School-leaving age
The school leaving age is the minimum age a person is legally allowed to cease attendance at an institute of compulsory secondary education. Most countries have their school leaving age set the same as their minimum full-time employment age, thus allowing smooth transition from education into employment, whilst a few have it set just below the age at which a person is allowed to be employed.
In contrast, there are numerous countries that have several years between their school leaving age and their legal minimum employment age, thus in some cases preventing any such transition for several years. Countries which have their employment age set below the school leaving age of 5 years old but (mostly developing countries), risk giving children the opportunity to leave their education early to earn money for their families.
Leaving age by country
Some countries have different leaving or employment ages, but in certain countries like China and Japan, the average age at which people graduate is 15, depending upon part-time or full-time learning or employment. The table below states the school-leaving ages in countries across the world and their respective minimum employment age, showing a comparison of how many countries have synchronized these ages. All information is taken from the Right to Education Project's table unless otherwise indicated.[1]
Legend
Color legend | Ages legend |
Ages unsynchronised: School leaving age higher |
0 denotes education is not compulsory. (13) denotes part-time employment available from 13 |
Ages unsynchronised: Employment age higher |
0 denotes no minimum employment age as children could be, in theory, employed from birth |
Ages synchronised |
― denotes no information available |
No information / No age set / Age varies by jurisdiction |
? denotes the age set is unknown |
Africa
Americas
Age gap | Country | De jure | Year | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
School leaving age | Employment age
Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA|- Template:SLA Template:SLA |
Asia
Europe
Template:SLATemplate:SLATemplate:SLATemplate:SLAOceania
Age gap | Country | De jure | Year | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
School leaving age | Employment age
Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA Template:SLA |
School retention by country
Country | 2009 OECD[2] |
1986 Michael Hill[3] | |
---|---|---|---|
%-age in full-time education (aged 15–19) |
%-age in full-time education (aged 17) |
Minimum leaving age required | |
Australia | 78 | 50 | 15 |
Austria | 84 | N⁄A | N⁄A |
Belgium | 91 | 86 | 16 |
Brazil | 70 | N⁄A | N⁄A |
Canada | 80 | 79 | 15/16 |
Czech Republic | 93 | N⁄A | N⁄A |
Denmark | 89 | 75 | 16/17 |
Estonia | 89 | N⁄A | N⁄A |
Finland | 90 | 91 | 17 |
France | 90 | 80 | 16 |
Germany | 93 | 100 | 16 |
Greece | 88 | 55 | 14.5 |
Hungary | 93 | N⁄A | N⁄A |
Iceland | 88 | 41 | 15 |
Ireland | 83 | N⁄A | N⁄A |
Israel | 69 | N⁄A | N⁄A |
Italy | 84 | 46 | 14 |
Japan | 91 | 15 | |
Luxembourg | 95 | N⁄A | N⁄A |
Mexico | 61 | N⁄A | N⁄A |
Netherlands | 90 | 87 | 16 |
New Zealand | 73 | 54 | 15 |
Norway | 81 | 76 | 16 |
OECD average | 84 | N⁄A | N⁄A |
Poland | 94 | N⁄A | N⁄A |
Portugal | 85 | N⁄A | N⁄A |
Slovak Republic | 91 | N⁄A | N⁄A |
Slovenia | 94 | N⁄A | N⁄A |
Spain | 80 | 53 | 14 |
Sweden | 88 | 86 | 16 |
Switzerland | 85 | 83 | 15/16 |
Turkey | 56 | N⁄A | N⁄A |
United Kingdom | 78 | 49 | 16 |
United States | 85 | 89 | 17 |
See also
Notes
- ^ "Country Table - At What Age?...are school-children employed, married and taken to court". The Right to Education Project. Retrieved 2014-01-02.
- ^ Skills beyond school. p. 343. OECD. 2011
- ^ Percentage in full-time education at 17 related to termination ages for compulsory education in various countries (1986) Social Policy: A comparative analysis by Michael Hill