User talk:Buidhe

I take requests for image and source reviews on historical topics at A-Class and Featured level. Please post all requests on this page.

Your GA nomination of Incitement to genocide

The article Incitement to genocide you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Incitement to genocide for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pi -- Pi (talk) 03:41, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Holocaust in Bohemia and Moravia (book)

The article The Holocaust in Bohemia and Moravia (book) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Holocaust in Bohemia and Moravia (book) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 15:21, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How good's your German?

I ask because the Fotos Aus Sobibor book has some interesting and (I think) novel information about Lager II. I'd like to summarize it in the article, but I'm not sure I understand it well enough to be sure I'm accurately reflecting it. Do you think you could check over my attempt? Thanks again for all your work on the article! Botterweg14 (talk) 01:40, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Botterweg14 Not perfect, but I'd be happy to give it a go. Google translate does pretty well with German as well. I don't have a copy of the book, however. b uidhe 01:55, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Buidhe, is it okay if I answer Botterweg14? I know it's weird writing on someone else's talk page, but I was passing by and I saw this and thought of Gerda Arendt and Ermenrich who are both Germans whose English is perfect and who are both really exceptionally wonderful totally brilliant people who might also be willing to help. It doesn't hurt to ask! Jenhawk777 (talk) 18:03, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jenhawk777, It's not just accepted but encouraged, if you or someone else could help him better than I could! b uidhe 18:35, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're so cool. :-) Jenhawk777 (talk) 19:17, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks so much to you both! I think I've figured out what I was confused about, but I may take you up on the suggestion as I continue to expand the article. I do wanna recommend buying the book, given your interest in the subject. It's available both as a hard copy and as an ebook. It's more than just a collection of the photos--- it's got a ton of new information about the site and about the perpetrators. Botterweg14 (talk) 16:14, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Incitement to Genocide

Are you still working on the GA feedback for Incitement to Genocide, or would you like me to finish off the review now? I see you've done some changes, I've not looked at them yet as I thought you might still be planning on doing some more Pi (Talk to me!) 13:01, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pi, Thanks for your review, I thought that I addresssed all of your concerns on the review page. So yes, I'm done editing unless you see anything else that needs addressing. b uidhe 17:11, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks, I'll look at it again in the next day or two Pi (Talk to me!) 20:08, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Incitement to Genocide is passed as a Good Article. Thank you for writing it, it was very interesting to read Pi (Talk to me!) 03:10, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Incitement to genocide

The article Incitement to genocide you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Incitement to genocide for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pi -- Pi (talk) 03:21, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

History of Christian thought on persecution and tolerance

Hey Buidhe! I came back to tell you I have finished going through all the references in the article. I am feeling very confident about its content and sources and would give my right arm to have you take a look at it and see if you think it's okay to nominate it for GA. I know you said you don't know much of the topic, but that shouldn't matter really, you know WP standards, and I admire your work here and respect your opinion. If you aren't interested that's okay I understand, or if you're too busy--I get that--but I wanted to ask. I could go ahead and nominate it and you could review it if you think that's a good idea. Anyway, I'd love to hear from you. Thanx again, Jenhawk777 (talk) 17:58, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for A World Without Jews

On 21 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article A World Without Jews, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in A World Without Jews, Alon Confino argues that "the messianic struggle to create a Nazi civilization depended on the extermination of the Jews"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/A World Without Jews. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, A World Without Jews), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hattab Dhib

Good evening Buidhe, Hattab Dhib was a Tunisian actor. He has french and arabic wikipedia articles . I would like to conserve my article. Thank you --MagieRouge (talk) 04:21, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alon Confino

What is your problem with describing him as Israeli? Giant Snowman 09:47, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a "problem" with it, I just don't think that nationality should be highlighted in the first sentence unless it's something relevant to the person's notability/work. From the sources I looked at, it did not seem to be the case. b uidhe 09:50, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've added sources, they were quite easy to find. Again, what is your issue here? Giant Snowman 09:51, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I answered your question already. I don't think it's necessary or helpful to highlight someone's nationality way more than it is in the vast majority of reliable sources discussing the subject (the sources you added just show that is an aspect mentioned in a small minority of sources). Wikipedia likes to put people into boxes by nationality way more than is done in most RS. b uidhe 09:57, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nationality should be in the lede per MOS:OPENPARABIO. Reliable sources use the nationality. So...what? Giant Snowman 09:58, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MOS is a general guideline. Nationality is relevant to many people, such as politicians. But I think it the first sentence should be evaluated on a case by case basis rather than dictated by a blanket application. b uidhe 10:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GiantSnowman, PS I don't appreciate threats to "escalate this". b uidhe 09:58, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And I don't appreciate blind reverting of information, in violation of MOS, with no attempt to find sources or resolution. Giant Snowman 10:04, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If I think MOS is being applied in a blanket fashion without thought or nuance, then I may oppose that particular interpretation or change. b uidhe 10:10, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fall

