Talk:(They Long to Be) Close to You

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the (They Long to Be) Close to You article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

R&B and Soul Music

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Pop music High‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Image copyright problem with Image:CloseToYou.jpg

The image Image:CloseToYou.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:52, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Separate

Please note : The is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs/coverversions with the purpose of trying to establish a standard rule for merge/separate different version of the same song. Please make known your feelings on the matter. --Richhoncho (talk) 14:33, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.vintageguitar.com/newswire/detail.asp?newsID=2005
- In Harry Connick, Jr. on 2011-03-22 22:12:23, 404 Not found
- In (They Long to Be) Close to You on 2011-05-20 21:24:00, 404 Not found

--JeffGBot (talk) 22:19, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please enter Distinguish template

... at the top of the article, like here:

I can not do it because the article is protected.

Not done Please read WP:NAMB, unless Close to You redirects here it is unneeded. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 22:56, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. -- tariqabjotu 01:55, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(They Long to Be) Close to You → They Long to Be Close to You – Although this current title is commonly used by many sources, the original title omits parentheses and is easier to type. Relisted. BDD (talk) 16:45, 28 August 2013 (UTC) George Ho (talk) 20:44, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This song's sub-title is "Close to You", which many artists use when covering the song themselves. If this article's going to be moved, move it to "Close to You". Best, --Discographer (talk) 21:43, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment only. I am tempted to say, "oppose" because, afaik, the most famous version does contain the brackets and whatever the final decision is there will have to be redirect(s) because it has been issued under at least 3 stylisations. AT present I note that there are no links via redirect pages, but that changes as soon as there is a redirect. Would somebody promise to sort all incoming links out if it is moved? --Richhoncho (talk) 19:04, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: After doing some research, I find Rich is correct. Any move here would be unwise, as The Carpenters' version is the most popular version played on popular music radio station outlets, also being the only version to top the music charts, and having itself (The Carpenters' version, that is) been covered by numerous artists, thus establishing it as the definitive version over all others. So, really a move wouldn't make any sense. Keep where it's at. Best, --Discographer (talk) 19:58, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Even if Bacharach/David entitled it without parentheses, the popularisation by the Carpenters makes this without doubt the most common usage. -- Ohc ^¡digame!_{¿que pasa?} 04:07, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on (They Long to Be) Close to You. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160305064644/http://www.austchartbook.com.au/ to http://www.austchartbook.com.au/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:11, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suppression of all other notable cover in 2022

I find quite sad that all the references added over time on the other notable versions were deleted in 2022 as per the song cover policy.

Showing that multiple versions exist is both informative and help illustrate how the song has been influencial and related to many artists.

Most of the artists mentioned in the list of covers are well known (Diana Ross, Cranberries...) and their albums (with the cover) were signicant (even if it can be debated if the cover itself stood out).

In this case, the strict application of WPSong cover has reduced the quality of the article and made it less informative. The purpose of the policy is to highlight the most notable covers and avoid having too many, but it shouldn't drain all content away from articles.

Sharing this to suggest we reinstate the other notable cover section deleted in 2022.

Thanks. Best regards, 2A02:2788:11A6:1C9:C149:5E0A:EB67:9BDF (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has a policy about not hosting indiscriminate facts. Our readers should see the important highlights about a topic, not an exhaustive list of facts. If you want a long list of song covers, try secondhandsongs.com, or a Carpenters fan page. Binksternet (talk) 02:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Parentheses (again)

Notwithstanding the 2013 RM discussion above, the image of the label in the infobox clearly shows no parentheses? Martinevans123 (talk) 22:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]