User talk:CommanderInDubio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Yug (talk | contribs) at 15:13, 16 May 2021 (→‎Confusing). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Draft:Иван Монтик

Hello, could you highlight the links in my draft that need to be replaced? I have studied the recommended guidelines, but apparently it takes practice to master this. Please do this for me, I will try harder to find suitable sources and rewrite the article. 37.215.41.240 (talk) 12:23, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Lucy Gibson

Hello, I believe there was a misunderstanding. I am not associated with Lucy Gibson or her companies. I simply wanted to expand my portfolio by adding "wikipedia article creation" to it. My wife follows her on IG and I searched her when looking for potential candidates for my wikipedia article creation. I would appreciate if you could review it with the correct context please. As you know, a significant amount of time went into it. Thank you Pantheonwest (talk) 14:11, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Please Advise accept my request Khogendrarupiniofficial1 (talk) 01:42, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hey there, thank you on the advice concerning my draft of Draft:Royal and Imperial Majesty on where to put requests for redirects. I had no clue that that existed before so thank you for the help on that! --CIN I&II (talk) 14:37, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
Thanks for getting the new page reviewer and for your contribution. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 08:55, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help

See this article Uvais Raza Khan Kaifraza786 (talk) 20:58, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Kaifraza786 what kind of help do you need? What is your question? This article has been nominated for deletion by a third editor. CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:34, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
You are special to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions and for your warm welcoming messages. ThePolarcub (talk) 19:21, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. You are welcome, happy editing! CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:32, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Shellfish allergy

Welcome aboard. David notMD (talk) 20:42, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@David notMD :-) I already modified the article Doctor (see templates inside) :) I suggest addressing those issues, let me know when you are ready. Have a nice evening, CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:54, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
From your two edits, I count seven citations needed, a clarify and a date needed. I will drop you a note when all that is rectified. David notMD (talk) 05:06, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@David notMD Yes, you are right - wanted to leave you a more detailed info this morning and put it on hold but I guess this will be not necessary. CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:30, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@David notMD Not that you are thinking being lazy, I am searching all day for citations especially for the Asthma and Skin prevelance, found some at Springer Link [1] but not exactly the figures which are mentioned in the article. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:56, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I intend to check all of the Regulation refs. I removed one for FSIS, but want to confirm that a FSIS ref used elsewhere covers what is in the text. David notMD (talk) 19:47, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
All citations needed addressed by use of existing refs. Ref list check identified two 'dead' refs. One removed (other refs covered the content) and the other updated to the current FDA version of the ref. I still need to check that the Regulation refs cover the Regulation content. I will put a note here when I am satisfied with all that. David notMD (talk) 14:58, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Regulations section refs checked. Added text and ref for regulations in Japan. David notMD (talk) 16:15, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your attentiveness to detail. Working on this led to discovering that several regulatory-related references were no longer functioning. As these are also used in GA articles Fish allergy, Egg allergy and Milk allergy, I will be addressing reference repair there. And adding the Japan regulatory ref. David notMD (talk) 12:48, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question

I am trying to fix an image on a userbox (the old one was out of date). Link: User:Tcr25/Userbox/User NASA SLS fan.StarshipSLS (talk) 18:48, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. Another user fixed it.StarshipSLS (talk) 18:48, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for all your help! StarshipSLS (talk) 18:44, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your denial of Earl Thollander

Hi @CommanderWaterford, you have reviewed my draft on Earl Hollander, and upon declining you said it lacks notability through the citations that were provided. I kind of agree, at the initial form (when you reviewed it) the draft indeed lacked proper citations. Actually the subject of the article is long deceased, since it's super hard to find any credible citations. But, I've looked upon the internet and newspaper archive websites, and dug up some credible citations (such as from Nytimes, SF Chronicle, Napa Valley, SF examiner, The press democrat, etc...). My kind request to you is, rereview the draft. I'm hopeful that it might pass this time around. Thanks! Tame (talk) 13:42, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tamingimpala I noticed your conversation with Cullen on its talk page regarding this draft - I am usually not reviewing a draft which I declined twice so please be patient until another reviewer will take care of it. CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:10, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammad Reza Homami Niya

Hi, I have added resources to the article if you can remove the delete tag.--Bahesab (talk) 16:17, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bahesab I am sorry but I will not remove the tag. your sources do not establish sufficient notability. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:29, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
How can they not be famous? He has been mentioned only 69 times in a news agency, if I need to add.--Bahesab (talk) 19:20, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

re-review

Hi sir; You declined my article some days ago. I rewrite and edit my article and make my effort to choose reliable reference cause it is needed. Can you please re-review my article and accept it if possible? thanks🙏🏽 Atena ak2 (talk) 16:47, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Benevolence International Foundation

