Welcome to the entertainment section
of the Wikipedia reference desk.

Select a section:

WP:RD/E

Want a faster answer?

Main page: Help searching Wikipedia

How can I get my question answered?

Select the section of the desk that best fits the general topic of your question (see the navigation column to the right).
Post your question to only one section, providing a short header that gives the topic of your question.
Type '~~~~' (that is, four tilde characters) at the end – this signs and dates your contribution so we know who wrote what and when.
Don't post personal contact information – it will be removed. Any answers will be provided here.
Please be as specific as possible, and include all relevant context – the usefulness of answers may depend on the context.
Note:
- We don't answer (and may remove) questions that require medical diagnosis or legal advice.
- We don't answer requests for opinions, predictions or debate.
- We don't do your homework for you, though we'll help you past the stuck point.
- We don't conduct original research or provide a free source of ideas, but we'll help you find information you need.

Ready? Ask a new question!

How do I answer a question?

Main page: Wikipedia:Reference desk/Guidelines

The best answers address the question directly, and back up facts with wikilinks and links to sources. Do not edit others' comments and do not give any medical or legal advice.

June 17

Trial film = legal drama?

Aren't those two expressions for more or less the same thing? (= Redundancy?)--Hildeoc (talk) 20:09, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Hildeoc:It looks like they are the same thing, so yes, it would probably be sensible to merge under "Duplicate: There are two or more pages on exactly the same subject, with the same scope." This reference desk is not the place for discussing this, so should probably be done on the talk page or the help desk. Regards, Willbb234 (talk) 20:35, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've posted a merge suggestion. --76.69.46.228 (talk) 22:42, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No. Legal drama states it also encompasses TV productions. That being said, I have no objection to merging trial film into it, as there is considerable overlap and I am a bit skeptical of the claim that "trial films" are a film genre. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:32, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably also there were 'Legal dramas' in the form of plays before the invention of radio (not previously mentioned), television and film. One might argue that The Merchant of Venice is, in addition to other things, a legal drama. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195) 2.122.177.55 (talk) 18:29, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think of a legal drama on TV as something like Boston Legal or Perry Mason, which were series rather than standalone works. 173.228.123.207 (talk) 01:26, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 19

NWSL

Where will the NWSL Playoffs be held this year? 66.234.203.14 (talk) 05:14, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not finding it in Google, only the date, Oct. 26. Is it normally held at the home stadium of one of the tournament qualifiers? Or does it rotate? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 12:06, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The playoffs are 3 games, semifinals on October 19/20 and the championship on October 26, of which only the champiohsip is played at a pre-determined site. But I don't see anything saying where. --76.69.116.93 (talk) 22:23, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You could go to the history of a previous year's tournament article and see when the site was first posted, and (with any luck) find a reference for it. That could be a tipoff as to when it's announced. If all else fails, you could write to the governing body asking whether the site has been selected yet. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 07:12, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rugby World Cup

Will the Rugby World Cup be televised in the UK and will I be able to watch it without paying for Sky or another specialist provider? will it be on normal TV? Thanks Anton 81.131.40.58 (talk) 08:14, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

According to this, all of it will be shown on ITV. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 08:45, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Andrew and condolences in advance. :) Anton 81.131.40.58 (talk) 15:19, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

reality nannies doing the right thing

I've seen videos in which Jo Frost is bound to contact authorities about a father disciplining his son with a belt. But I'd like to find out which Nanny 911 episode is where Deborah Carroll hears from a boy about his father sometimes threatening to use a belt as a form of discipline. Anyone know?2604:2000:7104:2F00:412:4DDE:E611:E730 (talk) 23:57, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 22

Regarding flight regulations & plane technologies

My two questions regard two issues:

a. once I'm qualified to fly a particular plane model (say Cessna 152), what is required in order to be qualified to fly other plane models in the same category (e.g., Cessna 172), or even other types, including low-wing planes) ?

b. what are the main differences in flying high-wing or low-wing planes, physically & technically ? Thanks, בנצי (talk) 21:21, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The answer to "a" will almost certainly depend on which country your in and what their laws are. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 04:14, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your = possession. You're = Your are. Please and thank you Anton 81.131.40.58 (talk) 08:38, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Actually "You're" = "You are", "You're" ≠ "Your are", as "Your = possession" etc. ;-) ---Sluzzelin talk 08:58, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Thank you for noting this word crime. :) ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 11:26, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A - Have a look at Type rating or use it as search term in your favourite search engine. MilborneOne (talk) 17:29, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 23

Where is the Hilo Johnny comes down to?

