Helmet-mounted display

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Integrated Helmet and Display Sight System (IHADSS)
30 mm M230 chain gun turret on a Boeing AH-64 Apache being aimed with a helmet-mounted sight.

A helmet-mounted display (HMD) is a headworn device that uses displays and optics to project imagery and/or symbology to the eyes.[1][2][3] It provides visual information to the user where head protection is required – most notably in military aircraft. The display-optics assembly can be attached to a helmet or integrated into the design of the helmet. An HMD provides the pilot with situation awareness, an enhanced image of the scene, and in military applications cue weapons systems, to the direction their head is pointing. Applications which allow cuing of weapon systems are referred to as helmet-mounted sight and display (HMSD) or helmet-mounted sights (HMS).


Aviation HMD designs serve these purposes:

  • using the head angle as a pointer to direct air-to-air and air-to-ground weapons seekers or other sensors (e.g., radar, FLIR) to a target by the pilot merely turning the helmet towards the target and operating a switch via HOTAS. In close combat, without HMDs, pilots have to align the aircraft to shoot at a target. HMDs allow pilots to simply point their heads at a target, designate a weapon and shoot.
  • displaying targeting and aircraft performance information (such as airspeed, altitude, target range, weapon seeker status, "g", etc.) to the pilot while "heads-up", eliminating the need to look inside the cockpit.
  • displaying sensor video for the purpose of:
    • verification that the chosen sensor has been cued to the right target or location without requiring the pilot to look inside the cockpit
    • viewing outside terrain using sensor video in degraded visual conditions.

HMD systems, combined with High Off-Boresight (HOBS) weapons, allow aircrew to attack and destroy nearly any target seen by the pilot. These systems allow targets to be designated with minimal aircraft maneuvering, minimizing the time spent in the threat environment, and allowing greater lethality, survivability, and pilot situational awareness.


In 1962, Hughes Aircraft Company revealed the Electrocular, a compact CRT, head-mounted monocular display that reflected a TV signal onto a transparent eyepiece.[4][5][6][7]

One of the first aircraft with simple HMD devices appeared for experimental purpose in the mid-1960s to aid in targeting heat seeking missiles. The US Navy's Visual Target Acquisition System (VTAS), made by Honeywell Corporation that was flown in early 1970s in F-4J and 1974–78 ACEVAL/AIMVAL on U.S. F-14 and F-15 fighters. VTAS received praise[8] for its effectiveness in targeting off-boresight missiles, but the U.S. did not pursue fielding it except for integration into late-model Navy F-4 Phantoms equipped with the AIM-9 Sidewinder from 1969.[9] HMDs were also introduced in helicopters during this time – examples include the Boeing AH-64 Apache with the Integrated Helmet and Display Sighting System (IHADSiSy) demonstrated in 1985.[10]

At the same time(1975) the Mirage 3CZ and Mirage F1AZ of the South African Air Force (SAAF) used a locally developed helmet-mounted sight integrated with the Armscor V3A heat seeking missile.[11][12]|url=https://asianmilitaryreview.com/2020/11/looks-really-can-kill/ |website=Asian Military Review |access-date=22 April 2021 |date=26 November 2020}}</ref>[13] This enables the pilot to make off-bore attacks, without having to maneuver to the optimum firing position. After the South African system had been proven in combat, playing a role in downing Soviet aircraft over Angola, it is popularly claimed the Soviets embarked on a crash program to counter the technology[citation needed]. As a result, the MiG-29 was fielded in 1985 with an HMD and a high off-boresight weapon (R-73), giving them an advantage in close maneuvering engagements.

Several nations[which?] responded with programs to counter the MiG-29/HMD/R-73 (and later Su-27) combination once its effectiveness was known, principally through access to former East German MiG-29s that were operated by the unified German Air Force.

One successful HMD was the Israeli Air Force Elbit DASH series, fielded in conjunction with the Python 4, in the early 1990s. The U.S., UK, and Germany pursued a HMD combined with ASRAAM systems. Technical difficulties led to the U.S. abandoning ASRAAM, instead funding development of the AIM-9X and the Joint Helmet-Mounted Cueing System in 1990. American and European fighter HMDs became widely used in the late 1990s and early 2000s.