Dear CommanderWaterford, Unfortunately I was not able to finish my editing, although of course I have the relevant sources for the added content. I will start editing again, thank you for your comment. Chrigre8582 (talk) 18:10, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cemetery of San Fernando

The article Cemetery of San Fernando you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Cemetery of San Fernando for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:41, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, and what happened next

Hey — you declined this Syed Iftquar Hussain at AfC, and rightly so. Don't know if you've checked back to see how the story continued? And I don't only mean the AfD it's currently at, but also the intervening edits. Curious. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:04, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Do you have twitter or email ? thank you Mohamadomari (talk) 12:22, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do have but I do not see any reason why I should give them to you.... if you want to ask me something you can do it here. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:23, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Link removed

Hello CommanderWaterford - just to let you know that I've removed a now-blacklisted link in one of the sections above as it meant ClueBotIII wasn't able to archive. Best, Pahunkat (talk) 16:45, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notify me

If this is challenged, send it to AFD and notify me. Celestina007 (talk) 17:07, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

👍 CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:17, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for all your help, User:JackReynoldsADogOwner and User:CommanderWaterford! StarshipSLS (talk) 19:49, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of senescence research speedy delete

Hi, I declined delete of Timeline of senescence research as previous AFD resulted in keep. see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of senescence research. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:57, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sonia Bassey, Britt Koskella

Many thanks for your very swift reviews of my two recent pages about Sonia Bassey and Britt Koskella. I will keep looking for more about Bassey to more clearly show her notability.--MerielGJones (talk) 08:31, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: VIA Institute on Character

Hello CommanderWaterford. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of VIA Institute on Character, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Hi CommanderWaterford. Again, you aren't able to see the version deleted back in 2010, and the discussion only hints at what the problems were. Google it up and you will find that there may well be UPenn mentions at least that could be included. . Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 09:22, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Link

Can I put a link to a livestream for a rocket launch on my userpage? StarshipSLS (talk) 16:06, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already answered on your talk page. One ping is sufficient. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:09, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 01:58, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AFC

The Articles for Creation Barnstar
Congratulations for having the most AFC reviews of any reviewer in the last 30 days. In fact, you have more than double anybody else. Great job. –Novem Linguae (talk) 10:36, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption request

Hello CommanderWaterford,

Thank you for rating the first article I wrote (Logic of appropriateness).

I am a relative newcomer to Wikipedia and I would like to write a few more articles on various social science theories (see the info on my userpage). I saw on your user page that you are a highly experienced Wikipedian and that you are willing to adopt new users.

Would you be willing to adopt me?

I would be grateful if you were, because I believe that I could learn a lot from you. If you are simply too busy to adopt new people, however, I would, of course, completely understand.

All best, Socialsciencenerd (talk) 13:53, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Socialsciencenerd I left you already some info at your talk page, sure can I adopt you, no problem. CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:47, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CommanderWaterford, thanks very much! Your message made my day. Many thanks also for all the information you left on my talk page. That's exactly what I need. I will take a close look at this. Thank you also for your willingness to answer any remaining questions. That's very kind of you. I appreciate your support. All best, Socialsciencenerd (talk) 15:58, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CommanderWaterford, Thank you very much for sharing the Getting help table with me. This has been extremely useful. (And very well presented.) I have already found answers to a number of questions I had.

May I ask you for your advice on how to create new articles? When I wrote my first text on the Logic of appropriateness, I had no clue about the most appropriate way to “upload” it. So I simply created and published the new article - and I was fortunate that it was evaluated and rated only a few days later. For my second piece (Draft:Emotional choice theory) I took what I thought was the more appropriate route: I put together a draft and submitted it for review. But I was then informed that the review process could take 5 months or more.

Now I am working on two more new articles. What would you say is the most sensible/helpful way for me to upload them: Should I just publish them as new articles straight away? Or should I submit them for review (and accept the wait time)? Or is there perhaps a better, third route that I am not yet aware of? Sorry for stealing your time with such a long-winded query. I would be very grateful for any advice that you may have. Thank you for your time! All best, Socialsciencenerd (talk) 08:37, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Socialsciencenerd I suggest creating your articles directly in main space as you gave done with the first one, as far as I see your drafts have good qualities and our New Page Patrollers do review the article as well. Right now I do not see any reason for you to go the AfC (=Draft) Way. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:44, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CommanderWaterford, Thank you very much for your speedy reply and your advice! I will create future articles directly in the main space, then. Thanks also for your kind words. I'll do my best to try and maintain a decent quality in the future. Have a good weekend! All best, Socialsciencenerd (talk) 09:21, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CommanderWaterford, Sorry to bother you again. Can I yet again ask you for your advice?

Thank you for your remark that the article still needs additional categories. I have just had a look at the WP:CATEGORY page, which was helpful. Out of the top of my head, I would put down the following additional categories:

Category:Social sciences| Category:Psychology| Category:International relations theory

Do you think these categories would be appropriate? Or are they too broad and general?