Just been digitising some ancient school choir recordings from my youth, and came across the shanty "Johnny Come Down to Hilo". Apart from being just a little concerned about the modern acceptability of the "big buck nigger" in the song, I also wondered where Hilo is? I'm assuming it's not the one in Hawaii. Where is it please? HiLo48 (talk) 03:59, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

According to this site, it's "probably the port of Ilo, in southern Peru, well-known to sailors working ships in the nitrate trade." And in fact, Ilo, Peru mentions that it was sometimes spelled Hilo "in older sources". Clarityfiend (talk) 06:12, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. That's great. And a terrific source. Very informative. HiLo48 (talk) 06:23, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed a different source cited in the same article states "The modern consensus ... is that the Hilo referred to is the Peruvian port of Ylo (or Ilo)". Clarityfiend (talk) 06:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a song called "Johnny Come Down Under to HiLo48"? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 16:27, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I guess someone had to make that play. HiLo48 (talk) 07:54, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

musical style

[1] Guy playing the piano and singing at the beginning (don't worry about the fight scene following), from Arnold Schwarzenegger Red Heat (1988 film). What is this musical style called? Is that particular song well known and what is its title? Are there other well known songs / performers? Thanks. 173.228.123.207 (talk) 22:22, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can't really help, but the tune is incredibly familiar. DuncanHill (talk) 22:35, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The song's title is "Я налетчик Беня-хулиган" ("I Am Raider Benya Hooligan") or just "Беня хулиган" ("Benya Hooligan"). I don't know who wrote it or whether there is a known songwriter. According to this link with lyrics and sheet music, the song is featured in a collection of popular "yard songs" (serf songs? don't know how to translate "дворовые песни") published in 2008, and in a compilation of prisoner songs from 1995. ---Sluzzelin talk 22:43, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Something from The Threepenny Opera perhaps? DuncanHill (talk) 22:47, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't come up with this exact melody anywhere else, but it does remind one of a lot, including Bänkelsang which of course influenced The Threepenny Opera. By the way, I saw the question had been asked at the film's talk page over ten years ago. Dmitry Dzhus, whom I assume to be a native speaker, gives a slightly different translation, and says it comes "from Odessa criminal circles". (He's also right about the singer having an accent: György Gáti is Hungarian). ---Sluzzelin talk 23:06, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!!!! I'm not so much after the specific song (although the info about it is much appreciated), but mostly would like to find out more about the genre in general, and listen to further examples. I hadn't looked at the talk page but the comments there are interesting too. 173.228.123.207 (talk) 23:34, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also not too concerned about the lyrics, which I can't understand anyway. But I like the music. 173.228.123.207 (talk) 00:32, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You could try googling the "yard songs" (which I still don't know how to translate, maybe I should post this at the language desk) in Russian: "дворовые песни". I did that and found, among other, over an hour from an album titled The Best Yard/Court/??? Songs. Or you can google "Песни узников", Russian for "prisoners' songs", and get more examples from YouTube etc. ---Sluzzelin talk 19:49, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I asked here. You might be interested in following that thread too, if indeed it will become one, 173.228.123.207. ---Sluzzelin talk 21:52, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I listened to part of that album and it's nice, though mostly more of a pop sound. I'll keep listening to it though. Benya Hooligan had a 1930s US jazz sound in a way. I don't know the technical lingo but the rhythm is "out of phase by 90 degrees" in relation to the melody compared with what we hear most of the time now. The first song on the album was also like that. I web searched "Benya Hooligan" and found a forum thread[2] where Gáti György himself posts that it was him playing the piano! But the thread is not very informative. It does give a youtube link[3] to a very different and more "produced" version of the song that I didn't find as interesting as the Red Heat version. This is interesting and might be related to the Benya in the song. 173.228.123.207 (talk) 02:32, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 24

Teams that won a championship in their lone season of existence

What are examples of sports teams that only existed for a single season, but won a championship in that season? Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:02, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This question sounds familiar. Have you consulted the archives? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 01:22, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Birmingham Americans qualify. However, the WFL itself only lasted a season and a half. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 01:27, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Formula 1 racing team Brawn GP, which was formed on 6 March 2009 from the assets of Honda Racing F1 Team by a management buyout led by Team Principal Ross Brawn, after parent company Honda had pulled out of the sport in December 2008.

Brawn (having adapted their cars to use Mercedez-Benz engines), proceeded to win the 2009 FIA Formula One World Championship, whose first and last races were on 29 March and 1 November 2009 respectively, although they wrapped up the win at the penultimate race on 18 October 2009.