I have set a DABTEST using the Meteorological fall which doesn't have any views[[1]] in the last 20 days. You suggested about moving the DAB page temporarily for the DABTEST. I agree that there is no consensus but indeed you have agreed that there is consensus for a temporarily move of the DAB to the base name. @King of Hearts: if you want to set up redirects for the other common terms on the DAB page you can otherwise we can just go with the season one. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:00, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, don't worry about it, King of Hearts has already taken care of it, thanks. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Incitement to genocide

On 22 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Incitement to genocide, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's call for Israel to be "wiped off the map" has been described as incitement to genocide? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Incitement to genocide. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Incitement to genocide), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Inayatiyya Move

Hi Buidhe,

Thanks for discussing the possible move of the Inayati Order to Inayatiyya. I'm sorry I didn't respond in time. With regard to independent sources, this move is very new and I am not sure there have been major articles about it in the last few months, though I will check. The group itself seems to be moving to not considering Inayati Order as their name at all. The name of their website [2] is still the old name, but everything else within the site uses the new one. Two of the most recent articles that I did find are this [3] from January, speaking about the Inayati Order. This most recent one, from earlier this month, cites an Inayatiyya. [4] They officially changed their name in April, though this has been in the plans for a while. I do think that outside sources will begin to use the new name over time. Thanks again for your input!

AnandaBliss (talk) 16:02, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@AnandaBliss: Thanks for your reply. It looks to me that it's too soon to say whether independent sources will pick up the new name. I would suggest waiting another few months to see if that changes. When it does, feel free to file another move request. b uidhe 16:14, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- That makes sense to me, I'll do that. Thanks! AnandaBliss (talk) 16:51, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Closing RM's

Again, PLEASE, I urge you, use {{rmnac}} when you close a requested move. Red Slash 19:45, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Nazis, Islamists, and the Making of the Modern Middle East

On 24 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nazis, Islamists, and the Making of the Modern Middle East, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nazis, Islamists, and the Making of the Modern Middle East argues that Nazism and Islamism are similar, especially in their extreme antisemitism? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nazis, Islamists, and the Making of the Modern Middle East. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Nazis, Islamists, and the Making of the Modern Middle East), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Wug·a·po·des 23:33, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 00:01, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image review request

Apologies for the random message and request. I was wondering if you could possibly do an image review for my current FAC. The article only has two images so hopefully, it would not take too much work. I completely understand if you do not have the time or interest. The nomination is still rather new, as I have only put it up earlier this month, but I am very grateful for the commentary it has already received at this point. I hope you are having an enjoyable week so far. Aoba47 (talk) 03:42, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoba47: fair use isn't really my area of expertise so I'll leave this review to a different user. I've added it to Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Image and source check requests. b uidhe 04:49, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response and for adding it to the list. I hope you are staying safe, and have a great rest of your week. Aoba47 (talk) 04:53, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FAC Nomination for Hyborian War

Hi Buidhe. Are there any unresolved image issues I can address for the FAC nomination for Hyborian War? And thanks for your time and engagement on this nomination. I appreciate it. Airborne84 (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review and work on my nomination. Greatly appreciate it! Airborne84 (talk) 03:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Battle for the railways

Hi, would you mind returning to this nomination and approving the alt? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 19:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NAD), I don't see a specific relevance of the German term and an interlanguage link, which is hardly usefull for the vast majority of the readers. Why do you think it's relevant? HerkusMonte (talk) 12:19, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The German term is not an exact synonym of "standard work" in terms of usage and it could be misleading to state that the source said it was a "standard work" without hinting that the source was written in German and pointing at the actual word used. b uidhe 12:23, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mmh, I don't think so, but I'll leave it up to you. HerkusMonte (talk) 12:27, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Das Lachen wird ihnen vergehen!!!.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Das Lachen wird ihnen vergehen!!!.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ST47 (talk) 07:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moisés Carmona

Hello Buidhe, either earlier this month or last month you moved Moisés Carmona to the draft space at Draft:Moisés Carmona due to the fact that the article was unsourced. Recently I've added a couple of citations, they are not the best as this is a somewhat obscure subject, but who probably meets WP:GNG. Just wanted to get your opinion if the article is ready to be moved into the mainspace again or if it should be submitted for review. Thanks Inter&anthro (talk) 01:46, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Inter&anthro (talk) 02:00, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Inter&anthro, Thanks for fixing up the article! b uidhe 02:01, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Brother, Can You Spare a Dime?