Alternatively, I could also put down some more specific categories, such as:

Category:Decision theory

All best, Socialsciencenerd (talk) 10:18, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Socialsciencenerd - Here you will find your answer: Wikipedia:Categorization dos and don'ts or in some more detail at Wikipedia:FAQ/Categorization CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:22, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CommanderWaterford, many thanks! That's very helpful - especially the FAQs. All best, Socialsciencenerd (talk) 10:47, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Hey, CommanderWaterford. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! Zai (💬 • 📝 • ⚡️) 14:40, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus Christ...how time flies...

...exactly one year has passed since Registration: 85,000 Edits (has someone did more in their first year here (just for curiosity), 3139 AfC Reviews and more than 300 Articles put into mainspace... never imagined that could happen. CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:43, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft

Hello! If my draft needs 1 more article, why Delligatti is in NS0 with only 1 article?--Cesyro (talk) 18:43, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Cesyro I don't know, you need to ask the Reviewer of this article why this is the case. See also Wikipedia:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:49, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, NASCARfan0548 ↗ 21:09, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 22:13:45, 6 May 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by 2A02:8071:6A9:6F00:9D0B:C47B:8D21:D988


How is the PlayWay article considered advertisment? Multiple games of the company have their own articles, they are listed on the biggest stock exchange on Poland. Not associated in any way with them by the way.


2A02:8071:6A9:6F00:9D0B:C47B:8D21:D988 (talk) 22:13, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your "draft" consists of only one short sentence and the rest of it are Wikilinks to Games they have published and their homepage. I do not see any content at all in your draft. Please have a look at WP:NCORP and think about creating a new draft following this guidelines. CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:29, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For article reviews

Thank you for taking time in reviewing some of the pages I created. Best wishes of good health! Crear2000 (talk) 02:13, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I Am Not Paid or Receiving any Incentive

Thank you for taking time to enlighten me on the WP:COI and WP:UNDISCLOSED PAID EDITOR but like I have stated clearly that I am not employed by anyone, organization of group to publish or edit any of the articles as I am yet to understand how that works. As far as I know Wikipedia as a community of learning, I believe my contributions have helped to do more research and be able to improve on my writing skills. So I wish to continue to learn and contribute to this community. Thank you. Bibihans (talk)Bibihans

user

@CommanderWaterford:. At least fix the problem Dear user, I ask you to solve the problems of this page and register it for final. I asked you for help .Linda Lover (talk) 12:55, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Attempted assassination of Mohamed Nasheed

Hello, I'm quite new in Wikipedia. Please, can you please tell me how to remove the "draft" tag of the article "Attempted assassination of Mohamed Nasheed"? It's quite expanded and enough referenced now. Wiki N Islam (talk) 18:06, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Wiki N Islam Ehm...You need to submit your draft for being reviewed by pushing the blue button "Submit the draft for review" CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:39, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, submitted my edits, but still "Draft:Attempted ass....." is showing in the name of that article. How can I move that article into it's correct position (not as a draft)? Wiki N Islam (talk) 22:21, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Wiki N Islam Now we just have to wait for the article to be reviewed. Kornatice (talk) 02:08, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you. Wiki N Islam (talk) 04:56, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of TheViper

Hello, I see you have marked TheViper for speedy deletion as promotion. As I stated in the talk portion of the article I am working on adding articles for other players and tournaments for this game. I do not think this constitutes "spam" or promotion of an individual. I am creating a branch of articles similar to those see in League of Legends in esports. With relevant individuals and tournaments. In fact I am working on the Hidden Cup Series and the winner of that tournament a player known as Hera. I would appreciate it if you refrained from deleting these articles unless you can explain why this esport is not relevant while others are. Thank you Youngdrake (talk) 05:11, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Roar (song)

Hello CommanderWaterford sorry to trouble you but how to solve these terrible looking 175 and 176 references? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 05:12, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Lotje, I marked them as dead links, if you want to rise greater attention to correct those ones I suggest asking for at the articles talk page (or eventually the Teahouse as well). CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:44, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you ever so much CommanderWaterford Lotje (talk) 08:06, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of South City Hospital Article.

Hi,

I see you have flagged my recent article for deletion. The page is not unambiguously promotional, because I am in no way related to the hospital. I am simply undergoing treatment there and was surprised to see that there wasn't any article on this hospital, even when it is one of the most popular one in our city. I am happy to make any edits if you think it sounds promotional, but I have followed a very neutral tone. Your guidance will be appreciated.

Thanks

Request on 18:16:01, 8 May 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Cereal Tester


Hello,

Would you be able to tell me what specifically is not considered a reliable source in the article, and/or what needs a reliable source. The sources listed are from a university, scientific journals and conferences, etc.

Thank you in advance for your help!

