Jump to content

Talk:Air Berlin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 178.11.204.109 (talk) at 16:00, 17 November 2017 (→Lead). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Former good article nomineeAir Berlin was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 29, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed


Untitled

It's a small point, but was it the Allies or the occupying powers (France, US, Britian, Solviet Union) that were permitted to fly out of Berlin? DJ Clayworth 18:09, 10 Feb 2004 (UTC)

The occupying powers. Of course, the Allies generally were flying out of West Berlin and the Soviets out of East Berlin. TL, 8 May 2006.

It appears that the official fleet size of Air Berlin is either 54 or 58, depending on which part of the website you look at -- airberlin:Facts and Figures or airberlin.com:The Fleet. Either number seems low. Does anybody have information (with a source, please) on the latest figures?

Fair use rationale for Image:Air Berlin logo.png

Image:Air Berlin logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 01:52, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History

Have amended and expanded the "History" section by adding and referencing further relevant facts relating to the company's formative period during the Allied/Cold War era. Have also added a new category "Defunct airlines of the United States" as the original company Air Berlin, Inc. has been superseded by Air Berlin GmbH & Co. Luftverkehrs AG. Technically, these are two separate companies, with the former ceasing to exist in 1990 when it was bought out by German shareholders and reconstituted as the latter under German company law. Therefore, that company is now defunct. Pimpom123 16:21, 05 December 2007 (GMT)

Perhaps they should be different articles for the American-owned and Germany-owned eras. MilborneOne (talk) 19:51, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The logo being used in the article is outdated. Air Berline recently changed their livery, logo, website appearance, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.242.73.200 (talk) 16:15, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV removal from article

The following has been removed from the article due to it being blatantly WP:NPOV.

On June 2008 airberlin's CEO, Joachim Hunold, published an editorial[1] where he attacks the use of the Catalan language, saying that it is "like going back to the Middle Ages" and "using Spanish is enough". As in Catalan speaking places of spain this kind of speech is linked to the fascist regimes of the 20th century (Nationalsocialism), this political attack made by an important German company caused a big scandal[2][3]. In 2007 airberlin had attacked using similar words the possibility that the Spanish government invested less in the Madrid airport and a little more in Barcelona's El Prat[4].

--Россавиа Диалог 02:18, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look here too: User talk:Martí Cabré#Air Berlin! --CeGe (talk) 14:47, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Air Berlin editorial attacking the Catalan language
  2. ^ Reactions to the Air Berlin attack against the Catalan language (in Catalan)
  3. ^ Reactions to the Air Berlin attack against the Catalan language (in Spanish)
  4. ^ Air Berlin wants no more inversions in Barcelona's airport

"operating as airberlin"

Air Berlin is in no way operating as "airberlin". They did change their logo, however they still spell themselves "Air Berlin" in written text. Check the "our company" section on their website or German wikipedia. There are also no results for site:airberlin.com airberlin -"airberlin.com" on Google. I'm gonna revert those changes as they are misleading. --Studmult (talk) 10:45, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I changed "operating" to "stylized". NagamasaAzai (talk) 16:37, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Fleet Thumbnails

Hey, well I did add thumbnails into the fleet chart, as per the Air Canada chart. It seems to be the newer form of fleet tables that seems to be used for various other notable airlines, such as Delta and JAL.

However, it has since been removed. Should I re-add it back in?

NagamasaAzai (talk) 16:37, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Air berlin logo2.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Air berlin logo2.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:41, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo airberlin com.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Logo airberlin com.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 06:40, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Air Berlin USA 1978.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Logo Air Berlin USA 1978.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 06:40, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free file problem

File:Hainan Airlines Logo.svg was removed from this article because it either does not have a Non-free use rationale or there are problems with the existing rationale. Please see Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria for the applicable policy and Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline for how to fix the problem. If further input or help is needed, questions can be directed towards Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or my talk page. Thank you. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 10:24, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Air Berlin A330-200.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Air Berlin A330-200.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:25, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Air Berlin 787-8.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Air Berlin 787-8.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:23, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Air Berlin/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TheSpecialUser (talk · contribs) 14:12, 29 July 2012 (UTC) A quick fail. Giving issues in next edit. TheSpecialUser TSU 14:12, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It was a rushed nomination by an IP address. This article is nowhere near to get to GA status. Here are just few issues that I see: Neutrality- The article is no written in a neutral way. There are peacock terms, and also promotional lines which need to be re-written. Prose is pretty bad and need throughout copyediting. Refs- many facts are not sourced and many are un-reliable sources. This is just an 10 second review. If wen't deep under, many issues exist. Thus I'm failing it. If someone wants a detailed reason for quick-fail, feel free to ping me on my talk. TheSpecialUser TSU 14:31, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Biased Criticism

The sections detailing criticism are biased and poorly sourced. Two are just message board postings, effectively anonymous, and the rest of the criticism consists of poor ratings on a couple of websites (with which, I wish to note, that I'd never heard of before). Furthermore a rating of 1.8 on ReviewCentre.com sounds bad, until you realise that, in fact, the very best-rated airlines only receive 2.5-2.7. On Airlikes there are only 10 reviews, of which two are by the same user. In the absence of any evidence that these problems occur to any significant proportion of the airlines customers, they should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.247.101.115 (talk) 15:59, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reads like a PR announcement

