Jump to content

Talk:Abergil crime family

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Abergil Organization)
Good articleAbergil crime family has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 14, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 3, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Abergil Crime Family is facing charges of money laundering, murder and drug trafficking, both in Israel and the United States?

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Abergil Crime Family/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    In the Drug trafficking section, "The Abergils", you need to explain who the Abergils are, this is for your reader who reads this article. Same section, "According to the LA Times", "according" seems to sound odd, maybe if the sentence was re-worded.
    Done - rephrased --Flewis(talk) 07:25, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Check. Also, the lead seems to be short and it may be a good idea to expand it a little more, per here. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:16, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    I've expanded and added in extra info into the prose. Does the lead specifically require any more work? --Flewis(talk) 01:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Nope, that'll do fine. Check. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:54, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
    In the lead, it would be best if "Israel" was linked once, per here. In the Drug trafficking section, the quote is not supposed to be italicized, per here. Same section, "LA Times" needs to be changed to "Los Angeles Times" and italicize it, since its a newspaper and per here. The article tends to have "red links", if they don't have articles, it would be best to un-link them, per here.
    Done --Flewis(talk) 07:25, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Half-check. You forgot the quote. Also, dates need to be unlinked, per here and in the Murders and assassinations section, "Murder" is linked twice, link it once and if there are any more links that are linked twice, please, unlink them. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:16, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Okay. . .done--Flewis(talk) 01:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Check. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:54, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    References should come after the parentheses.
    Done --Flewis(talk) 07:25, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Check. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:16, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    Are there any free-use images available for the article?
    Nope, the original pic's that were uploaded seem to have been deleted for incorrect licensing. The only way to get images for this article would be to upload them under a {non-free} license. --Flewis(talk) 07:25, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:57, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you to Flewis for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:54, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

picture of abergil

[edit]

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://mad.walla.co.il/w/18-200/197686-18.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.mahalo.com/Itzhak_Abergil&usg=__dwJAC12uLIU-XgjbhsZsqGnmGoM=&h=150&w=200&sz=10&hl=en&start=1&sig2=xm_ZzNvE_F5zlgeOzwh89g&um=1&tbnid=PUB1ijkJMTRB9M:&tbnh=78&tbnw=104&ei=6ieSSevdC6W-MayC0eAL&prev=/images%3Fq%3Ditzhak%2Babergil%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26sa%3DN —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thewikimaster94 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if its necessary to explicitly show the faces of the policemen on these pictures. Nobody derives any information needed by that. Their faces should be blurred out to protect their families and stuff or at least their privacy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:D78:35C0:3C05:6E44:6E02:E92C (talk) 22:31, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


move to proper capitalization

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was page moved. 195.14.199.233 (talk) 00:50, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Abergil Crime Family → Abergil crime family — The article should be moved back to the correct capitalization at Abergil crime family, from where it was erroneously moved a year ago. --195.14.199.233 (talk) 17:52, 2 October 2009 (UTC)  Done Xavexgoem (talk) 22:36, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

origins

[edit]

Hello, some IPs are adding origins of the Abergils, either Moroccan or Mizrahi without giving any sources. I'm going to revert that as long as there is no reliable source given. Ajnem (talk) 17:49, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Abergil crime family. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:39, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted undiscussed page move

[edit]

I have just reverted an undiscussed page move made in 2023 that moved this article from Abergil crime family to Abergil Organization because the article was moved without any explanation or discussion to explain why "crime family" should change to "Organisation". No sources have been provided to support this name change. The existing source #1 in this article uses the expression: "so-called "crime family"", so that name has at least one source. Also the previous move proposal supports this naming. Additionally, MOS:AT advised that the word "organisation" is in lower case because does not appear to be part of a proper name for this criminal group. Unlike many organizations, most criminal groups are not formally registered with a business name, and they might not even have a name, just an understanding between criminals. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 08:04, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Abergil_crime_family&oldid=1247005743"