Cereal Tester (talk) 18:16, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure @Cereal Tester - The problem in your draft is not the lack of reliable sources but of independent ones - all sources are too closed related to the subject of your draft. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:51, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ball Relay

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ball_Relay is this draft acceptable just wondering Gardner Eli (talk) 18:49, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Gardner Eli A Reviewer will tell you, please be patient, we have more than 5,000 drafts waiting for a Review, it can take up months. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:52, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks Gardner Eli (talk) 18:53, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know Ball Relay is a different game version of the game are different Gardner Eli (talk) 18:56, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Margery Wolf

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Margery Wolf you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Edwininlondon -- Edwininlondon (talk) 21:21, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Edwininlondon Thank you for taking your time to review it - if you have any question or comments please let me know. CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:25, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paddle Ball

Hi I added Red links to Ball Relay in Paddle Ball Gardner Eli (talk) 23:13, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Iam Farnaz Shetty

Hi This is my Wikipedia and few information regarding me is incorrect. My height and my age . Iam 5’4 in height and 16th September 1996 born . That’s why I didn’t find this information to be displayed on social media . Kindly make the changes . Farnaz Shetty (talk) 05:35, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Rafagahd

Hello CommanderWaterford, imo this should be deleted. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 11:06, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contesting Speedy Deletion: Goodberry's Frozen Custard

ello, you recently marked a new page I added for speedy deletion and I was wondering why? It doesn't appear to meet the criteria you applied to it for being unambiguous advertising unless acknowledging the place exist is advertising. I will admit I don't know much about the place and they don't have much info online besides their websites and references to them on reddit, hence why I marked it a stub, but I don't think policy for stubs on businesses is to yeet them from wikipedia for all time. Falderol (talk) 13:02, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Yogesh Singh

As per WP:NACADEMIC#6, the article is okay for the main space. Yogesh Singh is the Vice Chancellor of Delhi Technological University. Please go through WP:NACADEMIC#6

The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society."

Powerful Karma (talk) 08:20, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Powerful Karma Sure, now you only need to provide sources which are accessible for this claim (did you even follow for example the google scholar link in your draft?) then I am sure another reviewer will accept your draft. I suggest improving the sources in the draft instead of trying to convince me to accept your draft. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:26, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I allowed myself to add the necessary sources and approve lastly your draft. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:30, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 43

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 43, March – April 2021

  • New Library Card designs
  • 1Lib1Ref May

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Surekha Vani

Hi there. Surekha is a noted actress in Tollywood films, although made not be much recognized in Kollywood films. She is known for her comic roles. And so far she has done over 100 films. If you follow Tollywood films, then you will definetely know who she is. There are lots of other Tollywood (Telugu) actors, who don't have an article on wikipedia. In the course, I will improve the article. I request not to delete this article, as it follows the guidelines of entertainers. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 12:36, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Munaf Kapadia

Hola! I've cleaned up Munaf Kapadia and I think it may be ready. Would you be able to please review it. Thanks! VV 12:25, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

More specific feedback please

Hey, thanks very much for reviewing my draft! Would you mind giving me some more specific feedback about why it was rejected please. I'm particularly struggling with the tone. Thanks :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cescapind (talk • contribs) 14:16, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2021-19

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Changes later this week

  • Recurrent item The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 11 May. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 12 May. It will be on all wikis from 13 May (calendar).

Future changes

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

15:08, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Ken Griffiths

I don't know if you noticed, but the submitter of this draft has a misleading username, indicating good-faith confusion. The draft states that the subject, Ken Griffiths, died in 2014. The account has the same name as the person. This may be a family member, but in any case is probably someone who mistakes account name and article name. This is not exactly a common error, but it is more common than I would expect. I have reported the username as a good-faith misleading name. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:46, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon Good eye, indeed - no, I did not notice it. CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:48, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This, in my view, increases the likelihood that the draft might become an article, because it isn't an autobiography, and it might not be conflict of interest. It isn't an error that is due to the policies and guidelines being confusing, but it is a mistake that is occasionally made anyway. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:07, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, perhaps there is some kind of misunderstanding - I did not decline it for the COI - which clearly is present, I think. I declined it for now because he is lacking of significant coverage in the sources mentioned. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:24, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Questions about AFDs

Hello! I saw that you relisted a marathon page in the AFD space. In the discussion of deletion, there are two "Keep" votes. Instead of removing the AFD, it has been relisted. Is it typical to do this several times until you have 10 votes? Or is there no standard vote number, but just a subjective feel to relist? What is the criteria for moving from AFD to being clear? Just curious; thanks for your reply. Comm260 ncu (talk) 16:32, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry @Comm260 ncu but I am not able to explain you the whole AfD Process, which is very complex to be honest, here on my talk page. Please take a closer study at Wikipedia:Guide to deletion, an AfD Discussion wis relisted usually to get a consensus - the amount of keep and/or delete votes is not exactly relevant. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:37, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thanks for the advice. The references are very helpful. The guidelines state that A volunteer (the "closing admin") will review the article, carefully read the discussion, weigh all the facts, evidence and arguments presented and determine if consensus was reached on the fate of the article. So you're looking for more participation? Seven days have passed, which is the standard stated. Again, thanks for your work. Let me know if there's something I can do to assist.Comm260 ncu (talk) 16:49, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominate

