I was blocked for personal attacks and sockpuppetry.

First I want to explain about personal attacks. But i need to mention what i was thinking at that time when i created those pages about Gorilla Warfare; ''' and what i have understood and learned about my disruptive behaviour after getting blocked'''. Yesterday when i came across two pages which were like the names of Molly White. They were posting offensive comments about Gorillawarfare. I thought if i tell them that ''Gorilla Warfare is a 45 year old man not a girl'' , then they will stop trolling if they believe me.  '''But that was a very very bad idea by me.''' I thought i was preventing personal attacks.''' But i myself created an attack page by accusing an arbitrator, administrator and check user of faking her personal details on her user page. I was no different than the vandal.''' In order to prevent personal attack i went on personally attacking a respected Wikipedian of things she had not done. At that time i should have thought that if someone is a check user, then her identity is verified by Wikimedia foundation. And when i wrote on the talk page of those two vandal accounts, that ''she is a man posting a girl's pic'', i was also questioning the credibility of Wikimedia foundation. '''I don't know why i didn't think properly at that time'''. whatever i post, can be viewed by everybody. They will think bad about GorillaWarafre, in that sense fluffernutter's judgement was right. They might doubt about Wikipedians. I am sorry what i did at that time. I tried to stop a vandal by becoming a troll which was not right. First i was shocked about my indefinite block, but right now i feel fluuffernutter did the right thing, otherwise i wouldn't have thought whole night ; where did i go wrong. If she would have given me a plain warning, i would have felt i did the right thing.


Now coming to sockpupptry: If the check user have found solid evidence that My Ip address and my device was used for disrupting Wikipedia, Then i take full responsibility for the actions  and vandalism performed by those accounts which were found by Mike V. Though i don't know the details. I will''' not''' use those excuses:I have littlebrother, My account was hacked and my hostel roommate logged in when i was in bathroom or having lunch. The details about this i will mention below as this is becoming too long unblock request.
 <span style="border:1px solid #0072BC;padding:1px;">[[User:CosmicEmperor|<span style="color:#0072BC;padding-left:1px;">Cosmic</span>]] [[User_talk:CosmicEmperor|<span style="color:#fff;background:#0072BC;"> Emperor </span>]]</span> 23:58, 24 June 2015 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

More time passes, things become fishier. Maybe an umpteenth chance could be given to Cosmic. Previously, another user named AHLM13 has been blocked for same reasons. Wikipedia needs to be aware of ostensible cybercriminals.--115ash^→(☏) 11:12, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

requesting device check from Check Users. The IPs might match but the device won't match i hope

As i mentioned i live in Hostel, and there are computer terminals. Now i am allowed to surf the net through those terminals. I also have my personal laptop. Now the ISP provider of my datacard and computer terminal are same and both have same operating system, and i also login with chrome. Check user might think that i am using single device for logging WP but i am not. As it's free so i try that. But as there is no privacy so only five times in last months i used the computer terminal to use Wikipedia. I always care if anyone is standing behind me while i type password. I am also sure that nobody used my laptop. But that could be my over confidence. Some redirects created by me were nominated for deletion by captain assassin, as you can see from my talk page. out of that i seriously want Big Hero 7 to stay. But i can't do anything. I didn't create a sock account to vote there. And if you see any account posing as me, please block it.

I feel i am neglecting my studies by spending too much time on Wikipedia. I don't mind being blocked right now. But i hope in the near future i will be unblocked. Most wikipedians are computer enginners, scientists, post graduates while i am still a student. I need to reach their age before coming to Wikipedia or i will make silly mistakes again. I think i should leave WP temporarily. As THERE IS AN WIKI ESSAY "Wikipedia doesnot need you" and I am not "irrAplaceable". I have seen users whose contributions are much higher than me getting blocked indefinitely. If i get unblocked, then i would request NeilN to put semi-retired on my user page. If i don't get unblocked, then i will come back after two years after finishing my current course for which i have joined this college. I am not playing the diva here about whom there is an essay that they pretend to go away to get sympathy.

But my request to @Mike V: is to indefinitely block all those IPs which were used by those accounts which he has found check user evidence of being my sock puppets. I don't know the current status. If those IPs are blocked indefinitely then good. If not then there could a bad chance that someone will use those IPs to create sock accounts and check user evidence will show that i have created more sock accounts.

And if anyone is thinking that i will come back after 3 months with a new account: You must know i like my username very much. If i edit i will only edit as CosmicEmperor. Or i will be a reader not contributer. Thanks all of you. And @Liz: can you please google search and make sure Big Hero 7 is not deleted by captain assassin. I hope this request to you is not canvassing as I am a blocked user.Cosmic Emperor 05:23, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]