Jump to content

Mira Loma, California

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by FoCuSandLeArN (talk | contribs) at 02:44, 2 February 2016 (Reverted 1 good faith edit by 2602:30A:2CD4:9C10:3D26:F2FA:3A44:E45B using STiki). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

"Wineville" redirects here. For the 1920s kidnappings and murders, see Wineville Chicken Coop Murders.
Mira Loma
Former census-designated place
Location in Riverside County and the state of California
Location in Riverside County and the state of California
Country United States
State California
CountyRiverside
Incorporated into Jurupa ValleyJuly 1, 2011
Area
[1]
 • Total
8.149 sq mi (21.107 km2)
 • Land7.997 sq mi (20.712 km2)
 • Water0.152 sq mi (0.395 km2)  1.87%
Elevation
[2]
722 ft (220 m)
Population
 (2010)
 • Total
21,930
 • Density2,700/sq mi (1,000/km2)
Time zoneUTC-8 (PST)
 • Summer (DST)UTC-7 (PDT)
ZIP code
91752
Area code951
FIPS code06-47976
GNIS feature ID1656568

Mira Loma was a census-designated place (CDP) in Riverside County, California, United States. Its population was 21,930 in the 2010 census, up from 17,617 in the 2000 census.

Mira Loma was known as Wineville prior to 1930. The name was changed that year to help disassociate the community from the Wineville Chicken Coop Murders.

Boundary changes

In 2010, parts of Mira Loma became part of the newly incorporated city of Eastvale, California.

On July 1, 2011, parts of Mira Loma became part of the newly incorporated city of Jurupa Valley, California.

Geography

According to the United States Census Bureau, the CDP has a total area of 8.1 square miles (21 km2), of which, 8.0 square miles (21 km2) of it is land and 0.2 square miles (0.52 km2) of it (1.87%) is water.

History

Rancho Jurupa/Jurupa Valley was originally granted by the Mexican government to Sn. Dn. Juan Bandini, on September 28, 1838.[3]

Originally known as Wineville, it is located in the modern day "Jurupa" area of unincorporated Riverside County. It is separated from the city of Riverside by the Santa Ana River to the south, borders the Ontario/Fontana area of San Bernardino County to the north and west, and Pedley / Glen Avon to the east. The community officially changed its name from Wineville on November 1, 1930, due in large part to the negative publicity surrounding the Wineville Chicken Coop Murders.[4]

Incorporation into the City of Jurupa Valley

On March 8, 2011, voters passed Measure A by a 54.03% YES vote, incorporating the areas of Mira Loma, Pedley, Rubidoux, Glen Avon, and Sunnyslope into the new city Jurupa Valley. The effective date of incorporation was July 1, 2011.[5]

Demographics

2010

The 2010 United States Census[6] reported that Mira Loma had a population of 21,930. The population density was 2,691.0 people per square mile (1,039.0/km²). The racial makeup of Mira Loma was 12,577 (57.4%) White, 383 (1.7%) African American, 240 (1.1%) Native American, 465 (2.1%) Asian, 43 (0.2%) Pacific Islander, 7,250 (33.1%) from other races, and 972 (4.4%) from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 14,846 persons (67.7%).

The Census reported that 21,882 people (99.8% of the population) lived in households, 28 (0.1%) lived in non-institutionalized group quarters, and 20 (0.1%) were institutionalized.

There were 5,277 households, out of which 2,797 (53.0%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 3,415 (64.7%) were opposite-sex married couples living together, 647 (12.3%) had a female householder with no husband present, 461 (8.7%) had a male householder with no wife present. There were 335 (6.3%) unmarried opposite-sex partnerships, and 31 (0.6%) same-sex married couples or partnerships. 527 households (10.0%) were made up of individuals and 164 (3.1%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 4.15. There were 4,523 families (85.7% of all households); the average family size was 4.30.

The population was spread out with 6,618 people (30.2%) under the age of 18, 2,722 people (12.4%) aged 18 to 24, 5,848 people (26.7%) aged 25 to 44, 5,256 people (24.0%) aged 45 to 64, and 1,486 people (6.8%) who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 30.4 years. For every 100 females there were 103.3 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 105.3 males.

There were 5,640 housing units at an average density of 692.1 per square mile (267.2/km²), of which 3,902 (73.9%) were owner-occupied, and 1,375 (26.1%) were occupied by renters. The homeowner vacancy rate was 2.6%; the rental vacancy rate was 3.6%. 15,806 people (72.1% of the population) lived in owner-occupied housing units and 6,076 people (27.7%) lived in rental housing units.

2000

As of the census[7] of 2000, there were 17,617 people, 4,556 households, and 3,863 families residing in the CDP. The population density was 2,733.9 people per square mile (1,056.2/km²). There were 4,684 housing units at an average density of 726.9 per square mile (280.8/km²). The racial makeup of the CDP was 62.7% White, 1.9% African American, 0.6% Native American, 2.2% Asian, <0.1% Pacific Islander, 28.3% from other races, and 2.3% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 62.1% of the population.

There were 4,556 households out of which 47.6% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 67.0% were married couples living together, 11.0% had a female householder with no husband present, and 15.2% were non-families. 10.1% of all households were made up of individuals and 2.8% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 3.84 and the average family size was 4.05.

In the CDP the population was spread out with 34.0% under the age of 18, 10.3% from 18 to 24, 28.9% from 25 to 44, 21.1% from 45 to 64, and 5.7% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 30 years. For every 100 females there were 105.3 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 105.6 males.

The median income for a household in the CDP was $67,530, and the median income for a family was $68,834. Males had a median income of $33,356 versus $25,275 for females. The per capita income for the CDP was $20,655. About 9.5% of families and 14.0% of the population were below the poverty line, including 17.7% of those under age 18 and 13.2% of those age 65 or over.

Government

In the California State Legislature, Mira Loma is in the 31st Senate District, represented by Democrat Richard Roth, and in the 60th Assembly District, represented by Democrat Corey Jackson.[8]

In the United States House of Representatives, Mira Loma is in California's 41st congressional district, represented by Republican Ken Calvert.[9]

See also

References

  1. ^ "2010 Census U.S. Gazetteer Files – Places – California". United States Census Bureau.
  2. ^ "Mira Loma". Geographic Names Information System. United States Geological Survey, United States Department of the Interior. Retrieved November 11, 2014.
  3. ^ Jurupa grant
  4. ^ "Jurupa Valley History: Mira Loma History". Riverside County Planning Department. 2006. Retrieved 2008-01-26.
  5. ^ Stokley, Sandra (8 March 2011). "Jurupa cityhood approved". The Press-Enterprise. Retrieved 9 March 2011.
  6. ^ "2010 Census Interactive Population Search: CA - Mira Loma CDP". U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved July 12, 2014.
  7. ^ "American FactFinder". United States Census Bureau. Retrieved 2008-01-31.
  8. ^ "Statewide Database". UC Regents. Retrieved December 8, 2014.
  9. ^ "California's 41st Congressional District - Representatives & District Map". Civic Impulse, LLC.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mira_Loma,_California&oldid=702866861"