L. Murugan is not a assmbely member. He lost all election. He is only a president of a small state in India. The party has less than 2.5% vote in the state. Please nominate this page for deletion. 2409:4072:6D18:EFEB:2D6C:4264:602E:7EAE (talk) 16:41, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lyrics Academy of Music

Hi there, as it's a school, unfortunately, the A7 isn't valid. I have, however, decided to AfD the article as I can't find any independent sources showing significant coverage. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:06, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Spiderone Well, it is an online platform/online courses - not exactly a school. CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:09, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The website talks about having 35+ training centres across India, which I interpreted as meaning that they had 35 schools across India but I might well be wrong. Jam Circuit calls it a 'music school' but no idea if that's reliable. Not notable either way. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, in the outcome it doesn't matter at all. Thanks for noticing. CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:18, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notability tag

Thank you for reviewing Society of German Natural Scientists and Physicians. I created the article mainly because there were several redlinks for it. Unfortunately, almost all the sources about it are in German, which I can't read. The society appears to be the German equivalent of the Royal Society and several clues make me believe that it is actually quite notable:

  • The lengthy German Wikipedia article which has almost 400 incoming links
  • The 12 incoming links on English Wikipedia
  • It already had its own Commons category and Wikisource page

Do you have any suggestions for how I can prove its notability and keep it from being deleted? Nosferattus (talk) 23:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One way to go about this (without a translator) is to use Google Translate to attempt a rough translation for you. Open the Google Translate website, and instead of copying and pasting the text from the article, just copy and paste the URL into the "detect language" box. The site will offer a translated link, which won't be perfect, but it could get you the information you need for the page references. Give it a shot! Comm260 ncu (talk) 03:26, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Surekha Vani

Hi there. Surekha is a noted actress in Tollywood films, although made not be much recognized in Kollywood films. She is known for her comic roles. And so far she has done over 100 films. If you follow Tollywood films, then you will definetely know who she is. There are lots of other Tollywood (Telugu) actors, who don't have an article on wikipedia. In the course, I will improve the article. I request not to delete this article, as it follows the guidelines of entertainers. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 03:23, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Dunedin Collective for Woman

Thank you for your interest in this new page. Seeing as you were so quick to move it to draft, I invite you to now review Draft:Dunedin Collective for Woman. You will note that its references include coverage in three books, the corresponding article on the NZ government history website, and publications by or inspired by the Collective.

Alternatively, if you think that this is still not sufficient for article creation, I would appreciate your comments on what would you suggest would be required for it to match the standard of other Wikipedia stub articles.

With thanks Somej (talk) 08:02, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Teckzite

Hi, there was no promotional content nor such language on the page created which is declined when submitted for review, Teckzite is a national-level techno management fest page as many examples already existing on wikipedia. See Techfest page for instance. So I kindly request to accept the submission for review. Thank you! ShameenaSultana562 (talk) 01:45, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not paid to publish Draft:Elijah Chinezim Onyeagba

My sincere apologies for reaching you late, I have been busy with other engagements. This is to inform you that I am not hired or paid by Elijah Chinezim Onyeagba to publish his profile on Wikipedia. Thanks. Bibihans (talk) 08:43, 11 May 2021 (UTC)Bibihans[reply]

@Bibihans I have no idea why you are publishing this on my talk page - but let me tell you the more you publish this info on several user and community talk pages the last days honestly it does not get more likely to be truth, the contrary is the case. @Theroadislong @Celestina007 for your courtesy. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:49, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
CommanderWaterford Sometimes it is actually discouraging trying to learn especially when you are berated for your mistakes. I run a thriving and growing finance and investment company in Nigeria and my being on Wikipedia is based on my love for writing (I have published to two books) and consider Wikipedia a platform to sharpen my writing skills but this insistent accusation of being paid just makes me sometimes abandon this pursuit. I am not perturbed as I will continue pursue learning here no matter how seemingly difficult it is made to be sometimes. Thank you Bibihans (talk) 09:04, 11 May 2021 (UTC)Bibihans[reply]

Request on 12:39:58, 11 May 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Prolificainfo