The first civilian use of HMD on aircraft was the Elbit SkyLens HMD on ATR 72/42 airplane. [14]


While conceptually simple, implementation of aircraft HMDs is quite complex. There are many variables:[15]

  • precision – the angular error between the line-of-sight and the derived cue. The position of the helmet is what is used to point the missile; it thus must be calibrated and fit securely on the pilot's head. The line between the pilot's eye and the reticle on the visor is known as the line of sight (LOS) between the aircraft and the intended target. The user's eye must stay aligned with the sight; in other words, current HMDs cannot sense where the eye is looking, but can place a predicted impact point marker between the eye and the target.
  • latency or slew rate – how much lag there is between the helmet and the cue.
  • field of regard – the angular range over which the sight can still produce a suitably accurate measurement.
  • weight and balance – total helmet weight and its center of gravity, which are particularly important under high "g" maneuvers. Weight is the largest problem faced by fighter aircraft HMD designers. This is much less a concern for helicopter applications, making elaborate helicopter HMDs common.
  • safety and flightdeck compatibility, including ejection seat compatibility.
  • optical characteristics – calibration, sharpness, distant focus (or collimation, a technique used to present the images at a distant focus, which improves the readability of images), monocular vs. binocular imagery, eye dominance, and binocular rivalry.
  • durability and ability to handle day-to-day wear and tear.
  • cost, including integration and training.
  • fit and interfacing the aviator's head to the aircraft – head anthropometry and facial anatomy make helmet-fitting a crucial factor in the aviator's ability to interface with the aircraft systems. Misalignment or helmet shift can cause an inaccurate picture.

Head tracking[edit]

HMD designs must sense the orientation (elevation, azimuth and roll) and in some cases the position (x, y, and z) of the pilot's head relative to the airframe with sufficient precision even under high "g", vibration, and during rapid head movement. Five basic methods are used in current HMD technology – inertial, optical, electromagnetic, sonic, and hybrid.[15] Hybrid trackers use a combination of sensors such as inertial and optical to improve tracking accuracy, update rate, and latency.[16]

Hybrid inertial optical[edit]

Hybrid inertial tracking systems employ a sensitive Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) and an optical sensor to provide reference to the aircraft. MEMS based IMUs benefit from high update rates such as 1,000 Hz but suffer from precession and drift over time, so they cannot be used alone. In this class of tracker, the optical sensor is used to constrain IMU drift. As a result, hybrid inertial/optical trackers feature low latency and high accuracy. The Thales Scorpion® HMCS[17] and HMIT HMDs utilize a tracker made by InterSense called the Hybrid Optical-based Inertial Tracker (HObIT).[18]


Optical systems employ infrared emitters on the helmet (or flightdeck) infrared detectors in the flightdeck (or helmet), to measure the pilot's head position. The main limitations are restricted fields of regard and sensitivity to sunlight or other heat sources. The MiG-29/AA-11 Archer system uses this technology.[15] The Cobra HMD as used on both the Eurofighter Typhoon[19] and the JAS39 Gripen[20] both employ the optical helmet tracker developed by Denel Optronics (now part of Zeiss Optronics[21]).


Electromagnetic sensing designs use coils (in the helmet) placed in an alternating field (generated in the flightdeck) to produce alternating electrical voltages based on the movement of the helmet in multiple axes. This technique requires precise magnetic mapping of the flightdeck to account for ferrous and conductive materials in the seat, flightdeck sills and canopy to reduce angular errors in the measurement.[22]


Acoustic sensing designs use ultrasonic sensors to monitor the pilot's head position while being updated by computer software in multiple axes. Typical operating frequencies are in the 50 to 100 kHz range and can be made to carry audio sound information directly to the pilot's ears via subcarrier modulation of the ultrasonic sensing signals.[22][failed verification]


Older HMDs typically employ a compact CRT embedded in the helmet, and suitable optics to display symbology on to the pilot's visor or reticle, focused at infinity. Modern HMDs have dispensed with the CRT in favor of micro-displays such as liquid crystal on silicon (LCOS) or liquid crystal display (LCD) along with an LED illuminator to generate the displayed image. Advanced HMDs can also project FLIR or night vision imagery. A recent improvement is the capability to display color symbols and video.