On 16 November 2009 Brawn were bought out by Mercedes-Benz parent Daimler AG and Aabar Investments to become Mercedes-AMG Petronas Motorsport. Thus Brawn GP only existed for 8 months and 10 days, from 23 days before to 15 days after the active span of the season they won. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 2.122.177.55 (talk) 04:58, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This was the previous thread Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Entertainment/2018_July_14#What_is_the_shortest-lived_F1_team_in_the_21st_century.3F_What_is_the_shortest-lived_F1_team_in_terms_of_time_of_existence.3F. It was specifically about F!. This question is a bit broader. MarnetteD|Talk 16:43, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There was another question entitled "teams that won a championship one season but no longer existed the following season" here: [4]. Xuxl (talk) 17:41, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Los Angeles Xtreme won the XFL title in that leagues only year of existence. MarnetteD|Talk 16:45, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good job on the research and/or memory Xuxl. MarnetteD|Talk 18:04, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's memory - I remembered having posted on that previous thread. Xuxl (talk) 19:24, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An organization that lasts only one full season (such as the WFL) is necessarily going to have only one champion. Just FYI, in the case of the Union Association and the Players' League of 1884 and 1890 respectively, the leagues dissolved but the champion team in each case was brought into one of the established leagues for at least one more season. So in those cases, the teams outlasted their leagues. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 18:09, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket smallest winning margin

What is a smaller winning margin in cricket 1 run or 1 wicket? Google didn't give me an answer it showed me a list of matches with a 1 run winning margin. (78.17.116.81 (talk) 14:23, 24 June 2019 (UTC))[reply]

A comparison between a win by runs and a win by wickets is meaningless. Obviously, a win by 250 runs is a larger winning margin than a win by one run. By the same token, a win by 10 wickets is more emphatic than a win by one wicket. But you can't compare a win by runs and a win by wickets and say that one or the other of them is necessarily a smaller winning margin. --Viennese Waltz 14:33, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Whilst I'd agree with Viennese Waltz, to a watching crowd, a win by 1 run will feel a lot closer, as taking wickets is a scarcer event than scoring runs, so the side that lost by 1 run would feel a lot close to victory than the one that lost by 1 wicket. So much for WP:OR. In the History of Test cricket, and >2,300 matches in nearly 150 years, only 1 match has been won by 1 run, while 13 have been won by one wicket. All of that applies, of course to Test match cricket. It would be similar for first-class cricket. I don't really care about limited overs cricket, but I'd guess the same applies there too. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 15:33, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If I'm reading Wicket correctly, a team winning by a certain number of wickets is always the team batting last. The team batting first would have eventually been retired by 10 wickets going down. If the team batting last scores enough runs to win, then the match is over, and they've won by however many wickets they have not lost yet. Is that correct? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 16:21, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Broadly yes, but to nitpick, "The team batting first would have eventually been retired by 10 wickets going down" is not necessarily true, because teams batting first, second or third (there being two innings each in a first-class match) sometimes declare their innings closed while still having wickets in hand. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 2.122.177.55 (talk) 00:03, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So if the team batting first closed their innings after, say, 8 wickets, and the team batting last came back and won while losing 9 wickets, how would that be reported? Winning by "negative one" wicket? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 01:16, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, that would still be reported as winning by one wicket, because that's how many wickets the last-batting team had in hand in their last innings when they exceeded the other team's total. Note that the totals involved are, in first-class cricket, those of both of each teams two innings (if taken).

So for example: Team A declares (closes) their first innings at 400 runs for 2 wickets, Team B scores 250 all-out (for 10, but one never says that), Team A then declares their second innings at 350 for 3 (making their match total 750), Team B reaches 501 for 9 before the final close of play (making their total 751) – Team B wins by one wicket, even though they have lost a total of 19 wickets and Team A lost only 5.