Hello! Your submission of Brother, Can You Spare a Dime? at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:48, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NACs/relists again...

Please undo your relist here and read Wikipedia:NOQUORUM and WP:RELISTBIAS. I presented a cogent enough argument that this could be treated as a prod. Praxidicae (talk) 14:57, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Senedd Cymru

Regarding your close: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Senedd on television I don't understand the decision to merge to Senedd Cymru which is a redirect.

Per Talk:Senedd Cymru – Welsh Parliament#Requested move 6 May 2020 the article is at Senedd Cymru – Welsh Parliament and it probably makes more sense to merge to there. – wbm1058 (talk) 18:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again!

Hope you are well--I don't have to ask if you're keeping busy. :-) I have just completed a redo of Persecution of pagans in the late Roman Empire and would love if you felt like taking a look. I think the references are all good. I tried to make sure before asking this time! Jenhawk777 (talk) 20:41, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jenhawk777: Looks good, you should go ahead and nominate for GAN. (t · c) buidhe 21:08, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx! Jenhawk777 (talk) 22:09, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Asking for a favour

Hi Buidhe. You were good enough to do an image review for Battle of Cape Hermaeum at ACR - here. It didn't attract any supports and I withdrew it after six weeks. It is now at FAC - here - and I wonder if you might be able to have another look at it? Thanks.

PS On a separate note, I have made sure that the sourcing doesn't have any of the same silly errors to those you recently picked up. Thanks again for that. Although I have no doubt included a whole new set. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:31, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK you won

OK by editing and falsifying the CHARTA 77 page, you destroyed my work. You won. I will as of now refrain from working for Wikipedia. I am not willing to spend my time researching, and then someone comes and takes it all away. Do what you like! Bye! Royalrec (talk) 23:37, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations from the Military History Project

		The WikiChevrons
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the WikiChevrons for participating in 21 reviews between April and June 2020. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:34, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Czechoslovak myth

Hello! Your submission of Czechoslovak myth at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:19, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you were pinged over a week ago. Please respond now. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 20:19, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Historical negationism

Hello, referring to your revert of the alphabetical sorting of the article, I agree it can also be sorted chronologically. However, there are no dates given in any of the section headings, making it impossible for a reader to know that it is sorted chronologically. If you could add the dates so that it is more easier to understand, it would be good. Thanks, Siddsg (talk) 07:05, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Siddsg, Thanks for your comment but it's probably better to place it on the article talk page. (t · c) buidhe 07:06, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wochenspruch der NSDAP image

Let's give it a month, and then I'll try renominating it with you. Sometimes context matters, and we can prepare the proposal, with proposed text for a main page run, and so on, to give it a good chance. There are legitimate concerns to be had with Nazi propoganda, so I think we should make our case for how it can serve an educational purpose as strongly as possible, and right from the start.

Because I do think, in context, this image helps dispel Holocaust myths. If nothing else, it shows that Nazis were aware. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.3% of all FPs} 13:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will think about it. I really appreciate the support from you. (t · c) buidhe 21:21, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, FPC is a rather fickle place. Why is Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/La bohéme not passing? Who can say? There's a certain amount of derailment that happens when a discussion starts, but it can be completely random. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.3% of all FPs} 15:31, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copy

I was wondering why the gudban page is listed as a potential copyright, even though your edit summary here states its not a copyvio issue. Auxerre dejufan (talk) 16:39, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Auxerre dejufan, I'm not an "an administrator, copyright clerk or OTRS agent." so perhaps they want the issue to be resolved by someone else. (t · c) buidhe 21:22, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Government of New Zealand move proposal

@Buidhe: Another requested move was nominated by myself. This time the nomination concerns the New Zealand article only. There again appears to be a consensus to move the article. My understand is that, as an involved editor, I am unable to close the discussion myself. Are you able to look over the discussion and close it if appropriate? It would be much appreciated! --Hazhk (talk) 14:17, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relist

Hi Buidhe, Hope you are doing well. Just to inform you that you relisted over Sandstein action here. DMySon 07:50, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Holocaust in Slovakia at FA

Congratulations on the promotion of this article! A very worthwhile topic. —Brigade Piron (talk) 08:25, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review of it! Much appreciated (t · c) buidhe 08:30, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camley Street