Major systems[edit]

Systems are presented in rough chronological order of initial operating capability.

Integrated Helmet And Display Sight System (IHADSS)[edit]


In 1985,[23] the U.S. Army fielded the AH-64 Apache and with it the Integrated Helmet and Display Sighting System (IHADSS), a new helmet concept in which the role of the helmet was expanded to provide a visually coupled interface between the aviator and the aircraft. The Honeywell M142 IHADSS is fitted with a 40°-by-30° field of view, video-with-symbology monocular display. IR emitters allow a slewable thermographic camera sensor, mounted on the nose of the aircraft, to be slaved to the aviator's head movements. The display also enables Nap-of-the-earth night navigation. IHADSS is also used on the Italian Agusta A129 Mangusta.[24]

Media related to IHADSS at Wikimedia Commons

ZSh-5 / Shchel-3UM[edit]

The Russian designed Shchel-3UM HMD design has been fitted to the ZSh-5 series helmet (and later ZSh-7 helmets), and has been used on the MiG-29 and Su-27 in conjunction with the R-73 missile (NATO reporting name: AA-11 Archer). The HMD/Archer combination gave the MiG-29 and Su-27 a significantly improved close combat capability.[25][26]

Display and sight helmet (DASH)[edit]


The Elbit Systems DASH III was the first modern Western HMD to achieve operational service. Development of the DASH began during the mid-1980s, when the IAF issued a requirement for F-15 and F-16 aircraft. The first design entered production around 1986, and the current GEN III helmet entered production during the early to mid-1990s. The current production variant is deployed on IDF F-15, and F-16 aircraft. Additionally, it has been certified on the F/A-18 and F-5. The DASH III has been exported and integrated into various legacy aircraft, including the MiG-21.[27][unreliable source?] It also forms the baseline technology for the US JHMCS.[28]

The DASH GEN III is a wholly embedded design, where the complete optical and position sensing coil package is built within the helmet (either USAF standard HGU-55/P or the Israeli standard HGU-22/P) using a spherical visor to provide a collimated image to the pilot. A quick-disconnect wire powers the display and carries video drive signals to the helmet's Cathode Ray Tube (CRT). DASH is closely integrated with the aircraft's weapon system, via a MIL-STD-1553B bus. Latest model DASH IV is currently integrated on India's HAL Tejas.[29]

Joint Helmet-Mounted Cueing System (JHMCS)[edit]


After the U.S. withdrawal from ASRAAM, the U.S. pursued and fielded JHMCS in conjunction with the Raytheon AIM-9X, in November 2003 with the 12th and 19th Fighter Squadrons at Elmendorf AFB, Alaska. The Navy conducted RDT&E on the F/A-18C as lead platform for JHMCS, but fielded it first on the F/A-18 Super Hornet E and F aircraft in 2003. The USAF is also integrating JHMCS into its F-15E, F-15C, and F-16C aircraft.

JHMCS is a derivative of the DASH III and the Kaiser Agile Eye HMDs, and was developed by Vision Systems International (VSI), a joint venture company formed by Rockwell Collins and Elbit (Kaiser Electronics is now owned by Rockwell Collins). Boeing integrated the system into the F/A-18 and began low-rate initial production delivery in fiscal year 2002. JHMCS is employed in the F/A-18A++/C/D/E/F, F-15C/D/E/SA/QA/EX, and F-16 Block 40/50 with a design that is 95% common to all platforms.[30]

Unlike the DASH, which is integrated into the helmet itself, JHMCS assemblies attach to modified HGU-55/P, HGU-56/P or HGU-68/P helmets. JHMCS employs a newer, faster digital processing package, but retains the same type of electromagnetic position sensing as the DASH. The CRT package is more capable, but remains limited to monochrome presentation of cursive symbology. JHMCS provides support for raster scanned imagery to display FLIR/IRST pictures for night operations and provides collimated symbology and imagery to the pilot. The integration of the night-vision goggles with the JHMCS was a key requirement of the program.