Hello, I'm writing in connection to the review of the draft article Brother Leo (Artist), which was rejected. I understand where the feedback is coming from when saying that the article already exist on Wikipedia. However, the existing page is about Ola Svensson, whereas Brother Leo is a completely different project, which significantly deviates from Ola's previous releases when it comes to the genre, topics, persona etc. For that reason I think it deserves a separate wikipedia page, as it is not a continuation of previous projects. I can also give examples of Wikipedia articles, which exist separately for an artist and their solo project; one of them is Years and Years, which is a solo project of Olly Alexander. Both pages have their articles. Similarly Tame Impala, which is a musical project of Kevin Parker also has a separate article. For those reasons I believe the article should have been approved. Thank you in advance for your response.Prolificainfo (talk) 12:39, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COI

It seems that you still think I work for SpaceX and do COI editing for them. I do not, Please believe me. StarshipSLS (Talk), (My Contributions) 15:27, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notable subject but cannot accept

Hi, when trying to accept Draft:Yohannes Abraham (I'm currently double-checking if his position is a pass for notability) I realized there is already a redirect page for that article title. What is the proper procedure for dealing with the already existing redirect page? Apologies if this doesn't concern you. It just could be useful for any future similar scenarios. nearlyevil665 16:16, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nearlyevil665 This is an interesting question which raises up every few weeks - my way is the following: I nominate the redirect for CSD (Housekeep/Moving) with the description "that an AfC Draft is waiting for acceptance with same title)", then I mark the AfC Draft as "under review" and wait until a Sysop deletes the redirect (usually up to 24 hrs takes it...), then I approve the draft. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:26, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! nearlyevil665 16:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome, anytime. Keep up on the good work! CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:29, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Nearlyevil665 Redirect had been deleted, you can now accept the draft. CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:40, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC Draft:Das_Ding

Hello! Thank you for reviewing my draft. I did not expect it to be reviewed this soon, and I certainly intend to make further edits. Now that you have given it a close evaluation, would you mind answering some burning questions I have with regards to the sourcing policies?

I understand that the current sources, being interviews with the subject in question or descriptions written by affiliated parties (record labels, etc) do nothing to adequately establish notability. I could realistically find a number of sources that refer to Das Ding as one of the pioneers and more prominent faces of the modular synth scene in Rotterdam and perhaps the Netherlands as a whole. However, none of these sources would be considered noteworthy publications, as the subject, a niche scene in a small country, does not see itself covered by major publications.

The fact is, minimal wave and modular synth tinkering are both very niche subjects. Had there not been Wikipedia articles on either of those topics, I would not have even tried suggesting an article on Das Ding. I guess the bottom line of my question here is; how does Wikipedia deal with subjects that are niche enough so as to have a sparsity of sources available, yet are already half-represented by a number of other existing articles (sometimes poorly sourced, but evidently acceptable since they exist in mainspace)?

(When it comes to the points outlined in Wikipedia:Notability (music), Das Ding qualifies at the very least for points 5 and 7:

Point 5; Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable.

I would argue Stones Throw Records qualifies for the latter part of this;. Das Ding has been featured on multiple compilations released on this label, namely, two individual volumes of "The Minimal Wave Tapes"[1]. Or does the fact that these were collaborative albums ("Various Artists") mean that it doesn't count?

Point 7; Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city.

I believe Das Ding's qualifying for this point is established by the fact that minimal wave, a genre apparently notable enough to warrant its own Wikipedia article, saw its early-2010s revival based entirely around, among other things, the rediscovery of this subject's music.)

Despite remaining relatively obscure, Das Ding has regularly performed at a number of Dutch music festivals and venues, including WORM (Rotterdam), Amsterdam Dance Event, Motel Mozaïque, GOGBOT, etc.; yet any sort of lineup or announcement posted by any of the aforementioned sources would not constitute an acceptable source, correct?

Thank you for your time.

Fexulaan   talk 17:33, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Fexulaan - I suggest asking those questions at the Wikipedia:AFCHD. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:06, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. Thank you. Fexulaan   talk 18:22, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ popmatters.com/126314-various-artists-the-minimal-wave-tapes-volume-one-2496186929.html

Draft:Richard Burge

It is my understanding that an article deletion discussion at AFD is not a basis for speedy-deleting a draft, because drafts are not subject to notability. If a draft was deleted at MFD, then a resubmission of the draft can be tagged for G4, but that isn't the issue. A previous AFD is a basis for declining or rejecting a draft, and you did decline the draft, and I have left a comment on the draft both about the AFD and the conflict of interest. I think that this is a case where the draft can simply be left alone for six months now that the submitting account has been blocked.

However, I will raise this comment again about the deletion of articles and their effect on drafts, at the AFC talk page. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:40, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon I totally agree, what I tried to say is that if approved it is very probably a CSD G4 candidate. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:43, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, which is why it should not be accepted, and can be left alone for six months. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:58, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notability on Arrest of Tianna Arata

Good evening @CommanderWaterford:,

I hope you're doing pretty well today.

I noticed you placed a notability tag on the Arrest of Tianna Arata page, and since then I've updated the page with additional citations to prove it's notability. Additionally, doing a simple Google Search on the matter, there's a lot of reliable articles on the subject.