I came here for information about the airline, not advertising. In addition, this is very poorly translated from the original German. I would do it myself but I don't really care. 87.111.43.138 (talk) 13:06, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input. You are right, the overall quality of this article is indeed inferior. Especially concerning the history section: From 2010 onwards, it's more or less a random collection of incoherent news bits. The task "improve AB article" is now on my to-do list; I hope that I'll find the time and get this done (or rather, started) during the next few weeks.--FoxyOrange (talk) 15:32, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've just flagged the article accordingly. Also, please note that there is an obvious promotional account: Airberlingroup (talk · contribs). It has been blocked by now, but (as far as I can see) many of its edits (which were added in March 2013) are still there.--FoxyOrange (talk) 12:52, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've identified another two problematic user accounts (concerning the NPOV policy); both which were used exclusively to edit the article about Air Berlin: Onred ab (talk · contribs) and 217.7.56.20 (talk · contribs).--FoxyOrange (talk) 13:22, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Air Berlin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:38, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Air Berlin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:37, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 6 external links on Air Berlin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Air Berlin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:52, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Air Berlin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:36, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Air Berlin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:16, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

As of 2146 UTC, the last flight has landed [1], so the date (27 Oct. 2017) can be finally put in. 135.23.202.24 (talk) 22:05, 27 October 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Clarification: in the infobox, remove the comment next to the |ceased= parameter and replace with today's date. 135.23.202.24 (talk) 22:10, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

Air berlin stoped operations on 28.10.2017. and the airline ceased operations.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Moj Vikipedija (talk • contribs)

I disagree, per the reasons stated in my previous edit summaries. And if you really want to put something in the infobox, put the year (2017) and not some random date which is incorrect (Why 28th of October? The airline filed for bankruptcy in August and the last flight took place (and ended) on the 27th of October, and "formal" bankruptcy proceedings begin on November 1st. Which one do we put?) 135.23.202.24 (talk) 14:38, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe this link helps. It states Air Berlin ceased operations on 27 October 2017.--Jetstreamer Talk 20:55, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

I'd like to know why having the lead as one paragraph only would be better? It's unappealing and it does not group the different information presented within efficiently (in fact, it even reduces readability. in my honest opinion). 135.23.202.24 (talk) 20:27, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please dont force your reverts on the page before others get the chance to discuss here. IMHO it reads better as 1 paragraphSimply-the-truth (talk) 00:15, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
WP:HOUND. The disputed tag was placed without a reason or an edit summary, so I will remove it without further discussion. Concerning the lead, it does read better when there is more than one paragraph! One paragraph should be used only if all information is somehow contextually very closely related - in this case, the three sentences have different subjects and different information: the first is about what this article is about (the airline) - the second gives more precise information about that, while the last is about the chronology. I will reinstate a more precise version, in two paragraphs, as follows:
Air Berlin PLC & Co. Luftverkehrs KG (FWB: AB1), branded as airberlin or airberlin.com was Germany's second-largest airline and Europe's tenth-largest airline in terms of passengers carried.[1] It was a member of the Oneworld alliance, listed on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, and headquartered in Berlin[2] with hubs at Berlin Tegel Airport and Düsseldorf Airport.

The airline was founded in 1978 by a group of Americans. Following German reunification, Air Berlin was sold and restructured in Germany. After years of losses, Air Berlin filed for insolvency on 15 August 2017[3] and ceased operations on 27 October 2017.
Also, take notice that the lead had three paragraphs long before I started editing this article (example back in August) : the actual rule-breaker is 92.76.6.155, who has been banned for edit warring. 135.23.202.24 (talk) 03:36, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Air Berlin Strategy and Business Model [https://web.archive.org/web/20120813201418/http://www.airberlin.com/site/company/profile/index.php?LANG=eng&cat=strategie Archived 13 August 2012 at the Wayback Machine. Air Berlin, retrieved on 19 January 2011.
  2. ^ "Approach map." Air Berlin. Retrieved on 5 May 2010.
  3. ^ "Air Berlin meldet Insolvenz an – Bundesregierung gibt Kredit - WELT". DIE WELT. Retrieved 2017-08-15.
so you just revert again with no discussion at all? I will change it back until such time that we have discussed this and gained consensusSimply-the-truth (talk) 11:29, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
good action SIMPLY THE TRUTH ! I believe just that is necessary for a non-existent company anymore, while everything is said in Info-table besides and no need to repeat in short paragraphs. Edit-Wars of Wikipedia among all is the biggest problem we lose great efforts and good people works. It is why for me is a general reference, but I do not trust at all. So, for a personal preference this is enough and yes, Air Berlin among all articles is another because members and non-members IP dispute all several points of view. Wikipedia should find a way this encyclopedia be A. a consensus B. less destructive C, a new better system, because how it is, is not good at all. So, my opinion:

Air Berlin PLC & Co. Luftverkehrs KG (FWB: AB1), branded as airberlin or airberlin.com was a German airline and Europe's tenth-largest airline in terms of passenger, when ceased.[3] It was a member of the Oneworld alliance, listed on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, and headquartered in Berlin[4] with hubs at Berlin Tegel Airport and Düsseldorf Airport.

oh, sorry, forget to sign ,,, here you are --178.11.204.109 (talk) 16:00, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Air_Berlin&oldid=810809969"