When combined with the AIM-9X, an advanced short-range dogfight weapon that employs a Focal Plane Array seeker and a thrust vectoring tail control package, JHMCS allows effective target designation up to 80 degrees either side of the aircraft's nose. In March 2009, a successful 'Lock on After Launch' firing of an ASRAAM at a target located behind the wing-line of the ‘shooter' aircraft, was demonstrated by a Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) F/A-18 using JHMCS.[31]

TARGO II[edit]

Elbit designed system is used by Qatar and India on Rafale F3R[32][33]

Helmet Mounted Integrated Targeting (HMIT)[edit]

Scorpion Helmet Mounted Display

Thales introduced the Scorpion® Head/Helmet-Mounted Display System to the military aviation market in 2008. In 2010, Scorpion was the winner of the USAF/ANG/AFRes Helmet Mounted Integrated Targeting (HMIT) program.[34] The HMIT system was qualified and deployed on both A-10[35] and F-16 platforms in 2012.[36] Starting in 2018, the installed base of HMIT systems went through a helmet tracker upgrade. The original AC magnetic tracking sensor was replaced by an inertial-optical hybrid tracker called Hybrid Optical based Inertial Tracker (HObIT).[37][38] The HObIT was developed by InterSense[39] and tested by Thales in 2014.[40]

Scorpion has the distinction of being the first HMD introduced and deployed that can display full-color conformal symbology.[41] It is used along with the aircraft mission system to cue the aircraft targeting pods, gimbaled sensors, and high off-boresight missiles. Scorpion provides an "eyes out" capability: even when objects may be obscured from view, Scorpion can provide visual graphic cues to the near-field display.[42] Unlike most HMDs which require custom helmets, Scorpion was designed to be installed on a standard issue HGU-55/P and HGU-68/P helmets and is fully compatible with standard issue U.S. Pilot Flight Equipment without special fitting. It is also fully compatible with standard unmodified AN/AVS-9 Night Vision Goggles (NVG) and Panoramic Night Vision Goggles (PNVG). Pilots, using Scorpion, can view both the night vision image and the symbols on the display.[43][44]

Scorpion uses a novel optical system featuring a light-guide optical element (LOE) which provides a compact color collimated image to the pilot. The display can be positioned by each pilot, thereby eliminating the need for precise helmet position on the user's head or special helmet fitting. Software correction accommodates the display position, providing an accurate image to the pilot and allowing the Scorpion HMCS to be installed onto a pilot's existing helmet. A visor can be deployed in front of the display providing protection during ejection. The visor can be clear, glare, high contrast, gradient, or laser protective. For night operations, an NVG mount can be installed in place of the visor during flight. Once installed, NVGs can be placed in front of the display, thus allowing the pilot to view both the display symbols as well as the NVG image simultaneously.

Scorpion is also used by Tactical Air Support Inc. on F-5AT,[45] by French Air Force for Rafale F4,[46] by the Spanish Airforce on EF-18s,[47] the AC-130W Stinger II Gunship,[48] and the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor.[49]

Aselsan AVCI[edit]

Aselsan of Turkey is working to develop a similar system to the French TopOwl Helmet, called the AVCI Helmet Integrated Cueing System. The system will also be utilized into the T-129 Turkish Attack Helicopter.[50]


The French thrust vectoring Matra MICA (missile) for its Dassault Rafale and late-model Mirage 2000 fighters was accompanied by the Topsight HMD by Sextant Avionique. TopSight provides a 20 degree FoV for the pilot's right eye, and cursive symbology generated from target and aircraft parameters. Electromagnetic position sensing is employed. The Topsight helmet uses an integral embedded design, and its contoured shape is designed to provide the pilot with a wholly unobstructed field of view.

TopNight, a Topsight derivative, is designed specifically for adverse weather and night air to ground operations, employing more complex optics to project infrared imagery overlaid with symbology. The most recent version the Topsight has been designated TopOwl-F, and is qualified on the Mirage-2000-5 Mk2 and Mig-29K.

