This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
I have just modified 2 external links on Albert Lasker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
There are a couple of problems I see in reading this. First is the claim that a book "posits" Lasker was mentally ill. Books are not sentient, AUTHORS make claims in books. Jeffrey L. Cruikshank, the author of the apparent claim has ZERO authority in psychiatry, he therefore should NOT be used as the basis of such a controversial and speculative claim. The claim is stated as if it is fact, and the overwhelming medical opinion about mental illness is...wait for it...you actually have to TALK to the patient, not base a diagnoses on second or third hand hearsay. Second is the claim that Lasker was instrumental in increasing the NIH budget from $2.5 million to $5 billion by 1985. It makes no sense to credit him with acts done after his death in 1952!! IN 1945 appropriations were ~$3 million and in 1952 ~$47 million - a factor of ~16X. Third, his "legacy" must include not only his critical support of cancer research (government funding as well as reorganization of the American Cancer Society) but his contributions to Major League Baseball and the use of advertising in the election of President Harding as well as the general use of "modern" advertising which literally changed the world (and certainly popular American culture) (Notably, imho, sex education (for girls) in public schools and the targeting of women by cigarette adds.)98.21.72.69 (talk) 11:19, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Attributing an opinion to a book rather than to the book's author is a fairly standard bit of metonymy, there's nothing wrong with that. Your statements regarding the book's validity or lack thereof, I'm not going to address because I have insufficient information. "Legacy" is, in this context, being used for those things that are named for him. DS (talk) 15:18, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
to assert a claim in a major published book is " controversial and speculative" requires a reliable source. The book was vetted by a major academic publisher (Harvard Business Review Press) and has good reviews. Rjensen (talk) 17:17, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