Since I updated the article with additional citations, I feel like the issue is addressed according to my understanding of the WP:GNG. I'd like to know your thoughts since I will admit you have more experience than me, but I'm open towards going back and adding more sources to the page if the issue hasn't been met.

Thanks for taking the time to read into my thread.

Regards. JayzBox (talk) 22:27, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @JayzBox, checked it but I am afraid that I will not reverse the tagging - your subject seems to me a Wikipedia:BIO1E case, notable for only one event which is usually not sufficient. Passing WP:GNG could be questionable but that is the reason why I just tagged it and did not nominated it for deletion. CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Links to the Planning and Environment Act 1987 Page

Good afternoon CommanderWaterford,

Just wanted to thank you for flagging the orphaning in terms of links on the article I created. I have used the linking tool and have added inclusions in relevant pages such as Urban planning in Australia. Was there a specific minimum needed on Wikipedia for linkages or the links I have done so far should be okay?

Please let me know if you have any further questions.

APNOneTwo (talk) 04:09, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Can you help me? To develop this article Kurukkoli Moideen 

This page was created for Kurukkoli Moideen (officeholder ) member of Kerala Legislative Assembly - Tirur (State Assembly constituency)


This page should not be speedily deleted because This page was created for Kurukkoli Moideen (officeholder) member of Kerala Legislative Assembly - Tirur (State Assembly constituency)

Michael Henkel

I added two more sources, and the sources are now evenly distributed across the article. Do you think it's now OK to remove the header template? Thanks, Skippy2520 (talk) 19:17, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 10:25:32, 13 May 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by LindySQ


Hello, thank you for your review of my work, The murder of Marie Wilks. Could you please clarify for me my mistakes? I understand it was a single event, but I have read of similar single news events on Wikipedia, such as the disappearance of Madalaine Mccann for example. I had thought of linking the murder to a wider field of attacks on pregnant women, and the safety of female motorists, would that help? Also, I am a little confused as to citing sources, there are very few for the case. I really would appreciate your help in this if you have the time. Thank you once again.LindySQ


LindySQ (talk) 10:25, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just Like That (Toots and the Maytals album)

Hello CommanderWaterford. I am not sure if it is a usual practice, but I wanted to point out that you moved the article to Draft:Draft:Just Like That (Toots and the Maytals album) in case the repetition of "Draft:" was a typo. — The Most Comfortable Chair 16:57, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, that was a mistake by the script I guess, I will check this. Thanks for noticing. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:20, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Roel Vermeulen, created link

Thanks for your feedback. I have created a link to Roel Vermeulen on the Exposome-NL page so that it's not an orphan anymore. If you think that this solved the orphan issue, can you remove the orphan tag? Or would you have any suggestions how to find other pages that are suitable for creating a link? Martijn-030 (talk) 09:56, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mentor

Do you think @Neopeius could mentor me too? He/she has similar interests (space exploration) and says that he could mentor me. StarshipSLS (Talk), (My Contributions) 14:36, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@StarshipSLS: Did I say that? I'm sorry if I led you on. ^^;; I'm afraid I'm full up on mentees for now, though I'm happy to give advice as I can (and have). --Neopeius (talk) 15:06, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Neopeius: Do you think you could help me with Draft:Super Heavy (booster)? StarshipSLS (Talk), (My Contributions) 15:08, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@StarshipSLS I suggest you try to accomplish here on your own in the very first step - you are mistaken if you think that Mentors are going to do the work you want to be done. You already have 2 mentors, you do not need more mentors. @JackReynoldsADogOwner fyi CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:31, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but I would like a mentor that has the same interests as myself. StarshipSLS (Talk), (My Contributions) 15:33, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well @StarshipSLS, I would also love to have an adoptee who is willingly to learn from our hints and advices. Seeing your contributions the last days I do see editing primarily you on userpages / userboxes or welcoming new users, when it comes to work at drafts you ask others to do your "work". Some Editors might get the impression of Wikipedia:NOTHERE. CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:46, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@CommanderWaterford: I am very willing to learn from you. Currently, I am working with another user on Draft:Starship Orbital Test Flight. StarshipSLS (Talk), (My Contributions) 15:48, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@StarshipSLS This is an Article from another user which I personally moved to draft a couple of days ago, now 90% are a copy and paste move from an already existing article, the same way you did before at the other draft, which @Novem Linguae declined for exactly this reason. @JackReynoldsADogOwner fyi CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:54, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok StarshipSLS (Talk), (My Contributions) 16:00, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I see that you deleted that content. I am already learning more. I won't do that again. StarshipSLS (Talk), (My Contributions) 16:01, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@StarshipSLS:I don't know that our interests are that similar. I am not interested in modern spaceflight. :) --15:38, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NPP reviewing