Eurofighter Helmet-Mounted Symbology System[edit]


The Eurofighter Typhoon utilizes the Helmet-Mounted Symbology System (HMSS) developed by BAE Systems and Pilkington Optronics. Named the Striker and later version Striker II, it is capable of displaying both raster imagery and cursive symbology, with provisions for embedded NVGs. As with the DASH helmet, the system employs integrated position sensing to ensure that symbols representing outside-world entities move in line with the pilot's head movements.

Helmet-Mounted Display System[edit]

Helmet-Mounted Display System for the F-35 Lightning II
Helmet Mounted System Striker II from BAE System on DSEI-2019

Vision Systems International (VSI; the Elbit Systems/Rockwell Collins joint venture) along with Helmet Integrated Systems, Ltd. developed the Helmet-Mounted Display System (HMDS) for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter aircraft. In addition to standard HMD capabilities offered by other systems, HMDS fully utilizes the advanced avionics architecture of the F-35 and provides the pilot video with imagery in day or night conditions. Consequently, the F-35 is the first tactical fighter jet in 50 years to fly without a HUD.[51][52] A BAE Systems helmet was considered when HMDS development was experiencing significant problems, but these issues were eventually worked out.[53][54] The Helmet-Mounted Display System was fully operational and ready for delivery in July 2014.[55]


Jedeye is a new system recently introduced by Elbit Systems especially to meet Apache and other rotary wing platform requirements. The system is designed for day, night and brownout flight environments. Jedeye has a 70 x 40 degree FOV and 2250x1200 pixels resolution.


Sweden's JAS 39C/D Gripen fighter utilizes the Cobra HMD. The helmet is a further development and refinement of the Striker helmet developed for the Eurofighter by BAE Systems. The refinement is done by BAE in partnership with Denel Cumulus.[56][57]

Future technology[edit]

