User talk:It'sAllinthePhrasing

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi It'sAllinthePhrasing! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 20:39, Wednesday, January 11, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome!

Hello, It'sAllinthePhrasing, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 05:03, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Please comment on Talk:Persian people

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Persian people. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cram101

You added a source to Ligament, but that source was itself copied from Wikipedia. Cram101 take our articles and paraphrase them. If you look at the source, it clearly copied our article. Don't just grab a convenient source from Google Books, consider if it is reliable. Fences&Windows 18:06, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Fences&Windows: Thanks for the catch! I would like to think that was an uncharacteristic oversight on my end, but will be sure to triple check my references for sure. It'sAllinthePhrasing (talk) 16:16, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Club Car

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Club Car. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:George Wylde

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:George Wylde. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Template talk:Nazism sidebar

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Nazism sidebar. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello It'sAllinthePhrasing, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Freedom Foundation (Washington) have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:46, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Diannaa, I have reviewed my edits and the underlying copyright issues and will be sure that my future edits are in line with those policies. Thanks for reaching out. It'sAllinthePhrasing (talk) 15:59, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Blue Army (Poland)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Blue Army (Poland). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Manassas, Virginia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Manassas, Virginia. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Cold War II

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cold War II. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:West Montrose, Ontario

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:West Montrose, Ontario. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Battle of Cao Bang (1979)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Battle of Cao Bang (1979). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Catalan Countries

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Catalan Countries. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Genocide

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Genocide. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:29, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Alternative for Germany

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alternative for Germany. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Politics of the Republic of China

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Politics of the Republic of China. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Wahhabi sack of Karbala

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Wahhabi sack of Karbala. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Vladimir Lenin

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Vladimir Lenin. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Dobruja

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dobruja. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Germany

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Germany. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Indian annexation of Hyderabad

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Indian annexation of Hyderabad. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Moors

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Moors. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Algerian War

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Algerian War. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Unite the Right rally

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Unite the Right rally. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Spanish Empire

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Spanish Empire. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:2017 Las Vegas Strip shooting

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017 Las Vegas Strip shooting. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, It'sAllinthePhrasing. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just a notification

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33

Please comment on Talk:Thomas Guide

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Thomas Guide. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:2018

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2018. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Esplanade

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Esplanade. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:March 14, 1891, lynchings

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:March 14, 1891, lynchings. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Nagorno-Karabakh

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Nagorno-Karabakh. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring on Gateway Pundit

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 23:10, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Continuation War

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Continuation War. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Paektu Mountain

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Paektu Mountain. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Type 4 Chi-To

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Type 4 Chi-To. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring on Gateway Pundit

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 00:12, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Rasmussen and The Gateway Pundit

Hi, I'm curious if you are affiliated with these two subjects in any way. If you could let me know, that would be great. --K.e.coffman (talk) 06:09, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]