I don't follow your closure. There were two Delete and two Keep. At the very least, that is a No Consensus. The keep arguments were not stronger than the deletes. I think this should be re-listed again to try to get an actual consensus. MB 02:03, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MB: I have reverted the closure upon request, however, usually if sources are presented you should explain why they don't lead to the thing being notable, otherwise there is not a very strong argument for deletion. (t · c) buidhe 02:27, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

West African Dwarf goats

Hi, Buidhe! Are you confident that your closure of the RM of West African Dwarf goats reflects Wikipedia policy, specifically WP:COMMONNAME? I did not see a policy-based argument presented in favour of the move (I'm entirely sympathetic to the "let's get away from colonial naming" argument, but it has no weight in this discussion). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:22, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There were several users who !voted in this discussion and you were the only one who opposed the move, so I'm not sure it could be closed against moving. Admittedly the rationale was not particularly policy based, but there are arguments that could have been cited in favor of the move, especially WP:CONCISE. It also seems that KAMK1 is proposing a change in the scope of the article and other users agreed with that—I don't know how else to read the "support" !votes. Since the RM had already been open nearly a month, it shouldn't be relisted. However, since your arguments are much more persuasive I ended up reverting the close and adding my personal oppose vote, so perhaps the discussion might be closed as "no consensus". (t · c) buidhe 09:49, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Thomas Daniell

Hello Buidhe, thanks for your comments on the images in the article, I've now addressed them. I've gone for creating the article List of works by Edward Thomas Daniell—but it's definitely a 'work in progress'! Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 12:46, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Further comments now addressed. Thanks, Amitchell125 (talk) 21:25, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your source review comments done. Amitchell125 (talk) 10:11, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

German city dabs

Hello. I see that several German city and town articles have moved to Somewhere (city), with a dab taking the base name. The resulting broken links are gradually getting fixed, but a backlog is starting to pile up. Are there many more places to move? Certes (talk) 14:11, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Certes, I think I've gotten most or all of them. Only a few of the Nazi concentration camps were notorious enough to usurp primary topic status. (t · c) buidhe 14:12, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Buidhe: Thanks. Do you have a list of places where the primary topic has changed? Unless someone has kindly fixed them, there will now be articles where editors have correctly linked to the town with a simple [[Somewhere]] but which now link inappropriately to the camp. Certes (talk) 14:18, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Certes No, I was careful and changed them all to dab pages temporarily to avoid incorrect incoming links. PS I would have cleared all the dabs myself, except my antivirus software does not allow me to use dab solver. (t · c) buidhe 14:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I've been using DisamAssist for this sort of thing. It helps solve links from multiple pages into one dab, which is what we need here. (DabSolver is better at solving links from one article to many dabs.) As DisamAssist runs within the Wikipedia page, it may play more nicely with antivirus. (And sorry for pinging; I forgot where I was.) Certes (talk) 14:28, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Czechoslovak government-in-exile has been nominated for deletion

Category:Czechoslovak government-in-exile has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:32, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Brother, Can You Spare a Dime?

On 13 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Brother, Can You Spare a Dime?, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that business leaders tried to ban the Depression anthem "Brother, Can You Spare a Dime?" for being "a dangerous attack on the American economic system"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Brother, Can You Spare a Dime?. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Brother, Can You Spare a Dime?), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move Request for Brendan Angelides

Hello, Following step 1 of the move review process, I am the writing to follow up on the request to move the page 'Eskmo' to 'Brendan Angelides.' Brendan Angelides is shifting from the use of the artist name, Eskmo, to his birth name, Brendan Angelides. He recently transitioned from a touring artist to a composer for film & television and is crediting all future work under his full name. On IMDb you will notice past works are credited "as Eskmo," but his most recent 2020 credits (Naked Singularity & Minimum Mass), are credited as Brendan Angelides.^[1] His about section on ancestormedia.com also reflects this change. ^[2]Please inform me if this inadequate proof and I will proceed with Move review process. Thanks Bobtinontinton (talk) 16:03, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bobtinontinton I would not recommend a move review because you appear to be misunderstanding article titles policy. If there is a conflict, we usually label a subject by what it is called in third party sources, not its WP:Official name or preferred name. If you want a move request to be successful, it's helpful to start by presenting evidence that the destination name is what the subject is usually called in third party sources. (t · c) buidhe 16:12, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Another Holocaust

On 14 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Another Holocaust, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin claimed that he had prevented another Holocaust by bombing an Iraqi nuclear reactor? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Another Holocaust. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Another Holocaust), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed harasment

What you doing snowflake, stop harrasing my uploads. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 06:16, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.imdb.com/name/nm3691904/

[2] ttps://www.ancestormedia.com/about

[1]

[2]