  • RCEVS is developing a standard view Night Vision Cueing & Display (NVCD) for the U.S. Navy.
  • eye tracking – eye trackers measure the point of gaze relative to the direction of the head, allowing the system to compute where the user is looking. These systems are not currently used in aircraft.
  • direct retinal projection – systems that project information directly onto the wearer's retina with a low-powered laser (virtual retinal display) are also in experimentation.[58][59]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Rash, C. E.; Russo, M. R.; Letowski, T. R.; Schmeisser, E. T. (2010). Helmet-Mounted Displays: Sensation, Perception and Cognition Issues. Fort Rucker AL: U. S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory. ISBN 978-0-615-28375-3.
  2. ^ Kocian, Dean F.; Task, H. Lee (1995). "Visually coupled systems hardware and the human interface". In Barfield, Woodrow; Furness, Thomas A. (eds.). Virtual Environments and Advanced Interface Design. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-507555-2.
  3. ^ Rash, Clarence E. (2001). "Introductory Overview". In Rash, Clarence E. (ed.). Helmet-Mounted Displays: Design Issues for Rotary-Wing Aircraft. U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command.
  4. ^ "Science: Second Sight", Time, Friday, Apr. 13, 1962
  5. ^ Dr. James Miller, Fullerton, CA, research psychologist for the Ground Systems Group at Hughes, "I've Got a Secret", April 9, 1962 on CBS
  6. ^ "Third Eye for Space Explorers", Popular Electronics, July 1962
  7. ^ "‘Seeing Things’ with Electrocular", Science & Mechanics, Aug, 1962
  8. ^ "VTAS/HELMET INTERFACE". Best-of-flightgear.dk. Retrieved 2024-04-30.
  9. ^ "VTAS helmet". Best-of-flightgear.dk. Retrieved 2010-08-20.
  10. ^ Rash, Clarence E.; Martin, John S. (August 1988). The Impact of the U.S. Army's AH-64 Helmet Mounted Display on Future Aviation Helmet Design (Report). Army Aeromedical Research Lab Fort Rucker. Archived from the original on 27 February 2012. Retrieved 31 January 2010.
  11. ^ {{cite web |last1=Lake |first1=Jon |title=Looks Really Can Kill!
  12. ^ https://issuu.com/hennieheymans/docs/nongqai_vol_12_no_8/s/12986141
  13. ^ Dunnigan, James (12 September 2015). "The Helmet that Changed Everything". StrategyPage. Retrieved 22 April 2021.
  14. ^ ATR, Elbit Developing Wearable HUD AIN online (July 2016)
  15. ^ a b c Helmet Mounted Displays: Sensation, Perception and Cognitive Issues. U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory. 2009. ISBN 978-0-6152-83753. Archived from the original on March 3, 2012.
  16. ^ Atac, Robert; Foxlin, Eric (2013-05-16). "Scorpion hybrid optical-based inertial tracker (HObIT)". In Marasco, Peter L; Havig, Paul R (eds.). Head- and Helmet-Mounted Displays XVIII: Design and Applications. Vol. 8735. p. 873502. doi:10.1117/12.2012194. S2CID 120186142.
  17. ^ "Thales | Visionix". www.thalesvisionix.com. Retrieved 2018-09-30.
  18. ^ "InterSense | Precision Motion Tracking Solutions | IS-1200+ HObIT System". www.intersense.com. 2 October 2017. Retrieved 2018-09-22.
  19. ^ "Denel Optronics Head-Tracker System for Eurofighter Typhoon". Defence Talk. 4 June 2007. Retrieved 12 July 2011.
  20. ^ "FIRST GRIPEN FLIGHT WITH HELMET MOUNTED DISPLAY". Saab. Retrieved 12 July 2011.
  21. ^ "Denel, Zeiss in optical partnership". 27 March 2007. Retrieved 12 July 2011.
  22. ^ a b Air Power Australia. "Helmet Mounted Sights and Displays". Ausairpower.net. Retrieved 2010-08-20.
  23. ^ Sensory Research Division (August 1988). "The Impact of the U.S. Army's AH-64 Helmet Mounted Display on Future Aviation Helmet Design" (PDF). United States Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 23, 2016. Retrieved August 17, 2016.
  24. ^ "The Impact of the U.S. Army's AH-64 Helmet Mounted Display on Future Aviation Helmet Design". Stinet.dtic.mil. Archived from the original on 2012-02-27. Retrieved 2010-08-20.
  25. ^ "Fact Sheets : Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29A : Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29A". Nationalmuseum.af.mil. 1977-10-06. Archived from the original on 2010-08-12. Retrieved 2010-08-20.
  26. ^ "Fighter Aircraft, MiG-29/1". Sci.fi. Archived from the original on 2011-05-14. Retrieved 2010-08-20.
  27. ^ "MiG-21 2000 Fighter Ground Attack Air Force Technology". Airforce-technology.com. 1995-05-24. Retrieved 2010-08-20.
  28. ^ "Vision Systems International – DASH". Vsi-hmcs.com. Archived from the original on 2010-08-03. Retrieved 2010-08-20.
  29. ^ ADA 31st Annual Report (PDF) (Report).