Hi CommanderWaterford! I noticed that you approved Madeline Y. Hsu in the NPP log when it looked like this. I've since added some sources to establish that it passes NBIO, but that was very much not established at the time, so please be cautious; we don't want non-notable pages slipping through. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 19:21, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sdkb I do not see any problem at all, she is clearly notable and so I tagged it as reviewed. What makes you believe that I did not a WP:BEFORE search before I tagged it as reviewed?! CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:24, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You may wish to use {{Sources exist}} in the future, then, as otherwise there's no way for others to know that you or anyone else has done the WP:BEFORE. My understanding is that all bio pages created these days should have notability established before they're allowed to leave the patrol queue. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 19:33, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hello

@CommanderWaterford:

dear user. thank you. But in English Wikipedia, anyone can tag pages or do something However I did not remove the tag for any of the Wikipedia users I do not do polls or other cases Because I respect all users. However, Mahyar Ghasemi's Turkish page has been created for a long time And I created 20 new resources for them But you deleted the page However, I have nothing to do with other users' pages

@CommanderWaterford:

I thank you. Because you help me. Thank you very much. What if I said something that upset you?. I apologize to you. Thanks.Linda Lover (talk) 16:20, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship

I would like to make a new administrator request for you. Do you agree? StarshipSLS (Talk), (My Contributions) 22:11, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think you would be a great administrator. StarshipSLS (Talk), (My Contributions) 22:12, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Acting here in the role of an Administrator needs lots of experience in many, many areas and I am still learning from by far more experienced Editors/Sysops than I am. @Ashleyyoursmile will be a great admin for sure. CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:20, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@StarshipSLS Very kind but no, thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:12, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Do you plan to ever be an administrator? StarshipSLS (Talk), (My Contributions) 22:13, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Benjamin Kentish

Hi Commander Waterford, thanks for looking at the above article. Did you have any comments for how I can get this accepted? Thanks Sabisabi123 (talk) 22:26, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting AfDs

Hi CommanderWaterford, hope you're well. When relisting AfDs for a third time, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonita Lontoh (2nd nomination), please note that you are required to provide an explicit explanation. WP:RELIST says: Therefore, in general, debates should not be relisted more than twice. Users relisting a debate for a third (or further) time, or relisting a debate with a substantial number of commenters, should write a short explanation either within the {{relist}} template, or in addition to it, on why they did not consider the debate sufficient. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 23:36, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notable or not?

Hello, thank you for reviewing my article. In the template above it, you mention it might fail notability requirements. I wanted to ask if you could give me your opinion on this? The article is about a singer who is kind of an internet celebrity in Azerbaijan and there are sources about her + many videos on YouTube and it appears she was on TV as well. But it is very local stuff. What do you think? keep or not keep? Thank you. - Creffel (talk) 11:49, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing

Hello CommanderWaterford,
I am confused by your interactions with me which seems 100% through semi-automatic templates and do not answer to request for corrections. Are you using a tool, bot or semi-automatic edits ? Is your working process ignoring contributors' pings ? Your reactions barely seems to imply an human contributor, do not respond to pings, and are therefore confusing for the other party. If you are handling an heavy workload, a large number of tasks, and therefore cannot monitor each threads, please inform me so I take it into account and do not ask you further engagement and explanations. Yug (talk) 13:13, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Yug, thank you for reaching out to me but I am not aware of any interactions with you nor any pings from you, it would be quite helpful if you give me some link. CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:00, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
See User talk:Yug#Speedy deletion nomination of Illegal gymnastic skills, User talk:Yug#May 2021 (and User talk:Yug#Speedy deletion nomination of Damon Weaver). I tried to clarify the seriousness of my edits but got an additional accusation and no human responses from your side, which was confusing. Yug (talk) 14:27, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Yug I read your comments, indeed, but I have no reason to revise my nominations for speedy deletion. Lastly I do not decide wether your articles will be speedy deleted, this is task of an admin and as I see you are already in discussion with Liz. I do not see nothing to be confused at all. CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:33, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yug message removed by CommanderWaterford here.
Hi, I sincerely tried in the previous message to explain how your semi-automatic messages process and no responses are perceived from the other side. It' s a process issue, which can be improved. It's not related to you as an person. If you do not wish to discuss this matter on your talkpage, you can simply say so. Removing the previous message and closing the feedback channel prevent improvement, adding another incivility accusation on my talkpage and character assassination in the comment is not helping dialogue and the natural improvement loop.
@Liz and Nlu:: please review and administrator mediation needed. Yug (talk) 15:13, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:CS1 errors: unsupported parameter

Hello CommanderWaterford I was wondering if you know what one has to do with for example Peter Cellensis in order to get rid of the Unknown parameter |DUPLICATE_pages= ignored notification in the references section. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 14:44, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje A parameter which was twice defined in the reference, I corrected it. CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:47, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CommanderInDubio&oldid=1023466195"