Note also that if Team B had reached a score of only, say, 200 for 9 at close of play on the final day, so that they were 301 runs behind but still had a wicket in hand, the result would be a draw because of that untaken wicket: the risk of later running out of playing time before taking all the opponent's wickets, and thus drawing rather than winning, is (usually) what prompts a team to declare with some of their own wickets still in hand. (If the two match totals were exactly equal, a very rare occurance, the result would be a tie.) {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 2.122.177.55 (talk) 09:46, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An obvious follow-up question to that is why does play have to end at that time? Can't the teams just carry on until either Team B has reached its run target or is all out? For the answer, see playing time (cricket). (It's complicated.) --Viennese Waltz 09:56, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Viennese Waltz because otherwise they'll miss their cruise ship. See Timeless Test. The world record was nine days of play and it was still a draw. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 10:00, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mean carrying on beyond the fifth day, I meant carrying on the fifth day until a result is achieved. Besides, I answered my own question, so I'm not sure what your point is. --Viennese Waltz 10:08, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That effectively happens in One Day matches all the time. It's reported as winning by one wicket, and I have regarded that as an incorrect description since the first time I saw it. We need a better way. HiLo48 (talk) 02:37, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Limited overs is a whole other story. It's a bit like softball games that have a clock on them, e.g. no full inning can start after one hour has passed. The obvious solution for limited overs would be to simply report the score. In baseball, if a team wins in the last of the ninth after 1 out, you could say they won by 2 outs. That isn't done, of course. But it seems like the same general idea. The one thing about winning by X number of wickets is that presumably the runs margin will be narrow. But that doesn't necessarily make it a close match, because it would end once you've scored enough runs to win, right? But if for some reason you were to keep batting until you actually lost all 10 wickets, the final margin could be considerable. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 04:30, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A perhaps interesting thing about the way scores are described in limited overs cricket can be part taken from my example. If the team batting second win from the last ball it will be reported as a X wicket win. But it will be the same if they win with over half over their overs remaining. Even if it's a 1 wicket win, I think most of the time most people will agree a victory with over half the overs remaining and a victory from the last ball are quite different in how close they are. In fact, generally a 10 wicket win from the last ball is likely to be seen as closer than a 1 wicket win with over half the overs remaining. That said, it isn't uncommon to report how many balls were remaining in many contexts e.g. [5]. Nil Einne (talk) 13:50, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(EC) In limited overs cricket, without knowing more details I wouldn't say it always applies. To give a specific constructed example, in an ODI if the scores are 299 for the team batting first (however they got there) and 298/9 for the team batting second at over 49.5, both outcomes are reasonably likely, as well as a tie (albeit depending slightly on the specifics). Practically, how close a match feels can probably swing easier in an ODI (and even more so in a T20). For example, if at the start of the 49th over, the 9th and 10th batters (batsmen [6] [7]) are at the crease after 2 wickets from the previous 2 balls, and their team need 25 more runs, their situation seems rather dire. If they manage to get 4 straight sixes then suddenly at 49.4 it looks like they're on the cusp of winning. But if the next ball is the wicket of the batter who scored the 4 straight sixes suddenly at 49.5 we're at the situation I described at the beginning. To be clear, this is not to say you can't have fairly rapid changes in a test match, simply that it's easier to happen in an ODI. Nil Einne (talk) 04:35, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

question about a baseball "fact"

I was reading about Ronald Acuña Jr. of the Atlanta Braves on your site and this is listed.... "On April 25, 2018, the Braves promoted Acuña to the major leagues.[20] He became the youngest player in Major League Baseball upon his promotion,[21]"....

I believe this to be wrong, but trying to wade through your pages and pages of questioning a fact made my head spin (I didn't want to actually edit someone's article, just ask someone to double check, and I'm an educated person, so please don't think I'm stupid. It just seems like a lot of runaround navigating the help pages.)

Anyway, according to the Texas Rangers Trivia Calendar I have, David Clyde was younger than Ronald Acuña, when he made his debut. He was 18 year, 2 months old on June 27, 1973 when he pitched his premier game for that franchise. According to Ronald Acuña's dates, He was 20 years, 4 months old. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RobinBobo (talk • contribs) 21:35, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Those "youngest player" factoids in player articles mean "youngest player at that moment". (By the way, Joe Nuxhall was 15.) --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 21:59, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it should probably be amended to say "at that time" or similar to avoid the ambiguity. But OP, please note that it also did not say "of all time" or "in baseball history" or anything of that kind either. Matt Deres (talk) 14:29, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's fairly clear from the source that they meant merely the youngest currently active major league player. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 15:17, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't disagree, but the existence of this thread suggests otherwise. Matt Deres (talk) 20:02, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The cited source actually says, "Promoted by the Atlanta Braves from Triple-A, the youngest player in the majors was put into the starting lineup Wednesday night, batting sixth and playing left field against Cincinnati." Someone tried to paraphrase that and it didn't quite come out right. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 21:12, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. --76.69.117.113 (talk) 22:03, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 25

YouTube ads

I tend to watch a bit of YouTube, and I come across these frankly awful ads. By awful, I mean an small child on a budget of a week’s pocket money could do a better job at making an ad. If you’ve ever watched a YouTube gaming video, I think you’ll understand what I mean. So my question is, how does the owner of the game, who has created, launched and maintained a game as well as paying a large sum to advertise on YouTube not know how to make a decent ad? Or am I mistaken in that these ‘awful ads’ seem enticing to younger viewers? Apologies for not providing a link to one of these ads, if you want to find one, try any gaming video on YouTube, most of the ads are the same - mobile games with a fairly simple idea, often easy and offline to play. Regards, Willbb234 (talk) 20:36, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What would lead you to believe that those are intersecting skill sets? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 21:09, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]