  30. ^ "Vision Systems International – JHMCS". Vsi-hmcs.com. Archived from the original on 2010-08-03. Retrieved 2010-08-20.
  31. ^ Industry News, Your (2009-03-09). "RAAF has successfully fired ASRAAM at a target located behind the wing-line of the 'shooter' aircraft". Your Industry News. Retrieved 2009-03-10.
  32. ^ "TARGO™ II — Helmet Mounted Display System". Elbit Systems.
  33. ^ "The French Air Force Is Testing The New Rafale F4-1 Standard – The Aviationist". June 2021.
  34. ^ "Raytheon to produce HMIT system for US Air Force". The Engineer. 19 July 2010. Archived from the original on 2021-05-08. Retrieved 2018-09-23.
  35. ^ Cenciotti, David (2018-12-13). "Up Close And Personal With The A-10 Warthog's Scorpion Helmet-Mounted Cueing System". The Aviationist. Retrieved 2018-12-14.
  36. ^ Atac, Robert; Bugno, Tony (2011-06-01). "Qualification of the scorpion helmet cueing system". In Marasco, Peter L; Havig, Paul R (eds.). Head- and Helmet-Mounted Displays XVI: Design and Applications. Vol. 8041. pp. 182–188. doi:10.1117/12.884195. S2CID 121603702.
  37. ^ D'Urso, Stefano (2019-09-10). "The A-10C Warthog Gets New Upgrades To Be Ready To Fight In Future High-end Conflicts". The Aviationist. Retrieved 2019-10-08.
  38. ^ Axe, David (2019-10-06). "Nothing Can Kill the A-10 Warthog (And We Meaning Nothing)". The National Interest. Retrieved 2019-10-08.
  39. ^ "InterSense | Precision Motion Tracking Solutions | Home". www.intersense.com. Retrieved 2018-09-23.
  40. ^ Atac, Robert; Spink, Scott; Calloway, Tom; Foxlin, Eric (2014-06-13). "Scorpion Hybrid Optical-based Inertial Tracker (HObIT) test results". In Desjardins, Daniel D; Sarma, Kalluri R; Marasco, Peter L; Havig, Paul R; Browne, Michael P; Melzer, James E (eds.). Proc. SPIE 9086, Display Technologies and Applications for Defense, Security, and Avionics VIII; and Head- and Helmet-Mounted Displays XIX. Vol. 9086. pp. 172–181. doi:10.1117/12.2050363. S2CID 121689580.
  41. ^ Atac, Robert (2010-05-05). "Applications of the Scorpion color helmet-mounted cueing system". In Marasco, Peter L; Havig, Paul R (eds.). Proc. SPIE 7688, Head- and Helmet-Mounted Displays XV: Design and Applications. Vol. 7688. pp. 18–24. doi:10.1117/12.849287. S2CID 120094908.
  42. ^ "Thales Scorpion Helmet Mounted Display for fighter aircraft" (PDF).
  43. ^ "Raytheon Wins US Air Force HMIT Contract at Farnborough – Airforce Technology". Airforce Technology. 2010-07-21. Retrieved 2018-09-23.
  44. ^ "Thales | Visionix". www.thalesvisionix.com. Retrieved 2018-09-23.
  45. ^ "Private Aggressor F-5 Fighter Force is Flying with Helmet Mounted Displays". 16 March 2020.
  46. ^ "France invests €2 billion for Rafale new F4 standard".
  47. ^ "Thales to deliver Scorpion helmet mounted cueing systems for Spanish Air Force". www.airforce-technology.com. 12 May 2016. Retrieved 2021-12-21.
  48. ^ Hunter, Jamie (18 August 2020). "Check Out This AC-130 Gunship Pilot Wearing A Scorpion Helmet Mounted Display". The Drive. Retrieved 2021-12-21.
  49. ^ Rogoway, Tyler (8 February 2022). "F-22 Raptor Spotted Flying With Stealthy Underwing Pods". The Drive. Retrieved 2022-02-09.
  50. ^ "Monch Yayıncılık – AVCI". Monch.com.tr. Archived from the original on 2009-09-07. Retrieved 2010-08-20.
  51. ^ "VSI's Helmet Mounted Display System flies on Joint Strike Fighter". Rockwell Collins. April 10, 2007. Archived from the original on May 16, 2007.
  52. ^ "F-35". JSF.mil. F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Program. Archived from the original on 2012-05-06. Retrieved 2010-08-20.
  53. ^ "Lockheed Martin Selects BAE Systems to Supply F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Helmet Display Solution". BAE Systems. October 10, 2011. Archived from the original on October 11, 2011.
  54. ^ McGlaun, Shane (October 17, 2011). "BAE Systems Lands Contract for New F-35 JSF Helmet". Dailytech.com. Archived from the original on 2017-07-01. Retrieved 2017-01-04.
  55. ^ SEAN GALLAGHER (2014-07-24). ""Magic Helmet" for F-35 ready for delivery". Ars Technica.
  56. ^ "Saab & BAE Systems sign agreement for new integrated Helmet Mounted Display System for Gripen". SAAB CORPORATE. June 17, 2003. Archived from the original on August 17, 2016.
  57. ^ "Eyes on target". Archived from the original on March 10, 2021.
  58. ^ "Virtual Retinal Display Technology". Archived from the original on 2008-04-13. Retrieved 2009-10-02.
  59. ^ MATT LAKE (April 26, 2001). "How It Works: Retinal Displays Add a Second Data Layer". The New York Times. Retrieved August 17, 2016.


  • Melzer & Moffitt (1997). Head Mounted Displays: Designing for the user. McGraw Hill.

External links[edit]